by smallpoxgirl » Wed 24 Sep 2008, 11:59:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jboogy', 'T')hese banks do not deserve a bailout, no doubt. But the alternative, ( letting them fail), would have been disastrous. These are not little Mom and Pop, 10 million in deposits, regional banks. These are huge banks, and AIG insured a lot of other huge banks.
Fair enough. If that's the case, then any bailout plan needs to include anti-trust actions to break them up where they don't threaten the entire economy the next time they go belly up.
If we've allowed companies to get so big that their failure threatens the entire economy, then that is an abject failure of the government to regulate these companies in the best interest of the nation.
As best I can see, the government is trying to merge all of these companies and create an even bigger time bomb. I don't see anybody trying to fix the actual problem here. This is just a gigantic wealth transfer from me to a bunch of billionaire f---kers on wall street as best as I can see. It changes nothing about the fundamental problems.