Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

"Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

"Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Stonemason » Thu 11 Feb 2010, 16:28:25

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0nERTFo-Sk

Here's a review:

http://mises.org/daily/4095

This video goes into the differences between the Keynesian ecomomics and those of the Austrian school, mostly Hayek. It may be interesting to Peak Oilers because of the basis of Hayek's message, real wealth comes from savings and investment using current resources, and of course no state intervention into the market.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby mattduke » Thu 11 Feb 2010, 17:29:44

Haha I love it.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Stonemason » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 18:38:24

A lot of interesting threads run through economics as pertains to peak oil. The government intervention in the market that has lead to overspending with borrowed money rather than saving and living within our means. The government counting on what they do best, steal money from individuals, to pay for programs that now because of said intervention is now unable to extract the same amount of revenue to sustain the infrastructure.

This is a really good video highlighting the Keynesian school of economics and the Austrian school of economics. Many of our problems in the present can be traced back to the debate between these differing economic visions in the last century which culminated in the so-called triumph of Keynes and the government intervention into the market, and growth based on future debt. Hayek and the Austrians of course favouring savings as actual wealth and investment based on sound acculumated wealth.

People want someone to blame, either left wing or right wing, the giant red herring of our age. The state cannot save the economy. The state is a parasite to the economy. It can only divert resources from the market to one project or another. It only subsidizes that which is not profitable and disincentivises that which is productive. Coercion removes incentive and motivation and increases procrastination and hopelessness. Taxation is theft. The state is the embodiment of force and coercion in direct opposition to the voluntary exchange of services and goods between consenting individuals.

You cannot solve the problem using the instrument that caused it.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 19:46:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', ' ')The state cannot save the economy. The state is a parasite to the economy..


I'm pretty sure the economy is part of the state and vice versa.

If you use money, you are being part of the parasite. I guess I'm just curious, do you operate on a barter or a gifting basis in your personal economy? Or do you use money printed by the state?

I'm guessing you also use a lot of other state services like roads, police, water supply, schools, etc. possibly? Doesn't this bug you every day? Wouldn't you rather use private roads, etc and pay for those directly?
Ludi
 

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 19:53:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', ' ')The state is the embodiment of force and coercion in direct opposition to the voluntary exchange of services and goods between consenting individuals.




Also curious to see some examples of how the state has acted in opposition to your endeavors to voluntarily exchange goods and services with other individuals.

Thanks.
Ludi
 

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Stonemason » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 20:16:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', ' ')The state cannot save the economy. The state is a parasite to the economy..


I'm pretty sure the economy is part of the state and vice versa.

If you use money, you are being part of the parasite. I guess I'm just curious, do you operate on a barter or a gifting basis in your personal economy? Or do you use money printed by the state?

I'm guessing you also use a lot of other state services like roads, police, water supply, schools, etc. possibly? Doesn't this bug you every day? Wouldn't you rather use private roads, etc and pay for those directly?


Hi Ludi.

The state cannot produce anything of its own accord, it uses wealth generated by the economy (ie taxes) in order to fund itself. Sort of like a parasite. Also, anything worth doing that it controls could be done without the threat of violence (force).

I am forced right now by the state to use a monopolised currency called the Canadian Dollar. Unfortunately if I tried to use another currency, it wouldn't be accepted by anyone. Most people believe that a currency should not be a commodity on the free market.

I do indeed use state services, as all other choices are disallowed by legislature. I would indeed choose to use the private services were they allowed to operate.
Last edited by Stonemason on Fri 12 Feb 2010, 20:20:25, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Stonemason » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 20:19:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', ' ')The state is the embodiment of force and coercion in direct opposition to the voluntary exchange of services and goods between consenting individuals.




Also curious to see some examples of how the state has acted in opposition to your endeavors to voluntarily exchange goods and services with other individuals.

Thanks.


Personally, I'd rather not get into it, however, I could think of a couple things off the top of my head that would constitute a voluntary exchange of goods and services currently illegalised by the state.

-Prostitution (not a big fan myself, but hey... live and let live right?... yea that may not float too well 'round here)
-Illegal drugs
-Gambling (in some jurisdictions)

I'm sure a quick google search with the appropriate wording could find you a more comprehensive list. Hope this helps.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby mattduke » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 20:40:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', ' ')The state cannot save the economy. The state is a parasite to the economy..


I'm pretty sure the economy is part of the state and vice versa.

If you use money, you are being part of the parasite. I guess I'm just curious, do you operate on a barter or a gifting basis in your personal economy? Or do you use money printed by the state?

I'm guessing you also use a lot of other state services like roads, police, water supply, schools, etc. possibly? Doesn't this bug you every day? Wouldn't you rather use private roads, etc and pay for those directly?

Money is a free market phenomenon Ludi. The spontaneous phenomenon springs anew in isolated villages, in prisons and pow camps, etc. That it has been abrogated by the state (and subsequently fallen in value 96%) is an example of the destructive nature of the state, not some "service".
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 20:52:46

Planning and zoning controls are often very anti competitive and seem to operate to protect vested interests not the interests of free trade or the consumer.

For example, my 2 home countries operate at opposite ends of the poles on this.

In Australia, one would be insane to even think about setting up a shopfront without $100,000 in the bank to begin with. Fork out about $10k in legals. Wait months for approvals. Pay quadruple residential rent for the shop. Pay commercial property tax. Then finally fit out the shop and stock it. Oops, don't forget to pay all the tradies involved $100 an hour and your staff costs a few months in advance. Your $100k is gone by the time you open the doors, you will be closing them permanently if the business is not successfull within 3 months or so.

In the Philippines, I just registered 2 businesses last week. Total cost $15 (USD). Rent $0 because it is a touristy business and the local government have given us a place to do it (right in front of their hall, 50 meters to the beach, on the main street.). We are building a demountable to accomodate the shop, cost under $1k. Tradesmen $10 a day. Staff $5 a day. Total to open the doors/ under $1500. Also we have the choice to pay our tax to the local government directly or to the national government. (We chose the former/ hence the free rent). Anybody in any residential property can set up a family business. If you have no property you can run it out of a bicycle or on foot.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 21:05:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', '
')Money is a free market phenomenon Ludi. The spontaneous phenomenon springs anew in isolated villages, in prisons and pow camps, etc. That it has been abrogated by the state (and subsequently fallen in value 96%) is an example of the destructive nature of the state, not some "service".



I guess I'm just not sure how the state is preventing people from exchanging goods and services. Even in the above examples, I'm not sure that the state is really concerned. If a man wants to exchange food for sex, by taking a lady out for dinner before going back to his motel room with her, it's unlikely the state will give a rat's ass. I'm pretty sure you can make a bet about anything at just about any time and "the authorities" don't care. People place bets here at po.com all the time and I've never seen a moderator come into such a thread and say "hey that's illegal." Illegal drugs are illegal to possess, so barter or exchange of them is sort of incidental to the illegality of possession.

So, I'm not really convinced the state is coming between individuals' desire to exchange goods and services.

But then, I'm usually not convinced when people claim they are being prevented from doing something by the state. Usually they actually haven't been prevented from doing anything, and their examples are lame (as above).

Nobody is preventing us from engaging in a gifting economy. The state does not care if you give a girl a fur coat in exchange for sex.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 21:12:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'P')lanning and zoning controls are often very anti competitive and seem to operate to protect vested interests not the interests of free trade or the consumer.



Nobody is preventing you from exchanging gifts with your neighbors. Why you would think of yourself or your neighbors as "consumers" is a bit weird to me.

Maybe I'm just looking at this from a different perspective. 8O It seems to me people want to operate within the existing economy using government "services" such as roads, power grid, etc for their business (storefront or whatever) without having to pay taxes to support those "services."

Now mind you I'm not super in favor of the state, taxes, and all that. Not much at all. But I also don't believe people are being nearly as prevented from living a different way as they claim to be. Mostly the state doesn't care what you do if you don't make a big deal about it. At least that has been my experience so far.....
Ludi
 
Top

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Stonemason » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 21:16:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') guess I'm just not sure how the state is preventing people from exchanging goods and services. Even in the above examples, I'm not sure that the state is really concerned. If a man wants to exchange food for sex, by taking a lady out for dinner before going back to his motel room with her, it's unlikely the state will give a rat's ass.


That's called a date by my reckoning Ludi. What is the difference between exchanging food and exchanging money? Are they not both voluntary exchanges?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'m pretty sure you can make a bet about anything at just about any time and "the authorities" don't care.


I'm not sure where you live. If I opened a casino in my basement and "the authorities" caught wind of it, they'd be plenty interested.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')llegal drugs are illegal to possess, so barter or exchange of them is sort of incidental to the illegality of possession.


Have you ever heard of "possession with intent to distrubution"? Tends to make the repurcussions worse by orders of magnitude.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'B')ut then, I'm usually not convinced when people claim they are being prevented from doing something by the state. Usually they actually haven't been prevented from doing anything, and their examples are lame (as above).


That would be an ad hominem logical fallacy. It doesn't matter if the person claiming these things have had them happen to them or not. It matters if what they say is valid or not.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'N')obody is preventing us from engaging in a gifting economy. The state does not care if you give a girl a fur coat in exchange for sex.

What in the difference between a fur coat and cash makes one a voluntary exchange and not the other?
Last edited by Stonemason on Fri 12 Feb 2010, 21:36:42, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: "Fear The Boom and Bust" Hayek vs. Keynes Rap video

Unread postby Stonemason » Fri 12 Feb 2010, 21:20:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'N')obody is preventing you from exchanging gifts with your neighbors. Why you would think of yourself or your neighbors as "consumers" is a bit weird to me.


It's called "enlightened self-interest". When I open a bar I'm not selling beers to make my neighbours happy, I'm selling them beers to get their money. Both parties get what they want in such circumstances.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'M')aybe I'm just looking at this from a different perspective. 8O It seems to me people want to operate within the existing economy using government "services" such as roads, power grid, etc for their business (storefront or whatever) without having to pay taxes to support those "services."


Personally, I just want to not have a gun to my head forcing me to pay for only one option. There are many non-violent ways to provide services to people.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'N')ow mind you I'm not super in favor of the state, taxes, and all that. Not much at all. But I also don't believe people are being nearly as prevented from living a different way as they claim to be. Mostly the state doesn't care what you do if you don't make a big deal about it. At least that has been my experience so far.....


No disrespect intended at all Ludi but one anecdotal experience does not constitute objective reality.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron