by pablonite » Thu 04 Feb 2010, 14:12:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heinberg', 'I')ncreasingly I am forced to conclude that the object of the game that world leaders are actually playing is not to avoid collapse; it's simply to postpone it a while so as to be the last nation to go down, so yours can have the chance to pick the others' carcasses before it meets the same fate.
Precisely what the game is. The biggest hurdle for TPTB is maintaining control at all costs, whether they be Chinese, American, European or true internationalists.
But the last nation state went down a long time ago with globalization of the monetary system, work force and politics. The question is moot, China is a respected member of the UN - with headquarters is in New York. Russia is in the game too.
The players are big energy, big military and on top - big money. The bankers in the end decide who gets what as has been the case since at least 1694 with the creation of the empires central bank, the Bank of England. The primary target of the bank is and always has been the sovereign nation state in control of its own currency. China is not really in control of its monetary system anymore than Russia or America is.
The only question to be asked is how much longer this concentration of wealth into the hands of internationalists can go on before a redistribution or complete smack down takes place to avoid "collapse". Sure, there are subtle differences among the nations of the world but like someone else said, an alien visiting this planet would be struck more by the similarities.