by kakkerlak » Thu 20 Nov 2008, 10:16:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'T')hat's not true across the board is it? Pack animals with some social order have rules. Break the rule and you get punished by the alpha or someone higher up. Domesticated pack animals exhibit the same thing and show awareness of the rules. If I walk into a room and find our two dogs playing keep away with my sock, I don't even say anything but they drop the sock, drop their heads and slink around. Guilty!
Yes, social animals have rules. These rules can be described as "social rules" or "social norms" and are similar to our "unwritten rules". Shaking hands, driving on the right side of the road or giving gifts at birthdays are examples of these "social rules".
These rules are very different from moral or ethical rules. When you for example refuse to shake hands, breaking an unwritten rule, you're not doing anything illegal and you don't become a bad person in any way. However, people are not going to like you.
Note: Not shaking hands was a hot topic in my country not long ago. Some Moslim didn't shake hands with a female minister and was threatened to be deported back to the middle east. Only because he didn't want to shake her hand.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')rom
Wikipedia (don't bite, please):
Social norms are the behavioural expectations and cues within a society or group. They have been defined as "the rules that a group uses for appropriate and inappropriate values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviors. These rules may be explicit or implicit. Failure to stick to the rules can result in severe punishments, the most feared of which is exclusion from the group." They have also been described as the "customary rules of behavior that coordinate our interactions with others."
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vaseline2008', 'I')t is only by definition evil is "evil"...what if it was socially the norm to do "evil"...then would those acts of "evil" be called "good"?