by Dezakin » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 19:45:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nicholai', 'D')oomerland buzzwords? I dare you to refute Catton.
Oh take it to the overshoot forum. I've wasted enough time on Catton. Populations eventually overshoot when they behave static rules, sure. Humans are different because they engineer. You can throw around the cargoist ad-hominem if you want but it wont stop the pace of technological change from altering the rules every engineering cycle.
Eventually Malthus is right because theres only so much work you can get out of an isolated thermodynamic system, and the universe will approach heat death someday, but theres a lot of room between here and there.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n fact, it would make my evening for you to show me how a post-peak world could continue, as well as increase, fertilizer inputs, greater trade stability, greater harmonization (in terms of food production) all after peaking in oil supply. Would you rather side with the technocorpians and their fervent belief in nuclear-generated ammonia fertilizer?
Sure; After all we wont need it for at least 50 years, seeing fertilizer production isn't a function of oil at all but of natural gas and coal.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ezakin, I don't know how anyone can take you seriously. You didn't give rhyme or reason for anything you put forward.