by wisconsin_cur » Sun 17 May 2009, 21:54:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', '
')There is no proof that 7 Billion people cannot survive on the planet with advanced technology and education into the problems of overshooting the carrying capacity of the earth.
How exactly would we go about providing proof to your satisfaction?
Maybe we could find a way to feed 7 billion but then they would have more children wouldn't they? Or perhaps you think you can stop them? How, pray tell?
In the real world we need to ask if we are sustainable and if we are in overshoot given the state of the world as it is and with people as they are. Perhaps we could create a fantasy scenerio where it would all work, but I do not live in a fantasy.
I live in a world where greed and ignorance are powerful forces. I live in a world where monied and political interests work against long-term sustainability for short-term gain. I live in a world where the masses chase after the newest shiny object and any short-term gain in the direction of sustainability will, within a few decades, be squandered when a political movement arises saying, "Eat, drink, procreate, you have been repressed by the ecologists!" and such a message will win the day.
For every Carter (4 years) there will be a Reagan and his apostles. A few years after the "Moral Equivilant of War" we got morning in America and the SUV craze (25 years of excess). This is called, "moving in the wrong direction." This is rooted in what homo sapien is. We could pretend otherwise but I gave up playing pretend a few years ago.
But yes, you can create a fantasy world where we hold hands, sing "I would like to teach the world to sing..." but at some point it might be a good idea to turn off the TV and deal with the world outside your window. When you do I think, perhaps, you will begin to find your proof.