Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

In defense of Karl Marx

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby sparky » Wed 09 Dec 2009, 17:02:14

.

So is China communist or not ?
The Party is in ABSOLUTE control ,
they use capitalism but are totally Marxist ,

Marx wasn't very clear on state structures

spend some time checking out this site , it's enlightening and fun
it would make the reader better informed than thousands of pontificating journalists

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/


.
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby rangerone314 » Wed 09 Dec 2009, 17:20:10

I like Karl Marx. He makes me laugh more than Harpo and Groucho.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 09 Dec 2009, 20:52:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'T')oilet paper is scarce, for sure, but last time I was there I picked up a nasty internal bug most likely in the water and had no trouble getting back to perfect health. Free.

Oh, and although aspirin may or not be available (never touch the stuff) students won't need any because education is free. No more headaches stressing about how to finance their medical school.

Everyone in Cuba wants communism to end.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby sparky » Fri 11 Dec 2009, 03:56:47

.

When Marx wrote his " Kapital " people worked all their live for food and rags
twelve hours a day six days a week ,no

when H.G, Wells visited the place he said
" I though Chicago is a pocket version of Hell , now I believe Hell is a pocket version of Chicago "
the rich citizen of the city had a fund raiser to buy light artillery for the police to keep order
Slavery was rife in New York garment district , new immigrants would be fooled then locked up in sweatshops to work to be fed or else to be beaten and starved
Prince Albert consort of Victoria had a study of the living condition in the poor district of London made
, it pulled no punches and created a scandal

in the steel mills of Carnegie , thousands of people were maimed and killed every years
those who objected were killed by the Pinkerton goons
children were used preferably for dangerous work in confined space
miners would cough their lungs by age thirty
if old or maimed , you would simply starve or beg


Yep Marx was a bad man when he wrote ,
" workers arise , you have only your chains to loose "


.
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Dukkha » Fri 11 Dec 2009, 07:12:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n the United Kingdom, in the treatment of chronic kidney failure, those who are 55 years old are refused treatment at 35 percent of dialysis centers. Forty-five percent of 65-year-old patients at the centers are denied treatment, while patients 75 or older rarely receive any medical attention at these centers.


I had a quick look for that - unsourced - statistic. The Heritage Foundation (nice) preface it with "In 1978..." I would say "nice try". But it's not, so I won't.
User avatar
Dukkha
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri 14 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Dukkha » Fri 11 Dec 2009, 07:13:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sparky', 't')hey use capitalism but are totally Marxist ,


What kind of world would you have to inhabit for that sentence to make any sense at all?
User avatar
Dukkha
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri 14 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby evilgenius » Fri 11 Dec 2009, 14:15:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n 1918, the Soviet Union became the first country to promise universal "cradle-to-grave" healthcare coverage, to be accomplished through the complete socialization of medicine. The "right to health" became a "constitutional right" of Soviet citizens.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he system had many decades to work, but widespread apathy and low quality of work paralyzed the healthcare system. In the depths of the socialist experiment, healthcare institutions in Russia were at least a hundred years behind the average US level. Moreover, the filth, odors, cats roaming the halls, drunken medical personnel, and absence of soap and cleaning supplies added to an overall impression of hopelessness and frustration that paralyzed the system. According to official Russian estimates, 78
percent of all AIDS victims in Russia contracted the virus through dirty needles or HIV-tainted blood in the state-run hospitals.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o, as in all countries with socialized medicine, a two-tier system was created: one for the "gray masses" and the other, with a completely different level of service, for the bureaucrats and their intellectual servants. In the USSR, it was often the case that while workers and peasants were dying in the state hospitals, the medicine and equipment that could save their lives was sitting unused in the nomenklatura system.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he appalling quality of service is not simply characteristic of "barbarous" Russia and other Eastern European nations: it is a direct result of the government monopoly on healthcare and it can happen in any country. In "civilized" England, for example, the waiting list for surgeries is nearly 800,000 out of a population of 55 million. State-of-the-art equipment is nonexistent in most British hospitals. In England, only 10 percent of the healthcare spending is derived from private sources.

Britain pioneered in developing kidney-dialysis technology, and yet the country has one of the lowest dialysis rates in the world. The Brookings Institution (hardly a supporter of free markets) found that every year 7,000 Britons in need of hip replacements, between 4,000 and 20,000 in need of coronary bypass surgery, and some 10,000 to 15,000 in need of cancer chemotherapy are denied medical attention in Britain.

Age discrimination is particularly apparent in all government-run or heavily regulated systems of healthcare. In Russia, patients over 60 are considered worthless parasites and those over 70 are often denied even elementary forms of healthcare.

In the United Kingdom, in the treatment of chronic kidney failure, those who are 55 years old are refused treatment at 35 percent of dialysis centers. Forty-five percent of 65-year-old patients at the centers are denied treatment, while patients 75 or older rarely receive any medical attention at these centers.
What Soviet Medicine Teaches Us


You know, I have heard that criticism of the National Health brought up before. The fact is, however, that it works and works well. I have seen it save several friends of mine. Your criticism is typical propaganda derived from a point of view rather than boots on the ground. It is a system. It has its flaws. Its flaws by no means render it incompetent of ineffective.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.
Top

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby evilgenius » Fri 11 Dec 2009, 14:28:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sparky', '.')

So is China communist or not ?
The Party is in ABSOLUTE control ,
they use capitalism but are totally Marxist ,

Marx wasn't very clear on state structures

spend some time checking out this site , it's enlightening and fun
it would make the reader better informed than thousands of pontificating journalists

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/


.


That's a big issue, state structures. Marx argued for the logical abolition of the state. He imagined it would happen because that would be the natural, not the forced paradigm. It is one of the big measuring sticks by which to size up both the Soviet Union and Communist China. Neither should have had need for the large state apparati (sic) which they relied upon. When you see a dictator in a place like North Korea and he calls himself a communist perhaps you should ask yourself who's version of the story are you believing, his or history's.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.
Top

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Novus » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 02:35:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dukkha', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sparky', 't')hey use capitalism but are totally Marxist ,


What kind of world would you have to inhabit for that sentence to make any sense at all?


I guess you never read "Animal Farm" then. China is at the part in the book where the pigs put on clothes and start living houses. This is right before the pigs send the trusted work horse to the glue factory.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Dukkha » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 03:42:05

Eh....yes, I have read it - when I was about 12.

So you're saying that there's nothing contradictory with claiming that a government is simultaneously Marxist and capitalist because nasty Napoleon wasn't very nice to kind old Boxer. I see. Things are at that level, are they?
User avatar
Dukkha
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri 14 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby sparky » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 04:27:28

.

Dunkka , capitalism is about using the accumulation of value ( IE money )
to leverage more
Marx basic tenet is that the price of things is fixed by their use and cost of producing them
the profit is made by paying the workers as low a wage as one can get away with it

the difference between the value created and the value sold is the profit
since the value sold cannot be increased permanently ,
except in the case of monopoly or collusion

In a competitive society , the smart thing to do is to decrease the wages

Cheap wages will attract manufacturing , always , because it allow larger profit

have you traveled around Pittsburgh recently
don't look for the steelworks ....they have moved to China

don't confuse Marxism and Communism , one is a ( pretty good ) economic theory
the other is a way of structuring a country on authoritarian lines under a centralized command

Sorry to make you think about stuff , I know , it's not what you have been led to believe

but live and learn ...live and learn

.
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 04:44:04

China is now exporting manufacturing to cheaper labour countries; so called democracies like the Philippines!

http://subicnewslink.blogspot.com/2009/ ... ns-to.html
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Dukkha » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 05:23:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')unkka , capitalism is about using the accumulation of value ( IE money )
to leverage more

Partly. Capitalism has a variety of definitions but private ownership of capital and the existence of wage-labour (and so the denial of access to the means of production for the work force) would have to be important features of any useful definition.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')arx basic tenet is that the price of things is fixed by their use and cost of producing them
the profit is made by paying the workers as low a wage as one can get away with it

No, not really. Price is ultimately fixed by value (i.e. the value created by labour in the production of the commodity). Although Marx doesn’t deny the existence of supply and demand and their effect on price, Capital is an abstraction of economic processes and for the purposes of analysis he sets these aside. And I think you’re maybe getting confused between use-value and exchange-value.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')he difference between the value created and the value sold is the profit

Not exactly. As I just said, on Marx’s theory – and that of many classical political economists – surplus value originates in the value created by labour. Labour produces value but the cost of employing that labour – ie the socially necessary labour time required to reproduce that labour - is less than the value produced. The difference between the two is surplus value, which the capitalist realises as profit. This is spelt out in detail in the first volume of Capital.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')ave you traveled around Pittsburgh recently

Nope. I’m not American, I have never been to America and I strongly suspect I never will.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'd')on't confuse Marxism and Communism , one is a ( pretty good ) economic theory
the other is a way of structuring a country on authoritarian lines under a centralized command

Again, that’s not really true. Marx is much more a critic of capitalism than a proponent of economic theories of Communism. We can make intelligent guesses about some of the features of these theories but if you read Marx, they’re pretty thin on the ground. However, one thing we can have a pretty high degree of certainty about is that any economic system which Marx would approve off would not feature increasing levels of wage-labour, private ownership of capital, and bourgeoisification/proletarianisation of the populace, all features of modern China. As for Communism, well Marxist-Leninist and Maoist societies obviously have been authoritarian but that doesn’t exhaust the range of possibilities which fall within the label Communist. Left Communism and Council Communism could not, for example, be described as authoritarian.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')orry to make you think about stuff , I know , it's not what you have been led to believe

What have I been led to believe?
User avatar
Dukkha
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri 14 Dec 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 14:50:29

I'm just curious is it a coincidence that all advocates of mongrelization of human sub-species are rabid commies who prefer to live in capitalist countries? Quinny, dorlomin, dukka, americandream, who else is there?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby eastbay » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 15:41:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'I')'m just curious is it a coincidence that all advocates of mongrelization of human sub-species are rabid commies who prefer to live in capitalist countries? Quinny, dorlomin, dukka, americandream, who else is there?


It could be because that's all there are. For now.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River
Top

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby sparky » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 17:20:28

.

Thanks for your correction Dukka , It make me a smarter person

live and learn , live and learn :)

.
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Dukkha » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 20:09:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'I')'m just curious is it a coincidence that all advocates of mongrelization of human sub-species are rabid commies who prefer to live in capitalist countries? Quinny, dorlomin, dukka, americandream, who else is there?


Is this a permanent condition or just a particularly acute psychotic episode? Bark once for yes, twice for no.
User avatar
Dukkha
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri 14 Dec 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: In defense of Karl Marx

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 21:16:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dukkha', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'I')'m just curious is it a coincidence that all advocates of mongrelization of human sub-species are rabid commies who prefer to live in capitalist countries? Quinny, dorlomin, dukka, americandream, who else is there?


Is this a permanent condition or just a particularly acute psychotic episode? Bark once for yes, twice for no.



How would I know, it is your rabies. You are barking already? Do you guys bite each other to spread your desease? No wonder you all are from the same swamp.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron