Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Entropy Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby nero » Mon 20 Sep 2004, 04:47:30

My favorite FTL travel mechanism is Bistromathics from the incomparable Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')ttp://hhgproject.org/entries/bistromathics.html
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Unread postby Chicagoan » Tue 21 Sep 2004, 02:26:19

Those UFOs seem to defy the laws of physics. If you want to learn more, do some research. Those things can break the sound barrier close to the ground without disturbing anything. It is like they have no mass. Sightings and abductions have been reported from all over the world, including remote villages in the Amazon.

Who the hell knows how those things work. It is anyones guess. I think the technology is thousands of years ahead of ours, if we are even capable of achieving it.

If you think I am going nuts, I don't blame you. I was a skeptic until I saw the evidence. It is convincing. This topic is much less depressing to discuss then Peak Oil. I must thank Mr. VOR for this diversion.
Chicagoan
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby lowem » Tue 21 Sep 2004, 03:25:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chicagoan', 'I')f you think I am going nuts, I don't blame you. I was a skeptic until I saw the evidence. It is convincing. This topic is much less depressing to discuss then Peak Oil. I must thank Mr. VOR for this diversion.


I'm sure there are people out there, perhaps some on this very forum, who would like to call you some very umm *nice* names (not!)

Was it Arthur C. Clarke who said, any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic?

I have no evidence, just a gut feeling, or maybe I'm just imagining, that "the gods must be laughing" ... :lol: - if indeed, there are beings out there with technology advanced enough that we might think it's magic.
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore

Unread postby Guest » Tue 21 Sep 2004, 12:51:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m sure there are people out there, perhaps some on this very forum, who would like to call you some very umm *nice* names (not!)


I don't know why. I was just expressing my opinion. I know it is off topic, but this is the open forum.
Guest
 

Unread postby big_rc » Tue 21 Sep 2004, 14:13:49

Is that you Matt Savinar? Are you trolling around looking for trouble? I can recognize some of your smartass sense of humor from your previous posts.
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Unread postby big_rc » Tue 21 Sep 2004, 14:14:49

Voice of Reason = Matt Savinar.
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Unread postby Guest » Tue 21 Sep 2004, 15:45:49

No, I don't think that is Matt...the net effect and logical position of those posts are the opposite..he would never propose entropy wasn't real...he is an alarmist...(Not that we shouldn't be alarmed! We should!!!!)

No,the tone, attitude, and use of irony is more like this guy:

http://peakoil.com/fortopic1454.html

Also note his creative use of guest names....
Guest
 

Why I'm Ultra Optimistic About the State of the World =)

Unread postby VoiceOfReason » Thu 23 Sep 2004, 23:58:34

Last week I posted several logical, well thought out, and thoroughly cited posts about why this "entropy" thing is either:
1. A total myth propagated by pessimistic doomsayers who are most likley mentally ill and hoped up on all sorts of narcotics and/or prescription medications. or,
2. Sort of like a common cold - you catch it, you feel under the weather for a few days and then you get over it. or
3. A minor problem that technology and the market will solve as easily as a machate slices through warm butter.

Today, I found irrefutable proof that I'm right: "Scientists Break the Second Law of Thermodynamics"
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992572

Oh sure, I know what some of you doomers are going to say: "But VOR, oil and gas are at all time highs, we're embroiled in a major oil-quagmire in Iraq, threatening to invade Iran, the dollar has lost value against the Euro, Bush will be calling for a draft, the economy is in the tank and about to get worse, etc. How could you possibly place all of your faith in one article found on one website about one experiment done in one lab that has done absolutely jack-diddly squat and probably never will for us out here in the real world trying to put food on the table and pay the rent while not seeing our kids shipped off to some hellhole to die for oil?"

Puhlease people, I"m not buying it. And the link I posted above proves it beyond all doubt.

Look you freaks, 160 years ago, most people had never even seen a photograph. Yet less than two centuries later, you can go down to the store and buy a 50-inch plasma television, take it home, and watch Survivor or Queer Eye for the Straight Guy!

When you live in a society that can provide utility like that, where do you get off doubting its ability to handle "entropy" and "$200 oil" and "possible thermonuclear holocaust."

Like I said before and I'll say it again: its called technology and the market.

You need to read up on them and stop spending so much time worrying about silly stuff like "oil wars" and the "military draft" and "the president threatening to call off the elections and institute martial law because he might lose the election" and "standing in bread lines cause oil hit $100 and the economy crahsed" or the latest total bs fad, "global warming." Speaking of which, don't even get me started on the recent hurricanes. Again, a big-ass myth propagated by a bunch of fear mongering book-selling eco-fascists liberals who couldn't get real jobs.

I live in southern california and I didn't notice no hurricane! What does that tell you?! Exactly, something is fishy here; for all we know, there weren't any hurricanes. Really, have any of you bothered to double check the credentials of those claiming there were hurricanes? For all we know, there working for the insurance companies who want you to believe the hurricanes happened so they can drive up the price of insurance!

Anyways, I promised to meet my wife down at the Ford dealership today to sign the loan papers for the brand new, $40,000, 10 mpg SUV we're buying 100% on credit even though we've got 6 figure school loans we'll be working to the day we die to pay off. So I'll talk to you folks later. :D
Last edited by Ferretlover on Mon 02 Mar 2009, 21:31:47, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Entropy Thread.
VoiceOfReason
 

Unread postby trespam » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 00:36:24

How many milligrams of prozac are you taking each day? I can see the add now: Solution found for Peak Oil Blues: Prozac.
User avatar
trespam
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue 10 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Unread postby SeattleBull » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 00:47:36

VoiceOfReason,

Thanks for the link to the New Scientist. I'm convinced as you are that science will take care of all problems. We just have to be optimistic and not let pessimism hindle progress. I'm sure that even if things get really bad on Earth, we'll eventually be able to design space ships capable of travelling beyond the Solar System. The nearest star is only 4 or so light-years ago, and I'm sure we'll be able to get there someday given the presently exponentially increasing rate of technological progress.

SeattleBull
SeattleBull
 

Unread postby NewYorkBull » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 00:49:54

VoiceOfReason,

Thanks for the link to the New Scientist.

I'm convinced as you are that science will take care of all problems. We just have to be optimistic and not let pessimism hindle progress.

I'm sure that even if things get really bad on Earth, we'll eventually be able to design space ships capable of travelling beyond the Solar System.

The nearest star is only 4 or so light-years away, and I'm sure we'll be able to get there someday given the presently exponentially increasing rate of technological progress...

Moore's Law always applies! Just look at the last 30 years or so of technological advances.

NewYorkBull
NewYorkBull
 

Reality???

Unread postby Zoe » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 01:10:40

We cannot be sure if we are suffering denial when we embrace the optimistic view, nor can we be sure we are not suffering some sort of demented apocalyptic wish when we think we perceive the dieoff nightmare. The evidence can be twisted however we wish to twist.

One thing that should be clear is that if we prepare for a worst case future then we will be in a better position to live with the cards that nature deals. Being unprepared only gives you a survival scenario only if the best happens, but if the worst happens then you are likely among the dearly departed.

Whatever the outcome, the universe will unfold as nature intends.

My own perception is slanted more toward the "dieoff" view when I take into account the gross overpopulation of the world and the dependence of these hugh numbers on nonrenewable resources for continued existence.

While it is a possibility that invention will come to the rescue with a surprise that has not previously been imagined, I think that with the state of knowledge today, this is more in the hope category than the high probability category.
Zoe
 

Unread postby Colorado-Valley » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 01:43:47

Technology is just a tool. Whether it's used wisely or not is the question you are avoiding.
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby VoiceOfReason » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 03:03:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Colorado-Valley', 'T')echnology is just a tool. Whether it's used wisely or not is the question you are avoiding.


"Just A tool"?! Blashphemy! Heresey! Skullduggery!

And most of all, just plain ignorance. Clearly, you've never sat in front of a 50 inch plasma television playing nintendo all day or you'd realize the foolishness of your statement.

No friend, technology is much more than just a tool! It offers the cures for all the world's problems. Okay maybe not AIDS, or cancer, or the common cold, or depression, or gridlock, but look at how fast computers are these days!

VOR
VoiceOfReason
 

Unread postby Rod_Cloutier » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 04:53:34

I'm fairly optimistic about the near term future of the world but your post seems to be somewhat out of touch with reality.

Break the second law of thermodynamics?- the post you referred to in "New Scientist" referred to an experiment conducted at a quantum level. At a quantum level all laws of physics become a matter of probability and uncertainty. We do not live in a quantum world. The higher laws of physics are real and unbreakable in the day to day reality of life on Earth.

Although I differ with Montequest's position on a lot of issues. Entropy dominating ordered systems is not one of them. Ordered systems can and do require constant energy to maintain them. Its a question as to whether or not we can provide alternative energies after oil is in terminal decline.

As I have indicated in other posts- alternative energy solutions do exist & can make up for some (if not all) of the energy we are currently deriving from fossil sources.

Being super optimistic about technology solving all are problems is equally unreal. If the economy declines and we can't afford the price of food- then we won't be able to afford the newest and latest technology on the market. Technology is a factor of cost.
Rod_Cloutier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: Why I'm Ultra Optimistic About the State of the World =)

Unread postby Rembrandt » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 08:38:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VoiceOfReason', 'W')hen you live in a society that can provide utility like that, where do you get off doubting its ability to handle "entropy" and "$200 oil" and "possible thermonuclear holocaust."

Like I said before and I'll say it again: its called technology and the market.


Hmmz i think this is your argument (the rest about hurricanes etc. has nothing to do with it and is irrelevenant in this case).

First of all as repent said that experiment is not applicable to the world as we can see, live and breath it. It is at a very different level of existence and thus not directly applicable to the case of entropy on the human level of existence.

Secondly technological progress needs time and money. The whole idea about peak oil is that. A. there will be no more market as we know it at the moment. It cannot be based upon profit anymore in the way as we know it now. Secondly there will be little time to convert on a superior scale.

If you say the market will handle it and because the market will regulate technology will pop up then you may explain to me how the market will hold up in a non growth situation.
User avatar
Rembrandt
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 09:43:59

I recommend that everyone just ignore posts of "guests".

I strongly suspect that we are seeing a deliberate attempts to create "fraud" threads which are little more than a guest "multi-naming" and agreeing with themselves.

I'd be interested how many MEMBERS here would support eliminating guest posting completely...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

beating entropy and money

Unread postby Geology_Guy » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 10:06:34

As a card carrying scientist I make the following proposal. If society is counting on beating entropy! it's going to take lots of science to achieve anything beyond experiments on the quantum level.

All scientists in the US should have their incomes quadrupled and be given free housing, fast cars (gasoline paid for of course) etc. It will take a lot of work to beat entropy and we will not do it for free.

I guess my serious point is- if you expect scientists to save us all, the USA had better start training and teaching a lot more scientists and pay them a lot more. Complexity is a direct function of energy input. If you want complex solutions to fundamental problems (entropy) it will take loads of energy (money in early 21 century terms).
Geology_Guy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby nigel » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 11:11:49

Aaron - speaking as a regular guest - I oppose the motion. I've tried twice to join and failed twice. As long as Guests use a name so what? Only problem arises when two guests post anonymously? At least we avoid getting blasted by e-mails from Matt Savinaar.
nigel
 

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 24 Sep 2004, 11:21:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')aron - speaking as a regular guest - I oppose the motion. I've tried twice to join and failed twice. As long as Guests use a name so what? Only problem arises when two guests post anonymously?


You must have cookies enabled to become a member here...

With guest posting people can post replies to their own posts.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest