Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Water Quality Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: US drinking water is toxic, public too brain damaged to care

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 01 Oct 2009, 09:29:44

It truly is the end of the world--because this is being reported by Fox News.
mos6507
 

Re: US drinking water is toxic, public too brain damaged to care

Unread postby Kristen » Thu 01 Oct 2009, 16:32:39

This doesn't even mention what types of pharmaceuticals are in tap water.
User avatar
Kristen
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: US drinking water is toxic, public too brain damaged to care

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 01 Oct 2009, 17:41:27

Right. As opposed to the time when people's drinking water didn't contain animal feces? When was that again? People have been drinking out of rivers for an awfully long time.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: US drinking water is toxic, public too brain damaged to care

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 01 Oct 2009, 18:23:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'R')ight. As opposed to the time when people's drinking water didn't contain animal feces? When was that again? People have been drinking out of rivers for an awfully long time.
I'd say sanitation takes on a new meaning when it's 6.7+ billion people vs. what it was ages ago. How long do you think someone would survive drinking water straight out of the Ganges or Yalu river?
mos6507
 

Re: US drinking water is toxic, public too brain damaged to care

Unread postby Pretorian » Thu 01 Oct 2009, 19:43:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'R')ight. As opposed to the time when people's drinking water didn't contain animal feces? When was that again?
How about Tritium and Strontium--90? Cause my water got some.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: US drinking water is toxic, public too brain damaged to care

Unread postby oswald622 » Thu 01 Oct 2009, 19:47:37

smallpoxgirl makes a good point. wine and beer are popular in large part because there was often no safe drinking water in antiquity.
oswald622
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: US drinking water is toxic, public too brain damaged to care

Unread postby IgnoranceIsBliss » Tue 03 Nov 2009, 23:26:50

I wonder if the water from a well in the same area would be any different? (I assume it would not have the chemicals that are considered by-products of water treatment) There are some nasty chemicals that are produced as a result of mixing chlorine and stuff during the purification process at the plant.
User avatar
IgnoranceIsBliss
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed 23 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Georgia, USA

NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby Jotapay » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 21:09:14

One of the local papers wrote a story on Austin's drinking water recently. I and several others wrote letters to the editor about what was actually in Austin's drinking water, like Barium (a heavy metal), hormones, pesticides, mercury, and how to protect yourself from these pollutants.

Then the local NPR station ran a news story on the issue. I'm shocked that they actually made the story.

These are some statements from the new article (Click the link and press play on the little flash icons). You have to listen to the whole article since it's audio.
http://kut.org/items/show/19304

Texas State rep Belinda Bolton: "Do you really want to be taking your neighbors' heart medication, Prozac, chemotherapy, birth control pills?"

Dr. Desmond Lawler, Environmental Engineer at UT: "Hormones and birth control products that end up in our drinking water can lead to improper sexual development."

Dr. John Richburg, professor of Pharmacology at UT: The toxicants in the water can cause infertility in males through the ingestion of drinking water by the mothers, as early as infancy.


The thing that gets me is that these people who pretend to be environmentalists around here (but who are really big-government control freaks) will freak out about CO2 emissions and push global laws and regulations and inspections of our homes, but not give one rats ass about sterilants or other pollutants in the drinking water. That's so messed up.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby 2cher » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 21:14:25

Making the world infertile sounds like the best damn news for the planet that I have ever heard.
User avatar
2cher
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu 21 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bug Me Not

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 21:18:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', 'O')ne of the local papers wrote a story on Austin's drinking water recently. I and several others wrote letters to the editor about what was actually in Austin's drinking water, like Barium (a heavy metal), hormones, pesticides, mercury, and how to protect yourself from these pollutants.

Then the local NPR station ran a news story on the issue. I'm shocked that they actually made the story.

These are some statements from the new article (Click the link and press play on the little flash icons). You have to listen to the whole article since it's audio.
http://kut.org/items/show/19304

Texas State rep Belinda Bolton: "Do you really want to be taking your neighbors' heart medication, Prozac, chemotherapy, birth control pills?"

Dr. Desmond Lawler, Environmental Engineer at UT: "Hormones and birth control products that end up in our drinking water can lead to improper sexual development."

Dr. John Richburg, professor of Pharmacology at UT: The toxicants in the water can cause infertility in males through the ingestion of drinking water by the mothers, as early as infancy.


The thing that gets me is that these people who pretend to be environmentalists around here (but who are really big-government control freaks) will freak out about CO2 emissions and push global laws and regulations and inspections of our homes, but not give one rats ass about sterilants or other pollutants in the drinking water. That's so messed up.


I've heard/read this reported a number of times over the years. It's a relatively new pollution phenomenon, given the increasingly massive volumes of meds Americans consume.

From what I've read before, all these drugs are "trace amounts." The experts say the dosage is too small to have any effect, but what's unknown is the combination of trace dosages from many meds.

All in all, probably a good idea to play it safe and stop drinking tap water.. what's a good solution? Would one of those home type filters that snap on the faucet filter these meds out?

(and if you're at least not drinking it, is showering in it nothing to worry about?)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby auscanman » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 21:26:24

Sixstrings: No, a snap-on filter wouldn't remove these dissolved pharmaceuticals. The snap-on filters are only good for removing metals and insoluble or sparingly soluble materials. Even the most expensive filters won't remove pharmaceuticals and hormones. Only way to fully remove pharmaceuticals and hormones from tap water is by multiple/fractional distillation.

Reading all of this makes me happy to live somewhere where the tap water is pure as could be.
User avatar
auscanman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed 28 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby Jotapay » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 21:35:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'A')ll in all, probably a good idea to play it safe and stop drinking tap water.. what's a good solution? Would one of those home type filters that snap on the faucet filter these meds out?


When I saw the initial article in a local paper and was considering my response to write in, I also started this Peak Oil thread about how to secure a clean water supply because it is virtually impossible to remove hormones and prescription drugs from a reclaimed drinking water supply.

http://peakoil.com/planning/diy-atmosph ... 56723.html

I have continued to think about it and I'm still going to go with a dehumidifier and Berkey water filter to pull water from the atmospheric humidity. The total cost to me was going to be around $400, which I'll be able to take care of in a month or so after I pay property taxes. I'm also going to feed my rainwater collection/cistern system into the water reclamation system as well as I develop it over the next year.

I've been discussing this with my brother a lot, who graduated from Duke medical school as an anesthesiologist. Between my knowledge of Geology and Environmental Chemistry and his knowledge of the affects of different chemicals on the body, we reach pretty good solutions, it seems.

He just sent me an email recently about lithium, which is in our drinking water:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('My Brother', 'L')ithium, in my experience with patients, will really numb us. It is already in water reaching 17 million in USA.
http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-c ... hium/1083/


One of the issues we've defined is that some of these pollutants are readily absorbed in the skin when you shower. Fluorosilicic Acid shows toxicity in humans at 6 mg/L. However, our drinking water can contain up to 5 mg/L according to the EPA. Fluorosilicic Acid is readily absorbed through the skin. We haven't figured out a cost effective way to filter water coming out of the shower head yet, but the drinking water solution is at least taken care of.

http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/Che ... icates.pdf
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby Jotapay » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 21:38:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('2cher', 'M')aking the world infertile sounds like the best damn news for the planet that I have ever heard.


anti-human.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby Novus » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 00:02:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('2cher', 'M')aking the world infertile sounds like the best damn news for the planet that I have ever heard.


+1

Too bad they didn't start the program 30 years ago. Cheers :-D :-D :-D
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby culicomorpha » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 05:11:02

Jotapay,

I think this is a much bigger problem than most people recognize. I did some research a few years back and it seemed that more or less, we have let the genie out of the bottle and there really isn't a simple way to put it back in.

As for good information resources, one name that kept coming up was Christian Daughton, an EPA scientist who has written a number of journal articles and texts on pharmaceuticals in water. His cv is at http://www.epa.gov/esd/bios/daughton.htm. His work led me to some others who were trying to do remediation on wastewater treatment facilities. If you can find some of these texts that deal with the problems of wastewater treatment, you might learn some useful lessons for protecting yourself.

I've looked at many of the filtering technologies, and they all leave something to be desired in my opinion. The craziest thing the municipalities do is to fluoridate the water. It's impossible to remove except with R.O. or distillation, both of which are wasteful processes. The water sources for many places are actually fairly good, as most municipalities at least try to protect their reservoirs and watersheds, but then they poison it with fluoride at a dose that is not that far below the toxic dose. Ground water can be better, or it can be very heavily contaminated. That's a crap shoot, but it seems like the number of known-polluted aquifers increases every year.

Regardless of the filtration type, it doesn't really help much since these technologies typically cannot filter fast enough for a shower without spending a lot of money on a whole-house-sized system. I came across a study a few years back - I'll see if I can find it again - that determined experimentally that the vast majority of exposure to volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) happened in the shower, and that only a small amount is absorbed via drinking water. So if you can't filter your shower, and your shower accounts for, say, 90% of your total daily exposure, then it doesn't matter if you filter your drinking water or not.

The complete irony in this dirty water business is that this is exactly the function served by wetlands, most of which were drained by the Army Corps of Engineers during the course of the 20th century so the land could be "developed." Now that the natural cleansing function of the wetlands has been removed from so much of the US, we are forced to find methods to replicate this function - and we will have to pay now for what was formerly provided by nature.
User avatar
culicomorpha
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat 03 Nov 2007, 03:00:00
Location: cascadia

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby OutOfGas » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 08:47:39

We have a reverse osmosis system that we use for drinking and cooking. Purchased at Lowes for $ 150.00.
Filters (2) cost around $ 20.00 each and last approximately 6 months. The RO cartridge costs around $ 40.00 and lasts around a year.

Water quality is as good as bottled. We really noticed a difference in tea and coffee.
OutOfGas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat 21 Mar 2009, 19:31:45

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 09:16:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('culicomorpha', 'J')otapay,


The complete irony in this dirty water business is that this is exactly the function served by wetlands, most of which were drained by the Army Corps of Engineers during the course of the 20th century so the land could be "developed." Now that the natural cleansing function of the wetlands has been removed from so much of the US, we are forced to find methods to replicate this function - and we will have to pay now for what was formerly provided by nature.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wiki', '
')In June 2009, the ground water in Midland, Texas (US) was found to be contaminated with chromium. Erin Brockovich was involved again. The Midland groundwater reached higher levels of contamination than in Hinkley with 5250 ppb or 5.250 ppm.[8]


Another reason not to move to Texas. PetroChemical Plants.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 10:56:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('culicomorpha', 'T')he craziest thing the municipalities do is to fluoridate the water.


I was waiting for that. I'll do you one better. How about this? There is just NO way to filter it out of water!
mos6507
 
Top

Re: NPR: Your drinking water includes sterilants, hormones

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 10:58:34

Off topic posting deleted per COC 2.1.4.
mos6507
 

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron