Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I'm surprised

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby TheDude » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 01:17:01

My take home lesson: the economics Doomers went to bat first, like roccman here or Stoneleigh/Ilargi at TOD and Automatic Earth. What seemed like more outrageous hyperbole is coming to pass. Whether the out there statements from the likes of Savinar or Jack come to visit us we can only wait and see...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stoneleigh', 'R')elative values of currencies will depend on which currency is deflating most quickly. The only ones I would hazard a prediction on are the US dollar (a temporary rise, possibly quite sharp), the Canadian dollar (a fall as the Albertan energy economy falls flat on its face), the yen (a sharp and sustained rise as the carry trade unwinds), antipodean currencies (a fall as the yen carry trade that supported them unwinds) and the euro (a substantial fall as economic disparities in Europe wreak havoc with European unity).

Supporting currencies through the central banking system is a recipe for losing vast sums of money at times of great upheaval, when the power of the collective demonstrates how little power central bankers actually have to stand against forces of nature.I don't expect any attempted intervention to make any practical difference, except perhaps to make matters worse by wasting scarce resources by throwing good money after bad.


Comments from DrumBeat: September 13, 2008
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 01:21:57

For 700 billion the US could repair all the interstate highway bridges or build a high speed electric train line between LA and New York.

Instead, the Congress is going to spend the money on bad paper.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 01:42:49

To be fair, we are purchasing assets with the 700 billion and these assets have at least some value.

We are probably going to spend $700 billion to buy assets worth $350 billion.

That's still a huge loss and several times larger than the RTC mess.

But the bailout isn't going to work. It doesn't fix the fundamental problem, namely, falling house prices.

If house prices do not stabilize, and they can't if people can't get mortgages, then the hole will keep getting worse and worse.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 01:44:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')Then they started two pointless wars.


Afghanistan wasn't pointless. If we had gotten Osama in Tora Bora and then NOT gone into Iraq, you'd probably feel the same way.
mos6507
 

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby virgincrude » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 07:02:47

Tyler_JC: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')o be fair, we are purchasing assets with the 700 billion and these assets have at least some value.



WTF?
Assets?
You mean those dirty bits of paper banks bought for nothing in order to shore up loans which should never have been granted in the first place? Nobody knows what these 'toxic' debts are worth .... There are no 'assets' to be bought for heaven's sake!
User avatar
virgincrude
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 11:27:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('virgincrude', 'T')yler_JC: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')o be fair, we are purchasing assets with the 700 billion and these assets have at least some value.



WTF?
Assets?
You mean those dirty bits of paper banks bought for nothing in order to shore up loans which should never have been granted in the first place? Nobody knows what these 'toxic' debts are worth .... There are no 'assets' to be bought for heaven's sake!


Is everything single mortgage in default?

Even if 50% of the mortgages go into default (highly unlikely), the bond would still have value.

Also, just because you default on your mortgage, doesn't mean the mortgage is worthless. The bank can take over the house and sell it. They won't get all of their money but they could get maybe half of their money back? (worst case scenario)

So we take a 50% default rate and a 50% recovery rate from foreclosures and get a 75 cents on the dollar value for the bonds.

It's a terrible investment, but it's not a total loss.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby BigTex » Sat 27 Sep 2008, 11:47:41

It's amazing how quickly the conventional wisdom has changed from

"house prices always go up"

to

"house prices are going to keep falling and eventually every house will be worthless and have to be bulldozed at great expense"

I actually can't think of a more intrinsically valuable piece of property than a house, since it's one of the big three that we all need--you know: food, water, shelter.

The fact that housing prices are falling RIGHT NOW just means that they were overpriced, not that they're worthless.

People are talking about housing right now like it was an internet stock from the 1990s. The reality is that a home may lose 50% of its value, but it is very unlikely to lose 90% of its value.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby virgincrude » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 04:22:30

Tyler J_C: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he bank can take over the house and sell it.


I think this has to be the most naive, uninformed, and blindly hopefull comment I have read so far on the many threads related to this bailout.

I can not see how you expect banks or anybody being able to actually SELL any house to an American citizen in the foreseeable future. The amount of stuff you don't seem to grasp about this financial crisis is alarming.

Go here:Paulson's Plan is Unconstitutional

Or here: The Fed is a dangerous monster And see what other, wiser posters are saying. Don't try putting a happy twist on this, leave that to the MSM and corporate reps that pass for TV commentators.
User avatar
virgincrude
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus
Top

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby Turlox » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 04:34:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
People are talking about housing right now like it was an internet stock from the 1990s. The reality is that a home may lose 50% of its value, but it is very unlikely to lose 90% of its value.


What about when all those homes built in Phoenix, Vegas, and the outer ring of any suburban hell in America. They are worthless.

Where is the house located?
How far is the grocery store?
Is it in a geographic area that will be able to support the population?

The ones located near viable mass transit and a dense city core might maintain and even increase value but most of the housing that has been constructed since 1950 is pretty much worthless except for salvage value of components.
User avatar
Turlox
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby kam3Oen » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 12:16:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he ones located near viable mass transit and a dense city core might maintain and even increase value but most of the housing that has been constructed since 1950 is pretty much worthless except for salvage value of components.


I'm betting it all on rural and isolated. In a total collapse scenario, less people means less hostile encounters and a greater chance of survival. And yes, there will be total collapse, especially in the suburbs where people barely know their neighbors.
User avatar
kam3Oen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun 09 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby BigTex » Sun 28 Sep 2008, 14:59:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Turlox', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
People are talking about housing right now like it was an internet stock from the 1990s. The reality is that a home may lose 50% of its value, but it is very unlikely to lose 90% of its value.


What about when all those homes built in Phoenix, Vegas, and the outer ring of any suburban hell in America. They are worthless.

Where is the house located?
How far is the grocery store?
Is it in a geographic area that will be able to support the population?

The ones located near viable mass transit and a dense city core might maintain and even increase value but most of the housing that has been constructed since 1950 is pretty much worthless except for salvage value of components.


Local rental values will answer most of those questions. The homes you mention will be worth a lot less, but at some point investors will buy them for the rental value alone.

Longer term, of course, we can have the Kunstler exurb doom discussion, and I don't completely disagree with him. I'm talking more about the immediate future, and there will be plenty of buyers of these homes at the right price.

I doubt if many homes anywhere will lose more than 50% of their value in the next few years.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby jboogy » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 20:17:38

As Davep would say "we're living in interesting times". I'm a little surprised that paulson and bernanke asked to become supreme leaders of the free world so brazenly, not surprised shrub fully endorsed the idea. I think they laid the extreme doomsday scenario on the congress chiefs in that meeting.. and it worked.

I heard that Paulson and/or bernanke almost came to blows with Dodd behind closed doors with Dodd saying something like " who the f*ck do you guys think you are?" Am surprised that people have become so energized over this, who'da thunk it? I believe that this bill would have passed by a huge margin if people hadn't raised such a ruckus with their reps.

Wether this proves to be the smart move remains to be seen. If the banks get mad enough then the economy will come to a stop here. No paychecks, no nothing basically. 777 pts. is no joke.

I'll be surprised if the government gets into the real estate business, who is going to show the houses and schedule termite inspections. Will all the unemployed real estate agents do the legwork for an hourly wage or flat fee, you know they're used to 10,000 dollar commissions. I can't see middle aged women going out to show a house at 6:00 pm on a sunday for 10 bucks an hour. Would they get travel time?
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby hope_full » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 20:44:33

Back in the day, conventional wisdom was that banks (and bankers) did NOT want houses taken back thru foreclosure - if there was any way to avoid it. Foreclosed properties are nothing but a huge nuisance and a financial hole.

In addition to the expenses of sale, there's also maintenance costs (deferred and ongoing), winterizing expenses, taxes, yard maintenance, etc.

For this reason and many more, I really can't imagine the US government making money off all these foreclosed properties.
User avatar
hope_full
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: I'm surprised

Unread postby GoghGoner » Mon 29 Sep 2008, 20:47:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'M')y take home lesson: the economics Doomers went to bat first, like roccman here or Stoneleigh/Ilargi at TOD and Automatic Earth. What seemed like more outrageous hyperbole is coming to pass. Whether the out there statements from the likes of Savinar or Jack come to visit us we can only wait and see...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stoneleigh', 'R')elative values of currencies will depend on which currency is deflating most quickly. The only ones I would hazard a prediction on are the US dollar (a temporary rise, possibly quite sharp), the Canadian dollar (a fall as the Albertan energy economy falls flat on its face), the yen (a sharp and sustained rise as the carry trade unwinds), antipodean currencies (a fall as the yen carry trade that supported them unwinds) and the euro (a substantial fall as economic disparities in Europe wreak havoc with European unity).

Supporting currencies through the central banking system is a recipe for losing vast sums of money at times of great upheaval, when the power of the collective demonstrates how little power central bankers actually have to stand against forces of nature.I don't expect any attempted intervention to make any practical difference, except perhaps to make matters worse by wasting scarce resources by throwing good money after bad.


Comments from DrumBeat: September 13, 2008


I read that blog sometimes, the Automatic Earth. It is amazing to me the accuracy at which they have predicted this collapse. I was more interested in oil production but they were so right -- man, we are in deep.

I was surprised when Bush picked Hank since Hank and family give much more money to liberal causes than to the Republican movements.
GoghGoner
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1827
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Stilłwater subdivision
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron