Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Two More Bank failures tonight!

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby eastbay » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 13:13:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', 'N')ever in history have we seen a defaulting debt load of this magnitude, with this kind of leverage, and with a $1000 trillion derivatives market that will create a total world wide melt down when it implodes. This can not be compared to the S&L Crisis, the Asian Contagion or any other financial crisis in modern history. It is many, many magnitudes of order larger. Comparing past crisis to the one now developing, would be like comparing a flea to a bull elephant!

Well done.
I am afraid any analogies to prior economic declines won't apply here. That's why we don't know exactly how this will turn out, but we can be sure the consequences will be bad for most everyone.
With the FDIC saying the assets of the last three failed banks are worth 30% less than book value, to say we have a 'problem' here would be the under-statement of the year. How much will banking assets be worth when the recession really gets going, or when interest rates start rising to finance the deficit Congress already estimates at $800 billion in the next yeat forward from now?

The BIG question is calculating when. How do we determine this?
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby seahorse » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 15:55:54

JD, Why don't I take up OF2 on his bet? Because, I've never made a bet in my life on anything, don't believe in betting under any circumstances for any reasons. Just like I've never had a drink.

Now JD, last year or so, I asked you to tell me why the US invaded Iraq. You've ignored that question for a long time. Are you willing to give us your explanation now?
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby yesplease » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 17:14:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattS', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', ' ')There's a lot of interesting stuff going on in the banking sector.

So....have we reached the level of the S&L crisis yet or do we still have a ways to go?
AFAIK, in total losses, we are there. In terms of government losses via bailouts, I don't think we're even close. I'm guessing the government an taxpayer will see the same cost as the S&L scandal an the investor will get bent over on a worldwide scale, maybe up to a trillion bucks worth of you know what. There's a sucker born every minute... :(
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 17:38:49

I was talking about taxpayer losses.

The final tab for the American taxpayer will undoubtedly be higher than the Savings and Loans crisis. My twice as expensive guess was just a guess but I think it's within the ballpark.

Private losses will greatly exceed taxpayer losses but I don't care much about foolish investors.

The Federal Government is going to attempt to bail out these banks by using its perfect credit to buy junk loans from companies with junk credit.

And I have a feeling that we'll be bailing out a lot of our elected leaders' friends...Silverado Savings And Loans:x
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby cube » Sat 26 Jul 2008, 23:43:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DoubleD', 'I')gnore works beautifully - except when those of you who "play" the game keep quoting the person I have on ignore. Then I am subjected to seeing the posts despite my attempts to properly ignore it completely.
I have someone on my ignore list who keeps on quoting what I say out of context hoping to discredit me in front of others. I found out about it because somebody else quoted him.
That's beyond trolling.
That's being a $2 drama llama whore

I wish there was a feature where if you have someone on your ignore list they can NOT quote you.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby jupiters_release » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 01:27:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'I') have someone on my ignore list who keeps on quoting what I say out of context hoping to discredit me in front of others. I found out about it because somebody else quoted him.
That's beyond trolling.
That's being a $2 drama llama whore


:-D
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby ThereWillBeMoreBlood » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 04:30:59

Why not just keep them off ignore to begin with? It isn't that hard to skip over someone's post if you don't want to read what they have to write.
User avatar
ThereWillBeMoreBlood
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby cube » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 04:48:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ThereWillBeMoreBlood', 'W')hy not just keep them off ignore to begin with? It isn't that hard to skip over someone's post if you don't want to read what they have to write.
If somebody acts like an idiot to you IRL what do you do?
You ignore them obviously.
Why shouldn't the internet be any different?
If this person on my ignore list wants to keep talking sh!t behind my back well that's fine with me.

In the end my "reputation" will be vindicated and his will be left on a crumbling pedestal.
We all reap what we sow. So what do I have to worry?-->nothing. :)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby idiom » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 05:15:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f somebody acts like an idiot to you IRL what do you do?

That is the problem with online stuff. You can't give some a good right boot in the nutsack.
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby IslandCrow » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 05:38:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Concerned', 'I')MO it's not the volume of bank failures it's the volume of loans as a percentage of GDP that fail that is the problem.
e.g. 50 banks fail with 2 million bad loans each
4 banks fail with 250 million bad loans each
Thats an order of magnitude difference between the two scenarios. (figures are for illustrative purposes only)


+
In my mind the problem would be mostly in the size of the banks that fail. As the economist wrote:" There are 8,000 banks in America and most people haven't heard of 7,950 of them", so it is hard to judge the financial state just on the number of bank failures.
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby 3rensho » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 10:29:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'J')ust like I've never had a drink.

"Never trust a man who doesn't drink." - W.C. Fields
Sorry seahorse. :-D
User avatar
3rensho
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby jbrovont » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 21:58:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'P')rivate losses will greatly exceed taxpayer losses but I don't care much about foolish investors.

I'd just like to mention here, that after the change of law allowing people to move their pensions into funds, a lot of people did that. Many of those are going to evaporate too, because the foolish investors got control of people's pensions who thought the investors knew what they were doing. :(
User avatar
jbrovont
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Fri 16 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby Peleg » Sun 27 Jul 2008, 23:07:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '[')img]http://economistblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/carpediem251.jpg[/img]


Nice graphic. All it proves is that there have been two very large gabs by the PTB, and we are now entering the third and final one. does'nt anyone remember how the S&L scandal played out, who was involved, and why?
User avatar
Peleg
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby cube » Mon 28 Jul 2008, 01:23:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peleg', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '[')img]http://economistblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/carpediem251.jpg[/img]


Nice graphic. All it proves is that there have been two very large gabs by the PTB, and we are now entering the third and final one. does'nt anyone remember how the S&L scandal played out, who was involved, and why?
I guess that's like showing a graph of the stock market of real estate and *trying* to hint that the good times are going to keep on rolling! 8)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby shortonoil » Mon 28 Jul 2008, 12:45:12

MattS said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')nteresting that your paraphrasing, or interpretation, of what Roubini said, is in direct contradiction to what he said.
"at least a couple hundred small banks" is what Nouriel said.


If you are vying for the position of new PO News troll, you will have to do better than that to out do OF2! Your approach is a little lame in comparison to his delivery method.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y Ambrose Evans- Pritchard
Last Updated: 6:53am BST 21/07/2008

It feels like the summer of 1931. The world's two biggest financial institutions have had a heart attack. The global currency system is breaking down. The policy doctrines that got us into this mess are bankrupt. No world leader seems able to discern the problem, let alone forge a solution.

The International Monetary Fund has abdicated into schizophrenia. It has upgraded its 2008 world forecast from 3.7pc to 4.1pc growth, whilst warning of a "chance of a global recession". Plainly, the IMF cannot or will not offer any useful insights.

Its "mean-reversion" model misses the entire point of this crisis, which is that central banks have pushed debt to fatal levels by holding interest too low for a generation, and now the chickens have come home to roost. True "mean-reversion" would imply debt deflation on such a scale that would, if abrupt, threaten democracy.

Telegraph

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')etailers having a harder time getting credit indicates there is concern about the strength and/or sustainability of retail spending. Also note that Wal-Maryt -- the largest retailer in the world -- had to agree to tighter lending controls. This is a company with 378 billion in revenue last year. They have to agree to stricter lending standards.

This is why last week's euphoria regarding the financial sector was so completely overblown. Everyone was thrilled because several banks reported losses that weren't as large as feared. That was the good news -- banks didn't lose as much money as projected. Yet they still lost lots of money and wrote down lots of debt. And all of those writedowns are starting to crimp lending.

Much of the decline in outstanding credit has been due to banks sharply reducing the amount of bonds and other debt securities held on their books, but the slowdown is apparent across all forms of lending. The heavy losses banks have taken on mortgage-related securities are forcing them raise cash levels, leading to tighter lending. Because they can't know what other problems might be lurking on their balance sheets, they are being especially cautious.

None of this should be surprising to anyone. We have seen over $400 billion dollars in writedowns. We have seen 266 mortgage lenders shut their doors. All of this is bound to have an impact -- which it has in the discount spread


Washington Mutual is now $129 billion behind the eight ball. If (when) if collapses it will be the largest bank failure in US history. It will completely strip the FDIC and leave the gate open. If a couple more banks fail before Congress gets around to re-capitalizing that agency, it could get very interesting.

What we are witnessing is the beginnings of a collapse of debt based fiat currencies that will ultimately come in a post PO world. Their very structure makes this inevitable, as that structure guarantees that at some point there will be no way to service the debt that already exists.

That point is probably not that far away, as the US debt alone, is now exceeding the world’s GDP.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby seahorse2 » Mon 28 Jul 2008, 14:44:10

I too value Tyler's opinion and also the opinion of Mr. Bill. I would like to know Tyler's opinion on the status of the banking/financial sectors right now. From reading both Tyler's and Mr. Bill's posts over the last couple of months, it appears to me that they have become more pessimistic as of late. So, maybe they will weigh in here.

Here's the point of me starting this thread and some others on banking/financial issues of late. The financial sector is in trouble. Take for example the fact that after a couple of years without any bank failures, we have several this year, including Indymac which was the largest bank failure in California history I believe, but even if not, a big failure. Thus, there is reason for people to be concerned about the financial sector and people need to make sure their elected officials are taking the right actions. The future is always uncertain but is most certainly determined by actions today.

That's why I take issue with people who attempt to downplay this issue. For example, when OF2 attempts to downplay the issue by saying "he's never heard of the two banks that failed" it undermines the real significance of the serious issues at play and of the issues being debated in Congress about bailing out various financial institutions.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby shortonoil » Mon 28 Jul 2008, 16:02:15

MattS said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ow see, if you want to present hysterical quotes and then use them, I'm all for that. But presenting non hysterical quotes and trying to MAKE them hysterical....thats completely different.


Are you sure you want to contribute hysterical quotes to Ambrose Evans- Pritchard? Do you have the faintest idea who Pritchard is - a comment like that, being fundamentally absurd, makes it seems doubtful? I don’t agree with the Elliot Wave Theory in totality, but claiming that it’s hysterical, is almost --- hysterical!

seahorse2 said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat's why I take issue with people who attempt to downplay this issue. For example, when OF2 attempts to downplay the issue by saying "he's never heard of the two banks that failed" it undermines the real significance of the serious issues at play and of the issues being debated in Congress about bailing out various financial institutions.


Anyone with the qualifications (or even common sense) to comment on this issue would not find it relevant that they had not heard of a particular bank. Of course, the issue is what is the relevance of these institutions. The comment made by OF2 is a very definite indication that he is not interested in the issues at hand, and it is probably a good indication that he is not even intellectually curious about the subjects discussed here.

It is unfortunate that after the crash we will probably have some type of socially mandated consciousness that will dictate that we continue to feed these creatures. Since the OF2 type will become a social burden when we are no longer able to afford the luxury of their disturbances, perhaps we should start working on our soon to be dysfunctional proclivities before hand.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby Specop_007 » Mon 28 Jul 2008, 16:06:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '
')
Washington Mutual is now $129 billion behind the eight ball. If (when) if collapses it will be the largest bank failure in US history. It will completely strip the FDIC and leave the gate open. If a couple more banks fail before Congress gets around to re-capitalizing that agency, it could get very interesting.


Will it? How many investors does WM have? Remember, the Feds only have to pay out 100k per account, they do NOT have to cover all WM's holdings and investors. I believe (Although have no hard data) that a large portion of WM's worth will not be covered due to exceeding the federal limit.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat we are witnessing is the beginnings of a collapse of debt based fiat currencies that will ultimately come in a post PO world. Their very structure makes this inevitable, as that structure guarantees that at some point there will be no way to service the debt that already exists.


I dont know if I would say "collapse". A falllback certainly though. Things will return to a time when if you have bad credit you dont get a 500,000 mortgage. You know, times of common sense. The problem with our current financial sector however is amplified by all the other bad news out there. What one could argue is a small kitchen fire in the financial sector that could be put out with the fire extinguisher on the wall is compounded by the small fire in the garage with energy, the small fire in the living room from food....And suddenly your out of extinguisher!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat point is probably not that far away, as the US debt alone, is now exceeding the world’s GDP.

Heres some food for though.... Note the Public Debt (% of GDP) column.

If you're worried about the debt of America.....

Debt as percentage of GDP

While we're making interesting comparisons....If you're feeling bored look up the usage of oil as compared to GDP across the worlds top....say....10 countries.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 28 Jul 2008, 20:11:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattS', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', ' ')

That's why I take issue with people who attempt to downplay this issue. For example, when OF2 attempts to downplay the issue by saying "he's never heard of the two banks that failed" it undermines the real significance of the serious issues at play and of the issues being debated in Congress about bailing out various financial institutions.


One persons serious issue is another persons punchline. When your "serious issue" button gets triggered over a couple billion dollars here and there, a couple of banks here and there, within an economy the size of the US, maybe that is a bit premature.

Its not outrageous to be a little skeptical over the current size of the issue, considering the size of past issues, considering the current dollars involved in the form of a bailout, considering the governments ability to print money until we look like Zimbabwe if they want to.

Not everyone thinks that because a bank or 50 goes under is an issue....well....at least not the way YOU might think.

I'm more than a little pissed at the idea that its my tax dollars which are going to bail out people who speculated with real estate, which in the long run doesn't help solve the underlying issue, which is bringing housing values back into the range of median income in certain geographical areas in the US.


I find your post most puzzling. What exactly is your point?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Two More Bank failures tonight!

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 28 Jul 2008, 20:27:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattS', '
')Interesting that your paraphrasing, or interpretation, of what Roubini said, is in direct contradiction to what he said.
"at least a couple hundred small banks" is what Nouriel said.


Experts with the most clout tend to speak or write euphemistically, as their remarks help shape outcomes. The wider the audience, the softer the approach. This is just common sense. For a more genuine take on our unfolding troubles, Roubini's own site, for members only, is far superior.

From his site--Roubini with the gloves off: February 2008

A near global economic recession will ensue as the financial and credit losses and the credit crunch spread around the world. Panic, fire sales, cascading fall in asset prices will exacerbate the financial and real economic distress as a number of large and systemically important financial institutions go bankrupt.

A 1987 style stock market crash could occur leading to further panic and severe financial and economic distress. Monetary and fiscal easing will not be able to prevent a systemic financial meltdown as credit and insolvency problems trump illiquidity problems. The lack of trust in counterparties – driven by the opacity and lack of transparency in financial markets, and uncertainty about the size of the losses and who is holding the toxic waste securities – will add to the impotence of monetary policy and lead to massive hoarding of liquidity that will exacerbates the liquidity and credit crunch.

In this meltdown scenario US and global financial markets will experience their most severe crisis in the last quarter of a century.
Last edited by threadbear on Tue 29 Jul 2008, 22:51:40, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests