by bodigami » Wed 28 May 2008, 21:37:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Moped', 'G')ood opinion on this issue. Choosing not to procreate is equal to genetic suicide, whereas procreation is arguably the only reason to exist. I think of the thousands of generations of ancestry that came before me, had any one of those generations had failed to breed, the genetic line would have been broken and I would not be alive to experience the ride today. On the other hand one of the virtues of being human is that we can choose not to procreate, even if that means our own hardship in old age, that would be better than helplessly watching your own children or grandchildren die in agonising pain, or suffer under tirany, or die for tha lack of clean water, or adequate shelter, or simply starve to death which is almost now a certainty for a portion of the current population.
There's no purpose on having offspring that will most probably die painfuly at a very young age, not even a genetical purpose. But, surviving by "keeping light" (having no humans depending on you) and then having offspring is genetical (and memetical?) genius (also because of surviving a die-off).