Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Eminent Domain (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Eminent Domain vs. Surface Rights

Unread postby steam_cannon » Mon 03 Mar 2008, 12:27:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'W')hich part of NON-NEGOTIABLE did you not understand?

Image
Exactly! :lol:
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Eminent Domain vs. Surface Rights

Unread postby smileyhouston » Thu 06 Mar 2008, 10:15:38

does anyone know anyone that has had this happen to them?
User avatar
smileyhouston
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue 26 Feb 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Eminent Domain vs. Surface Rights

Unread postby BigTex » Thu 06 Mar 2008, 14:46:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smileyhouston', 'd')oes anyone know anyone that has had this happen to them?


It's happened to every person who has ever owned property. No bundle of property ownership rights is absolute.

To paraphrase Kansas: "Everything is on loan."
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagages

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 08 Dec 2008, 15:02:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]How To Guarantee A Depression, 12/8/08 Edition

I would normally consider this "tinfoil" in the extreme, but Steve Liesman has reported it TWICE in the last hour on CNBS, so here you have it:

Administration officials are allegedly considering using eminent domain to buy up MBS, with the justification for doing so being invocation of "national security".

Folks, if that's anything other than some nutball flying untethered off the reservation in DC I will go officially on record right here and now as saying that a Depression worse than the 1930s has just been assured.

Why?

Because the market says that MBS holders are nuts to allow modifications as they do not prevent redefaults!

"Dec. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Most U.S. mortgages modified by lenders to help keep struggling borrowers in their homes fell back into delinquency within six months, the chief regulator of national banks said.

Almost 53 percent of borrowers whose loans were modified in the first quarter of this year re-defaulted by being more than 30 days overdue, John Dugan, head of the Treasury Department’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, said today at a housing conference in Washington."

"Mortgage Modifications" don't work, are bad for the economy and investors, and the government needs to stop trying to prevent house price declines, shifting instead to forcing the bad debt to default and home prices to contract to affordable levels.

End of discussion.

The mouth-breathers among Congress, the National Association of Realtors and Home Builders need to shut the hell up and deal with reality as expressed by the marketplace, not their fanciful Peter Pan dreams.

IF Congress (or the Administration) is actually stupid enough to try something like this two things will happen instantly:

You will need to go long Georgia Pacific and International Paper as the number of lawsuits that will be filed will instantly deplete the available inventory of paper across the United States. This will be highly stimulative to that part of the economy.
All lending by private parties with capital, both inside and outside the United States to US markets, will cease instantly.
The market has proved that "mortgage modifications" do not work as they do not prevent defaults; the majority of modified loans redefault within six months.

Therefore, the MBS holders are exactly correct in refusing to play along and instead demanding that the proper legal process be followed to foreclose, seize the property, realize whatever losses may exist and move on.

If our government wants a Depression there could hardly be a better way to guarantee one than threatening to attempt to abuse Eminent Domain in such a fashion, say much less actually going through with it. [url=http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/677-How-To-Guarantee-A-Depression,-12808-Edition.html]Market Ticker
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby StormBringer » Mon 08 Dec 2008, 17:05:29

We the people for the people....ya right

Its high time for a restructuring of values in all markets..not just home values..I'm in up to my neck in my home but I make my payments on time every mth, although we do often have to choose between having the extra's in life...

My point is that I ergo we may drop some value in our homes but if the over-market for goods and services is corrected as well we would over time all have a better life...
User avatar
StormBringer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat 06 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: BFE Mo.

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby Snowrunner » Mon 08 Dec 2008, 17:33:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cbxer55', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'o')h no. can't do that. that's socialism and we must remain in awe of blockheaded right-wing conservative pap. I must have forgotten.
By the time 2012 gets here, w'ell be saying far worse about stone-headed liberals. You really thing b. HUSSEIN o. is gonna do anything different or better? I got a bridge to sell ya!

Still getting hung up on his middle name? Wow.

Will Obama be the saviour? No, we're all (the world) too far down the hill to really be able to stop what's coming.

Will he be able to soften the landing a bit? Maybe, but I think he is very quickly running out of time as well.
User avatar
Snowrunner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Screwed
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby yesplease » Mon 08 Dec 2008, 17:55:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'T')rains by nature are socialist. They require public right of ways, monopoly, and government dispensation for costs and damage incurred in their operation and management.
So are roads, but don't tell anyone! :P
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 08 Dec 2008, 18:05:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snowrunner', '
')Will he be able to soften the landing a bit? Maybe, but I think he is very quickly running out of time as well.


The media is talking about how people are complaining that Obama isn't doing enough. The guy hasn't even taken office yet and they expect him to be the de facto acting president! This has taken the term lame duck (re: Bush) to new levels.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 11:16:14

Trains by nature are socialist. Wrong.

They require public right of ways, monopoly, and government dispensation for costs and damage incurred in their operation and management. Wrong.

Train travel breaks down barriers between classes and opens lines of communication between natural opponents. Wrong.

Trains must be demonized. Wrong.

Ronnie Raygun started the process and the Bushes finished off the job. Wrong.

You possess the ability to think more rationally and less hyperbolic than this.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby nobodypanic » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 12:54:30

'wrong' isn't a counter argument.
User avatar
nobodypanic
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 15:18:57

Absurd hyperbole isn't an argument.

Thus, no counter is possible.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby yesplease » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 02:34:36

You can try, but you'll probably just get more of the same in response.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby yeahbut » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 04:10:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', 'A')bsurd hyperbole isn't an argument. Thus, no counter is possible.

Well that's handy, now, isn't it? :P
Come on Tommy, you must be able to refute those statements, otherwise, how could you know they are wrong?
User avatar
yeahbut
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 04:29:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', 'A')bsurd hyperbole isn't an argument. Thus, no counter is possible.

Absurd hyperbole most certainly IS an argument, and a very useful one at that. It amounts to carrying a thought process to a logical conclusion that seems outrageous at the end, but you get there in incremental steps each of which in itself is NOT outrageous, and is hard to dispute.

Counters to hyperbole ARE possible as well; instead of building to a logical though hyperbolic conclusion through deductive reasoning, you work opposite to that and do a reductive deconstruction of the argument. You were too lazy or else plain incapable of doing that, so you just made Declarations that some of the axioms were WRONG, without justifying WHY they were wrong. You have to do better than that if you expect your argument to hold any weight with the reader.

I personally will sit this one out for a while :-) I will say there are so many holes in both arguments the whole thread is like Swiss Cheese at the moment. LOL.
Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby yesplease » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 07:40:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', 'A')bsurd hyperbole most certainly IS an argument, and a very useful one at that. It amounts to carrying a thought process to a logical conclusion that seems outrageous at the end, but you get there in incremental steps each of which in itself is NOT outrageous, and is hard to dispute.
O.K. now you're just making stuff up. Hyperbole is not logical, and is by definition exaggerated, not to be taken literally.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')y⋅per⋅bo⋅le
1. obvious and intentional exaggeration.
2. an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.”

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') personally will sit this one out for a while :-) I will say there are so many holes in [your] argument the whole [thing] is like Swiss Cheese at the moment. LOL.
;) ;)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 08:59:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', 'O').K. now you're just making stuff up. Hyperbole is not logical, and is by definition exaggerated, not to be taken literally

A good argument by NO MEANS demands literal interpretation of the prose. All it demands is that it makes the reader understand the point being driven home. I can write simply outrageous stuff, and as long as in the mind of the reader it helps said reader to understand what is going on in the argument and what the underlying meaning is, it is VERY effective argument. I do it all the time YesPlease, and I KNOW it works. This very method has gained me quite a bit of credibilty on the board to date just BECAUSE it works. I could make it work a whole lot better also, just in deferance to Eastbay and others on the Mod board, I don't get near so hyperbolic as I can to make a point. LOL.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby yesplease » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 23:05:38

Talking about whether or not the argument was good or bad, a matter of personal taste, is fine I suppose, but it ain't what TommyJefferson or I were talking about AFAIK.

You or I can have the best argument in the world, but if it's built off of something that's incorrect or uses illogical reasoning, then it's wrong. How good or bad it is doesn't change that. That said, even if it's flat out wrong, there seem to be plenty of c0rnu/d00mc0pians who think it isn't just good, but great, but that doesn't make it right or wrong. It's assumptions and logical reasoning are what make it right or wrong.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Government may invoke Eminent Domain to buy up mortagage

Unread postby BlueGhostNo2 » Thu 11 Dec 2008, 06:57:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', 'T')his very method has gained me quite a bit of credibilty on the board to date just BECAUSE it works. I could make it work a whole lot better also, just in deferance to Eastbay and others on the Mod board, I don't get near so hyperbolic as I can to make a point. LOL.

Actually RE you write verbose illogical and incorrect rubbish presumably for emotional impact... It is not 'gained me quite abit of credibility' it's gotten you briefly argued with and ignored by the rational posters. Now they in the main leave you to the ranty circle jerk with the other fiction writing bozos.

Sad thing is you probably feel you're contributing! But contributing to what? These crisis do not require extra emotional impact, they're damn scary just listing the facts!

Incidentally the reason you are un-ignored by me at the moment is you replied to my russia debt rating thread and I was curious, Sadly the 'fact' you 'contributed' was completely made up rubbish - S&P is not owned by the Rothschild's, it took me about 3 mins of google to discover this, I should've refuted it in my thread but y'know, I can't be bothered correcting your ilk on this forum anymore. I just read the rational pdefaulteeps and ignore the dross... S/N is getting pretty horrific though. Back on ignore you go.

Incidentally, Railways and Roads are socialist. TRAINS are not necessarily. The US has no railways as I understand it because the auto's got big and destroyed them and no politician can withstand their lobbying and has the vision to re-create them. *shrug* if this is 'it doesn't happen because of market vs socialist ideology' then fair enough
User avatar
BlueGhostNo2
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue 24 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron