Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Green Movement Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Congress Honors Green Revolution Scientist

Unread postby PeakOiler » Sat 21 Jul 2007, 09:55:48

This Reuters article tells me that members of Congress don't have a clue with regard to population overshoot.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ASHINGTON (Reuters) - A 93-year-old agricultural scientist and Nobel laureate regarded as the father of the "Green Revolution" in farming received the Congressional Gold Medal on Tuesday for a life-long battle against world hunger.

President George W. Bush was on hand at the U.S. Capitol for the presentation of the highest civilian honor to Norman Borlaug, whose advances helped nearly double the food supply in countries including Mexico, India and Pakistan.
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: Congress Honors Green Revolution Scientist

Unread postby Homesteader » Sat 21 Jul 2007, 17:20:02

Yeah, I wonder if anybody pointed out during the ceremony that Mr. Borlaug's work hadn't ended or even mitigated world hunger, but merely made it possible for a lot more people to go to bed hungry.

I saw a documentary on GMO's that had Mr. Borlaug stating angrily stating that people who supported organic farming were misdirected, misinformed and basically delusional, and that GMO's were the only way to feed the starving hordes around the world. (which he helped create).

Guess he didn't read the U. of Michigan study showing organic farming methods can produce 2-3 times the amount of food as "modern agriculture". Or the U.N. report that stated that modern agriculture is the most destructive human activity on Earth.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Congress Honors Green Revolution Scientist

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 21 Jul 2007, 23:38:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'G')uess he didn't read the U. of Michigan study showing organic farming methods can produce 2-3 times the amount of food as "modern agriculture". Or the U.N. report that stated that modern agriculture is the most destructive human activity on Earth.
Yeah I totally agree. But facts like that don't matter to these people. Only power matters to these people and the green revolution gave corporate agriculture power.

Agribusiness probably sees it like this, to them organic farming takes more workers and organic farmers normally own their farms. Both of these things go against the current system. A large company can't turn as high a profit on their agribusiness holdings (farms) if it requires paying lots of workers. And taking the soviet system as an example, poorly paid workers who don't own the land tend to be undermodivated and not happy if they are stuck in the middle of no where (like Siberia or Kansas). And most large scale modern agribusiness in the US is centered away from civilization. So for agribusiness, trying to make organic farming work would be a nightmare. They would let people starve before giving away their land and that's what they presently do.*

So the current system of agriculture is a power structure. Ultimately banks own the deeds or own the money rented for seeds. Since biological patents have been approved, even saving your own seeds is often against the law. In the current system farmers make very little money and are essentially owned by agribusiness and banks. This system is very convenient for big money and not for the little guy. Since congress represents big money, it's no surprise that they want to honor the "Green Revolution"! It is a system that allowed them to take away the American Family Farm and consolidate power, much like how the Soviet collective farms operated. The soviets had solders locking up seeds, we have patents locking up seeds. Our methods are more subtle but the results are the same.

* "The Governments... war against small farmers and the land ... will happen to millions of farmers displaced by corporate industrialized agriculture"
http://www.navdanya.org/news/30mar07.htm

"We can go through numbers of farmers displaced from their land...The actual data shows the opposite-small farms produce far more per acre"
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Third ... _Farm.html

Another part of the war against the small farmer...
Foreign small farmers ruined by subsidy (by US product dumping)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 629405.ece

Seed patents threaten food supply for the world's poor
http://www.devp.org/testA/news/communiquesaaar-a.html

US product dumping is great for the USD, the World Bank, and dictators in line with agribusiness, and it's just part of their effort to destroy small farmers and consolidate power in the international arena... I suspect that for organic farming to become mainstream, all these power structures would have to collapse first. Organic farming is a great survival knowledge, but at present if you tried to go beyond supplying a few farmers markets you can bet agribusiness seed companies would start suing your farm for genetic patent infringements and generally try to destroy you.

Well, those are my thoughts on the Green Revolution. One other thing, talking with an average Joe a week ago, it was amusing. They guy didn't have any idea that the Green Revolution is about cheep natural gas fertilizer, petrochemical pesticides and sucking the soil dry of nutrients... He thinks of the Green Revolution as, "people just figured out how to farm better because like farmers were dumb before." What brilliant incite. I'm sure if their's a news special on "Congress Honors Green Revolution Scientist" people will eat it up! They don't know any better.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Congress Honors Green Revolution Scientist

Unread postby PeakOiler » Sun 22 Jul 2007, 12:27:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ElijahJones', '
')The irony of this is stupendous. By increasing food supply you enable exponential growth and probably increase the size of the eventual overshoot. Our doom is twice as ferocious because this man got happy with his chemistry set. It shows how irresponsible humans have been with scientific knowledge. Having ignored the holistic truths, or maybe we are just unable to see them, we change one element of a complicated system and then wonder why things don't turn out the way we thought they would. The brilliant stupid scientists of the 18th and 19th centuries gave many of the troubles we now face.


It wasn't the fault of science for population overshoot, but what governments and corporations did with such knowledge. After all, it wasn't the science that actually increased the food yields, but the exploitation of the fossil fuels to overproduce foods with the knowledge at hand. In other words, the blame for overshoot were policy mistakes, not necessarily the science. The science was used for growth, (or profit) instead of being used for a steady-state policy. Congress gave the guy a medal because it helped the government and corporations to make a bigger profit.
There’s a strange irony related to this subject [oil and gas extraction] that the better you do the job at exploiting this oil and gas, the sooner it is gone.

--Colin Campbell
User avatar
PeakOiler
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3664
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transition

Unread postby KevO » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 09:21:45

Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transition Towns

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ome say to save the planet, we should ‘burn, baby, burn’ and that the green movement is in fact killing the Earth by slowing the inevitable. The inevitable has only become the inevitable however very recently and only then if you ‘believe’ that we’re past the ‘it’s now too late, fuck it’ period.



FULL ARTICLE HERE


.
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA

Re: Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transit

Unread postby peasea » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 09:54:25

ok I understand the sentiment in going out and seeing the world before you die ( sort of ) .

The bit about planes has always puzzled me , build planes , build airports , by the time you can use ( built ) them they're too expensive to run - eh what?

this just highlights the trouble with the political system we have that rates 4 years as an eternity

peak oil , yeah really , when ? a week from now? no ? forget it then I need to look good now.......now where's Paris hilton , Ipod phone , ( insert vacous reason here )

sorry friday , could never handle fridays....... :-)

P.
User avatar
peasea
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu 26 Jul 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transit

Unread postby KevO » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 10:42:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peasea', 'o')k I understand the sentiment in going out and seeing the world before you die ( sort of ) .

The bit about planes has always puzzled me , build planes , build airports , by the time you can use ( built ) them they're too expensive to run - eh what?

this just highlights the trouble with the political system we have that rates 4 years as an eternity



that just about sums it up. 4 more years!
forever 4 more years.
That's why 5 is a sacred number. Nobody dare or can think that far :-D
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA
Top

Re: Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transit

Unread postby americandream » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 12:12:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KevO', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peasea', 'o')k I understand the sentiment in going out and seeing the world before you die ( sort of ) .

The bit about planes has always puzzled me , build planes , build airports , by the time you can use ( built ) them they're too expensive to run - eh what?

this just highlights the trouble with the political system we have that rates 4 years as an eternity



that just about sums it up. 4 more years!
forever 4 more years.
That's why 5 is a sacred number. Nobody dare or can think that far :-D


Immediate grrrrraaaaatification.

As for these greenies, with their middle class values and tendency to waffle, if you're waiting on them to deliver anything other than a sack load of lentils, you'll be waiting a long time pal.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transit

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 12:20:21

By extending the "transition" time frame, we encourage even more growth than would have been possible otherwise, making the consequences of the transition into energy poverty that much more potent.

You dog wants a hybrid.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transit

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 14:11:52

Ah, transition towns...

Devon and Cornwall - economically poor, underdeveloped infrastructure, long-suffering farming communities... yes, if you're already there, good luck.

Bristol? Brixton? Stroud? Stop kidding yourself. You're fucked.

"Who will be the first Transition City?" they ask on their website. Whoever wants a slice of the consumer electronics recycling action!
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transit

Unread postby gnm » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 14:20:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'Y')ou dog wants a hybrid.


Aaron... my dog _IS_ a hybrid!!
:lol:

I think hes half stress-puppy and half chow-hound...

-G
gnm
 
Top

Re: Burn Baby Burn. The Green Movement, Peak Oil and Transit

Unread postby Gerontion » Fri 03 Aug 2007, 16:29:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'B')ristol? Brixton? Stroud? Stop kidding yourself. You're fucked.


Yeah - Seeing Brixton on the list made me laugh. It's like saying, "Well, I've got Transition Tits but unfortunately my arse is still resolutely growth orientated." What are they doing? Building a moat? Extending the old city walls? What a load of crap.
User avatar
Gerontion
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Lampang, Thailand
Top

Re: Why can't America lead in green solutions?

Unread postby manu » Sun 19 Aug 2007, 03:48:13

I think that pstarr and kingcoal hit the nail pretty much on the head. I would just like to add that when you have a group of greedy buisnessmen running a country, and their idea of progress is rape of the earth to increase their bottom line. The propaganda in schools from the time you enter is that simple living is backwards, dirty, disease, ect. Now these same people are running big agro farms. They rape the land, poison it and all the other living creatures. It doesnt matter to them as long as they make $$$. They push that to wastefully consume products that are un-needed is happiness. So if you want to lead in green solutions, get off the grid. Simplify your life as much as possible. Ox power not toxic power.
User avatar
manu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

It Isn't Easy Being Green Program

Unread postby Ferretlover » Tue 04 Sep 2007, 19:47:29

SundanceChannel.com/green
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Join the Strawbridge family in their quest to be self-sufficient and environmentally responsible as they leave suburban comfort for a run-down 300-year-old English farmhouse and three acres in Cornwall. During the course of this eight-part British documentary series, engineer Dick Strawbridge, wife Brigit, son James and daughter Charlotte plan to harness a nearby stream to generate electricity, grow their own vegetables and raise a pig or two.

Here (MN) it is on Tuesday evenings from 8 to 8:35 pm EST among other times
It is about a family that is working to get off the grid. Last week, they built a greenhouse w/heat sink, prepared ground for gardens, and using a water mill that they had erected, connected it to a gear box for electrical power.
Last week, they had two pigs they had raised slaughtered (the slaughter man-our 'butcher?") came to the farm when they were ready. It showed nearly every aspect of slaughter (except the bullet actually killing the pigs, and the cutting the throat part), including having it cut up into the different cuts, and building a solar panel to heat the water from the water tank.
I thought this was a good program because you actually get a real time 'experience' at the things we will all probably have to learn.
On tonight’s program, they will be building a composting toilet.
This and other 'green' topics can be found at:

http://www.sundancechannel.com/thegreen/#/homePage
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: It Isn't Easy Being Green Program

Unread postby Ebyss » Wed 05 Sep 2007, 08:47:20

I have the book that goes along with the series, it's quite good.

Recommend also River Cottage w. Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall for more programmes and books on self sufficiency, incl getting food from the wild. They have a forum and website too, with downloads on preparing your "pig-in-a-day" when it gets back from the slaughterhouse (only available to members). Or it's available on dvd.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')the slaughter man-our 'butcher?")


No, two different jobs. Butcher cuts and works with the meat, slaughterman dispatches the animal. According to EU regs, animals for eating MUST be killed by an approved slaughterman/slaughterhouse if they are to be eaten by anyone outside of your immediate family.
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland
Top

Re: It Isn't Easy Being Green Program

Unread postby Madpaddy » Wed 05 Sep 2007, 09:05:30

Ebyss,

It is easy being green with the Sunoven. I'll do you a special price on one if you want. The killer is the shipping cost from the states.

PM me.
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: It Isn't Easy Being Green Program

Unread postby Ferretlover » Wed 05 Sep 2007, 10:26:24

I like this program. Seeing that family actually doing things I want to learn to do makes the projects more real and understandable-a vicarious experience...
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: It Isn't Easy Being Green Program

Unread postby Madpaddy » Wed 05 Sep 2007, 10:31:56

This programme was on last year. it is excellent. They made a heat sump for their glass house using polystyrene foam, crushed glass and some pipe. Ingenious.
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: It Isn't Easy Being Green Program

Unread postby morph » Wed 05 Sep 2007, 12:10:37

yep was on TV here in the UK last year. Good show! As said above Escape to river cottage/return to river cottage is another good programme all about self sufficiency/owning a small holding
User avatar
morph
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri 28 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron