by gego » Thu 03 Aug 2006, 10:30:25
I agree with Graeme that global warming is a threatening problem; I do not see it as separate from peak oil.
Nature, over a very long time period, stored carbon in the ground in the form of hydrocarbons. Man figures out how to extract this "fossil fuel" from the ground, and starts to release the carbon into the atmosphere at ever increasing rates. The energy from this storehouse propelled the human species from under 500,000 up to 6.5 billion.
The current human population level is out of balance with what nature would allow without using this stored energy, so this really is a Catch22 situation. If we continue to use the remaining storehouse of "fossil fuel" we can keep up the current population levels temporarily, but we add to the carbon in the atmosphere, making dieoff from heat inevitable. If we stop using the "fossil fuel" now, there is no way we can keep up these population levels now, so we accelerate the time of the dieoff.
I guess the point is mute anyway, because once peak arrives, we will be forced to use less oil and the dieoff will be imposed by nature.
In my view there is no way to have your cake and eat it too. There is no practical, significant way to stop adding to the global warming problem without eliminating the root problem, about 6 billion human life forms.