Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby Tanada » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 15:45:55

Back about 15 years ago a fertilizer company came around where I worked as a groundskeeper and tried to convince my boss to buy bio solid sterilized fertilizer pellets. My boss didn't go for it because he thought the visitors would object because sooner or later the word would get out. Plus it was 10-10-10 so to get the nutrients were were most lacking we would have had to both use large quantities and over supply some nutrients to get enough of others. The types we normally used were closer to 30-5-5
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby ennui2 » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 16:11:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '
')Didn't various economies crash during the same period, with conflict taking place for several of them?


Now we're getting back into Pstarr correlation = causation again and ignoring the credit crisis... Economies can crash and conflict can happen WITHOUT peak oil doom.

For some people, they simply will never pull their heads out of the fall of 2008. That was the year all peak oil predictions blew up in smoke and it's been all rationalizations ever since.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby onlooker » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 16:23:41

I tend to side with Pstar as the evidence can be attained by noting the full scale way in which unconventional reserves ie. shale , fracking have been pursued. Also, how we have been investing and trying to recover oil and gas from ever more inaccessible places. What exactly caused the crash of 2008 is up for debate. Yet much circumstantial evidence exists indicating peak oil in a general sense. By the way I am sure many are familiar with Matthew Simmons "Twilight in the Desert" making a very strong case of peak in SA. Well Saudi Arabia has been widely recognized as having the most reserves so that in itself suggests peak oil. Also, the fact that oil before and after 2008 has been way above historical price range.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby ennui2 » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 16:37:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'I') tend to side with Pstar as the evidence can be attained by noting the full scale way in which unconventional reserves ie. shale , fracking have been pursued.


I'm not disputing that convention oil has peaked. I'm disputing the doom that this is supposed to signify. You know, Cormac McCarthy, cats and dogs living together, etc... I remember a LOT of rhetoric circa 2008 that unconventional wasn't economical. And yet if that wasn't the case, it would not have been pursued. It was profitable, up to a point, but like anything, they fell into irrational exuberance. I don't think that means that the drilling couldn't make money. I'm sure it did when oil prices were higher. But that's kind of supply/demand give and take is the nature of commodities.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby onlooker » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 16:54:30

At least you have one convert hehe
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby ralfy » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 23:27:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'W')onder what happened to all those guys over there who invested so much time into all of this only to be proven wrong a short time later. Maybe they became cornies or just sulked in their basements.


We know what became of Gail Tverberg. She just set up shop with her own blog and is now dishing out doom-is-nigh-du-jour with an ever-evolving narrative to fit the current situation with the same sort of scientific-looking graphs and charts and logical leaps that fooled a lot of us 10 years ago.

It's amazing to me how successful such people can be at peddling their POV decade after decade. There are THOUSANDS of financial newsletters (now mostly blogs) where self-described "financial experts" peddle their advice, decade after decade. Apparently they're smart enough to tell everyone else what will transpire financially, but not to become financially independent (much less very wealthy) following their own advice. :roll: I guess marketing is a powerful thing.


I think it's the other way round: the goal is to be wealthy whether or not there is a crisis. That implies seeing each crisis as isolated or temporary. Can that be proven for the current financial crisis, peak oil, and global warming?
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby ralfy » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 23:28:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'I')t's amazing to me how successful such people can be at peddling their POV decade after decade. There are THOUSANDS of financial newsletters (now mostly blogs) where self-described "financial experts" peddle their advice, decade after decade. Apparently they're smart enough to tell everyone else what will transpire financially, but not to become financially independent (much less very wealthy) following their own advice. :roll: I guess marketing is a powerful thing.
Sound like that old adage: Those who can't, teach.


One, unfortunately, that doesn't make sense, as experience is the harshest of all teachers.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby ralfy » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 23:34:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('copious.abundance', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'W')ould Copious Abundance venture to share with us why he feels this disdain toward doomers?

I'll give you a hint: It has something to do with being wrong for decade after decade, and even century after century (see: Erlich 1968 and Maulthus 1798). And refusing to learn anything from those experiences.


The trend is your friend. We have proven Malthus wrong for over 200 years. No matter your internal narrative, doomer or cornucopian, this is just fact. This will remain the case up and until the day it no longer is. Now how is that for profound?


This might help:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... g-collapse

Can it be shown that if trends continue population will keep rising, the birth rate will continue dropping together with the death rate, and output per capita will continue rising even as resource availability keeps dropping and pollution rises?
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby ralfy » Tue 01 Sep 2015, 23:35:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Strummer', 'T')here's nothing fundamentally wrong about Malthus. The population still depends fully on agricultural production and that production still depends on the availability of fertile topsoil, constant input of energy and other resources (nitrates, phosphorus, etc...). In fact today it is much more dependent on those inputs than it was at any time in the past. The fact that we found some more temporarily available sources of those inputs than were known in Malthus' times does not change or invalidate his basic premise in any way.


No it doesn't but his specific prediction during his day that 18th century human population was critically over populated and at the tipping point was not true. For 200 years we are drawing down non renewable resource sinks. That is true. And we have avoided time and time again consequences.

Through sanitation, germ theory, green revolution in agriculture, digital technology, fossil fuels and last but not least, replacing natural ecosystems with human landscapes, all of this has allowed us to continue unabated since the time of Malthus to grow to 7.3 billion. To assume that this will all come to an end exactly during your or my lifetime is a potential fallacy of the doomer mind set.

This must be soberly acknowledged when attempting any kind of prediction going forward.

Will there be an end one day to this 200 year long linear exponential growth? Yes. Will it be through the catalyst of the consequences of human overshoot? Yes

Would I like to see the human foot print smaller on the planet? Yes

Would I embrace and welcome consequences that would return us to a sustainable population within carrying capacity? Yes

Copious Abundance states that carrying capacity is not definable and not exact and is influenced by too many factors. Like the ones I mentioned above; germ theory etc. While true there is a definition that serves me quite well. Homo sapiens can have whatever population it can afford to maintain as long as we have thriving and sustainable populations of natural ecosystems and bio regions, viable populations of
species with stable populations, allowing water sheds to keep viable populations of native wetlands, marine fisheries that allow for thriving populations of top predators like tuna. Etc etc. etc.
Maintaining resource sinks at renewable and sustainable levels like fresh water aquifers, top soil, etc.
Carbon emissions at a rate that it can be sequestered at a stable rate.

Anyone who wants to argue that carrying capacity can ignore any of those above mentioned examples is free to do so. And thus expose your hubris..... which is an invitation of sorts :)


Carrying capacity is definable for painfully obvious reasons, unless of course there are other earths that can used.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby onlooker » Wed 02 Sep 2015, 00:08:36

Ralfy, I suggest you do not keep up communication channels with CA, he/she obviously cannot comprehend the nature of the trend lines and what they signify, as his/her quote attests to "The trend is your friend" which I interpret more as a mockery then his/her genuine opinion.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby omul » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 00:15:05

heyGuHung...u so smart, that you are even smarter than me...only now i realize that you are all smarter than me as you are fluent in english or something....i cant abstain though to yell (my ) truth at least at ya'all...i dont understand why a stupid like me has to remind you or something...that there is no hope!!!...you uglies should just go back to your 69 lifestiles and enjoy urself till you can...dotcha see you all wasted ur time here, and mine too?. ..so its the end of the world...so what?...was it not gods plan from the beginning and of that joshua or whatever his name was for real?...dont tell me that you are all also without religions now...so the nukulear war will come and canibalism...not necessarilly in that order...so WHAT.?..are you uglies afraid of anything anymore?...
cause i aint...just homeless..--
omul
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon 20 Jul 2015, 20:24:28

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 00:29:30

Cool amul, looks like you may be our first real mutant homeless zombie poster! Kewl, weezbin waitin 4 ja!
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby GregT » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 01:55:11

WTF?

Sorry, but seriously, wtf? Maybe it's time for me to go on meds?????
GregT
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu 24 Jan 2013, 21:18:20
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby Ibon » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 15:18:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('copious.abundance', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'W')ould Copious Abundance venture to share with us why he feels this disdain toward doomers?

I'll give you a hint: It has something to do with being wrong for decade after decade, and even century after century (see: Erlich 1968 and Maulthus 1798). And refusing to learn anything from those experiences.


The trend is your friend. We have proven Malthus wrong for over 200 years. No matter your internal narrative, doomer or cornucopian, this is just fact. This will remain the case up and until the day it no longer is. Now how is that for profound?


I posted on another thread something relevant to these comments. In affect, modern civilization for 200 years has continuously won all the battles against Malthusian predictions of collapse only to perhaps eventually lose the war. Ultimately, each adjustment we make through technology to accommodate and enable a growing population to thrive is going to enable the eventual cyclical correction (the war) to be that much more brutal.

Or?

There is an interesting theoretical question that hangs in the air that Cornucopians rarely bring up that I think merits discussion.

Is a falling population due to resource constraints manageable to avoid an all out civilization collapse.

The triage decisions that are made in an emergency room after a bomb or natural disaster, you stabilize the wounded and save the most lives you can knowing you will lose some.

We start to write off the most hopeless unsustainable regions of the world due to political instability, over populated bio-regions of extreme low sustainable carrying capacity, coastal areas due to sea level rise, stopping the flow of immigrants, stopping the flow of food aid, etc. etc.

Wont moral drift result in nation states with abundant resources preserving their core as they allow collapse and barbarianism of regions simply written off? Some of these same nation states will apply this triage within their own borders.

Drifting morally into the territory of writing off whole populations as a triage is something morally unheard of today but maybe quite the status quo in a hundred years.

Wont a Copious Abundance in this future scenario still be preaching abundance where it is still preserved at its core?

Haven't we already started heading down this path?
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 16:03:31

100 years? Where did that number come from? It is happening now, Somalia, big chunks of Sudan, Ethiopia. Approaching failed states- PNG, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, DR Congo. Many more could join these lists this decade. Most of Africa, SE Asia, Latin America, thug Paradise, you got money, guns, drugs, you can play murderous feudal landlord gangsta, send your kids to the best schools in the world no questions asked.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby onlooker » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 16:23:40

Well my take is that we have not exactly been altruistic with each other throughout time. History has shown a clear distinction between winners and losers. It has been a Dawinian survival of the fittest scenario so that those regions Sea noted have been in modern times succumbing to the mandates of nature and of human prerogatives. Money being the arbiter of who gets what and who does not. So in that sense this moral drift is already occurring. It should increase considering the demands and realities of the upcoming very constrained world
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby onlooker » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 17:52:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'W')hat SeaGypsy says.

onlooker, it is not simple greed anymore.

I do not know about that P, last time I checked 1 million bucks allows you to have a bunch of stuff and do many things, while 0 bucks allows you to have zilch.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA
Top

Re: The 'Fear The Doomer' thread

Unread postby Ibon » Thu 03 Sep 2015, 19:40:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'W')hat SeaGypsy says.

onlooker, it is not simple greed anymore.

I do not know about that P, last time I checked 1 million bucks allows you to have a bunch of stuff and do many things, while 0 bucks allows you to have zilch.


I think he means that the consequences are here and now, the effects of that greed.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron