Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

"Work for all" Why ?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 16:34:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'T')here was a lot of discussion on this convolutedly on the racism thread, you'll need to dig back a few hundred posts; or RE might like to elaborate again/ update?


I've written about this in a few threads where eugenics arguments come up. I'll write the short version now, maybe elaborate tonight.

Children are necessary for a society to perpetuate itself, but too many children surving to reproductive age quickly grows a society past what the land they live on can support. So you do need some means that is fair to all to keep too many from surviving and reproducing.

So, through childhood, the children are supported by the tribe, some die of diseases of course before puberty, but of those who survive, once they are capable of reproduction they must be responsible members of the tribe able to take care of themselves. So through their growing up years, you train them all for the Test for Survival which comes to ALL at Puberty. Nobody gets out of the test by virtue of wealth or connections, nobody gets any more or any less than anybody else. You send all of them out into the Wilderness for one year, with a Knife, a Tent, a Bow and Arrow and some snares. Those who come back alive after a year in the Wilderness are the ones you take back into the tribe and who will survive to reproduce. It won't be many. Only the smartest and the strongest will survive, and few individualists among them. Only the ones who cooperate with each other will stand a chance.

IMHO, this is fair and does not put any person in charge of overseeing who is to live and who is to die. Nature takes its course, and in the end you do have a eugenics solution, because smart, strong and cooperative GOOD people will be selected for, they will be the Survivors.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 16:51:17

I am living once again in Aboriginal Australia which had these rites until very recently, in some places versions prevail still.
Weird that the same people who practised this most recently are now facing the rites of- Junk food diet, alcohol, petrol sniffing, ultra violent family abuse, incarceration, high speed intoxicated driving, chronic unemployment.
It's a bloody miserable situation for many of them and it's not hard to think they were better off with a 'Test by Nature'.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby vision-master » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 16:52:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'T')here was a lot of discussion on this convolutedly on the racism thread, you'll need to dig back a few hundred posts; or RE might like to elaborate again/ update?


I've written about this in a few threads where eugenics arguments come up. I'll write the short version now, maybe elaborate tonight.

Children are necessary for a society to perpetuate itself, but too many children surving to reproductive age quickly grows a society past what the land they live on can support. So you do need some means that is fair to all to keep too many from surviving and reproducing.

So, through childhood, the children are supported by the tribe, some die of diseases of course before puberty, but of those who survive, once they are capable of reproduction they must be responsible members of the tribe able to take care of themselves. So through their growing up years, you train them all for the Test for Survival which comes to ALL at Puberty. Nobody gets out of the test by virtue of wealth or connections, nobody gets any more or any less than anybody else. You send all of them out into the Wilderness for one year, with a Knife, a Tent, a Bow and Arrow and some snares. Those who come back alive after a year in the Wilderness are the ones you take back into the tribe and who will survive to reproduce. It won't be many. Only the smartest and the strongest will survive, and few individualists among them. Only the ones who cooperate with each other will stand a chance.

IMHO, this is fair and does not put any person in charge of overseeing who is to live and who is to die. Nature takes its course, and in the end you do have a eugenics solution, because smart, strong and cooperative GOOD people will be selected for, they will be the Survivors.

Reverse Engineer


What about the medicine man, the shaman, the healer.....
vision-master
 

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby Byron100 » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 17:00:06

Before you elaborate on this, I'd like to ask a few questions about this very intriguing idea.

Firstly, would the kids of that age all be sent out together as a group, on a particular day of the year? Would only the males be sent out, or would both sexes be subject to this? If both girls and boys are to be "tested", would any attempt be made to keep the sexes apart? (As to avoid any "premature" reproduction...LOL.)

Alas, this method is a very crude method of population control, IMO, as there's still no check on how many kids each family has, and there's no way of knowing how the population demographics would play out over time. Too few children being born + too few coming back from the year-long walkabout = extinction of the community over time. Or, parents compensating for the inevitable culling of their offspring by having way too many kids, thereby negating the culling effect of the survival test.

I do have to admit this might be a workable idea, at least in theory. After the great die-off, of course. The key is to never, ever allow any particular person to control the fates of others....that trait will be the most difficult of all to overcome. Sure do love the idea of us humans controlling our own evolution in a collective manner, though.
Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide...
...and the meek shall inherit the Earth!
User avatar
Byron100
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu 08 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 17:10:32

In the Aussie version there are group and individual tests.
The individual one is the biggie, no marriage unless pass.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby TWilliam » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 18:52:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'I')n the Aussie version there are group and individual tests.
The individual one is the biggie, no marriage unless pass.

Precisely. It is the INDIVIDUAL test which is the most significant in genetic terms. I submit that cooperation developed as an attempt by the second-rates to circumvent Nature's selectivity...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 19:10:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Byron100', 'B')efore you elaborate on this, I'd like to ask a few questions about this very intriguing idea.

Firstly, would the kids of that age all be sent out together as a group, on a particular day of the year? Would only the males be sent out, or would both sexes be subject to this? If both girls and boys are to be "tested", would any attempt be made to keep the sexes apart? (As to avoid any "premature" reproduction...LOL.)

Alas, this method is a very crude method of population control, IMO, as there's still no check on how many kids each family has, and there's no way of knowing how the population demographics would play out over time. Too few children being born + too few coming back from the year-long walkabout = extinction of the community over time. Or, parents compensating for the inevitable culling of their offspring by having way too many kids, thereby negating the culling effect of the survival test.


You could do this any number of ways, you could either make it gender independent or just test males this way, since females have their own Test for Survival with high mortality rates in childbirth. However, on the assumption we retain at least enough of our current medical knowledge to keep death by childbirth low, you would need to send out both in tests for survival. It probably would work better to send them out separately, although likelihood would be they would pair up as part of forming cooperative teams of survivors if you sent them out together Part of your education process would be to teach them that getting pregnant during this year is NOT a good idea as it would reduce their chances of survival. Those with enough strength of will to forgo sex during this year in the interest of survival would help their chances.

Far as lean years seeing too much die off in the walkabout, in those years you simply cancel it. Nature is doing enough to the whole tribe to keep the numbers down. You only use this method when the tribe is reproducing too fast.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 21:19:46

Image

The Spartans also had a rite of passage for the youth, but they did it with a kind of internal exile, where the youth spent a year living rough in the countryside around Sparta and stealing all their food from the Helots, the slave population that farmed Sparta's land.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby TWilliam » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 22:16:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he Spartans also had a rite of passage for the youth, but they did it with a kind of internal exile, where the youth spent a year living rough in the countryside around Sparta and stealing all their food from the Helots, the slave population that farmed Sparta's land.

They also tossed infants deemed to be 'puny or deformed' into a chasm.

Incidentally during the Krypteia, which you are referring to, they did more than simply steal food. They were sent out with nothing more than a knife and their training, and given license to kill helots in order to eat, as a form of state-sponsored terrorism. This ordeal generally occurred around the age of eighteen, after they had been enrolled in the Agoge from age seven onward.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 22:32:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he Spartans also had a rite of passage for the youth, but they did it with a kind of internal exile, where the youth spent a year living rough in the countryside around Sparta and stealing all their food from the Helots, the slave population that farmed Sparta's land.

They also tossed infants deemed to be 'puny or deformed' into a chasm.

Incidentally during the Krypteia, which you are referring to, they did more than simply steal food. They were sent out with nothing more than a knife and their training, and given license to kill helots in order to eat, as a form of state-sponsored terrorism. This ordeal generally occurred around the age of eighteen, after they had been enrolled in the Agoge from age seven onward.


I see you are a scholar as well as a gentleman, sir.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Tue 14 Apr 2009, 23:57:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', '
')They also tossed infants deemed to be 'puny or deformed' into a chasm.


That would be equivalent to the modern practice of aborting infants who show genetic abnormalities. You can practice abortion or infanticide as part of the process here, it would be up to the parent to decide if they wanted to raise a deformed infant or not. Depending on the severity of the deformity, said infant almost certainly would not pass the Test for Survival, so its not clear why you would raise it anyhow, but some people might.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby paimei01 » Wed 15 Apr 2009, 09:30:11

Working children in Bangladesh:
http://www.zoriah.net/blog/2009/04/gues ... labor.html


A comment at the end of the blog:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's important to ask, "what is the next best alternative for these children?". People in America love to say "they SHOULD be in school, or they SHOULD be playing with their friends". But the harsh reality is that if many of these kids weren't working in factories, they would be digging through trash heaps for scrap metal (many do) and working as prostitutes. If not that, then starvation.

At least this way, they are learning a skill. If Americans weren't so protectionist with their wealth and industry, more factories would move abroad and the competition for workers would raise wages in these third world countries.


Definitely the comment is from one of those insane people I described above. There is enough food, else those children would not be alive. But because the entire planet (including Bangladesh) is not smarter than a brick wall, you get exactly what I described in my above post. People cannot just share the food, and share the work for food, and only then and only if they want to, start working for non essential stuff.
Some will say : "If people have food and shelter they will get lazy and we will have no progress". What you see above is not progress is it ? If i am happy with food and shelter, I am not stoping you to work for more. Can't do it ? Sorry.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby paimei01 » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 02:40:43

Easy for me to say "choose this system is better". I can imagine myself convincing all the people around me , then what ? The greater system does not allow for a no money system inside. Need to be lots of people on a big territory with all the needed resources for the new system to work, and really use all the inventions. Else we would be just a village of hippies - if we have the land, working with tools from the 19 century just to survive, and always at war with the tax collectors and other people like that, can;t even reach the idea of "less work". From where will we get clothes ? Yes it is possible to make all, but that is lots of work, even more work than today, even for children, and exactly that I want to change. Using all the modern machines we could provide the basics to all, for a very long time before oil runs out.
So to avoid the life of the 19 century peasant we must become capitalist again, sell products, and so on. A nice little cooperative enterprise. Then we soon become the current system again.

But I think people will try the hippie village just out of necessity soon.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby Quinny » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 02:52:56

This thread has got me thinking about the worth of life improving/labour saving inventions. Could there be some kind of measure sort of similar to EROEI to look at the labour saving created by various tools/devices and it's effect on the quality of life. Probably not, too subjective, but could be interesting.

There are some devices that IMO are a waste of space and energy - dishwashers for one, but extending it to industrial agriculture, mining equipment etc could give interesting results.

I know there are some that say the market decides this, but we are moving into a different era, maybe we need different measures.
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby paimei01 » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 03:03:52

Maybe I can't imagine very well, but if all the village cooperates it would be a more easy life than a lonely peasant in medieval Europe. Even with no modern tools. But need lots of things, for example wool for clothes. So need a big territory from where people have all they need or they will have to trade for wool = current system.

If that "bigger territory" is the entire country (my country Romania or USA, not some desert country where people are dependent on outside imports even for food), then I am sure that using modern machines - food, clothes can be provided for all working in turns for 8 years max each - that includes making the machines. Meaning you work for 8 years max, then you have free food and clothes for the rest of your life. Now just learn how to make wine and party forever :) Shelter - will have all the time in the world to build some house.And you will be helped by neighbors, you help them too, there is no more that feeling of "he is a possible competitor" when looking at another person. There will be competitions between regions or cities , people bored of too much sitting around will say "let's build that or that, show the people over the hill what we can do !". But people will not just sit or party, each would follow his hobby, do what he likes, invent new stuff, and so on. All the scientists and inventors, look at Einstein, did they "work" or just did what they liked ? People working today do not want to invent new ways for more efficient work. They could become useless. So if a worker somewhere in a specific situation knows that he could become useless, he will not talk about improvements for that specific situation. The system makes us do this, and some still say "more work, more work !". More useless work they mean.

And people will be free to travel, food will be everywhere just not cooked. There could be some trading if you want some "services" when you travel. But with no money. Money must be banned , Stalin style. They lead to people taking from nature more than they need, then they lead to what we have now again. People are not "evil" by nature. Look at some Buddhist monastery, not all there are "enlightened", but they behave good among themselves because their organization is good. Same as my system they have free food. People will adapt and defend the new system even more than the current one.
Is this all just my imagination ?


http://www.ascentofhumanity.com/chapter1-5.php
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ther studies worldwide, as well as common sense, suggest that the !Kung were not exceptional. In more lush areas life was probably even easier. Moreover, much of the "work" spent on these twenty hours of subsistence activities was by no means strenuous or burdensome. Most of the men's subsistence hours were spent hunting, something we do for recreation today, while gathering work was occasion for banter and frequent breaks.
Primitive small-scale agriculturalists enjoyed a similar unhurried pace of life. Consider Helena Norberg-Hodge's description of pre-modern Ladakh, a region in the Indian portion of the Tibetan Plateau.iii Despite a growing season only four months long, Ladakh enjoyed regular food surpluses, long and frequent festivals and celebrations, and ample leisure time (especially in winter when there was little field work to do). This, despite the harsh climate and the (proportionately) enormous population of non-working Buddhist monks in that country's numerous monasteries! More powerfully than any statistic, Norberg-Hodge's video documentary Ancient Futures conveys a sense of the leisurely pace of life there: villagers chat or sing as they work, taking plenty of long breaks even at the busiest time of the year. As the narrator says, "work and leisure are one."
Last edited by paimei01 on Thu 16 Apr 2009, 07:24:18, edited 2 times in total.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 06:36:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'T')his thread has got me thinking about the worth of life improving/labour saving inventions. Could there be some kind of measure sort of similar to EROEI to look at the labour saving created by various tools/devices and it's effect on the quality of life. Probably not, too subjective, but could be interesting.

There are some devices that IMO are a waste of space and energy - dishwashers for one, but extending it to industrial agriculture, mining equipment etc could give interesting results.

I know there are some that say the market decides this, but we are moving into a different era, maybe we need different measures.


I think you want to keep around powered looms for weaving as long as possible, along with powerd combines and tractors. Back Hoes and Front End Loaders also. On the domestic end, washing machines are very simple devices that don't take that much energy, but really reduce the domestic chore by a good margin. Dryers however are a big waste, most everything can dry just by hanging it up for a day in almost any weather. Even in frigid cold, wet clothing dries just because the air doens;t hold much moisture. Wet clothes freeze and stiffen, then they dry out thru sublimation. Sewing machines are good, but you certainly don't need electricity for them, the Singer foot treadle models work fine. My aunt had one of those when I was a boy.

Bicycles are great. I think with a well designed town, you could easily get to and from your work on a bicycle, even in really bad weather. Basic machines can be sustained for a good long time here to come. Fixing these things up and keeping them working is a great PPO profession IMHO.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby Pretorian » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 08:15:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'L')ook at some Buddhist monastery, not all there are "enlightened", but they behave good among themselves because their organization is good. Same as my system they have free food.



Yeah. You just forgot to mention that someone must " work" so they will have free food.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 09:58:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', '
')So to avoid the life of the 19 century peasant we must become capitalist again, sell products, and so on. A nice little cooperative enterprise. Then we soon become the current system again.

But I think people will try the hippie village just out of necessity soon.



I like to think there could be a middle way. But I'm a crazy idealist. :)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 10:19:13

With consideration that Palmy is Romanian, with English as a second or 3rd language, he is a 'very bright cookie' as my grannie would have said.
The most travelled man I ever met told me Romania is the best country in the world for a person who is willing to share.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: "Work for all" Why ?

Unread postby paimei01 » Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:22:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'W')ith consideration that Palmy is Romanian, with English as a second or 3rd language, he is a 'very bright cookie' as my grannie would have said.
The most travelled man I ever met told me Romania is the best country in the world for a person who is willing to share.

Yes I am the wisest man in my country ! People make a pilgrimage to come to me ! I know everything ! except that which I do not know ! :-D
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron