Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

we can NOT afford the costs of war

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby bodigami » Tue 14 Jul 2009, 01:57:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jedrider', 'L')et's have a numerical value for the 'cost of war': $2 Trillion just for Iraq. Afghanistan is not included nor anywhere close to being finished. Could that be $1 Trillion??

http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2006/01/08/economists_say_cost_of_war_could_top_2_trillion/


trillion$ for oil... as any other empire... like a bunch of chimp$ fighting for banana$.
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Cloud9 » Tue 14 Jul 2009, 07:11:50

As we pull back, Europe can foot the bill.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Roy » Tue 14 Jul 2009, 08:52:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')well, you got the Repubs, what have the Dems done differently since the election?


Not a damn thing. I apologize for not making that clearer. The people in Washington and most American voters are members of and full supporters of the WAR PARTY.

I knew Obama would just be more of the same. Only the easily deluded or overly hopeful believed he represented anything different from the other candidates.

In that respect, Obama has not disappointed. The bankers and the MIC must love him to death.

me, not so much.
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Kristen » Tue 14 Jul 2009, 17:59:55

One thing to add to this post is Iraq's money is sent to the Federal Reserve Bank in New York under their reconstruction fund. I wouldn''t be surprised if we were given some of that money for all of our "sacrafices."
User avatar
Kristen
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby bodigami » Tue 14 Jul 2009, 22:27:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'A')s we pull back, Europe can foot the bill.


foot the bill? wtf does that means? (i am speaking as 4th generation italian)
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby bodigami » Tue 14 Jul 2009, 22:28:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')well, you got the Repubs, what have the Dems done differently since the election?


Not a damn thing. I apologize for not making that clearer. The people in Washington and most American voters are members of and full supporters of the WAR PARTY.

I knew Obama would just be more of the same. Only the easily deluded or overly hopeful believed he represented anything different from the other candidates.

In that respect, Obama has not disappointed. The bankers and the MIC must love him to death.

me, not so much.


at least the emperor$ are bankrupting there own u$a empire. :lol: :twisted: :)
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby bodigami » Tue 14 Jul 2009, 22:30:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristen', 'O')ne thing to add to this post is Iraq's money is sent to the Federal Reserve Bank in New York under their reconstruction fund. I wouldn''t be surprised if we were given some of that money for all of our "sacrafices."


I see only "them"; the son$ and bithce$ of abraham fighting for black goo... so pathetic.
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Wed 15 Jul 2009, 00:25:35

Just to stir up the pot a bit:

The "Big Three" TV networks are CBS, ABC and NBC.

CBS was purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation in 1995. Westinghouse is a company known for its nuclear power plants and weapons manufacturing systems. It sold the latter to Northrop Grumman a few years later but I'm sure they still have a cordial relationship. CBS merges with Viacom shortly after this.

Members of the Viacom board of directors include William Cohen (Secretary of Defense under Clinton).

ABC is owned by Disney. Walt Disney was a big time supporter of Nazi Germany. Disney has an ideological axe to grind well into the 1960s. Modern members of the Disney Board of Directors include Aylwin Lewis (on the board of Haliburton).

NBC is owned by General Electric. GE makes jet engines. Jet engines go into bomber planes. Enough said.

Fox News is owned by Rupert Murdoch, a man who directed all 175 of his newspapers to editorialize in favor of the Iraq War. The following newspapers are owned by Rupert Murdoch:
The Sun (UK)
The Times (UK)
The Daily Telegraph (Sydney)
New York Post (USA)
Wall Street Journal (USA)
Dow Jones & Company
...and others

Clear Channel Communications is the largest radio station owner in the world. The founder of Clear Channel Communications is Lowry Mays, a close personal friend of the Bush family and a major fundraiser.

Cheers,
Tyler_JC
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby eastbay » Wed 15 Jul 2009, 00:44:14

Oh stop.

Disney is no longer owned by Disney. Hasn't been for 25 years. The CEO is Eisner.

Who owns or controls the worlds media? To see who owns or controls the worlds mass media do some web searching. It won't take long for anyone to see.

Although it's common knowledge, one will get called mean names if they answer the question, so I won't.

It's part of the reason the mass media was almost 100% goose stepping together in formation calling for war in Iraq.

But the media doesn't pay for the war. So why would they ALL support it? Hmmmm, won't answer that one either because too many angry replies will be generated.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Kristen » Wed 15 Jul 2009, 18:34:29

Mass Media is a whole other ball game. Common Sense and observant studies have proven (at least to me) that human behavior can be manipulated by nonconcious stimuli. I hope no one would see that weakness in human beings as something to use for malevolent purposes, but life isn't so black and white either.
User avatar
Kristen
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby bodigami » Sat 18 Jul 2009, 02:33:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristen', 'M')ass Media is a whole other ball game. Common Sense and observant studies have proven (at least to me) that human behavior can be manipulated by nonconcious stimuli. I hope no one would see that weakness in human beings as something to use for malevolent purposes, but life isn't so black and white either.


your vision lacks some insight... humans aren't as passive as "taken credit for". attain nirvāna, 'nuff said :)
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 18 Jul 2009, 07:02:54

Advertising works. This premise is supported by the billions spent on it.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby bodigami » Mon 20 Jul 2009, 22:53:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'A')dvertising works. This premise is supported by the billions spent on it.


then buddhism should advertise more...
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Orion Blastar » Sat 29 Aug 2009, 16:53:22

We may not have much choice in the cost of war.

After the way the Bush and now Obama administration and Congress in both administrations as well keep on spending, eventually the government will have to cut something.

Like Clinton did, I think budget cuts to the US military will be next, and the cuts to social programs, cuts to education, and then downsizing of federal employees followed by higher taxes including the cap and trade carbon tax/carbon credits, unhealthy food taxes (soda, junk food, fast food, etc), sin taxes (alcohol, tobacco, energy drinks), and then a legalization of pot for medical uses and then a tax on that.

After we cannot afford the war, troops will be sent home, and then Veteran benefits will be cut including health care and the GI bill education.

Banks have too much power to print and create money, which is why the government spends so much. It all empowers the banks. Whomever controls the debt controls the nation and the world.
User avatar
Orion Blastar
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat 29 Aug 2009, 16:22:07
Location: District 268

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 18:39:32

They'll just keep printing money until we reach 1920 Germany-level inflation.
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby IgnoranceIsBliss » Mon 14 Sep 2009, 23:57:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Orion Blastar', 'W')e may not have much choice in the cost of war.

After the way the Bush and now Obama administration and Congress in both administrations as well keep on spending, eventually the government will have to cut something.

Like Clinton did, I think budget cuts to the US military will be next, and the cuts to social programs, cuts to education, and then downsizing of federal employees followed by higher taxes including the cap and trade carbon tax/carbon credits, unhealthy food taxes (soda, junk food, fast food, etc), sin taxes (alcohol, tobacco, energy drinks), and then a legalization of pot for medical uses and then a tax on that.

After we cannot afford the war, troops will be sent home, and then Veteran benefits will be cut including health care and the GI bill education.

Banks have too much power to print and create money, which is why the government spends so much. It all empowers the banks. Whomever controls the debt controls the nation and the world.


I think we will definately cut education and social programs (for the non-voting poor rather than white, voting elderly) well before the military. How many times have you heard someone argue that we need to cut the military (other than on here?) In my area of the South USA, that would be none. You would be a traitor to utter such non-sense!
User avatar
IgnoranceIsBliss
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed 23 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Georgia, USA
Top

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Cloud9 » Tue 15 Sep 2009, 07:03:25

Not to worry boys and girls. War time economies work. Mr. Schickelgruber had 100% employment. You were either working in a defense factory, in uniform, in a camp, or euthanized. 8O
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby argyle » Tue 15 Sep 2009, 07:38:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('WyoDutch', '[')i]America has a love affair with war. Any hour of the day, the media is propagandizing with everything from the D-Day landings to PFC Herman Hero kicking down the door of a mud hut somewhere in the third world. America can afford this love affair because it comes at no risk to the average sofa spud. (My nearest neighbors are perfect examples. During the attacks on Baghdad in the opening days of our glorious campaign to rid Iraq of WMDs, my neighbors breathlessly exclaimed about how they "... love to watch the war on tv"... but they were so relieved that "their son was on a (Mormon) mission to Canada and not involved in the fighting.")
.
If we had any national backbone... we'd enact some risk-sharing. As soon as any American troop is in a combat situation for 30 days, a 10% war surtax, with a $2,000 minimum, kicks in. At the same time, universal military service (women included) goes into effect. No exclusions, no deferments. If little Johnny or Joanie has to pick up cigarette butts for 2 years... Well, that's the cost of "freedom".
.
Yep... just ask the average American to participate in our perpetual wars and there will be a stampede for the exit strategies.


I support this.. I also believe that many Europeans are so opposed to war because many of their parents/grandparents actually experienced a war in their midst..
Americans have generally little experience what it really means when a battle/war is fought in their village/town, what it is like to be a refugee because one's home is burnt down, bombed out, or crops destroyed and has nowhere to go or risks being shot, raped,.. What it is like to be oppressed/pacified where you can be picked up off the streets randomly, mutulated, tortured, and/or executed,.. and where the offenders of those crimes don't fall under any law..
Although they did sacrifice a lot during WWII and I certainly don't want to downplay this, but they (families) have not experienced it in the same way Europeans/Iraqi's/Afghans/.... did. Their soldiers went of to fight on some distant battlefields, but for others, that battlefield are ppls homes, fields, cities, etc.. where all their loved ones are, out in the crossfire and harms way.. The general public has no idea how ugly a war really is (even with today's technology)..

There is a line in "The Patriot" that condenses it pretty good..

"Mark my words... this war will be fought not on the frontier or some distant battlefield, but amongst us. Among our homes. Our children will learn of it with their own eyes."
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."
argyle
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue 31 Mar 2009, 04:39:02
Top

Re: we can NOT afford the costs of war

Unread postby Orion Blastar » Sun 20 Sep 2009, 21:50:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('IgnoranceIsBliss', '
')I think we will definately cut education and social programs (for the non-voting poor rather than white, voting elderly) well before the military. How many times have you heard someone argue that we need to cut the military (other than on here?) In my area of the South USA, that would be none. You would be a traitor to utter such non-sense!


You cannot cut education because that is how the economy creates good paying jobs. We need a private and public student loan and grant programs to have more people graduate college and move on to higher paying jobs. Otherwise they are draining the economy with social programs and defaulting on bad loans.

Bill Clinton cut the military with a degree of success. The part that needs to be cut the most is the nuclear weapon program we could easily shave $200 billion off of it by stop producing nuclear warheads and rockets to launch them. Just by submarines we have the power to destroy the world 6 times over. That doesn't count missile bases, AGEIS Cruisers, and other things. We spend trillions on nuclear weapons each year, so $200 billion cut out of it won't be that much and it could be used to fund universal health care or start paying off the US Debt to China.

You need troops to fight the enemy, aka terrorists, but we can cut the military in the nuclear weapons budget and still keep the troops active and recruit more. The salary of the soldier is nothing compared to the money to make nuclear weapons we obviously won't use, and even if we did use them MAD means we'd all be dead 100 times over.
User avatar
Orion Blastar
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat 29 Aug 2009, 16:22:07
Location: District 268
Top

Previous

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron