by Mesuge » Tue 06 Oct 2009, 03:46:38
Hm, there are basically only three important issues:
1/ Time frame?
2/ What the U.S. actors will (not) do about it?
3/ Who is on board of the transition plan?
---
1/ Time frame?
As mentioned before, the prospect of fast implementation is quity risky for all players/actors, for instance in reaction to an attempt to hyperinflate out of it by the U.S., this will obviously create instant global havoc. And in that case you better have very strong back up plan B and C ready.
2/ What the U.S. actors will (not) do about it?
Basically only three major sub options here, firstly (2.1) the U.S. will just muddle through on its way downstairs to a status of former empire aka ending as "punished" regional power, proviso the public will do nothing as well the PTB.
Secondly (2.2), a genuine populist (or bought by PTBs) will take over the public opinion, takes millitary and fights the "not negotiable style of living" hard, and not just neocon style wimpy way but hardcore bioweapons/nukes/starwars-lite/civilian infrustructure damage.
Third option (2.3), this actually might be precursor to the 2.2 scenario, the U.S. based power brokers will gurantee security of its millitary/nukes to the world in exchange of some "rescue package" by the new global powers just to run the country on some barely manageble level. Think of Yeltsin's early 1990s Russia, or ancient Egypt, .., that's fairly common scenario in the history in terms of collapsed empires/failed states. This could however present itself as the last proverbial drop in the bucket and storm the formely docile U.S. public, so then fastforward into some form of that violent scenario 2.2.
3/ Who is on board of the transition plan?
There will be a price to pay for "Johnnies-come-lately" like the U.K. which became lately so overdependent on its City aka the global financial hub based on trading $ and related security schemes/crap for the empire, as much that it just got totaly under their skin and into their blood. So, they might end up with very bad deal when finally "allowed to join" the Euro or some global basket of currencies. However, suprises are possible, quite theoretically the U.K. could turn on its heel and even lead this transition with force, but that would be sudden shut down of US-UK relationships and that's unlikely, the personal/cultural bonds are still there and they would rather fall trying maitain the facade of former glory than realistically give up and hail to their new global masters EU+BRIC.
-
Please understand that the above mentioned rational actors may not necessarily be just nation states, but also the nation-less global top percentil/PTB who basically run many of them.
Last edited by
Mesuge on Tue 06 Oct 2009, 04:16:03, edited 1 time in total.
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..