by ReserveGrowthRulz » Thu 04 May 2006, 17:50:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mididoctors', '
')
How would that translate into a correlation with production?
Boris
london
I think it would be difficult to make too many assumptions about well density versus production. The example being, the US has had an odd million or so wells drilled into it, and produces some 5 MBOPD, whereas the Saudi fields have some 1000 or 2000 wells, and make twice as much per day, and will be doing so for quite some time.
In continuous accumulations, it is reasonable to equate well quantity with production and total reserves, but conventional results have way too much of a spread based on the geology available. Recovery factors start getting mixed in here, flow rates, capital investment and political considerations, results get tangled up with all of these factors pretty quick and you end up not being able to separate out exactly why this well has a given flow rate for a larger drainage area and these 4 wells have a similar flow rate for a smaller one.
So....heading into our 3rd year post peak and I'm still getting caught in traffic jams!! DieOff already!