by TWilliam » Thu 05 Mar 2009, 04:25:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'A')bsolute frogshit TWilliams.
Murder is the deliberate taking of another human life; other than as punishment for a crime seen by the commons as warranting such or in self defense against an equally armed attack.
So revenge killing isn't murder, while mercy killing is?
Anyway sorry, but you are wrong. (And it's TWilliam. There is no 's'... )
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url=http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Murder]
The precise definition of murder[/url] varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Under the Common Law, or law made by courts, murder was the unlawful killing of a human being
with malice aforethought. The term
malice aforethought did not necessarily mean that the killer planned or premeditated on the killing, or that he or she felt malice toward the victim. Generally,
malice aforethought referred to a level of intent or reck-lessness that separated murder from other killings and warranted stiffer punishment.
The definition of murder has evolved over several centuries.
Under most modern statutes in the United States, murder comes in four varieties: (1) intentional murder; (2) a killing that resulted from the intent to do serious bodily injury; (3) a killing that resulted from a depraved heart or extreme recklessness; and (4) murder committed by an Accomplice during the commission of, attempt of, or flight from certain felonies.Some jurisdictions still use the term
malice aforethought to define intentional murder, but many have changed or elaborated on the term in order to describe more clearly
a murderous state of mind. California has retained the malice aforethought definition of murder (Cal. Penal Code § 187 [West 1996]). It also maintains a statute that defines the term
malice. Under section 188 of the California Penal Code, malice is divided into two types: express and implied. Express malice exists "when there is manifested a deliberate intention unlawfully to take away the life of a fellow creature." Malice may be implied by a judge or jury "when no considerable provocation appears, or when the circumstances attending the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart."
". Note also the comment in the third paragraph about many jurisdictions "elaborat[ing] on the term [
killing. Nowhere is
.
. Neither the desire to end the life of one who is suffering nor the desire to spare the human race from extinction is grounded in
. It is grounded in
, and you have absolutely neither right, nor grounds, apart from moralistic horsesh*t, to presume otherwise.