Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE "I Confess" Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby AmericanEmpire » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 21:46:13

I have a very real fear that another "terrorist" attack will happen soon. Dubya needs to get the sheeple behind the resource wars again.
AmericanEmpire
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 14 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby LadyRuby » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 21:51:48

Forget about terrorists. Did you know that in D.C. you use petroleum for 100% of your electricity? I'd be more afraid of your electric bill than terrorists.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Unread postby brobak » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 21:52:07

Yeah...for awhile there, it felt like every time his polls would drop 10%, there'd be an Alert or something. But now he's really low...and I'm worried.

Of course, there was just London...but I feel like the pressure is building, and London, while horrific, wasnt really a pressure release... make sense?
User avatar
brobak
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby RonMN » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 21:52:56

I would rest easy if i were you. At this point the real targets are the oil platforms...ANY oil platform (drilling, shipping, refining, hauling, pipelines, etc.)...

And i mean anywhere in the world...it's a real bitch for them to hit the USA now...so they can take out an oil platform in iraq, venezuailia, etc etc...they would hurt us just as bad (if not worse) that way... & it'd be easier for them to do.

With security as tight as it is right now...you're probably in the safest place!
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby brobak » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 21:56:45

Well, remember, London has just as tight a security net, if not tighter, because of all the CCTV camera's that have been there for YEARS, plus their experience with the IRA for 40 years. And still, they were hit. Twice. In two weeks. I'm not quite so confident.
User avatar
brobak
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby turmoil » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 22:00:01

Plus I don't that he would allow STRATCOM to blow up his own house to make the point, if he even has a say in the matter. 8O
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

please excuse my "conspiracy" talk

Unread postby T4chibanaUkyo » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 22:36:24

let's not forget the mid-west, Chicago has a luxurious lakeside with the Sears Tower just aching to be destroyed.....wow, and I live in the northwest side. As a paranoid gesture, i went to see if the blast would hit me (google "nuclear effects weapon calculator" for some Java program that calculates nuclear blasts in populous cites) From the interent rumors, i hear that there will be a false flag attack using a 10 kt nuke on a boat. but you never know, there will probably be more bang (more bang=more fear) So,.....10kt=the whole LOOP is destroyed, coupled with the EMP shockwave that will shatter electronics....wow, hope the wind isn't blowing in my direction when it goes off. the blast would get me if it were 2 MT, would the government actually use a 2MT nuke just to start a war over oil? no matter what, i am dead.....1) nuke incinerates me OR if I am still alive.....2) resorce war will draft me and kill me. any thoughts are appreciated! good or bad.
User avatar
T4chibanaUkyo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby EnemyCombatant » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 23:12:17

I'm betting Chicago too.

Not the Sears tower though. I was thinking more along the lines of a few federal buildings.

This is just a rumor, but if there is any truth at all ...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')A Chicago grand jury has indicted the President and Vice-President of the United States along with multiple high officials in the Bush administration

Chicago -- August 2, 2005 -- TomFlocco.com -- U.S. federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's Chicago grand jury has issued perjury and obstruction of justice indictments to the following members of the Bush Administration: President George W. Bush, Vice-President Richard Cheney, Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, imprisoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller and former Senior Cheney advisor Mary Matalin.
Now why didn't I take the blue pill.
User avatar
EnemyCombatant
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

locations?

Unread postby T4chibanaUkyo » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 23:43:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnemyCombatant', 'I')'m betting Chicago too.

Not the Sears tower though. I was thinking more along the lines of a few federal buildings.


mind saying a few buildings so that i can find them on google earth and learn to stay away from them?
User avatar
T4chibanaUkyo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby karina » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 01:30:25

I work in DC. A week ago I got an e-mail about energy conservation in the building to avoid the rolling blackout.
User avatar
karina
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun 21 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Confession of fears for myself here in DC

Unread postby k_semler » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 02:43:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('brobak', ' ')And what better target is left than the White House in DC?

Anyways, I know you guys are an understanding bunch when it comes to rational (or irrational) fears. So I just thought I'd get this off my chest. I dont know that I feel any better, but at least its out there.


It really depends on what your final goal is. Here is a partial list of what I would go after if I were a terrorist bent on destroying the nation:

1. Any hotel on the "strip" in Las Vegas.
2. Hoover/Boulder dam.
3. Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
4. The Trans-Alaska pipeline
5. The Superbowl during the last 5 miniutes of the game.
6. Mall Of America.
7. Any major rail line, (preferably on a bridge or in a heavily populated area). All you would need is a cutting torch.
8. NY City subways.
9. Any revinery in SF, CA.
10. Spread brown rust, or black mold among wheat producing areas.
11. Spread anthracnose leaf blight, or Stewart’s Bacterial Wilt among corn crops in the corn belt
12. Contaminate urban water supplies with E. Coli.
13. Detonate C4 explosives on any major overpass, causing one interstate to collapse onto the next blocking traffic in 4 directions.
14. Release sarin gas into a trans-contidental flight.
15. Blow up generation turbines on Grand Coulee Dam
16. Detonate a small nuke at the Bangor-Trident submarine base.
17. Detonate a dirty bomb anywhere in the USA.

There are plenty of potential terrorist targets across the nation. It will be impossible to gaurd every target unless we want to be like the DPRK. There is a certian point where you just have to say. "Who Cares?" If it happens, it happens. There is not much you or I can do to prepare for it. It may, or may not ever happen; and it may, or may not occur near you. Worrying about it is about as pointful as worrying about the USSR nuking you. If it happens, you will probably die, if it doesn't, "Much ado about nothing."

Plus, if you live in fear, then you have played exactly into the hand that the government-media complex is feeding you. The government-media complex trives on fear to get listenership, and control the masses. The basic campaign for them is FUDD, (Fear, Uncertianty, Doubt, Distraction). Why else do you think that chick in Aruba has been on the radio for about a month now? Notice how they always have a pervert of the week to take up air-time with the most petty shit like the run-away bride, or that chick in Aruba? Oh yeah, don't forget about Survivor VIII, (did they even make that may survivors), making national "news" broadcasts.

As far as I am concerned, MSM can go swing from a 6 foot rope. They are as much of the cause of the problem as the feeling of entitlement that has gripped the nation.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 04:05:33

If I wanted to piss off Americans and ensure my own country gets turned into slightly warm greenish glass, yeah, I'd bomb the Superbowl or take out Mall Of America. If I wanted to destroy the US economy, then I'd attack oil production/distribution infrastructure.

Piss off Americans, sign your own death warrent. We're just too damn strong. Hit the US in the oil can and you get an economic depression and people start asking questions. We damn near had a revolution the last big depression.

Frankly all terrorist attacks are very stupid, but the US/Israel are acting as such merciless aggressors that the other side's not being given much choice. If you figure you're going to get killed anyway, and your people, might as well go out with a bang.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby Liamj » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 04:44:32

D.C. is safe, GWBs handlers know he needs all the fake stature (as provided by whitehouse etc) he can get, and its not as if the Democrats or the whitehouse press pool are any kind of threat to him. Plus they'll need the infrastructure to keep proper control of their estate (the USA).

I reckon they'll go for somewhere 'blue', as with 911 & 7/7. Betcha they're itching to do San Fran or Portland, but that'd be too obvious.

edit: what was i thinking, Chicago it'll be, unless they manage to bring Fitzgerald to heel on the Plame case.
Last edited by Liamj on Wed 10 Aug 2005, 04:55:53, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S

Unread postby Grimnir » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 04:50:22

This guy speculates that GWB would be killed if there were another attack, so that PNAC could seize power overtly instead of operating from behind the scenes:

http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78

I don't believe all this stuff, but my brain insists on worrying anyway...
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA

Unread postby VinceG » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 05:15:19

Personally, I am little bit worried about the relation between Bush' approval rate before and after 9/11 and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the current situation...

On September 7th 2001, only 51% of the American people approved Bush' handling of his job as a president...

After the attacks on 9/11, his approval rate skyrocketed to percentages between 85%-90%. In the weeks following, Bush started a war against Afghanistan and signed the Patriot act. These events have immensely changed the global geopolitical, military and cultural landscapes...

Currently, Bush' approval rate has sunk to 45%, the lowest of his presidency. Bush is in a very BAD need for some (?!) kind of major event that will boost his approval rate again, giving him unlimited opportunities to conduct military action (against Iran...) or install new Patriot acts...

I'm afraid that we'll very soon see some major 'terrorist' attack again, that will be legitimized by the Bush government to start wars and install new laws...
"In the U.S., fears are so exaggerated and out of control that anxiety is the number-one mental health problem in the country.", Barry Glassner
User avatar
VinceG
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue 12 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands

Unread postby SupplyConcerns » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 05:43:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnemyCombatant', 'I')'m betting Chicago too.

Not the Sears tower though. I was thinking more along the lines of a few federal buildings.

This is just a rumor, but if there is any truth at all ...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')A Chicago grand jury has indicted the President and Vice-President of the United States along with multiple high officials in the Bush administration

Chicago -- August 2, 2005 -- TomFlocco.com -- U.S. federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's Chicago grand jury has issued perjury and obstruction of justice indictments to the following members of the Bush Administration: President George W. Bush, Vice-President Richard Cheney, Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, imprisoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller and former Senior Cheney advisor Mary Matalin.


What is the deal with TomFlocco.com? Is he credible at all? I found the congressional sex-ring story hard to believe, too dependent on one man's claims, and not written in a very approachable way.
User avatar
SupplyConcerns
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ohio
Top

Unread postby brobak » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 11:16:14

Welp, I'm back at my desk today. Trying to ignore all the worries in my brain.

I guess there's just so much going on thats GOOD in my life right now, its only magnifies the fears that it would be cut short.

I got the earth sheltered home being built in WV, I got my wedding coming up in september, I got my new dog coming next month...big stuff, little stuff, but good stuff. *sigh* Blah.

It's really kind of draining you know? I wish I could stop.
User avatar
brobak
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby AlCzervik » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 12:14:05

Maybe it's just normal internet discourse and craziness, but these stories seem to keep piling up.

-You've got the Saudis pulling money out of the market (what do they anticipate?)
http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic10839-0.html

- You've got conservative mags reporting that Cheney wants to nuke Iran if there is another 9/11 (but, note that Amcon are old school conservatives and dislike the neocons)
http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

- You've got all kinds of speculation about the Fitzgerald grand jury
14. To distract from the impending release of the indictments and the naming of the unindicted co-conspirators, the Bush White House has caused deadly rumors to circulate.
Such as, that the FBI is tracking in the District of Columbia and elsewhere that certain supposed "terrorists" have suitcase dirty nukes ready to set off in D.C.

Such as, that Bush will declare Martial Law and suspend Habeas Corpus, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Such as the U.S. will be wracked with financial and domestic anarchy as Bush seeks asylum in Brazil, or Australia, or elsewhere overseas.

http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/S_28 ... s/bush.htm

And you have a very solid analysis of the martial law plan to be installed with the next attack.

THE GLOBAL BATTLEFIELD -
WE ARE STANDING ON IT
The Evolution of the Bush-Rumsfeld War Doctrine
Roadmap to Martial Law
London Attacks From Another Perspective
By
Stan Goff
<snip>
Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., June 2005 - Strategy for Homeland Defense and Civil Support. From the Executive Summary:

We now confront an enemy who will attempt to engage us not only far from US shores, but also at home. Terrorists will seek to employ asymmetric means to penetrate our defenses and exploit the openness of our society to their advantage. By attacking our citizens, our economic institutions, our physical infrastructure, and our social fabric, they seek to destroy American democracy. We dare not underestimate the devastation that terrorists seek to bring to Americans at home.

To defeat 21st Century threats, we must think and act innovatively. Our adversaries consider US territory an integral part of a global theater of combat. We must therefore have a strategy that applies to the domestic context the key principles that are driving the transformation of US power projection and joint expeditionary warfare.

Each section of this ten-year strategy outline for the Department of Defense is headed by an italicized quote from Reich Fuehrer Bush. This is what must be borne in mind as part of any analysis of this document, which is scaring the bejesus out of a lot of civil libertarians. Because it is - and I will describe exactly how as we go along - it is a roadmap to martial law.

But it is also an outline of a strategy of abject failure. It is a strategy so ambitious, so insanely grandiose, and so interdependently complicated in any attempt to put it into practice, that time, expense, and mind-boggling complexity at every scale will render the reality a ragged effigy of its own feverish ideal.

http://bgtruth.blogspot.com/2005/07/glo ... ng-on.html

Add it all up, and it is a bit concerning.
AlCzervik
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed 14 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Motor City

Unread postby LadyRuby » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 13:45:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('brobak', 'W')elp, I'm back at my desk today. Trying to ignore all the worries in my brain.

I guess there's just so much going on thats GOOD in my life right now, its only magnifies the fears that it would be cut short.

I got the earth sheltered home being built in WV, I got my wedding coming up in september, I got my new dog coming next month...big stuff, little stuff, but good stuff. *sigh* Blah.

It's really kind of draining you know? I wish I could stop.


Wow, I'm impressed. So you live in DC but have some property in WVa where you're building a house? Cool!
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Unread postby SupplyConcerns » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 14:18:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlCzervik', 'S')uch as, that Bush will declare Martial Law and suspend Habeas Corpus, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Such as the U.S. will be wracked with financial and domestic anarchy as Bush seeks asylum in Brazil, or Australia, or elsewhere overseas.


Seems arbitrary and poorly researched. Of all places, a fleeing Bush would be welcomed by the left-wing, populist Lula of Brazil? If he wouldn't in fact flee to Brazil, then why did the author cavalierly throw out the possibility as if he knew something we don't? If Bush would flee to Brazil, why doesn't he justify the fact that this would contradict reasonable assumptions based on Lula's appetite for housing Bush?
User avatar
SupplyConcerns
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ohio
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests