by copious.abundance » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 23:55:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'I')n the link to Sugar Loaf:
"The field is located beneath 2 km (1.2 miles) of water, several kilometers of sand and hard rock, and 2 km of salt"
There's your deep po conspiracy nastily holding all that nice oil in the ground for no good reason.
At $32/bbl (or even twice that), there is no way they are going to continue investing in fields like these.
Tell us which "organizations or NGO's" are conspiring to create a "fake peak" please. We're all interested to hear.
If you have no such information, please desist from trolling the forum.
dohboi I'd suggest you keep up with the Brazil thread:
-->
Stuff to read <--
Of interest are the several articles at the top of the page, in addition to ROCKMAN's comment here:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'I') hope they are right OF2...I might get a trip or to Rio if they are. I do know that the wells won't cost anything like our Deep Water GOM.
Though the play is in rather deep water the drilling is very conventional and thus much less costly and risky. The GOM wells, besides being drilled to depths below 30,000, require many casing strings to reach TD. The presalt wells are at half the depth and require simple (i.e. cheap) casing programs. Their target reservoirs are also super permeable and simple completion techniques. Great place for high delivery horizontal wells.Again, I haven’t seen any actual drilling costs so I can't be too definitive. With no pipelines out there they'll have to produce into some form of FSOP. I hate taking any gov't official word for granted when it comes to economic analysis but they may be telling something close to the truth.