by Plantagenet » Thu 28 May 2009, 19:29:34
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ian807', 'S')ure, why not? Make a bunch of complex expensive power plants with major waste disposal problems rather than thousands of relatively inexpensive solar panels, small hydroelectric dams, windmills, wave generators and perhaps a few ocean based stirling engine generators with no waste disposal problems.
Your assumption that the US has to build either nukes or renewable energy installations is silly. The US could and should build both nukes and alternative energy farms to replace our current use of oil and coal.
Any honest advocate of solar and wind energy has to admit that there are times when the sun doesn't shine (its called "night") and times when the wind isn't blowing (its called "weather"). Because of "night" and "weather" it isn't possible to build a power grid based solely on solar and wind power----backup capacity almost as large as the entire installed solar and wind energy base must be available to use when it is "night" and during times of windless "weather."
