Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE 'Examples of Disinformation' Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

THE 'Examples of Disinformation' Thread (merged)

Unread postby MarioPro » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 08:51:13

Disinformation on Sgrena's Story of Shooting ImageImageAP Linked to Disinfo on Sgrena's Story of Shooting Right-Wing Bloggers' Fake Sgrena Car Photo - With Help from AP by Fintan Dunne, Editor linkBreakForNews.com March 6th, 2005:
Right-wing bloggers are circulating a photo purportedly showing the car in which Guiliana Sgrena was wounded and her rescuer Nicola Calipari was fatally shot. The photo is being used to discredit Sgrena's account of the shooting. It shows a four-door sedan which has only the driver's side window broken and no overt bullet damage to the bodywork. That contradicts the "hail of bullets" described by Sgrena and others. And it boosts the US military's case that the incident was just a "mishap."

linkImage
At first glance the picture seems legitimate. Captions which accompany the photo on blogs say it's a still frame taken from an Associated Press video about the shooting at Baghdad Airport. These captions also give a source link to versions of the video on Yahoo and on [AP Feedroom

ImageImageMario's note: AP removed that video from their Feedrom, so now one can't see it anymore at the AP URL provided above.. They make comments like: "Unless this car is made out of thick metal and bullets bounce off of it, I don't think this car was shot at more than 10 times."

"I ask you, does the car above look like it was riddled with bullets? Either our soldiers are terrible shots or some people are being pretty loose with the facts in this story."

But if you are suspicious that the car seems far too little damaged, you might check major search engines for such a high-profile photo. On the Yahoo News Photo site - I quickly found the same vehicle photographed from another angle. This time with an Iraqi man standing beside the vehicle.

Image
The Yahoo photo caption says:An Iraqi driver stands near his damaged vehicle at the site of the kidnapping of an Italian journalist outside al-Nahrain University in central Baghdad,
Feb 4, 2005.... Gunmen pulled up alongside her vehicle, forced her driver and an Iraqi journalist with her out of the vehicle at gunpoint and then drove off with Sgrena, the sources said.The driver said that the gunmen hit his car as they were rushing away from the scene following the kidnapping.
(Akram Saleh/Reuters)

You can read the whole story at BreakForNews.com
as well as comments from Democratic Underground Thread

In the meantime the Italian press said Giuliana Sgrena's real car is being shipped to Rome, so we will be seeing it soon. See also:
[URL=http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=617569]Image Italy's relations with US soured by attack on hostage CONFLICTING VERSIONS (Source: The Independent, UK, 7 Mar 2005)
[/URL]. There are some glaring discrepancies in the Italian and American versions of the killing of the agent Nicola Calipari and the wounding of released hostage Giuliana Sgrena and two other Italian secret service agents:

ImageThe Americans say: the car was travelling at high speed
ImageThe Italians say: it was travelling at 40-50kph

ImageUS: It approached a checkpoint near the airport at speed when soldiers fired on it to force it to stop as a "last resort"
ImageItaly: It had passed three checkpoints without incident and was 700 metres from the airport when fired upon

ImageUS: The soldiers used hand signals and bright lights and fired warning shots before hitting the car with shots
ImageItaly: There was no warning. Three to four hundred rounds were fired, afterwards the car seats were covered in spent cartridges. The Americans forced the Italians to remain in the car without medical attention for an hour

ImageUS: There was a lack of co-ordination between the Italians and the Americans
ImageItaly: The Americans were kept fully informed

ImageUS: It was a regrettable accident which will be aggressively investigated
ImageItaly: Ms Sgrena claims it was a deliberate ambush to kill her, as the Italians had paid a ransom, a practice America opposes, and as she had learnt inconvenient facts from her abductors.

Mario Profaca The Global Intelligence News Portal
Last edited by Ferretlover on Thu 02 Apr 2009, 22:00:49, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Merge thread.
User avatar
MarioPro
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun 06 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Cyberspace

Unread postby Barbara » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 09:17:38

Thanks for the post, Mario! Very informative!

Barbara from Italy
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Unread postby maverickdoc » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 09:29:03

I hope you post more often MarioPro, be careful of trolls though. Seriously don’t bother arguing with them, it's just a waste of time
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Disinformation on Sgrena's Story of Shooting

Unread postby Jack » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 10:25:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarioPro', 'T')hree to four hundred rounds
were fired, afterwards the car seats were covered in spent
cartridges. The Americans forced the Italians to remain in
the car without medical attention for an hour


Sounds bad, doesn't it? But let's take a closer look. Why would the seats be covered in spent cartridges? The brass is ejected from the side of the weapon, not into the target! If we charitably assume that the piece meant to use the term "bullet" instead of cartridge, one cannot help but wonder how the penetration could be so low. A 7.62mm cartridge should go through several layers of thin sheet metal, so they shouldn't just lie upon the seats.

We also need to remember that wild allegations sell newspapers, whereas a more dispassionate analysis suggesting that a regrettable series of errors occurred would not sell newspapers.

I would suggest that readers take such lurid reports with several grains of salt. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

The art of warfare

Unread postby MarioPro » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 12:14:48

ImageThe art of warfare Image
[URL=http://mprofaca.cro.net/fratricide.html]
Image So called "friendly fire"[/URL]
What is "friendly fire" or fratricide all about?
Fratricide is the act of killing our own. When a soldier
drops a bomb or opens fire on his own fellow soldiers
- it's so called "friendly fire", so don't worry - be happy;
"Friendly fire" kills friendly.

Image Qur'an and war
"Your Lord will assist you with
five thousand of the havoc-making angels"

003.124
YUSUFALI: Remember thou saidst to the Faithful:
"Is it not enough for you that Allah should help you
with three thousand angels (Specially) sent down?
PICKTHAL: When thou didst say unto the believers:
Is it not sufficient for you that your Lord should support you
with three thousand angels sent down (to your help)?
SHAKIR: When you said to the believers:
Does it not suffice you that your Lord should assist you
with three thousand of the angels sent down?
003.125
YUSUFALI: "Yea, - if ye remain firm, and act aright,
even if the enemy should rush here on you in hot haste,
your Lord would help you with five thousand angels Making
a terrific onslaught.
PICKTHAL: Nay, but if ye persevere, and keep from evil,
and (the enemy) attack you suddenly, your Lord will help you
with five thousand angels sweeping on.
SHAKIR: Yea! if you remain patient and are on your guard,
and they come upon you in a headlong manner, your Lord
will assist you with five thousand of the havoc-making angels.

Image Islam’s Stance on Killing Captives
Title of Fatwa: Islam’s Stance on Killing Captives
Date of Fatwa: 17/ May/ 2004
Date of Reply: 17/ May/ 2004
Topic Of Fatwa: Jihad

[URL=http://www.islamonline.net/fatwa/english/FatwaDisplay.asp?hFatwaID=114486]Image Abu Bakar Bashir:
"God's warriors should not fight
by taking innocent women hostages"
[/URL]
Militant cleric appeals for release of Indonesian hostages in Iraq?
Source: Associated Press
, Jakarta, Indonesia (2004/10/2)
An Indonesian cleric accused of heading an al-Qaida-linked
terror group does not want to be freed in exchange for
the release of two Indonesian women being held in Iraq,
as their captors have reportedly demanded,
his lawyer said Saturday.
Abu Bakar Bashir urged the group holding the Indonesians
to release them immediately, saying, "God's warriors should
not fight by taking innocent women hostages," attorney
Mohammed Assegaf quoted him as saying.

Image "It is fun to shoot some people"
said U.S. Marine Corps Lt. General James Mattis
(Some Audience Members Clap)

This NBC video clip was censored,
removed from NBC 7/39 Feed Room
,[URL=http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/4153541/detail.html]
but you can read the NBC article [/URL] or click the photo
(below) to see slide show:
Image
About 200 people gathered for the discussion,
held at the San Diego Convention Center.
While many military members laughed
at Lt. Gen. Mattis' comments,
a military expert interviewed by NBC 7/39
called the comments "flippant."

Image "It's a good feeling ..."
This CNN video clip
http://monotony.eyebeeem.com/marines%20kill%20iraqi.wmv
was censored, removed from the server.

"It's a good feeling" says U.S. Marine soldier
after killing a wounded iraqi soldier
while he was laying on the ground.
(CNN, August 2004)

[URL=http://content.collegehumor.com/media/movies/videophone.wmv]Image Anyway, watch this to see
why you shouldn't trust video clips
[/URL] :smile:

Mario Profaca
The Global Intelligence News Portal
User avatar
MarioPro
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun 06 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Cyberspace

Unread postby Barbara » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 12:59:37

>>>>Why would the seats be covered in spent cartridges?
>>>>The brass is ejected from the side of the weapon, not into the target!

Jack,
what you missed is that our officials shooted back. There were 3 italian officials in the car (one of them is kept hidden, I mean our govt said he was there then he was quickly forgotten). They were armed of course.
Giuliana can't tell everything, she was briefed by the intelligence after her landing in Italy.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Unread postby Jack » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 17:37:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Barbara', '&')gt;>>>Why would the seats be covered in spent cartridges?
>>>>The brass is ejected from the side of the weapon, not into the target!

Jack,
what you missed is that our officials shooted back. There were 3 italian officials in the car (one of them is kept hidden, I mean our govt said he was there then he was quickly forgotten). They were armed of course.
Giuliana can't tell everything, she was briefed by the intelligence after her landing in Italy.


Thank you for the information.

While I understand that you must be pained by the loss of your countrymen...may I point out something?

I can understand why they would shoot back. I respect their courage. That having been said...when they started to shoot back, the reaction of the targets (U.S. soldiers) would be to conclude that the car did, in fact, contain attackers. And they would fire everything they had at the car.

This just adds to my conclusion that we see here a tragic accident. No one wanted this to happen, no one intended for it to happen - but a series of unexpected events resulted in the present situation.

Please accept my condolences for Mr. Calipari's death. They don't come any braver.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Barbara » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 18:32:28

The "shoot back" is a theory which is spreading throught the Internet.
Anyway, the car is on its way to Italy, so we'll see. We know it is an Iraqi-like car (not a fancy SUV, I mean) because they didn't want to attract attention when still in Baghdad.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Giuliana Sgrena

Unread postby MarioPro » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 20:28:18

[URL=http://www.ilmanifesto.it/pag/sgrena/video/vg.asx]ImageImageChi è Giuliana
Giuliana Sgrena: La verita (Il Manifesto)[/URL]

[URL=http://www.rsf.org/sgrena-en.php3]ImageImage
Timeline: Kidnapping of Giuliana Sgrena[/URL]
Giuliana Sgrena, 56, a senior reporter for the Italian daily paper Il Manifesto,
was kidnapped by gunmen in the centre of Baghdad on 4 February.
She had just interviewed inhabitants of Fallujah who had taken refuge
in a mosque on the Baghdad University campus.

[URL=http://www.rsf.org/special_irak.php3]Image 48 journalists and media assistants killed
since the start of fighting in Iraq in March 2003,
four still missing
[/URL] (Source: Reporters Without Borders)

Watch some CBS News, KTVT and BBC video clips
related to the shooting at the car
carrying the Italian intelligence officer Nicola Calipari
and ex-hostage Giuliana Sgrena to freedom:
Image 1ImageImage 2ImageImage 3ImageImage 4Image

Image What really happened?

And, by the way - see also:
My Report about YOU [smilie=5sonar.gif]

[smilie=icon_smile.gif] Mario
User avatar
MarioPro
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun 06 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Cyberspace

Re: Giuliana Sgrena

Unread postby TrueKaiser » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 20:46:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarioPro', '
')And, by the way - see also:
My Report about YOU [smilie=5sonar.gif]

[smilie=icon_smile.gif] Mario


nice site, but all you can do on my system is mess up the browser :)
User avatar
TrueKaiser
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Giuliana Sgrena

Unread postby MarioPro » Tue 08 Mar 2005, 21:19:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TrueKaiser', '
')nice site, but all you can do on my system is mess up the browser :)


Sorry, TrueKaiser, I hope we are not going to start
that discussion, but since my system as well as browser
(MS IE) is doing OK, I think you might need regular
Windows update, disk clean up and/or defragmentation.
(No hard feelings for mentioning the basics, please...)

Instead of starting never ending chat here on the forum
(e.g. about MS IE, Firefox, Opera or whatever) feel free
to send me a private message anytime. You never know,
may be I will even answer to it :)
User avatar
MarioPro
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun 06 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Cyberspace

Peak Oil Disinformation

Unread postby SoothSayer » Sat 06 May 2006, 04:17:10

"Raise The Hammer" have an interesting article - Link

He discusses the current Peak Oil "denial" process, and also covers some economic aspects.

He says:

Whether or not PO cuts oil prices by very much is another question. What will be the decline profile away from Peak Oil, in percent per year? Nobody knows, but informed guesses can be made. If the guess rate is around 3.5 percent per year, or even a little less than that, then it is likely oil prices will not shrink very much, and certainly not "collapse".
User avatar
SoothSayer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: England

Re: Peak Oil Disinformation

Unread postby aldente » Sat 06 May 2006, 04:42:37

certainly prices will not collapse.
Image
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil Disinformation

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 06 May 2006, 05:28:27

Andrew McKillop is just using peak oil in an anti-Darwin temper tantrum.

There are far more reliable and intelligent people to listen to now that McKillop has made an ass of himself.

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic19397.html+mckillop
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: Peak Oil Disinformation

Unread postby julianj » Sat 06 May 2006, 17:43:20

I agree entirely KillJoy! I was hotfooting (hotpixelling?) it over here to say the same thing but you beat me to it. I have really lost respect for McKillop over this anti-darwin drivel. V Peculiar.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Re: Peak Oil Disinformation

Unread postby killJOY » Sat 06 May 2006, 18:15:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') have really lost respect for McKillop over this anti-darwin drivel. V Peculiar.


One of the more peculiar moments in this unfolding saga, n'est pas?
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^
Top

Disinformation on the radio

Unread postby joewp » Tue 31 Oct 2006, 23:06:00

I was just coming back from buying more beer and listening to WCBS 880 AM in New York. It struck 9:00PM and the CBS national news came on. After the usual fluff about the soap opera we call "election season" here in the states, the announcer did the Wall Street coverage, reported the DJIA closing number and then said (paraphrasing) "Crude oil continued its downward trend today, losing 76 cents to close at 57.70 a barrel." If you can do a double take at the radio, I sure did one, knowing full well that crude closed up 37 cents at 58.73/bbl.

This is a national radio news reporting FALSE data to "Joe Sixpack" to assure him that oil prices are coming down all over the place, keep driving and make sure you thank President Bush with a vote for the Republican Senator and Congressman running in your state! In about 15 minutes I'm going to listen to the streaming audio at http://newsradio88.com/ and see if it's the same tape and/or he says it again.
    I see Shell announce a "new" discovery that's two years old.
    I see large speculators selling, selling and going short right before heating season.
    I see very bullish inventory data cause a one-day $2 spike last week that's been more than wiped out this week.
    I see an outage at the LOOP reported a week after the fact to ease the market after that bullish inventory report.
    I hear CBS News seriously misstate the price of oil on a news broadcast.
    I see OPEC production cuts shrugged off by traders.
    It doesn't look like Iran could move the oil market even if they detonated a nuke.
    Bad(bullish) news has driven this market down instead of up.


It's just very strange that all these unusual things are happening all at the same time, right before a very key election, the mid-terms in a second term of a Presidency that usually go against the President's party. Maybe I'm imagining all this, but it sure does seem fishy.

Be honest, is it me? Am I crazy or does this all seem suspicious?
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Re: Disinformation on the radio

Unread postby joewp » Tue 31 Oct 2006, 23:19:04

He said something similar at 10:03PM, "The price of crude oil continued to decline below $58 a barrel today".

Is this not a concerted effort to placate the sheeple's fear of high energy prices right before an election in which a Presiden'ts popularity rises and falls inversely proporionally with gasoline prices?

If its not a concerted effort, it sure looks, smells and tastes like one.
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Re: Disinformation on the radio

Unread postby PolestaR » Tue 31 Oct 2006, 23:45:57

I saw an Australian news broadcast which changed the oil price 3 times in the same segment (massive amounts and it's not a live price)... visually. Of course the reporter said it was going down.. but it had in fact gone up that day too... 2 of the 3 prices they showed were increases too.

It could just be people getting it wrong or using old data... we just pay more attention to the oil now and think it's a conspiracy because we see so many.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Disinformation on the radio

Unread postby Lighthouse » Wed 01 Nov 2006, 00:12:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'I') saw an Australian news broadcast which changed the oil price 3 times in the same segment ...


Funny though considering Aussis can't vote in the United States ...
I am a sarcastic cynic. Some say I'm an asshole. Now that we have that out of the way ...
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron