Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Nicholai » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 15:37:22

It's hopeless. Let us crunch the numbers and find out why.

The average American produces 20 tonnes of carbon pollution per year.

The average Somalian produces 0.01 tonnes of carbon pollution per year.

The world currently emits 7 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year.

Assuming that a global 'powerdown' would require an element of equality, a limit of 1 tonne per individual means a carbon output of 6 billion tonnes each year...Americans would experience a cut of 95% per capita and yet it is still not enough.

To bring to the world into any level of equilibrium, I'm going to assume that 1 billion tons of carbon production each year would be a decent target (since by now, most carbon sinks have been filled and most negative feedback mechanisms are close to the brink) this means allocating 0.15 tons per individual. THAT MEANS THE AVERAGE AMERICAN WOULD EMIT 1 / 133 OF WHAT THEY CURRENTLY PRODUCE.

Its hopeless, I'm moving to an ecovillage in Finland. I wish you all the best.
User avatar
Nicholai
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri 15 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: St.Albert, AB

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 15:57:09

I’ll rephrase the thoughts I have stated on many similar threads,

Barring totalitarian world government, the only solutions that will stick will start with voluntary actions from the ground up sparked by a handful of visionaries speaking loudly at just the right time.

One example is Rachel Carson ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Carson ) who single-handedly sparked change in the ag-chem business and started the environmental movement.

Gore may possibly have sparked another type of change, we'll see.

And it strikes me that perhaps GWB may have inadvertently succeeded where Carter failed.


Bottom line is, governments will always try to stay in power and as in everything else; the squeaky wheel gets the oil. Take a gander at the current political debates in the US and tell me it is not true.

Only if a sufficiently vocal and powerful group of their citizens become convinced the cost of change is worth the benefit will leaders then lead.


My solution is to continue to talk about the problem to those that will listen, at least plant a seed with those that won’t listen and do those things that you think should be done to power down.

Above all; walk your talk.


There is another Rachel Carson out there, so buy her a book for Christmas instead of an ipod.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Tanada » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 16:31:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'Y')ou have absolutley GOT to be kidding me! Auto racing, even counting all the fans going to and from events is so trivial an energy consumer as to be a micro-blip on the graph of use.


I said ICE racing, that means cars, trucks, boats, planes, motorcycles, go-carts, dune-buggies, quads, jetskis. I would go onto say it means banning all pleasure use of ICE cars, trucks, boats, planes, motorcycles, go-carts, dune-buggies, quads, jetskis and motorhomes.

By association, this would eliminate the manufacture of cars, trucks, motorhomes, boats, planes, motorcycles, go-carts, dune-buggies, quads, and jetskis for racing and pleasure use, along with all the associated industries that support them.

Don't think that would make a difference?


By association if by some miracle you got this proposal through exactly as you worded it people would shift en masse to manufacturing electric and/or fuel cell and/or external heat engines and you would get just as many pleasure craft. They would just either operate without directly consuming fossil fuels, or by some other alternative means. By attacking the ICE itself you are only poking the problem from one small angle, by zoning against suburban sprawl you are attacking the whole Peak Oil situation AND making future society enourmously more fuel efficient no matter what method of personal transport/pleasure craft they choose to use.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 16:53:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'B')y association if by some miracle you got this proposal through exactly as you worded it people would shift en masse to manufacturing electric and/or fuel cell and/or external heat engines and you would get just as many pleasure craft. They would just either operate without directly consuming fossil fuels, or by some other alternative means.

Seems like The Paradox Mandated to me – Mandate a ban on one use of a primary energy source and more will be expended to consume another source to the same end.

My thought is to make auto racing or personal watercraft, for example, as much of a social taboo as dog or cock fighting has become.

[edit, clarifification]
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 17:39:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'H')owever, it should also be about what sacrifices we must do.



By "we" do you mean "society" or do you mean "we individuals on this messageboard" ?



What sacrifices do you think we individuals on this messageboard must do?


Let's keep it real and specific, thanks.
Last edited by Ludi on Sun 02 Dec 2007, 17:42:01, edited 1 time in total.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Tanada » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 17:40:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'B')y association if by some miracle you got this proposal through exactly as you worded it people would shift en masse to manufacturing electric and/or fuel cell and/or external heat engines and you would get just as many pleasure craft. They would just either operate without directly consuming fossil fuels, or by some other alternative means.

Seems like The Paradox Mandated to me – Mandate a ban on one use of a primary energy source and more will be expended to consume another source to the same end.

My thought is to make auto racing or personal watercraft, for example, as much of a social taboo as dog or cock fighting has become.

[edit, clarifification]


That's a very tough row to hoe Pops! Cock fighting and dog fighting were always around but not omnipresent. Isolating and looking down on them was not all that difficult. ICE vehicles however ARE omnipresent, everyone knows about them even the poorest of the poor in Africa know what a car/truck is even if they can not afford one themselves. Much more of the population gets entertainment from watching ICE vehicle competitions than those which like blood sports, and yet despite the laws and social consequences blood sports are still pursued.

How much harder would it be to fight private vehicle ownership and racing/pleasure craft?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Duende » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 18:07:59

A couple thoughts:

1. Unfortunately, the individual liberties that humanity has worked so hard to establish over the past 300+ years will have to be reinvented/redefined rather quickly, at least to the extent that "the greater good" is considered. The problem with this of course is that our county is founded on principles of the individual pursuit of prosperity. questions regarding "how much one is entitled to" are impossible to determine to the extent that everyone will be happy (particularly those who do not see a problem with the status quo.

2. Our entire capitalist system is currently ideologically incompatible with sustainability. Business profits are predicated on the business's ability to externalize costs, particularly to the commons. Hence, the tragedy of the commons. Businesses need to completely internalize all costs of production, consumption, and disposal. Remember, there is truly no "away" to throw away to, particularly regarding air and water pollution.

Also, this obsession with "growth" - that is the expansion of the mining of the world - must end. I think one good idea is the implementation of demurrage instead of interest for all financial applications. This would increase long-term thinking in investments, localize economies via personal accounts, etc. I haven't thought it all the way through, but I think it would be good for a start.

Overall, the problem is that sporadic, personal attempts at making a dent do little to affect the situation. If we are to move toward, let alone achieve sustainability, we must work in concert with one another in order to build a critical mass of sustainable lifestyle choices. Walking to the backyard to reap lunch needs to be made as natural-seeming as zipping off to the convenience store in the car... for all of us, every single day.

The degree to which everyone would need to revisit their expectations for the future will be awesome, and the coordination and leadership needed to pull this planned, coordinated program off will be nothing short of legendary.
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 18:17:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Duende', '
')Overall, the problem is that sporadic, personal attempts at making a dent do little to affect the situation. If we are to move toward, let alone achieve sustainability, we must work in concert with one another in order to build a critical mass of sustainable lifestyle choices. Walking to the backyard to reap lunch needs to be made as natural-seeming as zipping off to the convenience store in the car... for all of us, every single day.

The degree to which everyone would need to revisit their expectations for the future will be awesome, and the coordination and leadership needed to pull this planned, coordinated program off will be nothing short of legendary.



What are you doing, or plan to do, to implement your proposals? What are you doing or plan to do to provide the leadership you speak of?


Thanks.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 18:29:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nicholai', 'I')t's hopeless. Let us crunch the numbers and find out why.

The average American produces 20 tonnes of carbon pollution per year.

The average Somalian produces 0.01 tonnes of carbon pollution per year.

The world currently emits 7 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year.

Assuming that a global 'powerdown' would require an element of equality, a limit of 1 tonne per individual means a carbon output of 6 billion tonnes each year...Americans would experience a cut of 95% per capita and yet it is still not enough.

To bring to the world into any level of equilibrium, I'm going to assume that 1 billion tons of carbon production each year would be a decent target (since by now, most carbon sinks have been filled and most negative feedback mechanisms are close to the brink) this means allocating 0.15 tons per individual. THAT MEANS THE AVERAGE AMERICAN WOULD EMIT 1 / 133 OF WHAT THEY CURRENTLY PRODUCE.

Its hopeless, I'm moving to an ecovillage in Finland. I wish you all the best.



I'm not convinced by those numbers. If to be fair on a planet of 6 billion we in the US need to cut our resource use to 1/5 of our current use, then if we are trying to have the footprint of 3 billion (the number many here agree is the carrying capacity of the planet) we in the US must use no more than 1/10 of our current resource use.


That seems very difficult but possible.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 18:50:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'H')ow much harder would it be to fight private vehicle ownership and racing/pleasure craft?


My only point is you will mandate nothing of importance without a popular consensus or iron fist.

Simply that.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Nicholai » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 18:54:43

Ludi. Our population is 6.6 billion. China has surpassed the US as the worlds largest carbon polluter.
China Passes US as Biggest Polluter

The oceans currently absorb 50% of the carbon we currently produce, although that carbon sink is filling up fast. Feedback loops become stronger and less predictable when carbon sinks reach their brink, in which they release the carbon they have long since absorbed.

Ocean Absorbs 50% less Carbon

How do you propose to sell this to American politicians? Be realistic, if you turned on the television tomorrow morning and Hillary got on stage and stated 'Americans must reduce their consumption by 80%.' What would happen to her? How would you go about this on a world stage?

Go to a Legislature or statehouse and you'll find out that people still believe it is 1975. The world is still small and America is still, and always will be, the world superpower. China builds our toys, French is white and Catholic and we should never trust the Russians. Things have changed, the mentality of our leaders has not.

How do propose we advocate for less consumption by each individual and still understand that our monetary system requires constant growth?

Who runs the show, ecologists or business people? Is Richard Branson asking people to use 90% less energy? No, he's putting his faith in technology. Technology won't solve our problem and neither will this fallacy of asking the entire planet to regulate individual consumption. It comes down to our idea of constant and perpetual growth but this will not be changed by some global epiphany. Negative feedback and a peak in oil supply will bring us back down to reality. By the time we realize our key problem, it will be far too late.
User avatar
Nicholai
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri 15 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: St.Albert, AB

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:19:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '
')By association if by some miracle you got this proposal through exactly as you worded it people would shift en masse to manufacturing electric and/or fuel cell and/or external heat engines and you would get just as many pleasure craft.


Not if you outlawed such notions. It's about the wanton waste of energy for sport and pleasure. That is a contruct of cheap energy.

It's time is gone.

That's where restricted per capita consumption comes in.

Proposal through?

You think that ICE racing won't have to take second chair to gas to get to work?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:23:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', ' ')By "we" do you mean "society" or do you mean "we individuals on this messageboard" ?


Both, of course.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:25:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'H')ow much harder would it be to fight private vehicle ownership and racing/pleasure craft?


Ah, the scale of our dilemma is seized upon!
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:28:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')I'm not convinced by those numbers. If to be fair on a planet of 6 billion we in the US need to cut our resource use to 1/5 of our current use, then if we are trying to have the footprint of 3 billion (the number many here agree is the carrying capacity of the planet) we in the US must use no more than 1/10 of our current resource use.


I read somewhere that if all resources were shared equitably, the standard of living for the world would be like that in Bangladesh.

And this was without peak oil.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:33:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nicholai', ' ')How do propose we advocate for less consumption by each individual and still understand that our monetary system requires constant growth?


Which is why I spent so much time on that thread topic.

Our Money System and Oil Depletion; Are they Compatible?

Is a debt-based monetary system compatible with oil depletion?
Yes
16% [ 37 ]
No
83% [ 184 ]

Total Votes : 221
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:38:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ' ')My only point is you will mandate nothing of importance without a popular consensus or iron fist.


Or, out of no other choice in the matter.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Nicholai » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:49:34

Montequest, check out my thread 'Spank Your Parents'
User avatar
Nicholai
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri 15 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: St.Albert, AB

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Duende » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 19:56:14

Ludi wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat are you doing, or plan to do, to implement your proposals? What are you doing or plan to do to provide the leadership you speak of?

Personally I've made choices which reduce my ecological footprint. I'm not completely there yet; I doubt many of us are. I eat food from the local CSA. I take public transportation whenever possible (which is often, thankfully). We've insulated our home, etc. Most importantly, I've educated myself regarding resource depletion and climate change to the point that I feel comfortable explaining it to others without sounding like a nut. :o

As a city planner, I am fortunate that I can actually affect change within my organization, and am actively making strides on that front. The curve is huge, I'll admit. And listen, I know how dire the situation seems. There are moments when I'm out and about that I see people acting in ways that confirms my suspicion that we are all screwed, and that coordinated change is impossible. But, I've found there are a lot of people willing to at least listen. The point is, I'm psychologically unable to just give up: the stakes are too high!

I firmly believe that the only way to work toward powering down will come through education and leading by example. That way, one of two things can happen: either positive change occurs due to the aftermath of some ecological meltdown or resource depletion "event", or better yet, we reach a "tipping point" when there is a critical mass of people acting in a coordinated way toward a common goal, for a common good. All this might sound indignant and humble, but it's all we have to give. And at the very least, those seeds of understanding have to at least be planted for us to have any hope.
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District
Top

Re: Powerdown: The Solution to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 20:03:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'O')r, out of no other choice in the matter.

Monte, I’m thinking that “you” as in any one person, group or government, faced with acting on a No Other Choice situation will be way too late in acting.

I suppose that is the source of my Macro Doomerism as well as my micro optimism.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron