Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Toyota Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby bratticus » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 10:46:20

Who is not buying Toyota cars?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]U.S. December Import Prices Fall for Fifth Month

... Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. said this month that December sales in the U.S. plummeted by more than a third...
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby outcast » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 10:54:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ybrids should be cheered because they bring us one step closer to an electric transportation grid.

That's the end game of Peak Oil. It's not the end of the world, just this way particular kind of lifestyle.



Exactly. It is strange that people don't think there can be a technological solution to a technological problem. So the era of louder engines are better is going away, so what? The next era might end up being my battery is bigger than your battery.

Sooner or later gas power cars will go bye bye for good, but that doesn't mean there will never be any suitable to replace it like electric powered cars.
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby Heineken » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 11:09:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('outcast', '
')
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')asically the electric-car movement is just another attempt to keep the party going.



It is an attempt to fix a problem.



No, it is not. The problem is how we organize ourselves. The infrastructure. The patterns. The values. The culture. They're not sustainable. How the cars are powered is fairly irrelevant, esp. since the damage will continue unabated. The GG can come from a smokestack or from a tailpipe---what's the difference? You're just fooling yourself if you think there is one.

Cars promote and reinforce the sort of development---the wasteful, hyperconsuming, socially and environmentally damaging arrangements of living---that's killing us.

We need to get our asses out of car seats and onto saddles.

So easy to dismiss this viewpoint as "luddism." It isn't. Actually it's a yearning for a more refined state of humanity and a desire to mesh people with environmental realities.

Gizmos don't make us happier. They don't make us better. They are a millstone around our necks.

The Greeks during the Golden Age had no automobiles. (Yes, they had slaves, but so do we, in all but name.)
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby the_red_pill » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 12:09:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chuckmak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the_red_pill', '
')Well said....I have a 2005 Civic I paid $14k for and I hyper-mile it to 48mpg average.....


Please tell me more about this. I have a 2002 Civic.


Sure. Equipment:
05 Civic VP Coupe
4cyl engine
5 sp manual
No power options
A/C
Tires are at 45psi (max side wall pressure is 51psi)
EPA sticker: 32/38
Current mileage: 43500

I simply coast and drive very slowly, seldom over 65 mph, lots of engine-offs at stoplights. I cycle the a/c in the summer, not running it full blast. I push my car out of the garage and roll it in neutral 1/10 mile to first stop sign (it's all downhill). When I park, I try to park in places where I don't have to back out or I can roll backwards with gravity. Oil changes every 3k miles. Last 5 months of driving(7300 miles) I've averaged between 45 and 50 mpg. Best tank: 55mpg. Worst tank: 39 mpg.

I also have an 92 Accord, 4cyl, 5 spd, 196k that I hypermile to 36mpg average (24/30 EPA sticker)

I personally think hybrids are a joke. Look at the prices: 05 Civic VP: $14k, 05 Civic Hybrid : $20k(?) Big waste of money to pay more for same mileage!!

I get the same mileage or similar with some conservative driving, not extreme or unsafe methods some guys use. Although I guess one could argue I could probably get 70+mpg with my techniques on a hybrid, what about the batteries life time? Am I going to get to hit with a few $k after I put 100k on a hybrid to replace them? Wouldn't that just obliterate whatever savings I had with fuel economy had I just stuck with a traditional 4cyl gas manual? I'm satisfied with my mileage and figure I'm still way better off than the person (with questionable intelligence or concern for the future) driving a humongo SUV.
User avatar
the_red_pill
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri 12 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby outcast » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 12:18:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow the cars are powered is fairly irrelevant, esp. since the damage will continue unabated. The GG can come from a smokestack or from a tailpipe---what's the difference? You're just fooling yourself if you think there is one.



There is a difference, even using coal power the greenhouse gasses emitted per vehicle would still be considerably less than with a traditional ICE, plus as you have been told already electricity does not always need to come from fossil fuels.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ars promote and reinforce the sort of development---the wasteful, hyperconsuming, socially and environmentally damaging arrangements of living---that's killing us.


Cars make transportation easier and faster. That's it. Whether or not we choose to over consume is up to us.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e need to get our asses out of car seats and onto saddles.


Yeah, like all that horse shit on the streets of or cities is really sanitary.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o easy to dismiss this viewpoint as "luddism." It isn't. Actually it's a yearning for a more refined state of humanity and a desire to mesh people with environmental realities.


Every agrarian based society has always faced the possibility of major famines and disease outbreaks. Weather patterns don't always hold true. Sure this year your crops did well, what about next year? If everyone else is doomsteading and is in the same predicament, then no one can help you since you gave up your supermarkets.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Gizmos don't make us happier. They don't make us better. They are a millstone around our necks.

Gizmo's are tools, nothing more nothing less. They aid us in performing the tasks they are designed for.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Greeks during the Golden Age had no automobiles.

The Greeks also had to deal with famines and lethal disease outbreaks. Industrialized societies don't have famines anymore, and whatever disease outbreaks we have are nowhere near as nasty as the ones the occurred in ancient times. Many of the diseases that were lethal then are treatable now.

Furthermore, I would also point out that agrarian societies also have the fastest population growth rates, whereas industrialized societies have the lowest. In that sense, which is more sustainable?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')Yes, they had slaves, but so do we, in all but name.)


Explain.
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby GoghGoner » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 13:01:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('outcast', ' ')Cars make transportation easier and faster. That's it. Whether or not we choose to over consume is up to us.


That's it? How simple and clear. Too bad the world is more complex. Cars pollute and give children asthma. Is it up to the children to make your decision to drive? Cars lead to obesity with skyrocketing health car costs. Why are these consumers taking my tax dollars? Why isn't it up to me that they drive? Etc, etc... It must be nice to live in a fantasy world where things can be boiled down to two colors!
GoghGoner
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1827
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Stilłwater subdivision
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby outcast » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 13:23:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat's it? How simple and clear. Too bad the world is more complex. Cars pollute and give children asthma.



Well obviously they don't have to, just that we didn't give much concern to air quality when we originally designed them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') personally think hybrids are a joke.



The concept is sound, just the current implementation is somewhat flawed, the plug in hybrids correct this by giving you the option of just using the electric motor for 60-70 miles, making it possible to not use any gas at all during your daily commutes.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ars lead to obesity with skyrocketing health car costs.


People misusing them and the laziness of people leads to obesity. Skyrocketing health care costs have nothing to do with cars.

By your reasoning cutlery leads to murder.
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby Revi » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 13:31:58

I do think that traditional car culture is doomed. It costs about $6000 to keep a car going nowadays. A person making $20,000 uses almost a third of their income on their car.

Pretty soon those people will drop their cars.

They might be able to keep a NEV going for a thousand a year, however.

I was in a resort area and a lot of people get around on a scooter. They have tiny engines and can be parked anywhere.

If you have to get around in a car, I think a Prius is a good choice.

They were going for $22,000 last year.

That's not much more than a similar car.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby jdmartin » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 13:35:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the_red_pill', '
')Sure. Equipment:
05 Civic VP Coupe
4cyl engine
5 sp manual
No power options
A/C
Tires are at 45psi (max side wall pressure is 51psi)
EPA sticker: 32/38
Current mileage: 43500

I simply coast and drive very slowly, seldom over 65 mph, lots of engine-offs at stoplights. I cycle the a/c in the summer, not running it full blast. I push my car out of the garage and roll it in neutral 1/10 mile to first stop sign (it's all downhill). When I park, I try to park in places where I don't have to back out or I can roll backwards with gravity. Oil changes every 3k miles. Last 5 months of driving(7300 miles) I've averaged between 45 and 50 mpg. Best tank: 55mpg. Worst tank: 39 mpg.

I also have an 92 Accord, 4cyl, 5 spd, 196k that I hypermile to 36mpg average (24/30 EPA sticker)

I personally think hybrids are a joke. Look at the prices: 05 Civic VP: $14k, 05 Civic Hybrid : $20k(?) Big waste of money to pay more for same mileage!!

I get the same mileage or similar with some conservative driving, not extreme or unsafe methods some guys use. Although I guess one could argue I could probably get 70+mpg with my techniques on a hybrid, what about the batteries life time? Am I going to get to hit with a few $k after I put 100k on a hybrid to replace them? Wouldn't that just obliterate whatever savings I had with fuel economy had I just stuck with a traditional 4cyl gas manual? I'm satisfied with my mileage and figure I'm still way better off than the person (with questionable intelligence or concern for the future) driving a humongo SUV.


Not to argue with your post (other than the part about the SUV, some people actually use these for more than just a one-butt hauler), but I have an observation for you. You're changing your oil every 3K miles and it's completely unnecessary. I have rebuilt many engines, worked on cars all my life, and 3k oil changes with today's oil is unnecessary. Your tire pressure is way high. You're tossing all your savings.

You've driven 7300 miles at 45mpg average, and sticker was lets say 35mpg average.

7300/45mpg =162 gallons. 7300/35mpg = 208 gallons. Savings of 46 gallons of gas. At $2/gallon, that's $92. Now you've got at least one extra oil change in there (a reasonable oil change schedule is 7500 miles unless you're in the desert) and if you don't do it yourself, that's 30 bucks. Now your tire pressure settings are about 15psi above recommendations. That's going to create a crown in your tire, meaning you're going to wear the middle of the tire out faster. Each psi above recommended for car (based on weight, distribution, and payload allowances) is going to be about 1% faster wear. So you're wearing your tires 15% faster. Let's say tires cost $400 for 4, mounted & balanced. You're only getting $340 worth of wear out of those tires.

Anyway, if you start running the numbers, you find that you're not saving as much money as you think you are, nevermind the inconvenience of pushing the car out of the garage and driving in a vehicle that handles like a rock because of overinflation.
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby the_red_pill » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:06:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jdmartin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the_red_pill', '
')Sure. Equipment:
05 Civic VP Coupe
4cyl engine
5 sp manual
No power options
A/C
Tires are at 45psi (max side wall pressure is 51psi)
EPA sticker: 32/38
Current mileage: 43500

I simply coast and drive very slowly, seldom over 65 mph, lots of engine-offs at stoplights. I cycle the a/c in the summer, not running it full blast. I push my car out of the garage and roll it in neutral 1/10 mile to first stop sign (it's all downhill). When I park, I try to park in places where I don't have to back out or I can roll backwards with gravity. Oil changes every 3k miles. Last 5 months of driving(7300 miles) I've averaged between 45 and 50 mpg. Best tank: 55mpg. Worst tank: 39 mpg.

I also have an 92 Accord, 4cyl, 5 spd, 196k that I hypermile to 36mpg average (24/30 EPA sticker)

I personally think hybrids are a joke. Look at the prices: 05 Civic VP: $14k, 05 Civic Hybrid : $20k(?) Big waste of money to pay more for same mileage!!

I get the same mileage or similar with some conservative driving, not extreme or unsafe methods some guys use. Although I guess one could argue I could probably get 70+mpg with my techniques on a hybrid, what about the batteries life time? Am I going to get to hit with a few $k after I put 100k on a hybrid to replace them? Wouldn't that just obliterate whatever savings I had with fuel economy had I just stuck with a traditional 4cyl gas manual? I'm satisfied with my mileage and figure I'm still way better off than the person (with questionable intelligence or concern for the future) driving a humongo SUV.


Not to argue with your post (other than the part about the SUV, some people actually use these for more than just a one-butt hauler), but I have an observation for you. You're changing your oil every 3K miles and it's completely unnecessary. I have rebuilt many engines, worked on cars all my life, and 3k oil changes with today's oil is unnecessary. Your tire pressure is way high. You're tossing all your savings.

You've driven 7300 miles at 45mpg average, and sticker was lets say 35mpg average.

7300/45mpg =162 gallons. 7300/35mpg = 208 gallons. Savings of 46 gallons of gas. At $2/gallon, that's $92. Now you've got at least one extra oil change in there (a reasonable oil change schedule is 7500 miles unless you're in the desert) and if you don't do it yourself, that's 30 bucks. Now your tire pressure settings are about 15psi above recommendations. That's going to create a crown in your tire, meaning you're going to wear the middle of the tire out faster. Each psi above recommended for car (based on weight, distribution, and payload allowances) is going to be about 1% faster wear. So you're wearing your tires 15% faster. Let's say tires cost $400 for 4, mounted & balanced. You're only getting $340 worth of wear out of those tires.

Anyway, if you start running the numbers, you find that you're not saving as much money as you think you are, nevermind the inconvenience of pushing the car out of the garage and driving in a vehicle that handles like a rock because of overinflation.


Thanks for your thoughts. However, I will debate a few things.
#1. Your oil change philosophy is right on, however, I *am* in the desert, so I choose to err on the side of caution until my warranty expires at least. I will probably stretch to 4k or 5k miles on my next oil change.
#2 I have read several articles about just what is proper tire inflation, it's debatable on tire wear but the tires are wearing just fine. I've 43k miles on them and should get another 10k or so, so with 55k on a set of tires, I'm not complaining. I'm a frugal shopper and will probably find tires much less expensive than your $400 number.
#3 Most of my driving experience does see SUVs as one-butt haulers, especially in stop/go traffic...
#4 I have driven many sports cars (former 'Vette owner) and don't mind the (subjective) rougher ride. It's still way softer than my old 5 series BMW. I also don't mind the pushing....I can consider it a challenge to increase my fuel mileage and so far I'm way ahead with my costs.

I agree with you, with today's ludricrous gas prices, I'm not saving much as much when it was $4/gal, but I feel like at least I'm conserving when most people aren't. As some people want to go faster/faster/higher hp, etc., I want to go with less/less fuel.
User avatar
the_red_pill
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri 12 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby 3rensho » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:25:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Munqi', '
')
Could it be that the money that is saved from gasoline is not the only reason why people buy these things?

Try not to call people idiots so much. It makes you look bad when you're not making any sense yourself. :roll:


The worst posters on peakoil.com are the ones with the lowest post count (and a few with the most ;) ).


When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed.
Say something once, why say it again?
;)
User avatar
3rensho
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby Heineken » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:26:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('outcast', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow the cars are powered is fairly irrelevant, esp. since the damage will continue unabated. The GG can come from a smokestack or from a tailpipe---what's the difference? You're just fooling yourself if you think there is one.



There is a difference, even using coal power the greenhouse gasses emitted per vehicle would still be considerably less than with a traditional ICE, plus as you have been told already electricity does not always need to come from fossil fuels.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ars promote and reinforce the sort of development---the wasteful, hyperconsuming, socially and environmentally damaging arrangements of living---that's killing us.


Cars make transportation easier and faster. That's it. Whether or not we choose to over consume is up to us.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e need to get our asses out of car seats and onto saddles.


Yeah, like all that horse crap on the streets of or cities is really sanitary.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o easy to dismiss this viewpoint as "luddism." It isn't. Actually it's a yearning for a more refined state of humanity and a desire to mesh people with environmental realities.


Every agrarian based society has always faced the possibility of major famines and disease outbreaks. Weather patterns don't always hold true. Sure this year your crops did well, what about next year? If everyone else is doomsteading and is in the same predicament, then no one can help you since you gave up your supermarkets.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Gizmos don't make us happier. They don't make us better. They are a millstone around our necks.

Gizmo's are tools, nothing more nothing less. They aid us in performing the tasks they are designed for.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Greeks during the Golden Age had no automobiles.

The Greeks also had to deal with famines and lethal disease outbreaks. Industrialized societies don't have famines anymore, and whatever disease outbreaks we have are nowhere near as nasty as the ones the occurred in ancient times. Many of the diseases that were lethal then are treatable now.

Furthermore, I would also point out that agrarian societies also have the fastest population growth rates, whereas industrialized societies have the lowest. In that sense, which is more sustainable?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')Yes, they had slaves, but so do we, in all but name.)


Explain.

I've had a hundred discussions with people with your perspective, outcast. It's a perspective I know cold. So, I accept that your viewpoint---the establishment viewpoint---exists and that it's in the driver's seat and has been for a long time.

What makes you think we aren't an agrarian society? We are the ultimate agrarian society. We just run it differently from the ancient ones. On a massive, impersonal, grossly harmful scale.

Industrialized societies have achieved a low birthrate precisely because the birthrate is so high in non-industrialized ones. We live on their cheap labor.

Gizmos are tools, but in our case they're the wrong tools. Nuclear bombs are tools, for that matter.

What makes you think we're immune to famine? To epidemics? Where we've been in is a unique period utterly dependent on energy and other borrowings from the distant past and from the future, a future that can never be repaid. When we get there we will see how bankrupt we and our environment are. We are getting a glimpse right now.

We have slaves. Energy slaves. And ultra-low-paid human ones. And we're all slaves to government, "the economy," and the System. It's destroying human dignity.

We have lots of diseases the ancients didn't, and we aren't necessarily healthier than they. Some of us live longer, but our lives are full of "quiet desperation." Being old can be quite unpleasant, healthwise. Anyway, more and more people have less and less access to the medical miracles, a trend certain to continue.

I would argue that our entire civilization is deeply sick and unhappy and unsatisfied.

So . . . I tend to think laterally. Something is terribly wrong, and replacing ICEs with batteries won't begin to fix it. It's just another misallocation.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby outcast » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 21:15:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat makes you think we aren't an agrarian society? We are the ultimate agrarian society. We just run it differently from the ancient ones. On a massive, impersonal, grossly harmful scale.



The definition of an agrarian society in one where the majority of people are farmers or involved with agriculture in some way.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')ndustrialized societies have achieved a low birthrate precisely because the birthrate is so high in non-industrialized ones. We live on their cheap labor.



Even if the birthrates in developing countries crashed tomorrow they would still make our stuff because they wages will be far below ours. High or low birthrates don't matter when it comes to cheap labor, only living standard does.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat makes you think we're immune to famine? To epidemics?


We produce far too much food, that's why developed countries are pretty much immune to famine. Epidemics can still happen, but unlike before we can do things to prevent further outbreaks, and we have far better medicine than before. Disease in developed countries is nowhere near as big of a problem as it was back then.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')here we've been in is a unique period utterly dependent on energy and other borrowings from the distant past and from the future, a future that can never be repaid.


The future can be repaid through adjusts to our system, such as getting off of fossil fuels as well as environmental rehabilitation.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')We have slaves. Energy slaves.

Actually you have it backwards. Energy is very much our slave, as we can, through our tools, use to our own ends to get things done.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd we're all slaves to government, "the economy," and the System. It's destroying human dignity.

We've always been "slaves" to the government ever since we started having them. We used to have slaves in agrarian society, they were called peasants. The always lived in between famine and ruin. That was destroying human dignity.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e have lots of diseases the ancients didn't, and we aren't necessarily healthier than they.

I would say most of us live far longer than they did. Some of these diseases they didn't have such as cancer happened because they simply didn't live long enough to develop them. A great many diseases they had we wiped out with medicine. I would venture to say that, at least in Europe, Japan, and South Korea we are much healthier now.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nyway, more and more people have less and less access to the medical miracles, a

Compared with before when there was little real medicine at all for anyone. In developed countries, with the exception of the US, medical care is more or less free, giving everyone access to "medical miracles".

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a') trend certain to continue.

In what way?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') would argue that our entire civilization is deeply sick and unhappy and unsatisfied.

When ours was an agrarian society we were quite sick, because we had no medicine, unhappy because we were deeply impoverished and sometimes didn't know if we would have enough food to make it through the winter, and unsatisfied because too often we would go to bed hungry.
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby bratticus » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 22:25:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Japan Machine Orders Fall by Record on Export Slump

By Jason Clenfield
Bloomberg
January 15, 2009

Japanese machinery orders fell by a record in November as businesses cut spending amid a deepening global recession that’s choked off demand for the country’s cars and electronics.

... skip ...

Recessions in the U.S. and Europe have stifled demand for Japan’s exports, prompting companies from Toyota Motor Corp. to Sony Corp. to curtail production and fire workers.

... skip ...

Toyota said last week it will close all of its domestic factories for 11 days. Japan’s biggest carmaker is expecting its first operating loss in seven decades for the year ending March.

... snip ...


New Toyota:

Image
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 14 Jan 2009, 22:51:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')So . . . I tend to think laterally. Something is terribly wrong, and replacing ICEs with batteries won't begin to fix it. It's just another misallocation.


Perfect is the enemy of good.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby Heineken » Thu 15 Jan 2009, 18:24:32

Outcast:

Our philosophic viewpoints are hopelessly incompatible. That's what I've learned here over the years. I could answer all your arguments, which are well put, but it just leads to another round of disagreement, and another.

I believe we have to change course radically, you believe we can stay on the same general course with certain tweaks and fixes to the machinery.

I would only add that we are an agrarian civilization (granted, "society" probably isn't the right word) that's run by machines and fossil fuels instead of people. We are a new kind of agrarian civilization. We've agriculturally coopted vastly more of the earth's surface far more harmfully than in the earlier eras. The agriculture is still there, bigger and badder than ever, minus the people.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 15 Jan 2009, 19:33:23

Outcast is a rigid person. :razz:
vision-master
 

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby outcast » Thu 15 Jan 2009, 20:54:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'O')utcast is a rigid person. :razz:



Not really. I've actually changed my opinion on quite a few things since coming here, as a result of actually having to look into things as well as being presented with new info about stuff (and verifying it to see if it is the real deal).
Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world.
-Kunstler

Don't respond, I'll just ignore it.
-MonteQuest
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 2010 Toyota Prius Revealed

Unread postby Heineken » Fri 16 Jan 2009, 10:36:27

I just tend to feel that refining or advancing the technology can't lead to the solutions we really need. Perhaps it can buy time, but only if teamed with a revolutionary new trend of downsizing and powering down.

When a solar farm opens in, say, California and I read excited headlines about "enough new green power for 15,000 homes," I say, yeah, and in a month or two there are 30,000 new houses built. And think of all the things those houses and their occupants consume other than power. So we're still going backwards.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

NY Times: Toyota to Sell Plug-In Hybrid in 2011

Unread postby joe1347 » Tue 15 Dec 2009, 20:55:04

So much for Toyota keeping its plug-in hybrid plans secret.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Toyota to Sell Plug-In Hybrid in 2011

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/15/busin ... ta.html?hp

By HIROKO TABUCHI
Published: December 14, 2009

Toyota Motor said Monday that it planned a widespread release of its plug-in hybrid car in 2011


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')everal tens of thousands” of the plug-in version of its Prius hybrid will go on sale in 2011, the automaker said Monday


Great news. Huge first step towards the electrification of the transportation grid. Of course, it's only a short range plug-in (reportedly 13 miles?), but I suspect many drivers will see >70mpg. Especially if you're able to plug-in at work for the return trip home during your daily commute.

http://priuschat.com/news/2010-prius-pl ... r-recharge
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson
User avatar
joe1347
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron