Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Elasticity of Human Nature (Split from India thread)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Is humanity capable of progressing, without divine intervention, to a state where they will live modestly and in harmony with the natural world and one another when otherwise being capable of exploitation, imperialism and oppression?

Yes, but only for a generation or two.
0
0%
Yes, and such a society could be a stable state for the species.
3
No votes
No, humanity will only change as a result of divine intervention or only when constrained from acting otherwise.
2
No votes
No, all talk of "purpose" is a manifestation of an inability to cope with the meaninglessness of existence.
2
No votes
It is impossible to know.
3
No votes
These questions are a waste of time. Go out and plan a garden.
4
No votes
Other
0
0%
 
Total votes : 14

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby vision-master » Sun 30 Nov 2008, 10:30:00

It all goes back toooo......
Image
anywho

The blood of Jesus - The Holy Grail.
Image

Horus - the thalamus within the human brain!
Image
Last edited by vision-master on Sun 30 Nov 2008, 10:46:37, edited 1 time in total.
vision-master
 

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby skeptik » Sun 30 Nov 2008, 10:44:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('3aidlillahi', 'Y')ou mean Hindus by country? Wiki has a neat little graph:

Weird. I wonder why there's a 'Hindu colony' in Guyana?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')The religion of peace kills again..."

Nah.. A bunch of brainwashed nutters with Kalashnikovs. The thought of an abstract noun killing anybody is as silly as a "War on Terror"
User avatar
skeptik
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Costa Geriatrica, Spain

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby skeptik » Sun 30 Nov 2008, 11:13:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'I')t all goes back toooo......
Image

Hawaiian. Hmm. The middle figure reminds me of a Celtic Sheela-Na-Gig figure.
User avatar
skeptik
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Costa Geriatrica, Spain

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby Consensi » Sun 30 Nov 2008, 17:20:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('skeptik', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('3aidlillahi', 'Y')ou mean Hindus by country? Wiki has a neat little graph:
Weird. I wonder why there's a 'Hindu colony' in Guyana?

I believe Guyana was a British Colony at one time and Indians were shipped over as either slaves or indentured servants.
Consensi
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed 28 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby Taghayee » Sun 30 Nov 2008, 18:22:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '3'). Human communities are imperialistic. Islam was happy to expand when it was capable. Today Secular Western Capitalism is able to expand so it is. That is because both are made up of homo sapiens.

Your logic is faulty here. Dogs walk on four, horses walk on four, therefore horses are dogs.

In his article, Mohammad's Sword, Uri Anvery sums up the spread of Islam; Contrary to popular mass media wisdom, it was quite peaceful and unifying. The spread of what is known as 'Secular Western Capitalism' was neither peaceful nor unifying. It was done for maximum profit and through bombardment, deforestation, assasination, misery, genocide, pollution, resource thievery etc. The former had ethics at its core and joined masses from Morocco all the way to Indonesia while the latter has armaments industry and maximum profit at its core and went on to divide people all over the world. If anything, they are quite opposite of one another. One was for man the other for machine.

I agree with your notion of imperialistic nature of human societies, the means however differ from community to community or collectivity to collectivity. And that makes all the difference.
User avatar
Taghayee
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue 08 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Classified
Top

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 01:52:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Taghayee', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '3'). Human communities are imperialistic. Islam was happy to expand when it was capable. Today Secular Western Capitalism is able to expand so it is. That is because both are made up of homo sapiens.

Your logic is faulty here. Dogs walk on four, horses walk on four, therefore horses are dogs.

In his article, Mohammad's Sword, Uri Anvery sums up the spread of Islam; Contrary to popular mass media wisdom, it was quite peaceful and unifying.


Telll that to Vienna.

Every Empire claims to be (and with a degree of truth it) unifying and "peaceful." World trade benefits a lot of people and standardized economic practices have made Mumbai and the east coast of China what they are. We have been unified by the English language blah blah blah. We both know the real cost but if one buys into all of the propaganda western secularism has been "unifying and peaceful"... Don't believe today's propaganda; don't believe ancient propaganda.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 01:54:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '[') A war mongering tribe of Mongols swarming over the plains raping and pillaging along the way tends to have a lower net worth than a bunch of Polynesian Fishermen living in Hawaii, for instance. Not to say there wasn't evil in that society either, just not quite so rampant, eh?

The bigger the society, the more rampant the Evil. Small is good. The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth.

Reverse Engineer


Yes those human societies with out the resources necessary to commit great evil only commit little evil... I am not quite sure of the value of this observation but yes those without resources necessary to act do not act.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: "The religion of peace kills again..."

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 02:19:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '[') A war mongering tribe of Mongols swarming over the plains raping and pillaging along the way tends to have a lower net worth than a bunch of Polynesian Fishermen living in Hawaii, for instance. Not to say there wasn't evil in that society either, just not quite so rampant, eh?

The bigger the society, the more rampant the Evil. Small is good. The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth.

Reverse Engineer


Yes those human societies with out the resources necessary to commit great evil only commit little evil... I am not quite sure of the value of this observation but yes those without resources necessary to act do not act.


Its an acute observation, you understand the point then. Its when Evil is brought from thought to action that it wreaks its havoc on the world. In each person is the seeds of Evil, but without the resources upon which to grow through greed and selfishness, it remains only a seed and does little damage.

The problem here you see with this observation is that when you make universal statements about the nature of human beings, you do so in the context of the large societies we have dominating the earth today. Its a matter of society growing too large with too many fertile fields and fertile minds wherein the seeds of Evil sprout, and take over the garden like weeds.

Shrink down the societies to manageable levels where everybody knows everyone else and knows they depend on everyone else for survival, their behaviors are a good deal different then the behaviors you see as universal. They are not universal, they are an artifact of society having grown beyond its britches.

The time has come to shrink back down, and unfortunately that will not happen without the ugly behaviors you identify as universal coming to the fore. So it goes, but in the end, the Meek Shall Inherit the Earth.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 02:44:44

and it is the nature of human beings to grow beyond their britches and whenever they can grow beyond their britches they will. So you can either a) so destroy the environment that humans beings are incapable of outgrowing their britches or b) wait for humanity to evolve either 1. smaller brains or 2. higher nature

I find (a) rather distasteful and to be avoided and puts the species at risk since a marginal existence is well an existence on the margins. (b) may happen but I find it rather a waste of time since I can do nothing to effect it and if it does happen it will (probably) not effect my existence in the world. It is kind of like worrying about a potential galactic catastrophy 100,000 years from now; it ain't worth worrying about when you have more immediate problems (global warming, peak oil or the need to raise propaganda savvy children).

Today and for the foreseeable future homo sapiens are homo sapiens. Being angry at them for being them is a waste of energy. Hoping they will become something other than what they are is a waste of time. The best we can do is to live as wise and a good life as is possible for a community of homo sapiens in a world full of homo sapiens... If that is a goal and you work towards it there is not enough energy left to be angry nor enough time to try to reform the species.

Exhibit One:

Nickle Mines
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 03:04:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'a')nd it is the nature of human beings to grow beyond their britches and whenever they can grow beyond their britches they will. So you can either a) so destroy the environment that humans beings are incapable of outgrowing their britches or b) wait for humanity to evolve either 1. smaller brains or 2. higher nature

I find (a) rather distasteful and to be avoided and puts the species at risk since a marginal existence is well an existence on the margins. (b) may happen but I find it rather a waste of time since I can do nothing to effect it and if it does happen it will (probably) not effect my existence in the world. It is kind of like worrying about a potential galactic catastrophy 100,000 years from now; it ain't worth worrying about when you have more immediate problems (global warming, peak oil or the need to raise propaganda savvy children).

Today and for the foreseeable future homo sapiens are homo sapiens. Being angry at them for being them is a waste of energy. Hoping they will become something other than what they are is a waste of time. The best we can do is to live as wise and a good life as is possible for a community of homo sapiens in a world full of homo sapiens... If that is a goal and you work towards it there is not enough energy left to be angry nor enough time to try to reform the species.


Well first off, Peak Oil insures that eventually here, Human Beings will never be able to get THIS fat and roll over their britches quite so much as now, so that in itself is hopeful news. Regardless of what you perceive to be the inherent nature of human beings, if the environment and resources won't support so large a population, you won't have near the amount of Evil growing that results from that. That is a direct consequence of your own observation.

Second, I disgree that there is nothing we can do to promote human beings moving toward a higher level of consciousness and personal responsibility. That is what you must TEACH to your children, so that this is what gets passed on to the survivors, NOT the tendency toward Greed and Selfishness. If you regard this as immutable and universal, it will of course never change, its your EXPECTATION that it will never change. Children live up to the expectations of the adults who surround them,if yours are low, then your children will live up to the lowest of them, guaranteed.

Will you or I ever see a better world in our lifetimes? I hardly think so, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't preach what is Good to our children, or that we shouldn't be angry about the sad state the world is in now either. I personally am damn angry about this, and I have no issues with saying so either, regardless of what the DSM IV might say about this aspect of my personality.

Its not important what comes about in my lifetime, its what I stand for now that counts, and what I preach. I won't see the results of it here in this life, but I will see it from the Great Beyond.

See You on the Other Side

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 03:26:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '[')

Well first off, Peak Oil insures that eventually here, Human Beings will never be able to get THIS fat and roll over their britches quite so much as now, so that in itself is hopeful news. Regardless of what you perceive to be the inherent nature of human beings, if the environment and resources won't support so large a population, you won't have near the amount of Evil growing that results from that. That is a direct consequence of your own observation.

Second, I disgree that there is nothing we can do to promote human beings moving toward a higher level of consciousness and personal responsibility. That is what you must TEACH to your children, so that this is what gets passed on to the survivors, NOT the tendency toward Greed and Selfishness. If you regard this as immutable and universal, it will of course never change, its your EXPECTATION that it will never change. Children live up to the expectations of the adults who surround them,if yours are low, then your children will live up to the lowest of them, guaranteed.

Will you or I ever see a better world in our lifetimes? I hardly think so, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't preach what is Good to our children, or that we shouldn't be angry about the sad state the world is in now either. I personally am damn angry about this, and I have no issues with saying so either, regardless of what the DSM IV might say about this aspect of my personality.

Its not important what comes about in my lifetime, its what I stand for now that counts, and what I preach. I won't see the results of it here in this life, but I will see it from the Great Beyond.

See You on the Other Side

Reverse Engineer


The Roman Empire, Spanish, Aztec, British etc etc empires were plenty evil and they did not need oil to be so.

Yes you can train your children but that is no guarentee how they will turn out let alone how their great-grandchildren will turn out. Some people come out of awful childhoods to become quite reflective some grow up with every spiritual advantage and are not. Part of a good life is to do what you can to tutor those who will take your place in the future but each of the students that truly takes up the task will live in a world much like ours with about the same ratio of enlightenment vs base behavior among the population as a whole.

Again show me a communtiy that has raised its children right in such a way as to weed out greed out of the population as a whole... you already confessed that it does not exist. You have that great human secularist eschatology which is as faith-based as my theistic one (which I do not talk about here because it is faith-based). "If only we teach out children right they will..." I see no evidence that they will and since I do not share the secular-humanist hope for the inhierent transcendence of human character I lay that hope where it belongs, with the divine.

And since it is the job of the divine to manage the meta-narrative of the species I can busy myself with those things that I really can control. Faithful living in the present world as I find it. Part of that is public; mostly it is private. And at the end of the day I am too tired to worry about what everyone else is doing. This is good because the first impulse of empire building is an over-concern with everyone else's business.

Small scale (ie the Amish) maybe you can train for sustainability but a close reading of their history will reveal they are not immune and the seductions of power and greed that they face... I have little doubt that if they had the potential to become empire builders they would, over time, re-enact they cycle of imperial ambition. As it is, they do a pretty good job of minding their own business and trying to form communities of faithful living.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 04:09:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'Y')es you can train your children but that is no guarentee how they will turn out let alone how their great-grandchildren will turn out. Some people come out of awful childhoods to become quite reflective some grow up with every spiritual advantage and are not. Part of a good life is to do what you can to tutor those who will take your place in the future but each of the students that truly takes up the task will live in a world much like ours with about the same ratio of enlightenment vs base behavior among the population as a whole.

Again show me a communtiy that has raised its children right in such a way as to weed out greed out of the population as a whole... you already confessed that it does not exist. You have that great human secularist eschatology which is as faith-based as my theistic one (which I do not talk about here because it is faith-based). "If only we teach out children right they will..." I see no evidence that they will and since I do not share the secular-humanist hope for the inhierent transcendence of human character I lay that hope where it belongs, with the divine.


Far as my personal philosophy, which is far more Theistic these days than it is Humanist goes, I have in numerous posts outlined the logic that underlies this, so its not strictly faith based. You could however argue that this is like Christian Apologetics, since I take my own set of Axioms and build out from there.

Regardless of whether you want to call it Humanist or Theist, Logic based or Faith based, the issue with teaching children is that no you cannot expect them to necessarily come out precisely with the same ideas you did as a result of teaching. It doesn't work that way since they each have their own spirit. However, like making good preps, good education and good principles enhance the chances of a good outcome, though they do not guarantee it. Most certainly, teaching bad principles does not make likely a good outcome. Neither does having low expectations of this generation or the next, and in fact its wise to carry down the wisdom from one generation to the next through the written word. Thus the justification for the Bible of course. Doesn't mean everyone will follow the priniciples correctly or that it won't be misused, but it is better than nothing.

We actually have many congruences in our thinking, perhaps that is why we argue so much? Its a few critical differences in interpretation of behavior and what personal responsibility means I think that cause us so much conflict. I perceive you to be a very good man Cur, just I find you have a tendency to look for universalities of behavior and a fatalistic attitude toward it that I do not agree with. I make value judgements on the nature of good and evil that you do not agree with. So it goes. I do not know if we will ever find a common ground, but I will say that I much prefer our recent discussions to the old ones. Much more idea based. That is good.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 04:44:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', ' ')you have a tendency to look for universalities of behavior and a fatalistic attitude toward it that I do not agree with.


I would argue that it is not fatalistic to abstain from struggling to control that which is beyond one's control... One could just as easily say it is hubris to think that one can change what has been human character since "the fall" (however one wants to construe that event/metaphor).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Reinhold Niebuhr', '
')God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
Taking, as He did, this sinful world
as it is, not as I would have it;
Trusting that He will make all things right
if I surrender to His Will;
That I may be reasonably happy in this life
and supremely happy with Him
Forever in the next.
Amen.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 05:06:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', ' ')you have a tendency to look for universalities of behavior and a fatalistic attitude toward it that I do not agree with.


I would argue that it is not fatalistic to abstain from struggling to control that which is beyond one's control... One could just as easily say it is hubris to think that one can change what has been human character since "the fall" (however one wants to construe that event/metaphor).


I would argue back that it is hubris to think you know what you cannot control. Who are you to define the limits of a man? Only God can do that. Nor do I look to change human character since the fall, I already postulated that the seeds of evil are present in all men. I merely seek to put it in a box it cannot escape from, by not feeding it. It is irrelevant if a person is a heroine addict if there is no heroine to buy of course.

Anyhow, we have an irreconcilable difference of opinion on the nature of man here, and also likely on the nature of God, which we have not discussed. Leave that one for another day.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 05:29:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')
I would argue back that it is hubris to think you know what you cannot control. Who are you to define the limits of a man?

Reverse Engineer


10,000 years, many many religions, many many different cultures, languages, ways of life and

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')I can't point to a society that is not corrupt, only to people in those societies who are not corrupt. They tend to be in the minority in most societies, but there are always good people out there.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')u·bris (hybrs) also hy·bris (h-)
n.
Overbearing pride or presumption; arrogance:


presuming to be able to do what no other human or society has been able to do or accepting that things are as they are and attempting to live a life faithful to one's values in the world as it is.... which one is hubris?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')um·ble (hmbl)
adj. hum·bler, hum·blest
1. Marked by meekness or modesty in behavior, attitude, or spirit; not arrogant or prideful.
2. Showing deferential or submissive respect: a humble apology.
3. Low in rank, quality, or station; unpretentious or lowly: a humble cottage.


You want humanity to be modest in behavior yet the very undertaking of the task to reform humanity is an example of the very hubris that you want to exterminate. Such is the beginning of all empires... the need to change the other "for their own good." Your goal and your ideals our contradictory.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 05:45:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '
')
presuming to be able to do what no other human or society has been able to do or accepting that things are as they are and attempting to live a life faithful to one's values in the world as it is.... which one is hubris?


In the words of Robert Kennedy

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?


To reach for change and to aspire for something better is not hubris, its the very essence of purpose. To exist with what is is not hubris, it is capitulation.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')You want humanity to be modest in behavior yet the very undertaking of the task to reform humanity is an example of the very hubris that you want to exterminate. Such is the beginning of all empires... the need to change the other "for their own good." Your goal and your ideals our contradictory.


It is not my job to change humanity, it is each person's job to change themselves, and in so doing humanity will change. People WILL change as the result of the trials before us, its just a question of in which ways they will change. Will they turn more toward the Darkness, or more toward the Light? All I do is speak the truth as I see it. How it is interpreted by others and what choices they make are their choices and their responsibility, I cannot force anyone to do anything. So no, neither my goals nor my ideals are contradictory.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 06:15:28

And those who set unattainable goals... what are they?

Image

I have goals and purpose, and have been quite open with them in this thread. To live a faithful and fullfilling life in the world. This goal is meaningful and attainable. It is not capitulation to accept what cannot be changed; it is maturity. It is not fatalism to focus one's self on what is within their power and control but smart.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RE', 'I')t is not my job to change humanity, it is each person's job to change themselves, and in so doing humanity will change.


And so has been the preaching of humanists (theistic and secularist) since I do not know when. What would you put the odds of that actually happening actually being? What evidence is there that humanity can/will really change? Again, name me one community that is there or one step ahead. Or is it just important to have the hope?

I am sorry that humans are "fallen" or imperfect or frail or whatever adjective you would choose to describe the current condition but it ain't gonna change by human effort. It would take divine intervention as is the "orthodox position" of most mono-theistic faiths.

Trying to play God, yeah that is hubris.
Last edited by wisconsin_cur on Mon 01 Dec 2008, 06:33:30, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Terror Attack In India

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 11:53:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RE', 'I')t is not my job to change humanity, it is each person's job to change themselves, and in so doing humanity will change.


And so has been the preaching of humanists (theistic and secularist) since I do not know when. What would you put the odds of that actually happening actually being? What evidence is there that humanity can/will really change? Again, name me one community that is there or one step ahead. Or is it just important to have the hope?


I would put the odds at 100%. I don't need to have hope that humanity can change, it always does.

Image

Whether humanity will change for the better or for the worse remains an open question of course. Regardless, though the change may be imperceptible in the lifetime of one man, every man makes his contribution to the ever so gradual change. I nwhich direction you move is up to you, but everybody changes throughout their lives, change is a constant.

What is out of my control? Only that which I cannot conceive of in my mind's eye. If I can think about it, I can have some effect on it. If I can write about it, I can have still more effect. If I can distribute it out over the internet, I can have more effect than that. Karl Marx's & Friederich Engels Communist Manifesto certainly had a large effect on people, wouldn't you say?

I'd hardly put what I write up as the new Manifesto for Humanity, to do so would be hubris of epic proportions of course ;-) Nevertheless, I hope that what I write at least makes a few people think about things in a different way.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Elasticity of Human Nature (Split from India thread)

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 12:11:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') can have more effect than that. Karl Marx's & Friederich Engels Communist Manifesto certainly had a large effect on people, wouldn't you say?


Not the effect that they intended. You are changing the name of the game now (as is often the case I noticed). And people can change the world by seizing a hotel for a few days or, for that matter, committing any crime.

Can you guide humanity into your vision, up to this point you have claimed yes, by teaching children you can have a small part in the species. To not have such hope would be surrender or "fatalism."

Now you are much more humble, comparing yourself only to Marx (another failed prognosticator of humanity's grand evolution) a person who through their vision of a better tomorrow was used to justify the murder of millions, another person with an emotional need to think that humans were progressing. He is the perfect example of secular eschatalogical thinking at work... and you mirror him in many ways... humanity would have been much better served if he had concentrated more on tending a garden and less on committing his secular religion to paper.

For anyone interested on what Marx and the neocons (as well as RE and plenty of other secular eschatological thinkers have in common I highly recommend John Gray from your public library.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat is out of my control? Only that which I cannot conceive of in my mind's eye.


No, no hubris in that statement. :roll:
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: The Elasticity of Human Nature (Split from India thread)

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 12:24:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'C')an you guide humanity into your vision, up to this point you have claimed yes, by teaching children you can have a small part in the species. To not have such hope would be surrender or "fatalism."

Now you are much more humble, comparing yourself only to Marx (another failed prognosticator of humanity's grand evolution) a person who through their vision of a better tomorrow was used to justify the murder of millions, another person with an emotional need to think that humans were progressing. He is the perfect example of secular eschatalogical thinking at work... and you mirror him in many ways... humanity would have been much better served if he had concentrated more on tending a garden and less on committing his secular religion to paper.


I still maintain you can have a small effect by teaching good values to children. You haven't shown that it's not possible.

Far as the the Communist Manifesto being used as a justification for the murder of millions, the Bible and the Koran have been used for the justification of many more than that. So does that mean the world would have been better off if God didn't set the words down on paper?

If the Word of God can be used for nefarious purposes, so also can the words of a man be used that way as well. How Marx's words or my words or the Word of God is interpreted by you or anyone else is solely up to you. The results you get out come from how the people who read the words interpret them. That IS something I have no control over ;-)

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron