Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Precious Metals in General

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby Malthus » Wed 27 Apr 2005, 17:43:24

The answer of this question is very easy because precious metals is money in its purest most liquid form. If it wasnt we wouldnt be holding in central bank vaults instead we might replace it with guchi handbags,wheat or ammo. Dont let those idiots at wallstreet fool you that the colored paper that you hold in your wallet is money it is not, it is a federal reserve note that is in virtually unlimited supply.
Gold and the other precious metals have a very particular quality from an economic point of view their marginal utility is constant this means that the first krugerrand brings you the same utility as the last one. With normal goods marginal utility is declining the 1st car is very useful, 2nd is an offroad vehicle somewhat useful, 3rd much less useful etc. You may object by saying that this is the case with your colored paper and it will be true however if we look at utility in time we will see that the marginal utility of all goods paper money included falls with time. Your house brakes appart and provides less utility each year unless you conduct repairs, your paper money looses value by some understated percent each year etc. Gold and silver and the PGMs usually maintain their value in time the exception is the last 2 decades where due to heavy central bank sales and lots of leasing to bullion banks the price of gold has been kept in check in face of declining mine production in the last 3 years. With silver the situation is even worse 16 years of production deficit and 39,5 out the 40 billion ounces of silver ever produced is gone in industrial applications and photography, no wonder why Warren Buffet cornered the market by buying about 25% of the phisical above ground supply (around 140 million ounces).


Imagine that you lived in Germany in 1913 and had lots of reichsmarks (paper) some gold and land in western Poland. By the end of the war you ve lost your land because Poland gained its independence and conficated and sold the land of the germans that left to live in Germany, the reichsmarks you ve had are worth less than the paper they were printed on but you can spend your gold as money. Imagine that you didnt touch it and wait for the end of WWII. Now the reichsmark is still worth less than the paper it is printed on. Germany is kaput there are no more Reichsmarks and yet your gold is spendable and purely liquid. If you find a treasure on some island full of spanish gold coins it would be spendable money although the gorvement that issued it is long gone. Can you say the same about paper money or other goods from that century they would be pretty worthless by now wouldnt they. All fiat currencies are inflated into extinction even the most stable like the dollar or the swiss franc lose some 90% of their value every 30 years. Precious metals are always choosen by the market as money the stuff that you have in your wallet is money by decree of law, it is an illusion.


People and gold have a very long history, gold is the 1st metal known to man. Gold's beauty and grace were the reason why man became interested and started working with metals in the 1st place. Virtually everybody that has seen a gold coin with high gold content (22karats) recognises it's value. I will tell you a personal story I was in a restaurant with 3 friends and the bill came it was about 100$ I forgot to take some cash with me and I didnt have a credit card but had 10 soverigns in my wallet (a sovereign is a bit over 100$ it was a bit over 100$ back in the late 80s when I was in the restaurant) So I took out the sovereign and left it on the table to see what happens the waiter immeadiately recognised the coin and paid the bill from his wallet and kept the coin for himself.One of my friends looking at the other sovereigns said "lol this is money we used to have" and the other one said "it is the money we should have". If there are still humans in 1000 years there would recognise the value of gold and mine it long after the stupid keynesianism is dead and forgotten

Now the choice is not between gold and land it is both gold and land and I have lots of them a bit less than 300 hectares of which 100 forest 200 farmland and 2000 ounces of gold + 25000 ounces of silver + 500 ounces of palladium that I am waiting to arrive soon. I save 95% of my income 1/3 of that goes to precious metals. If you dont have enough money to invest in large quantities of gold you should try silver which is undervalued even campared with gold as Geology guy pointed out silver is the best metal in electronics virtually all that you have uses some silver somewhere in its production.Gold above ground supplies are about 2 billion ounces (virtually all the gold that we have ever produced is stored somewhere) as for silver 0.5 billion ounces of above ground supply you get the picture. Historical gold silver ratio is 1:15 today it is 1:60.
If you want to buy gold but can only afford small quantities for the time being you should not buy phisical gold because you would pay a lot for mail and insurance instead put you money with a stock broker with a 2:1 leverage and buy a gold ETF when you gather enough money (~40k) sell the ETF and buy the gold thus you would insure yourself against some rapid appreciation in the price of gold you can to this with a futures contract too. However I should warn you that an ounce of gold today would probably buy less tomorrow not because gold would be worth less all the contrary but there would be much less to buy.
Last edited by Malthus on Wed 27 Apr 2005, 18:00:10, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Malthus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat 15 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: varies

Unread postby Malthus » Wed 27 Apr 2005, 17:51:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')ut what about the scenario where economies stagnate but remain intact, where markets struggle and deflate but remain in place, currecies fold and are replaced - happened in brasil and mexico several times over, potholes don't get fixed, but police still patrol. people may cling even harder to their institutions when they are scared of scarecity. the german currency collapse between the wars didn't seem to weaken the law and order contingent. i think we will have a legitimate market for quite a while, esp in commodities.


Crime sky rocketted in Germany during the hyperinflation, everything was worth stealing even doors or gasoline from cars, the cars them selves virtually everything. And yes currencies will be replaced but you will be left holding bag when hyperinflation occurs unless you hold the right currency (gold) I have a 20 billion and 50 billion reichsmark banknotes in my collection. Even without the gloom and doom stuff we would see gold quoted in 4 digits before the end of the decade.
User avatar
Malthus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat 15 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: varies

Unread postby RdSnt » Wed 27 Apr 2005, 21:11:23

It's not just belief that makes gold, in particular, historically valuable. At the most pragmatic level it is valuable because it doesn't degrade. All the gold that has been mind over the past 5000 years is still here. Some certainly has been lost but it is still gold. Steel isn't that valuable because it rusts, returns to it's constituent elements. Gold is unique.

Historically all currencies were supported by gold, meaning that the bills and coins you held in your hand derived their value directly from a corresponding amount of gold.
There's a problem with this system, a country is forced to be prudent with their money, because it was limited to how much gold the government held in reserve. If a country wanted to print more money than they had gold, well the value of the printed money would just drop to match the gold reserves.

The US didn't want to play by those rules, they wanted to print as much money as they chose to. So they abandoned to gold standard. This has worked quit well for the world economy over the past 40 years. Unfortunately what this fait money system is is a giant cheque kiting scheme.
Now of course the US is in such deep debt that all the major economies are forced to prop the whole phoney scheme or face a complete, global financial collapse. All their currencies are pegged to the US dollar which doesn't have any value any more accept the vicious circle of foreign government buying US dollars to keep it from collapsing.

That the US financial system if going to collapse catastrophically is inevitable. It's really simple math. At present foreign governments MUST buy 2+billion US dollars EVERY DAY, to prop up the US economy. That money currently represents 80% of all the daily money supply used to back currencies. As the US debt is growing exponentially, sometime within the next 6 to 12 months the world will run out of money to keep the US debt affloat.
It's like Peak Oil, there will be oil left but no more and it will get worse as the demand for oil increases. It's worse though for the US debt, there is no way to cut back the growth except to collapse the economy.

At the moment, you are guaranteed the gold will, over the medium term, will increase in value simply because the US dollar is loosing value.
When the dollar collapses gold will shoot through the roof, it will be the only money that actually will have value.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby joewp » Wed 27 Apr 2005, 23:42:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('epononymous', 'I') believe I read somewhere in the past year or two (either MSN or TheStreet.com) that the amount of gold that is produced each year well exceeds what is needed for all industrial and luxury uses. In theory excess supply should push down the value and cause production to slow, but it doesn't because all of humanity seems to agree that gold is inherently valuable simply because it's gold. I suppose that could change but it seems to be so ingrained in our way of thinking that we'll never see that change in our lifetimes. IMHO


This brings up the point as to how much gold can be mined without fossil fuels? I'm no gold mining expert, but I'm sure it's energy intensive. At a certain point, it might become too costly to use the energy on gold mining. More reason to hold onto some gold coins for the long term.
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Unread postby aflurry » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 10:46:56

RdSnt,

What is your opinion of gold commodities contracts versus buying the actual metal?
User avatar
aflurry
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Zentric » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 16:10:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', '
')
This brings up the point as to how much gold can be mined without fossil fuels?


That is the question, Joewp. If we could forecast which worldwide industries would be most important post-peak, and how much fossil energy (or, conversely, human labor) we'd need to mine or recycle the gold, silver, rhodium, platinum or palladium required for them, then we might be able to calculate the relative post-peak worth of each of these commodities, keeping in mind the following:

1) At some point, could the scarcity of any one metal (or any other input, really) actually serve to capsize the given industry?

2) To what extent could the PGM and other metals be used interchangeably by the post-peak industries, since flexibility - the ability to adapt to shortages of a given commodity - will be paramount in the years to come.

3) Sometimes extraction or recycling processes can be flexible too. For example, when doing a final extraction for rhodium, maybe you use a process that tends also to pickup gold but not silver, since, on any given day, depending on the commodities' relative worths, one process is likely to give you a better yield than another.

Also, is anyone else curious why United States announced yesterday it will soon be getting back bigtime into the gold coining business? I honestly don't know what I'm talking about, but two ideas are that (1) they want to sell the metal they have stashed in reserve to "bolster" the dollar a little longer, since, by now, they're probably desparate. And (2) when they sell you the new gold coins, they'll take down your name and address so that they can collect them back from you later. (Or maybe I'm not just being paranoid.)
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby joewp » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 18:53:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zentric', '
')
That is the question, Joewp. If we could forecast which worldwide industries would be most important post-peak, and how much fossil energy (or, conversely, human labor) we'd need to mine or recycle the gold, silver, rhodium, platinum or palladium required for them, then we might be able to calculate the relative post-peak worth of each of these commodities, keeping in mind the following:

1) At some point, could the scarcity of any one metal (or any other input, really) actually serve to capsize the given industry?


I look at gold as more of a medium of exchange than a raw material. I don't think there will be that many "industries" as we go down the wrong end of the production curve.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Also, is anyone else curious why United States announced yesterday it will soon be getting back bigtime into the gold coining business? I honestly don't know what I'm talking about, but two ideas are that (1) they want to sell the metal they have stashed in reserve to "bolster" the dollar a little longer, since, by now, they're probably desparate. And (2) when they sell you the new gold coins, they'll take down your name and address so that they can collect them back from you later. (Or maybe I'm not just being paranoid.)


Which is why I'm buying Canadian Maple Leafs from independent dealers. Even if they catalog my name and address, I can always say "I lost them", right? :wink:
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida
Top

Unread postby RdSnt » Thu 28 Apr 2005, 22:57:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aflurry', 'R')dSnt,

What is your opinion of gold commodities contracts versus buying the actual metal?


Buy the real thing. Unless you are playing with the big fish (meaning you have lots of money you are willing to loose) contracts are simply a speculative tool looking for big profits. If the market fails the contracts are worthless.
While in the short term your actual metal could increase in value quite a bit, the best part of having the gold in your hand is that it will retain useable value, to be exchanged for essentials.

I recommend Maple Leaf coins and bars, not because I'm Canadian but because it is the purest gold, 4-9's. That means 99.99% purity.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Unread postby merecat » Thu 05 May 2005, 01:52:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', 'E')ven if they catalog my name and address, I can always say "I lost them", right? :wink:


he he, yup i'm very careless, i'm regularly "losing" my 1Oz coins ;)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', '
')I recommend Maple Leaf coins and bars, not because I'm Canadian but because it is the purest gold, 4-9's. That means 99.99% purity.


Good call RdSnt, maples are a lovely bullion coin, nice and yellow! no question or doubt about it they're GOLD to anyones eye!

note: I accidentally bent some 1OZ maples when i had them angle stacked in my back jean pocket :( , they're that soft!

P.S.
Anyone here agree with the idea that gold is being artificially devalued by the fed like GATA states?
User avatar
merecat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri 22 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Unread postby Malthus » Thu 05 May 2005, 02:28:14

The only objection I have against buying maple leaf coins is that you pay too much premium over the spot for them although there are really beautifull I have a few. For krugerrands you pay 7$ premium delivery included, for maple leafs you pay 20-23 depending on the dealer. So why pay more gold is gold and gold in Krugerrands are just as easily recognisable as maple leaf coins. Besides the 22 karat standard is used to prevent the coins from benting becaause gold is very malleable it is another flaw for the maple leaf.
User avatar
Malthus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat 15 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: varies

Unread postby jimmydean » Thu 05 May 2005, 12:19:53

What is the best way to actually buy gold in terms of storage.

I don't like the idea of actually having to worry about storage.

thanks in advance
User avatar
jimmydean
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu 05 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby frankthetank » Thu 05 May 2005, 12:33:48

You could bury it in the backyard, hide it in your wifes panty drawer (HA HA), or even drop it at my house, i'll keep a watchful eye on it. :)

Really, i would probably buy a safe and chain that bastard to the foundation of the house or hide it somewhere.

Are you people buying these Krugerands over the internet or in your local town?
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Precious Metal or Energy Mutual Funds to protect from PO

Unread postby chuck6877 » Thu 19 May 2005, 17:44:55

What do you guys think will be a better option, Precious Metal Mutual Funds or Energy Mutual Funds when stuff starts to get bad?

I'm thinking about putting my money 50/50 between the two.

I think I know which Energy Mutual Fund I'm going to buy. What are the Energy Mutual Funds you would suggest though?

Do you guys have any SUGGESTIONS about which Precious Metal Mutual funds are good? Should I just buy a GOLD mutual Fund or diversify amongst all precious metals?

Thanks,
Chuck
User avatar
chuck6877
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby qwanta » Fri 20 May 2005, 08:44:12

You could also consider a pool account such as www.kitco.com has. You buy physical gold/silver but without taking delivery so you can sell it at anytime. There's also a gold ETF (exhange traded fund) called GLD which you can buy like a stock but it traces the gold price. It's an easy hassle-free way to get into gold, but there are some issues in terms of exactly how much bullion is backing it.
Gold stocks seem to have more growth potential if gold prices rise, especially junior stocks, but I think it's a good idea to also invest in physical, because if peak oil hits hard, mining costs are also going to be impacted.

What energy funds have you been looking at?
User avatar
qwanta
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue 08 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby chuck6877 » Fri 20 May 2005, 13:14:37

After research on Morningstar.com by going to FUNDS and then fund comparison tool,

I first searched for NATURAL RESOURCES FUNDS (ENERGY FUNDS)

I decided on this am Energy Mutual Fund:
Global Natural Resources (RSNRX)

I then searched for PRECIOUS METALS FUNDS (Gold, silver, etc.)

I decided on this Precious Metal Fund:
Tocqueville Gold Fund (TGLDX)

I'm young, so I don't have that much money, but I filled out the fund applications today. I'm splitting my IRA 50/50. I hope they get there in time! :)

I think mutual funds are a lot better way to invest than individual stocks.

I'm putting my 401(k) money in Foreign stocks and a Capital Preservation fund(money market accout basically).

Unfortunately my 401(k) doesn't have a gold or energy fund:(

I'm putting my money in foreign stocks because I think the US will crash more than anywhere else, especially with the Housing bubble, Credit card debt etc. The falling dollar should bring up the international stocks. I hope.

Chuck
User avatar
chuck6877
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby cat » Sat 21 May 2005, 12:30:35

Has anyone out there had any expierence with platinum? Platinum is needed for the making of fuel cells.
User avatar
cat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western Washington

Unread postby NEOPO » Sun 22 May 2005, 22:15:49

I would buy a farm, grow excess food and trade the suckers out of their gold and oil when they are starving ..heh........so thats a hold on gold and energy and a buy on land,seeds and anything agri,alt,pv,bio !!!

Ham sandwich = gallon of gas
Head of lettuce = Thats a very nice ring you have 8)
A big fat steak - yer first born woman child :o
Maybe a starving swedish bikini team would ...nah

As your attorney I advise you to consider teaming up with a genius midget or a retarded giant :)

Sorry and all apologies.
Anytime someone talks about "profiteering" on peak oil I become violently nauseous as I mentally relive the day Morpheus offered me the red pill.....
I will understand If the moderators of this forum wish to move or delete this post - I simply could not resist :oops:
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Are precious metals really going to be valuable ?

Unread postby RacerJace » Sat 22 Oct 2005, 08:31:51

Like many others posting on this forum I have considered the prospect of selling my house (of which I own ~40% of the equity) and buying precious metals (physical coinage) with the capital gains as the most defensive investment one can make against times of hyperinflation.

However, I have a few points to consider assuming there is a global economic crash, followed by a prolonged greater depression that will re-establish some sort of equillibrium in population and energy consumption over energy availability...

1. Will gold, silver and platinum etc. be valuable given it will not likely be of much practical use other than for jewellery, and perhaps denistry? I mean you can't eat precious metal can you.

2. Currency may well be transformed directly to energy. If you have the ability to generate kW you will have the power to barter for goods in exchange. Perhaps the charge applied to batteries will be new currency.

3. Like in the dark ages and 3rd world nations of today, goods will be traded directly based on thier scarcity and demand. One potaote may be worth one and a half buckets of clean water. Cows are the currency in many African cultures.

4. In times of past gold has been the favorite hedging investment. However this was when the oil economies where in a positive growth trend.

5. Leading up to the crash, during the predicted slide of repeating cycles of recession, minor recovery followed by deeper recession, gold will most likely steadily increase in value. During this time there may be an opportunity to gain wealth out of gold etc. enough to set ones self up with a property for sustainable living and permeculture. This is my hope and plan. But knowing when to bail out of gold is as speculative as peak oil predictions themselves.
User avatar
RacerJace
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: Are precious metals really going to be valuable ?

Unread postby perplexd » Sat 22 Oct 2005, 11:48:06

http://www.geology.ucdavis.edu/~cowen/~ ... 15CH7.html

If you take a look at historical articles like the one above, it may make you wonder the same as it does me.

Why do we feel like we need to bail out of gold at all, ever? It has always been valuable, always sought after. The only thing I'm worried about bailing out of is paper.

I think the difficulty here comes from the fact that paper has been money since most of us were born. I had never held non-jewelry gold in my hand before this past year. It is strange to own bullion coins, at first, but once you get used to it, it is even stranger to own paper.

The scary part about the paper is that it is never an ASSET. It is always the promise of someone else to give you an asset. So, in a world full of debt defaults and broken promises and shrinking ability for economies to meet the needs of people, I can't see why it would ever make sense to "bail out" of gold into paper again.

Bail out into a different ASSET? Sure. You should get solar hot water even before you get gold. It will be an even more highly valued (but much less fungible and transportable) asset.
The passing of abundant oil is not shaping up to be a soft landing for those with the fattest asses. - Jan Lundberg
User avatar
perplexd
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Shoreline, Washington

Re: Are precious metals really going to be valuable ?

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Sat 22 Oct 2005, 13:15:39

no, i dont think they will be. the next recession is going to be a worldwide one, and i believe that the value of everything will go down, nothing will be spared.

i suppose its just a matter of chosing things that wont lose their value as much as others. maybe it would be a good idea to invest in fine antiques or something? problem with that of course is that they are tangible and therefore destroyable.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron