Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

question for americans.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

how many yrs. till we lose ALL our civil liberties?

1 year
6
No votes
2 years
5
No votes
5 years
18
No votes
10 years
16
No votes
 
Total votes : 45

Postby Chuckmak » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 20:20:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chuckmak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'T')he day the liberals/Democrats finally take away all our gun rights is the day we lose all our civil liberties.
Which is why it confuses the hell out of me why people would even think of checking a D earmarked candidate on the voting card.


let's keep the 2nd amendment but throw the other 9 out the window.

AND ANOTHER THING...

u think checking an R on a ballot is any better?

we need a viable 3rd party. this jackass and elephant shit is too fucking much.


Because, on the most basic level, a man with a gun is a citizen, a man without is a subject.
I know its hard to fathom that an armed society would actually revolt against its government, but the fact is as long as we have guns we have a means to fight the Establishment. Its happened time and time again. Keep the subjects unarmed and you have total control over them.
And historically the Democrats have done more to take away our guns then anyone. And taking away guns is the first step to an unstoppable oppresive government.


you and k just 180'd my opinion

"WE GOT GUNS!!!" (c) M.O.P.
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City

Postby Macsporan » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 21:31:38

Specky, PO's favourite loudmouth, is now going to take out an Abrams APC with his trusty rifle and a molotov cocktail!

Hahahaha! :lol:

Please, go ahead.

I'll be right behind you, laughing my arse off.


By the way, have you:

Resigned you job and got another one in three days, tops?

Joined the US army and gone to fight for our freedom in the Middle East?

Gone to your local mosque and massacred the worshipers for God and Country?

I didn't think so.

Windbag.
Son of the Enlightenment
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Postby seldom_seen » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 21:47:35

"The tank, the B-52, the fighter-bomber, the state-controlled police and military are the weapons of dictatorship. The rifle is the weapon of democracy. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military. The hired servants of our rulers. Only the government and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws." -- Edward Abbey
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Postby Jdelagado » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 22:40:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'T')he day the liberals/Democrats finally take away all our gun rights is the day we lose all our civil liberties.
Which is why it confuses the hell out of me why people would even think of checking a D earmarked candidate on the voting card.


Right on..... No doubt here.

"D" is for DUMMY

jdelagado
User avatar
Jdelagado
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri 29 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Phoenix

Postby Specop_007 » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 22:43:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Macsporan', 'S')pecky, PO's favourite loudmouth, is now going to take out an Abrams APC with his trusty rifle and a molotov cocktail!

Hahahaha! :lol:

Please, go ahead.

I'll be right behind you, laughing my arse off.


By the way, have you:

Resigned you job and got another one in three days, tops?

Joined the US army and gone to fight for our freedom in the Middle East?

Gone to your local mosque and massacred the worshipers for God and Country?

I didn't think so.

Windbag.

I would take you seriously but honestly man. Your from Australia. Whats to take seriously about you?
You come from a line of pedophiles, theives and murderers, have a continent of mainly dirt and a few kangaroos, have about 3 cities on that whole barren wastelend and live under a bassackwards socialist regime that has people attacking one another with CROSSBOWS.
How on Earth do you expect me to take you seriously?
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby LadyRuby » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:04:02

Why don't I just go ahead and make myself a big old target here...C'mon all you Texans, give me your best shot!!!!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'I')N 1776, the civillian population had the exact same weaponry as the millitary force they wished to overtrow. The Redcoats had only muskets, cannons, axes, swords, knives, and other primitive weapons. The rebelling forces had access to the exact same weaponry of the time. If you were to compare modern day weapons regulations to the founding fathers, the Redcoats would have had musketss, and the rebelling army would have had only stone axes and spears. This is pretty much the case with the modern firearms laws. It is now to the point that the civilian population only has access to "millitary" firearms that are about 50 years out of date, (legally).


Okay, you're right Semler. Damn, give me my nuclear missile!!!

In 2001 terrorists killed almost 3,000 Americans, while during that year there were also about 16,000 homicides in America (similar to 2002). Clearly, we Americans are much better at killing each other.

By comparison, Canada has about 11% of our population and experienced 554 homicides in 2001. Canada has much stricter gun control laws. If we could bring our homicide rate down to the level in Canada, we'd save about 11,000 lives annually.

Go ahead, give me your best shot and tell me what a liberal weenie I am. There's just no denying the gun violence in America, and I especially resent the number of women who are killed by their husband/boyfriends:

http://www.regulateguns.org/fact_sheets ... micide.asp

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ublic health research has consistently shown that guns and domestic violence are a deadly mix. A 1997 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine examined risk factors for violent death of women in the home. The study found that women who were killed by a spouse, lover, or first-degree relative usually were killed in the context of a quarrel, physical domestic fight, or assault. Homicide was frequently followed by the perpetrator committing suicide, and a handgun was the weapon most frequently used. When looking at the risk of a woman being killed at the hands of a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative, the authors found that having one or more guns in the home made a woman 7.2 times more likely to be the victim of such a homicide.


Angry men and guns don't mix.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Postby Jack » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:26:47

By the same standards, alcoholic beverages, knives, and assorted blunt instruments should not be sold.

Sacrificing fundamental principles of liberty because a subset of the population engages in domestic violence sells our heritage far too cheaply.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:32:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'W')hy don't I just go ahead and make myself a big old target here...C'mon all you Texans, give me your best shot!!!!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('k_semler', 'I')N 1776, the civillian population had the exact same weaponry as the millitary force they wished to overtrow. The Redcoats had only muskets, cannons, axes, swords, knives, and other primitive weapons. The rebelling forces had access to the exact same weaponry of the time. If you were to compare modern day weapons regulations to the founding fathers, the Redcoats would have had musketss, and the rebelling army would have had only stone axes and spears. This is pretty much the case with the modern firearms laws. It is now to the point that the civilian population only has access to "millitary" firearms that are about 50 years out of date, (legally).


Okay, you're right Semler. Damn, give me my nuclear missile!!!

In 2001 terrorists killed almost 3,000 Americans, while during that year there were also about 16,000 homicides in America (similar to 2002). Clearly, we Americans are much better at killing each other.

By comparison, Canada has about 11% of our population and experienced 554 homicides in 2001. Canada has much stricter gun control laws. If we could bring our homicide rate down to the level in Canada, we'd save about 11,000 lives annually.

Go ahead, give me your best shot and tell me what a liberal weenie I am. There's just no denying the gun violence in America, and I especially resent the number of women who are killed by their husband/boyfriends:

http://www.regulateguns.org/fact_sheets ... micide.asp

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ublic health research has consistently shown that guns and domestic violence are a deadly mix. A 1997 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine examined risk factors for violent death of women in the home. The study found that women who were killed by a spouse, lover, or first-degree relative usually were killed in the context of a quarrel, physical domestic fight, or assault. Homicide was frequently followed by the perpetrator committing suicide, and a handgun was the weapon most frequently used. When looking at the risk of a woman being killed at the hands of a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative, the authors found that having one or more guns in the home made a woman 7.2 times more likely to be the victim of such a homicide.


Angry men and guns don't mix.


Ahh, typical iberal AGAIN. Look at statistics in a vacuum.
Whats the racial breakdown of those crimes?
See, I'm a realist and I'll say that non PC stuff that pisses people off.
Black people commit more crimes. I'll not say its a product of actually being black, but rather a socio economic factor. Hence, you could just as easily say poor people commit more crimes. Spin it as you wish.
Regardless, you have to compare socio economic factors into it.

Additionally, answer me this if you answer nothing else. If gun control works so well, why is Britain mulling around with banning KITCHEN KNIVES. They've banned guns. Crime continues. They honestly want to ban kitchen knives.
If gun control works so well, why is it they are looking at banning other weapons.
Secondly, why does Switzerland have such a low crime rate. One could argue Switzerland has more gun ownership then America! Switzerland is FULL of gun owning families. Why dont they have gun crime problems.

Yes yes. Lets be simple minded and have a narrow view. Its the guns that are bad. Bad the guns, crime stops. How retarded of a thought process.
People like YOU are the exact reason we HAVE the crime we do.

Thank you Lady Ruby for keeping our streets unsafe and keeping criminals on the streets and stripping away the Rights of law abiding Americans. :x
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby SidneyTawl » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:08:15

from where I'm sitting and looking at the situation.

The government hasn't had to fire ONE SHOT and they have accomplished what they needed to do for most people to not question their govt., say about 95 percent

fear to stand up for their rights

fear that rocking the boat is bad for their families

fear to question the govt's authority

fear to hold the quilty accountable because of the financial implications

fear to speak out if they feel they should dissent, and if they do they remain anonymous out of fear.

fear to join any group or organization that would cast a bad light on their job prospects.

fear not to have that latte each morning

fear not to have a car

fear not to have air conditoning in the summer


Dude the battle seems to be lost before it was one.

There is not much sense of history from the founding Patriots. What it took to give them "their freedom" has no meaning anymore. Its a fireworks show and music. They don't realize what they do has such big consequenses for the future, and they forget that those people in the Revolutionary war fought not just for themselves, they fought for the future, the future was something they thought about. They cared about the future and what this country would become.

Todays "citizen" thinks about only his "future", the country will take care of itself.

and so they give it away and don't realize,.. then its gone,.. getting it back will be a struggle they fear to face and so they relinfquish control of their lives.

THey find it easier to find a reason to say "what can I do, instead of what can I not do to straighten it our.


K, even if the population found the srength and the reasons to actually "go to arms", if you will, then the ability to fight such a battle was lost long long ago. And what weaponry is availble is of little consequence.

When armies went "modern" even back to WW1 with the airplane, the ability to rise up against a govt imo was lost, because the general public couldn't afford to "duplicate" the weaponry of the armies.


BUT

All the people/population have to do is not pay their taxes and only shop for the most necessary of items. Economic weaponry is what the people hold, but they don['t realize. In fact they have been trained to fear even one day without all their luxuries and toys. They fear to lose anything because they don't understand the cost of battle and the fruits of victory.

hardship, for a while maybe, but their was much more hardship for the soldiers and families who fought in 1774 -76.

IMO to bring down any govt. today you can do it by economic means.

What you think it would take,. and how long before the soldiers of the families that were doing this would drop their weapons and stop putting their friends and family in jail.

Getting the people of the United States to do such a thing would be next to impossible unless under the most extreme of cirumstances.

Thinking that the men and woman of the military would continue to fight against their own people for any lenght of time is someting to consider also.

IT takes numbers for change, and I don't see any.
User avatar
SidneyTawl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby k_semler » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:24:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'B')y tyranny we're not talking about the so-far minor applications of the Patriot Act or the Eminent Domain decision


8O Worse than that? Personally, I couldn't even imagine worse than having absolutly no property rights. I am now already on the brink of sanity. If the Constitution is usurped anymore, I honestly will probably go "Bezerk".

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'C')ancellation of elections or gross election manipulation, prior restraint on the press, disappearances and mass detentions of US citizens, bans on public assembly, etc. etc. you get the idea.


Yes, then I believe it would be time to do some really fast reading, and employ those tactics. ( I just got my shipment in today.)


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'T')hese citizen militias, acting under the command of local military commanders supporting the rebellion, would handle tasks such as guard duty, sentry, patrol, keeping order in liberated zones, assisting local law enforcement in liberated zones, a certain amount of light combat duty depending on circumstances, and a lot of combat support duty.


I can do zone patrol, combat support, and gaurd duty. I Gaurd duty would be my last option, as staring into the darkness for 4 hours with no end with no ability to smoke or drink would rather suck. I could do light combat, so long as I only had small arms, (I don't have adequate skill for artillery).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'B')ut the only thing worse is knuckling under to tyranny and giving up without a fight.


Exactly. I would sooner die on my feet, than live on my knees. I am a freeman, and no slave.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'A')trociously pisspoor planning from the top. Insufficient troop strength from the beginning. Insufficient armor and equipment. No plan for the post-maneuver phase of action. Atrocious intelligence leaks, including the outing of CIA covert operatives (Plame), sabotage of signals intelligence work (the Iranian code leak). Preferential treatment of private contractors. Insufficient training of guards in charge of prisoners. Top-level condonement of violations of the Geneva conventions. Hasty post-hoc measures such as stoploss-on-overdrive and fulltime combat duty for Guard and Reserves. A huge proposed budget cut to the Veterans' Administration, speaking of kicking wounded vets when they're down. And the endless ideological politicizations of the war right down to Karl Rove's latest little insinuation that Democrats are somehow disloyal.

About the only thing I disagree with you on is "condoment of Geneva Convention Violations". The reason I disagree with this is because of one reason, the enemy flies no flag, and are fighting for no nation. Hence, they are not subject to the Geneva Convention. I say apply as much force as nessecary to save lives. The VietCong employed this tactic quite well with favorable results. Yes, I dont really approve of shoving bamboo shavings under fingernails, or the Chinese Water Tourture, but don't you think turning up the heat, and turning air conditioning to 50F completly pails in comparison? Hell, I work in a laundry room all day long. It gets up to 115 degrees in there because the air conditioner is broken and I have 2 natural gas industrial dryers about 1.5 feet behind me. It sucks yes, but it is nothing 2 gallons of water a day cannot solve, and I wouldn't exactly consider it torture. Assanine yes, but not torture.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'B')ecause they have more important things to do than put their muscles where their mouths are?

There is only one reason, and one reason only that I am not in the service: They will not accept me due to lack of vision in my right eye. This is not correctable by modern medical science, nor do I expect it ever will be. If it would not be for this, I would have been killed along time ago. I would sign up tomorrow if they would take me, but they will not.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', '.')..our only hope is to elect a President who has real military background including command positions on his resume. A Colin Powell or a Wesley Clark. I would vote for either of them in a flat second.

8O DAMN! I never thought I would support a canidate you would! I thought you were a Liberal Democrat. I would support these canidates completly. Out of curiosity, what is your stance on Comrade Clinton? I absolutly DESPISE her, and wish upon her every plauge known to man.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'A')nd by the way, if you believe in representative democracy, separation of church & state, and the various rights ennumerated in the Constitution, that makes you a liberal too. A classic 18th-century liberal, but a liberal none the less. Liberal as in liberty.

I plead Nolo Contradore, your honor. I subject myself to the mercy of the court. Unfortuanatly, "Liberal" has been hijacked by the modern socialists/communists posing as liberal. Since when was the abolishment of property rights, forced indocternation into the "tolerance" society, and higher taxes than me after 4 bowls of BC Bud considered either "Liberal" or "Progeressive". Yes, I am for equal rights, and a 100% constitutional republic. I imagine I would be considered a liberal 120 years ago, but by today's standards, I am a far-right millitant that poses a threat to domestic security. I seriously would not doubt it if the federalies watch my every move.

Fortunatly, I am routed through 3 proxies whenever I get online, and reguarly secure delete all sensitive information along with a daily spyware scan, and bi-yearly FFR. If they are monitering my computer, they aren't getting much information. :) Fight fire with fire I say. One question though, what should I call the socialists posing as liberals? Socialist sympathysers is just too long to type. Maybe I should just use "Progressives" to refer to this enemy. Sounds like a plan to me, as they always want to change things for "progress", while ignoring the constitution.

Wow, I actually agree with you on so much! Maybe there is hope for a underground resistance / support after all? You are actually a person I would want fighting next to me, I don't care about your race or sexual orientation. You seem like you are on the side of the Republic, and that is what matters. We must have a common goal to be successful in the mission.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Postby strider3700 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:33:24

Well speaking as a canadian I seriously doubt that our low gun related homicide rate has anything to do with gun control, almost everyone I know has a gun of some sort. We just don't want to shoot each other as much as you guys do.

I'd also like to point out that you pro gun guys down south do seem quite crazy, having said that I'm very happy that you exist as I worry far more about your government then you guys.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Postby k_semler » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:34:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Macsporan', ':')
Resigned you job and got another one in three days, tops?

Joined the US army and gone to fight for our freedom in the Middle East?

Gone to your local mosque and massacred the worshipers for God and Country?


1. Yes, I've done that 5 times. No big deal there. Whenever I have lost a job, I always have another one within one working week, maximum. It has never taken longer. (except for the last time, I sat on my ass for a week, and got a job that Monday.)

2. I would already have been killed, I have already posed the reason in this thread why I am not a member of the service, or buried in Arlington National Cemetary.

3. Sadly enough, I have thought about it. To be honest the only reason I didn't was because I was not sure it was a mosque. (it looks like one).

Yeah, you could say I am teetering on the edge, but I just think I have too good a view of reality. Unfortunatly, that is what gets you locked up in an insane asylum. Oh well, if they give me free pot and beer, I don't care.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 01:47:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('strider3700', 'W')ell speaking as a canadian I seriously doubt that our low gun related homicide rate has anything to do with gun control, almost everyone I know has a gun of some sort. We just don't want to shoot each other as much as you guys do.

I'd also like to point out that you pro gun guys down south do seem quite crazy, having said that I'm very happy that you exist as I worry far more about your government then you guys.


Exactly.
Emotion driven senseless narrow minded liberals want to blame crime on the weapon. There too ignorant to admit it isnt the weapon thats the problem, its the damned criminals!

Make tougher laws against criminals, keep'm locked up and you want have crime!

Oh, the common sense. Or lack thereof.
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby k_semler » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 02:03:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'W')hy don't I just go ahead and make myself a big old target here...C'mon all you Texans, give me your best shot!!!!

Okay, you're right Semler. Damn, give me my nuclear missile!!!

In 2001 terrorists killed almost 3,000 Americans, while during that year there were also about 16,000 homicides in America (similar to 2002). Clearly, we Americans are much better at killing each other.

By comparison, Canada has about 11% of our population and experienced 554 homicides in 2001. Canada has much stricter gun control laws. If we could bring our homicide rate down to the level in Canada, we'd save about 11,000 lives annually.

Go ahead, give me your best shot and tell me what a liberal weenie I am.


No, that would be too easy. Plus, gg3 striatened that out. I now refer tyou kind as "Progessives", as you are trying to progress America striaght down the shitter. Anyhow, According to THIS, firearm discarges, (accidental and purposeful), rank 9th on a scale of 14. During the year 2000, 29,000 persons died as a result of firearms discharges. This equates to about 2.4261586638% of deaths that result from a firearm being involved at any point for any reason. The death rate among the general population is 0.834% in any given year. This would mean that your chances of dying in one year due to a gunshot discharge is about 0.020234163256092% Not exacly anything I am worried about. Hell, if your end goal is to reduce deaths, why not outlaw travelling faster than 15 MPH, and make smoking tobacco a class A felony. It would reduce deaths, so why not do it?T :roll:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'T')here's just no denying the gun violence in America, and I especially resent the number of women who are killed by their husband/boyfriends.

Angry men and guns don't mix.


And there is also no denying that Alcohol and heavy equipment do not mix. What is your point exactly? Alcohol and motor vehicles do not mix either. If I were to apply your logic, I would advocate banning of all alcohol and motor vehicles regardless of combination, simply because a few people mix the two ingredients to produce deatly results. Hell, I might as well ban hands. Thousands of people get choked to death each year. I say it is time to cut off everyone's hands who does not register them! We must get the strangulation problem under control! If you have opposible thumbs, it is obvious that you are going to commit a crime! 8O 8O Give me a fucking break! :x :roll:
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 02:09:56

Like I said K, they fear that which they dont understand.
Take away alcohol?! NO WAY! The Lady Ruby couldnt get loaded with her friends at the bar and have a good time while acting like an irresponsible slut!
But ban guns? Take away what is largely a responsible, mature sport? HAVE to do that! Firearms can KILL YOU!

Its an emotional based argument driven by fear and ignorance. It disgusts me.
Personally, we should do away with the 19th, Womens Sufferage. Lets see how long those Soccer Moms like restricting peoples rights when its THEIR Rights being attacked.

Like I said. Liberals are a poison on our society.
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby k_semler » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 02:31:48

I say we go one better. We station troops in all homes that have a person who voted for a demoncrap during the last two presidential cycles. Then we impose a law that those homes supporting a soilder are illegal to engage in dissent in any form, and also subject the home to random searces, and random seizures of persons and property. Also suspend the right of minors to vote, (under 21), and suspend Women's right to vote. Any offence against this will be considered aiding and abeting the enemy which is a reason to prosecute for treason. The minimum penalty for treason shall be no less than death by firing squad, (with all riflemen loaded). Aren't you glad I'm not president? :twisted:
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 02:35:44

k_semler for President!!

:-D
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby k_semler » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 02:53:30

:lol: *Campaign promise* Yeah!, (Howard Dean yell), Free beer for all, even if you don't like it! Yeah! (Howard Dean yell again).
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Postby Macsporan » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 10:24:34

Gun-toting Nazis engaged in mutual masturbation is not an attractive sight and I wonder what we have all done to deserve so much of it.

For my part I think that, far more than Canada, there should be very strict gun control laws in the US as Americans have shown that they simply can't be trusted with them.:-D

As for these racist slurs that most of the killing is done by Blacks, as they are only 10% of the population this simply does not hold up statistically.

There's a lot more people than Blacks shooting each other in the land of the free.

By the way KS, since the US already has the highest rate of incarceration in the world, just how many more people do you want to imprison? Stalin would be proud of you.

Since these dangerous Blacks should be under no circumstances permitted to have guns I suggest the K Semler and Specop should become gun-control advocates and lead a special police unit and do house to house searches for firearms in Black areas.

While this might not solve the problem it would be nice to give these chaps a chance to put their money where their capacious mouths are, for we know from long experience they are always looking for such opportunities.:razz:

It might also, by giving them something to do with their hands, lessen the tirade of cloth-eared bigotry with which we long-suffering POers have had to contend. If our luck's in it might even end it all together, along with their lives, at the hands of some gun-wielding Negro gentleman who is just as passionate about the right to bear arms as they were.

All jokes aside this stuff about guarding people's rights with guns is rather hollow.

Gun ownership has not prevented the Patriot Act taking away a good part of people's rights and laying the foundation for a future Gulag state. Nor has it prevented many of the other enormities detailed below.

To return this thread to a more savoury, not to say constructive, direction I submit the following.

Techniques of progaganda, arising from mass-advertising, have reached the stage where they verge on mind-control.

Consider the last twenty years: the American working people have seen their Unions smashed, their jobs exported, the living standards decline, their job security and conditions eroded, two presidential elections stolen, and a clique of neo-fascist maniacs take over the country without most of them rioting in the streets or even apparently noticing much.

They have even managed to recruit some of the victims of this relentless class-war to foam with hate not against their persecutors, but their fellow victims and those few clear-sighted people who have tried to stop all this.

None of the beinghted cyber-space superheroes, whose Onanist antics have so amused us on this thread, want to go and shoot the Republicans and the Rightist pressure-groups who have done this to them, but the Liberals, the Blacks and the Arabs and any other irrelevant scapegoat that the corporate mass-media has inserted into their dim minds.

There is of course a large element of personal stupidity in this, but a large element of manipulation also. If you can get people to drink poisonous Coca-Cola, buy nutrition-free breakfast cereals, unhealthy snacks and drive uneconomical, unsafe, shoddy cars, then it's not far to go to get them to blame Liberals for the devices of the Conservatives.:roll:

Divus et Impera. It's as old as Rome.

So, to my Confederate Degenerate sparring partners here, I say: you've been had, gents. You're on the wrong side in the wrong war.

Micky Mouse is Dead. Your masters want to eat your flesh.

It doesn't matter how many guns you have if you've lost control of your own consciousness.

The first step to liberation should be the destruction of your TV and the opening of books.

I'll be here to help you with the big words. :razz:

To those sane and stable people like Ladyruby and others I say, in the words of J RR Tolkien, "awake from fear and put aside the imaginations of Darkness."
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 13:15:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Macsporan', '
') The first step to liberation should be the destruction of your TV and the opening of books.


Dear Christ, Hell froze over. :shock:
I agree with Macsporan on something. 8O
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron