Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Group of 20 (G20) Thread (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby Novus » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 03:51:21

He was walking too slow so they would have had to go around him to get to the crowd and he had his hands in his pockets. Hands in pockets means possible weapon. That is what cops are trained to do. Those police have likely been hitting and shoving people all day. This guy is nothing different. What was different was the guy probably would have been in a Suit and tie if not for the protests. Who goes to work dressed like that? He is probably a pigman banker anyway who was hanging a bit too close under the cops nuts and got bitch slapped for it. I am not really feeling any sympathy for this guy.

We live in an evil time full of evil people under an evil system. There are no innocents.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 03:55:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'A') few years ago I couldn't imagine I would come to call police pigs, but I can't find a better word.

Ian Tomlinson (47) was walking home from work through the G20 protest areas when he was suddenly assaulted by a policeman. Ian died that day from a masive hear attack.
Thank God for video camers or Ian would have been labeled a trouble maker.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2009/apr/07/g20-police-assault-video

Are these people working for us or against us?
People shouldn't be afraid of the state, the state should be afraid of it's people.
Make you opinion heard.

He has died of heart attack after all... so there will be some issues with causation, intention etc.

However it is true that Britain is turning into police state.

6 years ago I have left Britain.
Emergence of police state, lets say speed cameras everywhere, "TV licensing" "threatening" adverts in TV and various issues related to civil rights erosion was easy enough to observe.

Emergence of such environment was one of reasons to leave England in my case.
Another reason was that I have made enough money to set up family business in more amicable place so there was no longer any need to keep my high paid job in pharma but also suffer all associated nuisance.
From perspective of time that was the best decision in my life.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby davep » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 03:58:20

He was walking slowly because he had already been assaulted, according to witnesses.

There are photographs of him after he collapsed with head wounds. There is going to be a second post-mortem since the new evidence has arrived. It may not have been a heart attack. The police who pushed him from behind (while his hands were in his pockets) causing him to bang his head could be up for an involuntary manslaughter charge.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby mefistofeles » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 05:06:51

To me this looks like a crowd control situation gone awry. The police were in the middle of an operation, and he should got in front of its that simple. From a situational perspective their primary mission was crowd control, they had to track hundreds of protestors. He isn't the only person of interest that they're tracking.

Let's be honest getting in front of a group of police officiers attempting to control a mob really isn't smart. They also appeared to use what I would call a proper force level, he was in their way and they forced him down with lowest force level possible. Once the victim was out of the way the police officiers moved on.

Part of controlling a mob is being able to maintain formation and his movement disrupted the police formation.

I don't think he deserved to die but I do think he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Its important to remember that mobs can get out of control and can quickly go from peaceful protesters to burning cars and smashing store fronts causing millions in damages, look at Los Angeles in 1992. The LA Riots started because police pulled out of an area with 30 protesters and riots quickly spread throughout the city,requiring the deployment of national guard forces. Hence the need for a strong but not excessive initial response.

Personally I feel the victim died of adrenal overload. A few months ago I was riding a bike and hit a car and caught air. Initially I thought it was a pretty neat experience,but afterwards despite a lack of injuries (due to protective gear I was wearing at the time) I experienced an extremely elevated heart rate and pulse for a while after the accident. When the parademics finally got to the scene (ten minutes later) they measured my heartrate at 150 bpm. It stayed elevated for quite a while because of my body was put into a life or death sitaution. I think the same thing probably happened to the victim, he's walking along and boom he's assualted. That's bound to trigger a major adrenal release,especially after a stressful day at the office. If you're not healthy it could be dangerous for your heart to be working at 150+ bpm for a ten or fifteen minutes.
Last edited by mefistofeles on Thu 09 Apr 2009, 05:18:25, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mefistofeles
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby davep » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 05:12:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', 'T')o me this looks like a crowd control situation gone awry. The police were in the middle of an operation, and he should got in front of its that simple. From a situational perspective their primary mission was crowd control, they had to track hundreds of protestors. He isn't the only person of interest that they're tracking.

Let's be honest getting in front of a group of police officiers attempting to control a mob really isn't smart. They also appeared to use what I would call a proper force level, he was in their way and they forced him down with lowest force level possible. Once the victim was out of the way the police officiers moved on.

Part of controlling a mob is being able to maintain formation and his movement disrupted the police formation.

I don't think he deserved to die but I do think he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Its important to remember that mobs can get out of control and can quickly go from peaceful protesters to burning cars and smashing store fronts causing millions in damages, look at Los Angeles in 1992. The LA Riots started because police pulled out of an area with 30 protesters and riots quickly spread throughout the city,requiring the deployment of national guard forces. Hence the need for a strong but not excessive initial response.


The crowd had been peaceful, yet the police were looking for a fight.

This guy had been selling newspapers and had already been assaulted at the moment of the video. It's hardly his fault that he was a bit dazed. There was no "mob".
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby mefistofeles » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 05:34:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he crowd had been peaceful, yet the police were looking for a fight.


Aside from this one tradgedy, at least from the video footage it seems as if the police used a minimal level of force to clear the crowd. They didn't become crazy and start shooting tear gas at the journalist who was taking photos or run out of formation using their batons on protestors.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his guy had been selling newspapers and had already been assaulted at the moment of the video. It's hardly his fault that he was a bit dazed. There was no "mob".


A man died so there should be a thorough inquiry. Between London's CCTV system and all the journalists on scene I'm sure someone has the footage to either prove or disprove those allegations. Also a complete autospy will probably either confirm this or rule it out. However from the evidence that's immediately available in the video its hard to call the behaviour of Metropolitan PD reckless or dangerous once the perceived threat was handled the police moved on.

Personally would I have preferred it if he they had simply paused and allowed him to move yes. If I were an onscene commander would and knew for certain that hitting this individual would cause his death, I certainly wouldn't have allowed it. But this is not something that a police commander can know ahead of time.

As a police commander dealing with crowd control you have to monitor dozens if not hundreds of individuals and have a good sense of situational awareness. You can't dwell on the fate of one man who got whacked by an officier, especially after he gets up without any apparent injuries.

I won't say the police did everything in their power to prevent this man from dying but from the video footage it seems like they acted reasonably given the situation that they were in. I don't think there is any evidence of gross misconduct but who knows other evidence may surface later that may change this.
User avatar
mefistofeles
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby Micki » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 06:02:43

When you sneak up behind someone peacefully walking and push them with two hands so that he falls into the street, I dont' call it minimal level of force. I call is assault and I hope the assaulting policeman is charged at least for that.
If they keep getting away with such, then they'll move up the ladder to the next level of violence.
As you know Mephisto, this is already common behaviour, to push, beat, taze people without reason.
Micki
 

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby mefistofeles » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 06:59:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hen you sneak up behind someone peacefully walking and push them with two hands so that he falls into the street, I dont' call it minimal level of force. I call is assault and I hope the assaulting policeman is charged at least for that.


If a policeman randomly assualted the victim for no reason I completely agree it would be manslaughter, no doubt it about it. However that doesn't appear to be the case the police were engaged in a crowd control situation and the victim impeded the police formation.

In fact several protestors have confirmed that police were involved in clashes with protesters beforehand and that police actually sent Medics to attend to the injured man:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTCwQt3z ... re=related


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s you know Mephisto, this is already common behaviour, to push, beat, taze people without reason



I completely agree that if Met PD acted in a manner that was unreasonable and endangered public well being people should fired or even sent to prison. However in the context of clashes with protesters beforehand and a high security summit in the city its hard to difficult to fault the Met or the officiers involved.

Use of force is highly subjective and what may be appropriate in one situation may not work in another. Personally from the evidence that I see its hard to fault the officier involved when he had to make a decision within seconds. New evidence may prove otherwise but from what I see the officier seems to have acted within reason.

The facts seem to point to the Met acting responsibly, more so than any other police department imaginable, being able to provide immediate on scene medical assistance to a dying man.
User avatar
mefistofeles
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby davep » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 07:26:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', '
')In fact several protestors have confirmed that police were involved in clashes with protesters beforehand and that police actually sent Medics to attend to the injured man:



When the man finally collapsed, he was helped by a medic in the crowd. The police originally wouldn't help. When they finally did come, they made out later that they had been under a hail of bottles from the crowd. There was one bottle thrown, but that was stopped by other protesters who could see what was happening. The police have tried to disinform at every turn, which is at least as worrying as the original assaults.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby argyle » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 08:40:34

I don't know about you guys, but this person was NO threat to any of the policemen or the situation at hand.

It wasn't like the police were charging a crowd, it seems they were merely setting up a defensive line, not clearing a street or area, but rather seal off. There was no rush to setup this defensive line (like when a mob disperses into differnt streets, and thus can cause more mayhem and is harder to control).
Just by havin the police walk there, that direction was already secured (I didn't see any protesters try to break through or attack them -> I wouldn't if they had attack dogs with them)

The violent nature of the police action was totally not needed. That person did not make any "offensive actions" towards the police, and was actually slowly walking away from them. Their cmdr should have made a decent defensive line to start with, and if they would come across any stragglers, they would have been able to slow their pace and still hold the line (or atleast "prod" the ppl in the right direction, which is differnent from assaulting him from behind, totally unaware -> you can see this is exactly what the officer with the dog and cap does, the one that hits him, even leaves his position in the line that is forming to go out and hit him, he was only out to give ppl a beating (probably full of adrenaline and didn't have himself under control))

Even if he had not died afterwards, the actions of the police, an unneeded, unprovoked, unexpected attack from behind, should have been investigated under any circumstances. Not just because the person died afterwards.

Refusal by the police to assist the man when he did collapse is even more unforgiving (this mainly to the officer that is overseeing this "operation"). Even as a civilian, atleast in Belgium, you can be charged in front of a court if you have neglected to assist anyone in distress.
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."
argyle
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue 31 Mar 2009, 04:39:02

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 09:38:21

Police behavior for these sorts of events is routinely and systematically abusive. Every one of these events includes a budget for the millions of dollars in civil rights abuse lawsuits that the city will lose because they behave in a routinely abusive and illegal fashion. Being assaulted by police officers and slammed into the ground while you're trying to walk home from work is absolutely enough stress to produce a fatal heart attack in a vulnerable individual. There is absolutely no excuse for beating up innocent people because they're in your way. None. Pegging this on a single cop though is a huge miscarriage. These jerk offs will be in another city next year holding the same sort of conference. Citizens in that city will be just as pissed off, and the police will be forced to resort to illegal tactics to protect them from the constituency there too. This death needs to be hung right where it belongs. Square around the neck of Barack Obama and all the other abusive rulers of the g20.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby johhnytrash » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 09:53:10

He had his hands in his pockets and he was impeding police formation. In a protest situation, that's looking like someone with a concealed weapon. For the police to be safe, they need to form that line. I don't know if you can say for certain that the cop was 100% wrong. Now the cop punching the grinding the face of the guy they are arresting from the subsequent post ... THAT cop is scum.

Police aren't there to protect you, they are there to protect property from you. Laws give them authority and they are trained to submit people anyway they can. I give them a wide a berth as I can. I don't trust them. They are like hungry predators, waiting for you to give them an excuse to kick the crap out of you. I'm not surprised by any police brutality that I see. Angered and sickened, but not surprised.

And when the peak comes and anarchy starts to leak into the system we can expect more brutality, not less. And if the cops go away, the organizations that will fill the vacuum can be expected to be even more brutal and less restrained in the use of force. There is no solution. People suck.
User avatar
johhnytrash
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby Chuckmak » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 10:58:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'H')e was walking too slow so they would have had to go around him to get to the crowd and he had his hands in his pockets. Hands in pockets means possible weapon. That is what cops are trained to do. Those police have likely been hitting and shoving people all day. This guy is nothing different. What was different was the guy probably would have been in a Suit and tie if not for the protests. Who goes to work dressed like that? He is probably a pigman banker anyway who was hanging a bit too close under the cops nuts and got bitch slapped for it. I am not really feeling any sympathy for this guy.

We live in an evil time full of evil people under an evil system. There are no innocents.


oh will you shut the f*ck up...damn.
Last edited by Chuckmak on Thu 09 Apr 2009, 16:33:40, edited 1 time in total.
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City
Top

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 11:58:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', 'B')etween London's CCTV system

Which had been deactivated
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', 'a')nd all the journalists on scene

Who either work for the very same corporations who are profiting from this, or are independant and therefore not taken seriously
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', 'I')'m sure someone has the footage to either prove or disprove those allegations.

There's footage right in front of you.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', 'A')lso a complete autospy will probably either confirm this or rule it out.

You must be the last true believer out there. How many times per year are the crimes of police buried by their investigators, or left unprosecuted by the courts?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', 'H')owever from the evidence that's immediately available in the video its hard to call the behaviour of Metropolitan PD reckless or dangerous once the perceived threat was handled the police moved on.
You need a new perscription for your eyeglasses. The "minimum level of force" would have been a 1/4 to 1/2 strength push to the upper back and shoulders, not a strike to the knees with a baton, followed by a tackle.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby Jotapay » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 12:20:53

After reading mefistofeles post, I know what Morpheus meant when he said that some people wired into the Matrix will actually defend it....
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 12:35:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', 'Y')ou need a new perscription for your eyeglasses. The "minimum level of force" would have been a 1/4 to 1/2 strength push to the upper back and shoulders, not a strike to the knees with a baton, followed by a tackle.

I disagree with even that. The minimum level of force would have been a conversation.

"Sir we need you to move"
"Sorry. I had a long day at work. I've got arthritis. I'm just trying to get home."
"Well Sir, you need to walk faster"

There really is just no need to go beating on people just because they're in your way. That's one of those lessons of human behavior that you're supposed to pick up in kindergarten. Everything about that guy's body language says non-threatening.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby Quinny » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 15:07:13

Sergeant Mefistofeles to you young man - now move along quietly now

Or I'll kick your f*cking head in. :(

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'A')fter reading mefistofeles post, I know what Morpheus meant when he said that some people wired into the Matrix will actually defend it....
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby rangerone314 » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 15:32:39

I laughed when I read the article, nothing really changes for the better ever.

Unfortunately police everywhere share 3 common traits:

1) They do not really usually PREVENT crimes from happening.

2) At best they are like garbage men cleaning up after a mess has already happened.

3) Generally, they are tools of the gov/elite (read: rich & powerful) who exist to suppress political dissent by people who realize that Republics / Constitutional Monarchies / whatever are just democratic window-dressing for plutocracy.

4) They are revenue agents for rent-seeking governments looking for revenue outside of traditional taxes (income, property, sales)
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby mefistofeles » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 18:22:30

Lol I'm obviously not going to win this debate. But it is good to see that respect for liberty is high on peakoil. I suppose it is better to err on the side of liberty than tyranny.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hich had been deactivated


Actually according to Sky London's CCTV system was active:

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... _Tightens_
User avatar
mefistofeles
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: G20:UK police assaults innocent passer by who later dies.

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Thu 09 Apr 2009, 20:50:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mefistofeles', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hich had been deactivated


Actually according to Sky London's CCTV system was active:

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... _Tightens_


I don't know Sky News. I do know the Guardian. And the only footage I've seen was shot by an amature videographer who was on the scene - the same footage that is currently on Sky's front page.

So my source says they were off, yours say they were on, and the only footage of the incident we've seen comes from a third source.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron