Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE High Speed Rail [US] Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 11:59:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('anador', 'T')he sad thing is that most freight corridors used to be mixed freight and passenger, as most trains themselves were, the modern rail shippers have disassembled or neglected to destruction most of the double line track in these corridors. Theres no way to pass. this is why theres such an outcry, its not congestion so much as an inability to move out of the way.

Now returning to mixed freight and passenger on the same engine probably holds more promise then having two competing systems on a marginalized track network.


AND, don't forget to blame the USPS. At one time most intercity mail moved by passenger train. It was rough sorted then stuck on the train, where sorting continued. Many large city terminals (Penn Station NY/Philadelphia) were highly integrated with the postal service. Long conveyor belts from the PO to the tracks, also Roadway Freight was a big player. All gone now. Infrastructure has been dismantled. Property "developed."

Why? Some Post Master General decided that the way of the future was to move all mail by air. This amounts to a huge lost subsidy for trains.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 12:01:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', 'T')he freight-line tracks should generally not be carrying passenger trains.


Freight and Passengers should/will be considered the same thing.
This is a major non negotiable point.

Thus EVERY train will have the focus of EVERY one to get to the
next station on time.

If the tracks become too congested, THEN we talk about
out building.


Not for HSR, not even easy for normal commuter rail. Focus is different for the two, they do not mix well.

NE Corridor was at one time a mixed use ROW but over the years the freights and Amtrak have split apart to a large degree. Now the corridor is predominantly Amtrak and commuter (NJT/SEPTA/MetroNorth) and still there is contention.

People constantly underestimate the degree of difficulty in making this all happen.


I'm not underestimating anything. Especially the recalcitrance of
the Big 5 Rail Systems to scuttle anything.

That's why Freight/Passengers are one and the same.
It eliminates that contention from the start. And we're
going to do this in one way or the other.

The Obama Emergency Rail Act should've been his highest
priority. Single Payer Medicare for All and he's on the Dollar
Bill. A Silver One ;}.

I can start today. 8) Put the Mail on a Train:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t was rough sorted then stuck on the train, where sorting continued. Many large city terminals (Penn Station NY/Philadelphia) were highly integrated with the postal service. Long conveyor belts from the PO to the tracks, also Roadway Freight was a big player.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 12:04:48

There's a 4 track right of way all the way into Pittsburgh, and most of the old rails were pulled up.

Also, that area has desperately bad roads
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 12:15:55

FYI - From this mornings Progressive Railroading daily brief. Obviously a sales pitch, no endorsement, just info.

1/28/2010 High-Speed Rail

Visit HSRupdates.com for high-speed stimulus grant coverage

Last night, the White House unveiled details on the high-speed stimulus grants that will be announced by President Obama today during town hall meeting being held at the University of Tampa.

Information on the grant awards is being provided on Progressive Railroading’s HSRupdates.com. In addition, HSRupdates will feature a live video stream of the president’s town hall meeting, which is scheduled to begin today at 12:30 p.m. eastern time.

During the coming days and weeks, the site will include further details on the grant awards, including interviews with grant recipients and high-speed stakeholders, and information on how, when and where the stimulus money will be spent.

A one-year subscription to HSRupdates.com is $199. In addition to stimulus grant coverage, the site features high-speed rail news, a state-by-state listing of high-speed rail plans and profiles on each of the federally designated high-speed rail corridors.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 12:20:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hillsidedigger', 'T')he freight-line tracks should generally not be carrying passenger trains.


Freight and Passengers should/will be considered the same thing.
This is a major non negotiable point.

Thus EVERY train will have the focus of EVERY one to get to the
next station on time.

If the tracks become too congested, THEN we talk about
out building.


Not for HSR, not even easy for normal commuter rail. Focus is different for the two, they do not mix well.

NE Corridor was at one time a mixed use ROW but over the years the freights and Amtrak have split apart to a large degree. Now the corridor is predominantly Amtrak and commuter (NJT/SEPTA/MetroNorth) and still there is contention.

People constantly underestimate the degree of difficulty in making this all happen.


I'm not underestimating anything. Especially the recalcitrance of
the Big 5 Rail Systems to scuttle anything.

That's why Freight/Passengers are one and the same.
It eliminates that contention from the start. And we're
going to do this in one way or the other.

The Obama Emergency Rail Act should've been his highest
priority. Single Payer Medicare for All and he's on the Dollar
Bill. A Silver One ;}.

I can start today. 8) Put the Mail on a Train:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t was rough sorted then stuck on the train, where sorting continued. Many large city terminals (Penn Station NY/Philadelphia) were highly integrated with the postal service.
Long conveyor belts from the PO to the tracks, also Roadway Freight was a big player.


I am not arguing with you but the topic is High Speed Rail. NOWHERE does HSR coexist with freight.

If you want to talk about mixed use, then fine. But that is a horse of a different color.

As to the mail, fat chance. The infrastructure is GONE. Paid for by US dollars during the last depression and our generation has pissed it away. GONE! To private development.

Yeah, it sucks. I wish it were not true. But saying "Just DO IT" only works for Nike.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 12:27:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'F')YI - From this mornings Progressive Railroading daily brief. Obviously a sales pitch, no endorsement, just info.

1/28/2010 High-Speed Rail

Visit HSRupdates.com for high-speed stimulus grant coverage

Last night, the White House unveiled details on the high-speed stimulus grants that will be announced by President Obama today during town hall meeting being held at the University of Tampa.

Information on the grant awards is being provided on Progressive Railroading’s HSRupdates.com. In addition, HSRupdates will feature a live video stream of the president’s town hall meeting, which is scheduled to begin today at 12:30 p.m. eastern time.

During the coming days and weeks, the site will include further details on the grant awards, including interviews with grant recipients and high-speed stakeholders, and information on how, when and where the stimulus money will be spent.

A one-year subscription to HSRupdates.com is $199. In addition to stimulus grant coverage, the site features high-speed rail news, a state-by-state listing of high-speed rail plans and profiles on each of the federally designated high-speed rail corridors.


That HSR must be going thru Orlando to Melbourne.

Where 1/4 of buildings are vacant.


28% of Orlando-Area Housing Units Vacant
January 27th, 2010

Via: Orlando Sentinel: Via Cryptogon.

The last thing this corridor needs is HSR. Quality over speed.
Resilience over Growth.

More like the RidgeRunner from Albuquerque/Santa Fe
or the Frontliner along Utah's Frontlines Project:

http://www.rideuta.com/projects/frontli ... fault.aspx
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 12:38:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')I am not arguing with you but the topic is High Speed Rail. NOWHERE does HSR coexist with freight.

My point exactly. By 2020 per Heinberg/Post Carbon/Orlov/
Lundberg/Greer et al this will be the very best scenario:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')This policy at first translates into a serious global economic crisis and a very high unemployment rate which will have to be balanced by strong local solidarity. As governments invest 10% of their GDP into renewable energy there are few resources left over and the financial sector will shrink considerably. Numerous industries will disappear. As a whole the economy will undergo a reorientation similar to that experienced by the American economy after the Second World War.

After 2020, however, the investments begin to pay off and a more local, largely rural society will begin to see the light of day. The global population will stabilize and then decline, but without collapsing. The transport network will be structured around shipping lines and railways, and international trade will principally be concerned with raw materials. Agriculture will have been reorganized on a local basis and the global economy will reach a new phase of stability, strictly within the framework of natural limits.

Translated by Laura Bennett for the Post Carbon Institute 26/9/09
http://www.damienperrotin.com/charbon.html


That's 10 years from now and the very best scenario possible.
HSR will have no place in that scenario. Who will need that speed?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfi', '
')If you want to talk about mixed use, then fine. But that is a horse of a different color.

As to the mail, fat chance. The infrastructure is GONE. Paid for by US dollars during the last depression and our generation has pissed it away. GONE! To private development.

Yeah, it sucks. I wish it were not true. But saying "Just DO IT" only works for Nike.


Mixed use will be the only way forward. Passengers were split off
to rot on the vine. And I'm gonna do it. With or w/out.

I never live anywhere farther than a bicycle ride (or horse drawn)
from a functioning rail.

And if it "costs" extra. like this HSR will, the $$$ just won't
be there. Any program that does not pay for itself immediately will not get done. It really is that simple.

And here's the Work Horse:

http://www.thedieselshop.us/Data%20MP%20MP-PH40-3C.HTML

And note it's top speed:

Speed: 108 mph Who needs to go faster?
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:08:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'O')bama's commitment of 8 billion isn't enough to actually build anything.

The estimated cost of an LA to Las Vegas high speed rail line, for instance, is about 80-100 billion.

The tiny amount of money Obama is giving to high speed rail shows he really isn't serious about it.


Half a billion dollars to lay a mile of track?

150 years ago, Chinese laborers would do that in one day with hand tools.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:18:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '[')I am not arguing with you but the topic is High Speed Rail. NOWHERE does HSR coexist with freight.

As to the mail, fat chance. The infrastructure is GONE. Paid for by US dollars during the last depression and our generation has pissed it away. GONE! To private development.


There looking at running freight trains on HS1 in the UK

http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/freight/2009/05/07-hs1-next-year.html
An aspiration is for an ultimate freight train top speed of around 140 mph, which will be the maximum speed of Class 395 domestic services coming in later this year. However, that would require new locomotives. When the service starts it is expected that the locos to be used – dual-voltage Brush Traction built Class 92s, introduced in the mid-90s – will run between 60mph and 80mph. Top speed of the 127-tonne locos is 87mph

We have the mail back on UK rail also - removed a few years ago, now back on long distance (London - North West - Glasgow).

You can do anything IF YOU TRY.

Gasmon


Gas, I think you are making my point. HSR is above 125mph, not 87. And aspirations are just that, aspirations. Hell, I have aspirations to be rich, that didn't happen either.

We CAN do mixed use and HAVE done mixed use up to and above 89MPH. I forget what the old PRR did back in the day but it would make most blush now.

Even assuming you are right, that you can do it if you want, then I ask you to show me real and true evidence of us having this kind of drive and ambition in the US at this time. If nothing else look at the quote below. HSR is above 125 outside the US and above 90 here. You can succeed at anything if you sufficiently redefine the objectives.

And note the postal quote.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

High-speed rail is a type of passenger rail transport that operates significantly faster than the normal speed of rail traffic. Specific definitions include 200 km/h (125 mph) for upgraded track and 250 km/h or faster for new track by the European Union, and above 90 mph (145 km/h) by the United States Federal Railroad Administration, but there is no single standard, and lower speeds can be required by local constraints.[1][2]

While high-speed rail is usually designed for passenger travel, some high-speed systems also carry some kind of freight service. For instance, the French mail service La Poste owns a few special TGV trains for carrying postal freight.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:20:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'O')bama's commitment of 8 billion isn't enough to actually build anything.

The estimated cost of an LA to Las Vegas high speed rail line, for instance, is about 80-100 billion.

The tiny amount of money Obama is giving to high speed rail shows he really isn't serious about it.


Half a billion dollars to lay a mile of track?

150 years ago, Chinese laborers would do that in one day with hand tools.


Building 2 new tunnels into NYC from NY and an underground terminal station is very roughly about 10 miles in total, will cost about (again very roughly) 10 BILLION. That does not include energy generation or vehicles.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:27:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'T')here's a 4 track right of way all the way into Pittsburgh, and most of the old rails were pulled up.

Also, that area has desperately bad roads


And you can do this all over America.

And you can trace it back to the Big 5 Rails eliminating
competition.

In my area, UP couldn't pull up the track between
Little Rock and Memphis any faster.

The Rights of Way are still there, along with the
Bond Issues from each County along the way.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Plantagenet » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:29:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'O')bama's commitment of 8 billion isn't enough to actually build anything.

The estimated cost of an LA to Las Vegas high speed rail line, for instance, is about 80-100 billion.

The tiny amount of money Obama is giving to high speed rail shows he really isn't serious about it.


Why so much? I have no idea what these things cost, but according to Wikipedia the latest TGV project between Paris and Strasbourg is only 4 billion euros. That's 215 miles.. according to Wolfram Alpha (hey, I found a use for that!), the distance between LA and Vegas is 200 miles.

So something doesn't compute here.. how can covering 200 miles in France cost 4 bil euros, and 200 miles in the US cost 80 billion?


A big part of the cost in the US is building new train stations and related infrastrucure like modern train yards that can handle the high speed trains. There are already TGV stations in Paris and Strassbourg, and they already have the central control systems all constructed, so all they have to do is build track.

In the US we'd have to build a new high speed rail station in downtown LA and another new station in downtown Las Vegas and new control centers to monitor the trains and new train yards to maintain the trains. Thats got a cost of billions right there. Once you got a train station built in downtown LA, then you could use the same station for a high speed line to, say, San Francisco, and then to Phoenix, but right now we've got nothing and we are starting from essentially zero.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:44:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '
')A big part of the cost in the US is building new train stations and related infrastrucure like modern train yards that can handle the high speed trains. There are already TGV stations in Paris and Strassbourg, and they already have the central control systems all constructed, so all they have to do is build track.

In the US we'd have to build a new high speed rail station in downtown LA and another new station in downtown Las Vegas and new control centers to monitor the trains and new train yards to maintain the trains. Thats got a cost of billions right there. Once you got a train station built in downtown LA, then you could use the same station for a high speed line to, say, San Francisco, and then to Phoenix, but right now we've got nothing and we are starting from essentially zero.

The last mile of any distribution system is the most expensive.

By your reasoning, we'd all be hauling water by hand and cooking over open fires.

You could put those rail terminals at our soon to be idle airports, even feed them with commuter rail on lanes carved from the expressways that feed the airport.

Of course that's not necessary anyway - I've been to the bullet train station in Tokyo, and it occupies about an acre. One ticket counter, no baggage claim, no parking.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 14:01:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '
')And you can do this all over America.



In Texas most of the rail rights of way were sold off. People have been working hard to stop the Trans Texas Corridor which would be an enormous rail and highway system crisscrossing the state. People do not want family farms and ranches destroyed for this monstrosity.


http://transtexascorridor.blogspot.com/
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 14:22:55

8 BILLION over 13 routes in 31 states is nothing but pork. It's peeing in a wheat field and calling it an irrigation project.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 14:33:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '
')And you can do this all over America.

In Texas most of the rail rights of way were sold off. People have been working hard to stop the Trans Texas Corridor which would be an enormous rail and highway system crisscrossing the state. People do not want family farms and ranches destroyed for this monstrosity.
http://transtexascorridor.blogspot.com/
What's up with that and the LaRouchies these days?

I never saw it as a threat to national soveriegnty, I just saw it as a way for the Texas GOP mafia to take business away from the blue state ports and funnel it all into the midwest.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Plantagenet » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 17:42:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '
')A big part of the cost in the US is building new train stations and related infrastrucure like modern train yards that can handle the high speed trains. There are already TGV stations in Paris and Strassbourg, and they already have the central control systems all constructed, so all they have to do is build track.

In the US we'd have to build a new high speed rail station in downtown LA and another new station in downtown Las Vegas and new control centers to monitor the trains and new train yards to maintain the trains. Thats got a cost of billions right there. Once you got a train station built in downtown LA, then you could use the same station for a high speed line to, say, San Francisco, and then to Phoenix, but right now we've got nothing and we are starting from essentially zero.

The last mile of any distribution system is the most expensive.

By your reasoning, we'd all be hauling water by hand and cooking over open fires.


You don't get it, as usual.

I support high speed trains.

Obama is just showboating....his 8 billion dollars won't build even a single high speed intercity connection. Obama made a huge mistake putting 80 billion into GM and Chrysler----that money would've been better spent building the future (high speed rail) then shoring up the UAW and the failed car companies.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Obama wants nationwide high-speed rail system

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 28 Jan 2010, 17:55:51

Plantangent,

Even better would have been to convert the US grid to HVDC. That would have yielded something like 30% increase electricity efficiency.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests