Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Biggest Surprise Post Peak

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 09:46:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'T')he biggest surprise post peak is that people won't even notice we're past peak. Nor will they care.
You boy, are a damn fool.


Well, his comment compared to reality is pretty spot on so far, and he doesn't appear to post here while wasted, and he certainly doesn't proclaim himself to be here just to troll...so why don't you just crawl back under your rock and give it a rest?
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 09:50:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JJ', 't')he corn at the grocery I work for is .89 cent an ear.


Yeah, that's another thing the 4 for a dollar specials are gone. Seems like prices on broccoli and cauliflower have gone up too, but I don't know for sure.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') worked commercial fishing 25 years ago. The "trash" fish we threw away is selling for 6.99 a pound now. The fish are almost gone.


I'm glad I'm not the only one on this forum who's noticed this. I don't fish myself, but the long-time anglers I know can rattle off a lot of species that used to be common but are now a rare catch. I don't think any of the restaurants in my area use local fish anymore (maybe that's a good thing), for example the tourists think they're eating Florida grouper but it's really shipped in frozen from Vietnam. Which is weird, because this particular restaurant is on a pier where years ago you could catch grouper all day long.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby seahorse2 » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 11:40:04

We are at a production plateau without a decline. So, how has that affected us, what do we see? We see political changes and economic changes to reflect a production plateau.

(1) One could argue resource wars in the ME, that at the heart of US policy in the ME is the Carter Doctrine and thus we are fighting two wars in the ME bc the ultimate interest in the area is to protect access to energy (Klare's thesis in "Blood for Oil", a great read);

(2) We see recession;

(3) We see a highly volatile political situation internally in the US and externally (arguably the beginning of trade wars, currency manipulation etc);

(4) a growing disparity in the "haves" versus the "have nots" - aka loss of the middle class in the US discussed by Kaplan in "The Coming Anarchy" and another read of his "Was Democracy a Moment" link here http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/97dec/democ.htm

(5) as pointed out earlier, we see a "green" president and "green" Secretary of Energy now openly admitting that alternatives are not a substitute for fossil fuels (not in our lifetimes) and opening drilling off coast in the US and beginning the first nuclear plants in decades (all good moves in my opinion, but the first recognition there is a problem on the horizon).
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby AAA » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 13:18:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'A')s us diehard peakers now know, our world changed in the recent past from a happy and wonderful pre peak world to the horrifying reality of the post peak world we now live in. The exact timing of the most recent peak isn't critical to this question, just the concept that its been a done deal for 5 or 2 years now, depending on your choice of what "oil" is mostly.


When did we peak? Isn't it way toooo soon to be calling a peak?

Especially if we are on the peak plateau.
How can Ludi spend 8-10 hrs/day on the internet and claim to be homesteading???
User avatar
AAA
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed 12 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 14:11:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', '
')(5) as pointed out earlier, we see a "green" president and "green" Secretary of Energy now openly admitting that alternatives are not a substitute for fossil fuels (not in our lifetimes) and opening drilling off coast in the US and beginning the first nuclear plants in decades (all good moves in my opinion, but the first recognition there is a problem on the horizon).


Well, I agree that green stuff is good, but certainly none of this is the "first recognition", specific to political leadership, I would say Jimmy was the first President to recognize what was happening and advocate, including passing legislation, doing something about it.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 14:13:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AAA', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'A')s us diehard peakers now know, our world changed in the recent past from a happy and wonderful pre peak world to the horrifying reality of the post peak world we now live in. The exact timing of the most recent peak isn't critical to this question, just the concept that its been a done deal for 5 or 2 years now, depending on your choice of what "oil" is mostly.


When did we peak? Isn't it way toooo soon to be calling a peak?

Especially if we are on the peak plateau.


Well known peakers have been calling the peak for half a decade now....certainly the information available hasn't made liars out of them....yet....or....again. :lol:
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby AAA » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 14:48:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'W')ell known peakers have been calling the peak for half a decade now....certainly the information available hasn't made liars out of them....yet....or....again. :lol:


According to the March 2010 Oilwatch Monthly the most recent World Crude Oil Production peak was in 2008.

Then as we know, the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression happened. So of course oil production is going down. Not because of geologic constraints but because most companies slowed down the drilling of new oil wells.

I wouldn't be surprised if we hit a new peak in oil production in the next 3 years.

Calling for a peak less than 2 years from the most recent production peak is setting yourself up to look like an idiot. Similiar to everyone saying May 2005 was the peak. That proved to be false and then everyone started to discredit the peak oil community.

I recently read a article making fun of Matt Simmons because of his troubled past in predicting oil production and prices.
How can Ludi spend 8-10 hrs/day on the internet and claim to be homesteading???
User avatar
AAA
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed 12 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby thuja » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 17:08:30

Some of you may remember how pundits were discussing oil prices in 2005- but back then the thought of 100$/barrel oil was nearly unimaginable and cause for great concern. OIl had been trading in the teens for much of the 90's and still mostly only averaged in the 20's- 40's up to 2005.

Back then even hitting 50/barrel was a pretty big deal.

Now a scant five years later and we're at 85 $ a barrel and I don't feel near the same level of concern than I did from back then. So this would be my second greatest surprise. The first one is that we could even achieve 85$/barrel in a deeply recessionary environment. And my second surprise would be that most of the pundits don't seem to be that concerned.

Perhaps I'll be wrong as we push 100 again but so far...not much.
No Soup for You!!
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby davep » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 17:30:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AAA', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'A')s us diehard peakers now know, our world changed in the recent past from a happy and wonderful pre peak world to the horrifying reality of the post peak world we now live in. The exact timing of the most recent peak isn't critical to this question, just the concept that its been a done deal for 5 or 2 years now, depending on your choice of what "oil" is mostly.


When did we peak? Isn't it way toooo soon to be calling a peak?

Especially if we are on the peak plateau.


Well known peakers have been calling the peak for half a decade now....certainly the information available hasn't made liars out of them....yet....or....again. :lol:


Give it a rest, eh? Being out by a decade or so is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. The principle hasn't changed one iota. Your monomania is becoming tiresome.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby thuja » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 17:46:39

Wow- I swear my last post was not ripped off from the recent Forbes article but here they are saying almost the exact same thing...except they say the pundits were freaking out about 80$ barrel oil...



"Time was, not so long ago, that energy economists and pundits went practically apoplectic at the thought that oil might cost $80 a barrel. That's a price the world seems blissfully unexcited about today. The magic $100 number will change all that, reviving and reshaping long-standing debates around every aspect of energy policy."

http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/05/transo ... mills.html



Here's another key point that many of us PO observers have made...

"The oil price hiatus of the past couple of years came from the global recession (demand reduction) not from a supply increase from oil, or alternatives to oil. The past two years eviscerated 6 million barrels per day of Western oil demand. The emerging economies are of course the entirely new factor in the century-plus world oil market. At the same time as industrial-world demand collapsed, oil use in emerging economies grew some 5 million daily barrels per day. "


So I am left wondering what will happen when the global economy starts to rev up again- how quickly will high oil prices decimate the economy and send us spiraling back into recession?
No Soup for You!!
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby dinopello » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 18:38:49

Surprise ? I think it's going as most had predicted. Heinburg in "End of Suburbia" had said the peak would be difficult to notice at first as it will manifest as a series of economic downturns followed by recovery, following by energy price increases followed by downturns, rinse and repeat. Obama's "drill baby drill" shuld not be surprising as he had said OCS exploration was something we needed to consider during the campaign and had said Nuclear is needed at the same time while also saying he believed we go from "shock to trance" etc.

Meanwhile, my elected officials are all over it as indicated in policy priotities they elaborated this year (and similar in previous years).

Chairman of our County Board says

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or most, we take energy for granted. We flip a switch, plug a cord in an outlet, or fill the car at the gas station. Yet there is growing concern about the sustainability of our communities and our quality of life, because of our reliance on carbon-based fuels for our energy.

For our country, there is a compelling need to stop the dependency cycle of borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Middle East while destroying our collective environment. As our own Tom Whipple has warned, the time at which oil demand outstrips supply – peak oil – is near.



Vice-chair of our County Board says

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ustainability requires dealing with the present, but also preparing ourselves for the future, readying for the next sea change that is bound to transpire. As difficult as this period is, its adversity does bring some opportunities that can help facilitate the investment necessary for that future. Right now, the cost of capital is lower, the cost of construction is lower, and the cost of land is lower. True fiscal sustainability requires that we seize such opportunities when they arise.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 19:41:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AAA', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'W')ell known peakers have been calling the peak for half a decade now....certainly the information available hasn't made liars out of them....yet....or....again. :lol:


According to the March 2010 Oilwatch Monthly the most recent World Crude Oil Production peak was in 2008.


Yup....some have made different calls because of what they call "oil" versus "liquids". I stick with the earlier date because...well...I can.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AAA', '
')I wouldn't be surprised if we hit a new peak in oil production in the next 3 years.


Quite the possibility. We discussed this in the "how far after peak do we wait to be certain its THE peak" thread.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AAA', '
')Calling for a peak less than 2 years from the most recent production peak is setting yourself up to look like an idiot.


Hey, you know it, I know it, maybe together we can convince the peakers to stop doing it already?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AAA', '
')Similiar to everyone saying May 2005 was the peak. That proved to be false and then everyone started to discredit the peak oil community.

Your chronology is a bit off, I would say Colin and his original 1990 prediction started that ball rolling. Much of the recent loss of credibility has taken place since the amateurs adopted it as an excuse for...well...everything.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AAA', '
')I recently read a article making fun of Matt Simmons because of his troubled past in predicting oil production and prices.

Simmons has skin in the game, his agenda is much more obvious than most.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 19:46:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '
')Well known peakers have been calling the peak for half a decade now....certainly the information available hasn't made liars out of them....yet....or....again. :lol:


Give it a rest, eh? Being out by a decade or so is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. The principle hasn't changed one iota. Your monomania is becoming tiresome.


"being out by a decade or so is irrelevant" is certainly NOT the time frame envisioned by the likes of Lundberg, who measured PO effects within DAYS.

Its easy to say, 5 years after peak has happened, that "gee, I never said it would happen immediately" when the reality reinforces the obvious every single day we progress into our post peak world, but contemporaneous to when peak oil happened in 2005, such calm dismissal of timing was hardly the norm.

And the topic is, "whats been the biggest surprise for you" since peak oil happened, and I didn't see you mention one. Got one?
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby americandream » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 20:21:24

My biggest surprise thus far is the wide spread prevalence of the bonehead mentality, that has led and continues to lead vast numbers of Western households into unsustainable credit driven lifestyles, in other areas such as the use of global resources and economic growth. Whats even more stunning is the Morris dance of euphoria as China and India join us in the rush to the cliff edge. When Lovelock laments capitalism's hubristic tendencies, he is so on the mark.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', 'A')s us diehard peakers now know, our world changed in the recent past from a happy and wonderful pre peak world to the horrifying reality of the post peak world we now live in. The exact timing of the most recent peak isn't critical to this question, just the concept that its been a done deal for 5 or 2 years now, depending on your choice of what "oil" is mostly.

Now, I believe that each of us undoubtedly had a scenario or a concept in our minds about what a post peak world might look like, ranging from zombieland to renewable energy utopia.

So of all the wild and exciting changes which have taken place since peak oil happened, which has been the biggest SURPRISE? What one thing which you were SURE of, just didn't work out like you had figured?

Doesn't have to be a big thing, it can be a little thing, like someone must have thought that NASCAR would go belly up, there is just no way that racing gas guzzling billboards, let alone hauling them around the country in fleets of tractor-trailers, week in and week out, could survive peak oil, just no way!

Seeing as how I am as peaker as anyone else, I shall go first. In the interest of full disclosure, my surprise has been influenced by having been through one of these things before.

I have been absolutely floored, just stunned silent, by how little real gasoline prices here in America had to rise to cause the average American to react in a vocal and visible way (bitching and whining, blaming big oil, buying smaller cars, etc etc ). I would have bet my bottom dollar that enough Americans remembered the gasoline shortages and rationing and whatnot from the 70's to not be surprised, to have prepared in advance, to KNOW that sooner or later, such things would happen again, and to have a higher tolerance for the price increases.

So thats my biggest surprise, that a real gasoline price not really worse than the last one would cause the same types and volume of complaint...what I WOULD have expected is that the spikes in the 70's would have innoculated Americans much better, and therefore their full throated complaints and behavior change would have required a much higher real price of gasoline. Based on the chart I used, I would speculate that the bitching took place at about the same real price of gasoline....effectively no innoculation at all.

Here's a chart of real gasoline prices I was looking at when thinking about this.

http://www.inflationdata.com/Inflation/ ... _chart.htm
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby shortonsense » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 21:08:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'M')y biggest surprise thus far is the wide spread prevalence of the bonehead mentality, that has led and continues to lead vast numbers of Western households into unsustainable credit driven lifestyles, in other areas such as the use of global resources and economic growth.


Why is that a surprise? Its what everyone was doing BEFORE peak oil, certainly unless peak oil has the strength to shake the world like a dog a bone, it seems pretty reasonable that same old - same old would be more the norm than any surprise?
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest Surprise Post Peak

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 22:23:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')You only speculate in commodities that you think will rise in price, and that comes from demand overtaking supply.


The moral for peakers in all this is that price instability is a function of speculation. This speculation obscures the fundamental "pure" oil prices that we would otherwise face if it were purely a matter of supply and demand.

So we can't just interpret the charts in a self-serving manner.

What peakers tend to do is interpret all high prices as reflecting geological depletion, without factoring in speculation. Then when prices tank, it's interpreted solely as demand destruction (aka peak oil broke the back of the world economy, and causing GD 2.0).

The psychology of speculators is no different from Wall Street in the sense that they can push prices high in a bubble and then cash out and cause prices to tank.

Any analysis of peak oil should be much more nuanced than merely obsessing on the oil price du jour.

For instance, I don't think TOD has done a good job of really digging into speculation, certainly not as much as the 60 minutes piece that was aired right after oil prices tanked. That piece explained that speculation in the oil markets is a relatively new phenomenon, opened up via the same sort of lax regulatory policies and the desire among investors to find some new way to game the system when other investments run dry. This is really something that should be better understood. I've heard that some new controls were put in place to try to limit oil speculation but I don't have any details on it. We really should have a better handle on this so we don't have to guess how much oil prices reflect speculatory frenzy vs. underlying supply and demand.
mos6507
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests