by ki11ercane » Sat 27 Dec 2008, 18:35:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('oilluber', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ki11ercane', 'S')till think we'll see 1998 non adjusted inflation amounts of $10.00 a barrel, or $20.00 adjusted for inflation if deflation doesn't balance things out.
From $30.00 to $42.00 back down to $36.00. As soon as inventories start to rise again after the cut, prices will go down. Another cut, prices will spike then go down again, going down lower.
wow, a 10 buck call on crude,,,, there is almost no producer, except
in war torn places that can make any money at that.
all the oil fields would shut down, hire a security guard, lay off
everybody else and bide time.
Crude was
$9.30 in February 1998. The U.S. dollar was juiced up globally. There were nowhere near the tar sands projects in Canada at the time. Again as I have said before the world has seen sub $10.00 oil before, and it was not in turmoil, and we were not in a recession in 1998 when this happened. Even in 1991 when there WAS a recession going on oil averaged $20.16 a barrel. Oil should have been $60.00 a barrel in 1998. (adjusted for inflation and no recession) but it was not. When times were tough, oil cost more to buy than it did 8 years later. I know a lot has changed in 10 years, and I am not going to refute that. Even with all that has happened in the oil industry, China, India, and the U.S., if you adjust oil for inflation in a healthy economy, you should see only $20.00 average for 2009. The reality is if deflation continues to happen, now globally and not locally, (ie. North American alone), $10.00 oil in 2009 is a stark reality. The OPEC countries and the Sauds can afford to sell it for $3.00 a barrel if they have to. With oil only costing them $2.00 a barrel to produce, they will still be making billions annually instead of several billions. But they will still make money. Russia, Canada, and Brazil, not so much.
This is just my opinion. I am not an economist nor an expert, but I can read and compare charts. $148.00 oil was just not sustainable in 2008. Maybe 2048, but not 2008.
The problem I think with predicting oil prices is too much wobbling between not enough and too much. Mix in a sharty economy which will probably take 10 years to recover to pre 2008 levels, or never recover at all. Couple in all the new "pumping" (not discoveries OF2, they are useless unless oil is flowing out of them) at the $2.00 production level (which is non-existent in 90% of the oil producing world) with the "forced" reduction of consumption (ie. bad economy) and the eco-geek attempt to reduce consumption (ie. massive solar, wind, nuke and electric) oil prices are really HARD to predict.
Again, I am waiting for the real economists here to chime in. Like my posts here, this is all conjecture. I am the first to admit it. I know nothing!