Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE "Found on Yahoo" Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Misguided man from a yahoo message board

Unread postby JimBad05 » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 19:07:06

OIL Scam
by: Shotgun4fun (50/M/Missouri) 04/01/05 06:01 pm
Msg: 38859 of 38909
1 recommendation

I have it a good authority that oil tankers are being stopped in Texas from unloading. The government is lying to us. Would someone in Texas around those shipping lanes take some picures and show the world the oil prices are being artifically inflated to line the pockets of the rich and famous!


This is taken from one of those message boards after a news story on yahoo. Though most try to blame libs or cons for high oil prices, a certain percentage are there preaching peak oil to the masses. Then, you just have plain lunatics like this guy.
User avatar
JimBad05
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Hubbard, OH 44425

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 20:25:50

Plenty of reasons to stop tankers.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/specials/ ... ire24.html
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n February 2003, the Polar Resolution was offloading oil in Martinez, Calif., when a tiny fuel leak in a high-pressure line caused hot bunker oil to collect on the deck plating around the pipe. That's not good, because misty, hot fuel is explosive.

The ship sailed out of the Golden Gate even as engineers worked all day and all night, tearing out and rewelding huge sections of pipe.

At least one engineer worked 22 hours straight -- a violation of federal work limits instituted after the Exxon Valdez, though there are exceptions in an emergency.

One seaman reported that when he was called to help around 5:30 a.m., the other engineers were "red-eyed, goofy and incoherent."

Then the ship was rocked by an explosion.

The blast, unrelated to the leak, destroyed a 6,600-volt electrical breaker. The tanker scurried back to anchor in San Francisco Bay.

The Coast Guard knew nothing of the episode when the Seattle Post-Intelligencer repeatedly inquired about it. Apparently neither the tanker's officers nor its owner reported it.

The P-I found out when it contacted a crewman who suffered smoke inhalation in the aftermath of the explosion. In what could be construed as an attempt to evade reporting requirements, a medical report signed by the captain classifies the smoke inhalation not as an accident-caused injury, but as an illness. The captain, Dan Ellison of Fountain Valley, Calif., did not return phone calls.

Failure to report such a damaging explosion and an injury -- an apparent law violation -- reflects a breakdown in post-Exxon Valdez reforms.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 20:44:00

I live in sight of the port of Houston and I see tankers coming in all day long...

In fact I'm looking out my window right now... and there's one going by.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Yahoo! News: 01-Apr-05

Unread postby EnviroEngr » Fri 01 Apr 2005, 21:38:59

From the Yahoo! News Portal:

Fri Apr 1, 6:16 AM EST

Gas prices jeopardize road projects
-------------------------------------------
| Whose reality is this anyway!? |
-------------------------------------------
(---------< Temet Nosce >---------)
__________________________
User avatar
EnviroEngr
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richland Center, Wisconsin

Hello Peaksters (from the creator of Runningonempty Yahoo)

Unread postby SeeOtter » Fri 08 Apr 2005, 00:28:48

Hi People,

I've been into PO since way back (internet time!) to the early Paleolithic (1999), before it was a media hot flash. I started up the original Yahoo discussion group "RunningOnEmpty" (now renamed by the guy I turned it over to as "RunningOnEmpty2").

I'm just posting here to alert anybody who cares that I've got 3 other semi-relevant groups related to the whole energy/overshoot/dieoff meme:

General end-of-it-all chat at my main group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AlasBabylon/

My extended 2003 interview with my friend Jay Hanson, internet godfather of all this dieoff stuff is the file 'HansonSummingUpInterview' at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AlasBabylon/files/

Those who fear Japan devolving back to Edo period can get comfort or chills from the (rather desultory!) chat at my group here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HubbertJapan/

Those in AL, WA, OR, northern CA, or ID can banter about local life-or-death here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RunningOnEmptyCascadia/

Have a Nice Dieoff!

-Scott Meredith
User avatar
SeeOtter
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby aldente » Fri 08 Apr 2005, 01:16:31

Thanks for finally posting.I remember the first post "with an accelerated heart beat". It's all about the response, isn't it and this is a forum where fist fighting is the rule.

Anyway, in the first link that you place about the IMF warning about permanent higher oil prices it states:

The IMF forecast in its World Economic Outlook that crude would cost $34 a barrel in 2010 in today's money and would rise to $39-$56 a barrel in 2030. The predicted prices are well above market and oil industry expectations. They are also much higher than the latest long-term forecast from the International Energy Agency, the oil watchdog, of real oil prices of $27 a barrel in 2010 and $34 a barrel in 2030.


Now what how naive can one be and what is the point to even post such a kind of information????
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby SeeOtter » Fri 08 Apr 2005, 04:08:33

Hello,

I believe you are mistaken. I have no intention of fighting anybody.

>Now what how naive can one be and what is the point to even post such a >kind of information????

I'm far from naive and was into PO probably long before you and most here.

The post you refer to is one of thousands placed by one of the 525 list members in my group as background information on what significant others, in this case the IMF, are saying/thinking. Posting the article does not imply endorsement or validation of the contents. Is that a difficult or novel concept?

But do be warned: AlasBabylon is a wild and freaky group, focused on the cultural and psychological aspects of dieoff. It is not moderated and it is not for everyone. People who can't take a rough, weird, crazy and sometimes stupid ride probably won't feel comfortable there. If you love control and "respectability", don't bother to join AlasBabylon.

Thanks!
-Scott Meredith
User avatar
SeeOtter
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby aldente » Fri 08 Apr 2005, 10:40:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeeOtter', '
')I'm far from naive and was into PO probably long before you and most here.


I didn't want to say that "you" are naive, but whoever wrote that particular text plus I have no doubt that you are aware of the problem longer than I.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeeOtter', '
')I believe you are mistaken. I have no intention of fighting anybody.


Well, same here, I did not hint that "you" were out to fight anyone but noticed simply that some posters statements were ripped apart and in pieces within the shortest time. Eventhough your direction is fully alligned, and that scenario not truly applicable.
I refer rather to people like that neo-con that posted recently, some of you might remember. I actually have to say to his defense that he had some valid points and he defended them solid.
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Hello Peaksters (from the creator of Runningonempty Yaho

Unread postby MattSavinar » Mon 11 Apr 2005, 23:06:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeeOtter', 'H')i People,

I've been into PO since way back (internet time!) to the early Paleolithic (1999), before it was a media hot flash. I started up the original Yahoo discussion group "RunningOnEmpty" (now renamed by the guy I turned it over to as "RunningOnEmpty2").

I'm just posting here to alert anybody who cares that I've got 3 other semi-relevant groups related to the whole energy/overshoot/dieoff meme:

General end-of-it-all chat at my main group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AlasBabylon/

My extended 2003 interview with my friend Jay Hanson, internet godfather of all this dieoff stuff is the file 'HansonSummingUpInterview' at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AlasBabylon/files/

Those who fear Japan devolving back to Edo period can get comfort or chills from the (rather desultory!) chat at my group here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HubbertJapan/

Those in AL, WA, OR, northern CA, or ID can banter about local life-or-death here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RunningOnEmptyCascadia/

Have a Nice Dieoff!


I'm not sure why, but this last line had me roflmao.

Natt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Suggestion for meetup.com, yahoogroups integration

Unread postby Ayoob_Reloaded » Thu 14 Apr 2005, 12:21:11

There's a bunch of people on runningonempty2, runningonempty3, thedieoffQ&A, foodwatershelter, etc. There's probalby 5K members of those groups. Do you think it would make sense to add forums with those names and ask them to pick an occasional article that they think would be of interest to this site? It might be an interesting way to get some good articles and maybe some cross-pollenization.

Just a thought.

Actually, it might not be that bad of an idea to have a thread for the Frugal Squirrels forum or any other groups that have similar interests. Maybe the Green Party or the Libertarian Party, or is that too divisive?
User avatar
Ayoob_Reloaded
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Aaron » Thu 14 Apr 2005, 13:06:31

The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Yahoo! News: 27-Apr-05

Unread postby EnviroEngr » Wed 27 Apr 2005, 17:48:47

From the Yahoo! News Portal:

Wed Apr 27, 4:00 PM EDT

Bush Lays Out Energy Plan As Prices Soar
-------------------------------------------
| Whose reality is this anyway!? |
-------------------------------------------
(---------< Temet Nosce >---------)
__________________________
User avatar
EnviroEngr
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richland Center, Wisconsin

Unread postby AlCzervik » Mon 02 May 2005, 16:05:56

OPEC Boosts Supplies to 25 Year High
http://tinyurl.com/7g6kv
AlCzervik
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed 14 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Motor City

Peak Oil: one of the 5 "Top Stories" at Yahoo News

Unread postby Dvanharn » Sat 28 May 2005, 15:28:39

There is a 59 minute-old headline at Yahoo! News Home Page as I write this - peak oil is indeed hitting the mainstream news!! It was written by by MATT CRENSON, AP National Writer, and I think he did an excellent overview.

Here's a link to the story, because I don't know how long it will stay on the "front page" of "Yahoo! News"

Experts: Petroleum May Be Nearing a Peak

It's going to be a very interesting summer if the discussion of peak oil hits other mainstream news media - especially CNN, Fox, or the front pages of the major newspapers. Once one media major gets a hot story going, the others will jump on it like flies on dung.

Dave
User avatar
Dvanharn
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Sonoma County, Northern California

Unread postby bart » Sat 28 May 2005, 17:00:58

This is a big development.

When I looked on Google News, more than 76 news organizations had put a version of this story online.

Forbes, Newsday (NY), NY Times, SF Chronicle, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, LA Times, ABC News, and CBS News were among those that carried the story.

Energy Bulletin has an archive copy of the story:
http://energybulletin.net/6383.html .

A week ago, the Canada Globe and Mail (the big paper in Canada) started a week series on the oil crunch, with several stories per day. Now we have a fairly good summary of Peak Oil running in many of the important U.S. newspapers.

Step-by-step, we're on our way.
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif

Unread postby kenohio » Sat 28 May 2005, 17:42:16

I think the people in the know already realize that we are at or very near peak oil.

I know in Pennsylvania many older coal mines are being reopened on a very large scale. Plus other mines are getting huge infusions of new capital to increase production.

This type of investment hasn't been seen since the 70's.

Consol Energy in the suburbs of Pittsburgh just announced they are investing $500 million dollars to increase capacity at one of it's mines. The investment will make the coal mine in South Western Pennsylvania the nations largest underground mine. It will produce over 17 million tons of coal per year.

If these companies didn't have very good information that the price of coal will remain high for the forseeable future, they wouldn't bother investing the millions that it takes to bring a mine on-line.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05148/512077.stm
User avatar
kenohio
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 29 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Unread postby RonMN » Sat 28 May 2005, 18:21:52

Once PO becomes mainstream & everybody is aware...i give the stock market about 15 minutes...maybe less. :(

Dow: 37
Nasdaq: 2
S&P: 0
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby snowhope » Sat 28 May 2005, 19:47:19

Once this becomes mainstream, my concern is that a degree of panic will set in. Markets will get even more jittery than normal. One thing will lead to another and the downwards spiral will start. As soon as panic hits, almost anything can and will happen.

From a pureley selfish reason, I hope it doesn't cause panic just yet - I AM NOT READY!!!! :!: :( :cry:
User avatar
snowhope
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri 20 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: United Kingdom

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Sat 28 May 2005, 20:37:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', 'D')ow: 37
Nasdaq: 2
S&P: 0



LOL. the 2 nasdaq points will be solar panel manufacturers.
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby NEOPO » Sat 28 May 2005, 21:03:24

Good article.

Ron is such an optomist :lol:

Does anyone remember why its called wall street?

The barbarians are at the gate, on the gate and behind the gate :o
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests