by phaster » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 03:26:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Interfector', 'B')y that I mean, anyone who believes that the era of cheap oil is over, and that life will probably get steadily tougher for the majority of people, but doesn't think that we'll be resorting to cannibalism to survive within a decade, but that could be a potential scenario in the future if the right action isn't taken now.
Yup "middle grounder" is an apt description of my outlook. For quite a while now I've seen so much potential in the USA to become so much more efficent with our environment and our economy.
I've been looking at and been interested with the global warming problem since about 1989 or there abouts when I read hanson report at university, and about that time also started reading the literature on old king hubbert. I've also been reading the worldwatch reports since the early 1990's
http://www.worldwatch.org/
and was somewhat pessmistic over the long term viability of ever increasing global human civilization, becasue many trends pointed toward massive resource mismanagement and technology not up to the challange of addressing global demend, but over the past few years with a self taught understanding of economics, and the now with the public conversion of T. Boon Pickens toward stuff like wind energy, I think the public is now ready for a new social outlook based less on consumption and self. Therefore I think cannibalism to survive is much less likely because ironicly enough of the realitive suddeness of the constraction of the US economy due to the subprime loans, and increase in gas prices...
This is not to say there will be local conflicts, but what I think is going to happen is a pulling together of society like what happened in the USA during the 1930's depresion, and what happened in cuba during their "special" period.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Period
When I was in cuba, a few years ago I had a chance to talk to various people about some of the problems there, and was kinda surprised to find out that during the special period, people there did try and work together. Afterward I did some reading about moral during the battle of london blitz, and the moral of germans when the 8th air force was fire bombing many german cities, in both cases moral of the people under attack somewhat increased, because they were able to focus on an enemy. Same thing was seen here in the USA after 9/11 people do rally together when they can focus on an enemy.
Hate and fear can be uses as constructive motivating force, much more so than sound reasoning. For example I've known about the problem of global warming and peak oil now for about 20 years, but I discovered these topics, cause I'm a bookworm geek by nature. When I tried to tell people about the potental problems of global warming and peak oil, 99.9% of the people in the past were too self absorbed and distracted by toys produced in a consumer society. Now that problems have comeup in the economy and the environment, people are now more interested in finding solutions.
I have no doubt there is going to be anger and denial about problems with global warming and peak oil, but now that the manifistations of mismanagement of the economy and the environment are too big to ignore, the general public will eventually pull ogether and solve these big issues...