Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Al Gore Thread pt 2 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby joelcolorado » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 17:02:31

The big thing was it ruins the prairie. Well how bout those farms and silos and oil wells and power lines and fences etc. One bid subdivisionout there with the HUGE ass houses in the prettiest pasture BEFORE they build houses there. You are correct. you get used to it.

Railroad runs thru there with 10 trains a day. No one complaining bout that, or the highway or interstate. good lord.
Goofy ppl. Want to turn on their A/C but not get free energy from wind.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Homesteader » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 17:19:25

Somebody posted some time ago about putting a little wind turbine on top of every telephone pole and plugging it in. Local energy production tied right into the existing grid.

When the public votes that down they can just put a big 'ol wind turbine in my back yard as long as I connect for free.

People really need a bitch-slappin reality check.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby joelcolorado » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 17:23:14

Son in laws doctoral thesis says kansas alone can provide 25% OF NATIONS entire energy needs. Good lord.Just need the WILL. One day we will wake up after its too late to save the economy and will have to rebuild that over a lot of time. Will change, just WHEN.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby xironman » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 21:47:44

It is often mentioned in the peak oil debate why we did not attack this problem thirty years ago. The short sighted thinking I see on this thread is a case study in how that comes about. It is exactly how we get to 11:59. Enjoy your second coming.
User avatar
xironman
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby lorenzo » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 22:54:50

It can be done, perhaps, with biomass as the backbone. Else, I don't see much of it happening. Non-biomass renewables have no clout: no baseloads, no peakloads, they rely on coal or gas, they're expensive, they deplete resources like copper, aluminium, rare earth elements, etc...

You can already see this with solar stocks: they have been declining for a long time now, simply because some basic materials have become too expensive.

A reality check is needed on non-biomass renewables.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Duende » Fri 18 Jul 2008, 23:36:19

Just read the article, the OP cited, and well... I think Gore is asking us to powerdown.

Yes, I'm reading in between the lines and I see powerdown. And to that, I'll give him a slow clap.
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby f2tornado » Sat 19 Jul 2008, 04:14:33

I've seen enough Blood and Gore, aka: Generation Investment Management. Ironic Al Gore outsourced himself to England while his party complains about jobs outsourcing. While Gore may be donating his salary to environmental concerns, this only serves as a cover for the millions he stands to make investing in the firm which will no doubt get its share of subsidy money to play with. Further, Gore gets to be the the lead actor in the AGW legion of doom in order to spook the public into supporting his act (and profit) further.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')ore consumes large amounts of carbon-based electricity while he trumpets a growing "global warming" crisis that drives up the value of "green" companies like the ones in which he [s]buys carbon offsets[/s] invests in their stocks.


Gore's "plan" is not realistic. It is going to take way more than 10 years to phase out all the CO2 producing power plants which utilities have billions invested. Perhaps a more logical idea would be for the Federal and state governments to mandate any additional power generation facilities be of the renewable variety.
User avatar
f2tornado
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby cube » Sat 19 Jul 2008, 04:21:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', '.')...
Most of the rest of you have your heads so far up your asses you think sh*t is sunshine.

I've never seen such a series of unthinking, kneejerk, brainwashed reactions. You're just spewing out the emotions that you have been carefully taught by your trainers to have toward this person. The thread is really a disgrace to the forum, and should probably be place in the hof's at this point. Not really any useful dialogue here.
....
People who come onto this board and act like they're still 14 years old resorting to name calling get put on my ignore list.

Congratulations you're now on my ignore list dohboi.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Pholostan » Sat 19 Jul 2008, 07:12:59

Blah blah blah.

Gore is right. We need to conserve and stop using fossil fuels. It is really simple people. Don't shoot the messenger.

And I think people need visions and inspiration. Does it matter if we achive our goals a little late? I don't think so. The important thing is to try and eventually succeed, no matter the trials. Are you men or are you sheep?
"We cut the earth until it bleeds, rain ashes from the sky
Just to make a light that no one can see"
-- VNV Nation - Carbon
User avatar
Pholostan
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun 02 Mar 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Sweden

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Twilight » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 18:07:48

People need achievable personal goals, otherwise they switch off. No-one is going to be inspired by something every single person in the audience knows is not going to happen. That kind of message is indistinguishable from everything else they are constantly being told, and they have no particular reason to believe it over anything else.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 18:09:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'P')eople need achievable personal goals


I agree.
Ludi
 

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Shaka » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 18:52:03

It's a nice thought, but it will take more than ten years to achieve such a thing.
However, as more and more people use solar and wind to power their own homes, the better.
User avatar
Shaka
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Peyton, Colorado, U.S

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Cashmere » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 22:40:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shaka', 'I')t's a nice thought, but it will take more than ten years to achieve such a thing. However, as more and more people use solar and wind to power their own homes, the better.


To Shaka and Joel Colorado -

there's no way on G-d's green earth that we can convert even 20% of the U.S.'s current electricity use to non-FF sources EVER, unless we invent fusion driven power.

What all of crazy Al's inane propositions fail to recognize is that it would be tremendously energy intensive, and therefore expensive, to put the infrastructure in place.

Anybody got a number?

If you wanted to convert 20% of America's electricity to solar, riddle me this . . .

How many solar panels would you need?

and

How many solar panels are available to buy in the next 12 months?

Anybody.

This is all a nice day dream, but it's not possible. Not with oil where it is. Not with the amount we use.

Eventually, we'll be back to 100% solar, but in the cellulose way, not the silicon way.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby joelcolorado » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 22:54:37

Son in law is writing doctoral thesis on this. Will ask him. But he said today that if Kansas would utilize wind energy to the maximum capacity, this state can produce enough electricity for 25% of the ENTIRE USA.

So the pieces of the pie are there, but will take several pieces to make a whole pie. Solar, wind, coal, nuclear, hyrogen, passive solar homes, etc.

If every new home and business was heated with passive solar heat, in 50 years we would not need any wintertime heat. Think of THAT. But ppl are ignorant as hell about this. My buddy has to VENT his house in the winter it is TOO hot. Grows veggies in the solarium that uses the passive design.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby sciencegirl » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 23:01:40

Is he super serial.
We are the Borg. Resistance is futile. Your culture will adapt to service ours. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.
User avatar
sciencegirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Unread postby Blewbird » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 23:22:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'A')ctually, while I disagree with Al on global warming being settled science, I agree with the idea of spending trillions on wind, solar, hydro and geothermal systems. These projects require huge capital investment and the return may take a while, but they are well worth the initial investment. For example, I doubt that the Hover Dam could have been built with the current political mentality. Huge projects such as the Apollo program, require vision, a can-do spirit and willingness to take on risk.

In order to make these systems worthwhile, we will need to update and upgrade much of the electrical grid. We have the means, using existing technology, to make electricity virtually abundant and very cheap, which would help out a great deal with maintaining civilization in lieu of PO. In other words, we need all the help we can get. Cheap, abundant electricity will make it much easier on us. Electric resistance heat, for example, would become practical.

My Utopian idea for dealing with PO involves spending all our remaining money and fuel on building a brand new electrical grid based on renewables and massive expansion of electric powered public transit. The chances of that actually happening are about zero, but it's fun to dream.



With all respect, I understand you are an expert but we must remember that the problem is not energy per se, but expensive energy.

Again, sorry if you already know this but I will state it for others who are new. In mentioning building trillions of dollars of solar and windmills for a small increase of energy we must remember two things.

1. Building time until production time.
2. Cost total must be paid for by raising prices
3. the problem will not come from lack of energy, but from lack of cheap energy.
4. Downsizing will completely destroy the american economy.

so instead of gasoline, and now talking about more expensive and less amount of more difficult to produce energy (wether renewable is not the point) what is going to happen is our economy is going to crack and the countries are going to irritate each other to the point of final war.

This is inevitable, and now, when international war starts, it won't last long, but niether will the entire infrastructure.

The problem is not whether we could replace it, but that everything is going to collapse long before the billionth windmill is built or the thousandth nuclear plant is going to be built.

There just is no time to prevent the big economic downsizing that is in full sway as we speak.

It is too late to save the economy, but we do have a few years left as the mighty titanic raises itself up, slowly and then disappears beneath the waves quickly and efficiently.
User avatar
Blewbird
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby cube » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 23:50:19

digging up an old post:
:lol:
Do you know how many windmills we'd need to supply 20% of our electricity production?
USA total: 4.062 trillion kWh (2005)
5M windmill produces 17 GWh/yr
4,062,000 GWh X 20% / 17 GWh == 47,788 windmills
Image

Image

Image
//
You want 100%
multiple the above by 5
Al Gore says we can do this in 10 years!
ohh I forgot to also mention upgrades to the electric grid, battery storage, and a bunch of fancy electronics to control this power.

Is there anyone here who wishes to prove beyond ALL doubt to the rest of this forum community that they are a TROLL? Please step forward and say this plan is realistic! My fingers are starting to itch and I'm in the mood to put another TROLL on my ignore list. :twisted:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby Cashmere » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 00:53:53

The best part would be in 4 years or 10 years or whenever when some part starts to go. On all 200,000 giant ass windmills. Have fun swapping out the bearings, or whatever . . .
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Unread postby yesplease » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 01:43:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 't')here's no way on G-d's green earth that we can convert even 20% of the U.S.'s current electricity use to non-FF sources EVER, unless we invent fusion driven power.

What all of crazy Al's inane propositions fail to recognize is that it would be tremendously energy intensive, and therefore expensive, to put the infrastructure in place.

Anybody got a number?
~$7-10 trillion. At most about what the country spends on gasoline and the externalized costs of the modern auto in a decade. Course, the Bushes and the Saudi Royal's ain't gonna complain if we continue converting cash into Carbon, congestion, crashes, and coughing fits instead of alternatives. :lol:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'I')f you wanted to convert 20% of America's electricity to solar, riddle me this . . .

How many solar panels would you need?

and

How many solar panels are available to buy in the next 12 months?

Anybody.
None. Unless of course you're looking for the most expensive way possible... :P
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron