by culicomorpha » Mon 15 Feb 2010, 13:55:05
Getting back to the claim made by Last_Historian, that there will be a return to patriarchy, it would useful to look at the definition of the term:
Patriarchy$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1') : social organization marked by the supremacy of the father in the clan or family, the legal dependence of wives and children, and the reckoning of descent and inheritance in the male line; broadly : control by men of a disproportionately large share of power
2 : a society or institution organized according to the principles or practices of patriarchy
My claim from the beginning was that I'm not seeing any evidence of a "return to patriarchy," largely because everywhere I look, I see women asserting their power. I can't fathom how men could possibly increase their disproportionate share of power from where we are now. If men derive their power from their breadwinner status - and this appears to be the case, then loss of outside employment ipso facto means they will have less power. Since I define freedom in the same way as Cicero, as "participation in power," then there is a direct relationship between the exercise of power and freedom.
The nuclear family is a very isolating form of social organization, and I just can't see it lasting very long, particularly if things break down as fast as many people here claim. Nuclear families will be sitting ducks in a context of gross violence. Larger organizations: clans, tribes, etc will offer much more in the way of security, and once the women are not solely dependent upon one man, they will naturally reassert their power in that context.
Partly I say this out of experience, being involved in a small community that is more or less equally split between men and women. The women have a lot of say about what happens on a day-to-day basis, and the men do not get what they want through the use of violence. Were they to do so, they would be banished. It has already happened. Instead, we try to draw upon the strengths of each particular person, regardless of gender. So again, I'm not seeing this "return to patriarchy" as a viable social organization going into the future. It seems to me a projection of what some men might like to see, but in my opinion it is delusional, and not based on facts or experience.