Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Wed 07 May 2008, 22:33:15

I wanted to start a thread regarding the state of modern ag around the world and the situations and changes people here at PO.com see/read taking place.

We have more than one thread about the various causes, effects and proposed solutions but this thread is about the current state of affairs affecting our food supply from the PO perspective. Please, lets keep to the current state of affairs and not proposed solutions.

Ethanol incentives would be revised under the bill to encourage development of renewable fuels from cellulose, found in grasses, trees and crop residue. The tax credit for corn-based ethanol would be cut by 12 percent and a cellulosic ethanol credit of a dollar would be created.

There has been a big shift in food production in the last couple of years in the US. We here at PO talk about this and that but people with their lifes' work at stake have went out on a limb to buy land, equipment and invest in distilleries because of a War on Foreign Oil.

I think we are feeling the effects of subsidized ethanol consumption in our food prices but what I fear more is an abrupt cutting of the subsidies .
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby SpringCreekFarm » Thu 08 May 2008, 00:03:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')here has been a big shift in food production in the last couple of years in the US. We here at PO talk about this and that but people with their lifes' work at stake have went out on a limb to buy land, equipment and invest in distilleries because of a War on Foreign Oil.

I think we are feeling the effects of subsidized ethanol consumption in our food prices but what I fear more is an abrupt cutting of the subsidies .


That is so true Pops. It's a shame and it goes to show what can happen when the hysteria of finally making big bucks on a commodity can shadow the need to look at all the angles before you jump in. I didn't learn of the folly of biofuels and their effect on food prices until I got here and looked around. I was very excited about biodiesel and even considered making some at one point. It's too bad those people that did invest didn't look closer into the details or were better informed.

It's probably because those selling it to them either didn't know or wouldn't tell the truth. It's hard to say. I see a number of farms with the signs at the road that they're proud to be part of the local biofuel co-op and I wonder how that's working for them now.

I was at a farm dealership in the Brantford area the other night and I asked the counter help what the current spring crop buzz was like and he replied 'dismal'. Everyone is afraid to commit to the crop.

A cousin of mine that is a cash cropper isn't moving too fast to get started this year but I haven't talked to him recently to see why. I might do that but I'd hate to see a grown man cry.
SpringCreekFarm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri 03 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Colorado-Valley » Thu 08 May 2008, 01:38:48

With a population growing at 75 million a year, it shouldn't be too long before corn farmers are getting $100 a bushel anyway just based on pure demand.

:)
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby The_Virginian » Thu 08 May 2008, 01:48:01

The Government Giveth, and the Government taketh.

And no they don't really give hoot and holler.

The good news for farmers is that even W/O gov. Subsidies, they will get a lot more for that bushel than what was expected 10 years ago...

Now if deflation sets in then we are all in trouble...

till then commodities should rise in general...
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby cat » Thu 08 May 2008, 02:15:53

They may not need to pull the plug on the ethanol sub. - http://www.slate.com/id/2190878/?from=rss
With the price of corn going up and the price of fuel going up, it is a difficult business to be in right now. Energy/money invested is as much as the return or more.
User avatar
cat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western Washington

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Fishman » Thu 08 May 2008, 09:35:54

Aside from ethanol, your question was about changes people here at PO.com see/read taking place. I think history will give us some perspective. Not looking at solutions but problems faced. As we all know here diesel fuel drives the modern farm. I think there will be less tillage depending on cost of ag chemicals. Probably more crop rotation. Looking at the fields here in eastern NC folks are planting from fencepost to fencepost, sometimes actually planting up to the edge of the road.
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Ferretlover » Thu 08 May 2008, 09:47:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')Ethanol incentives would be revised under the bill to encourage development of renewable fuels from cellulose, found in grasses, trees and crop residue. I think we are feeling the effects of subsidized ethanol consumption in our food prices but what I fear more is an abrupt cutting of the subsidies .


What I fear is the escalating loss of the trees. I just can't seem to get past the thought that using living plants for fuel will and is stupidly killing those things that provide the oxygen we need to exist.
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Heineken » Thu 08 May 2008, 11:33:09

Big Ag must die off and replaced by small ag, 19th century style.

The essential shift that is taking place is that instead of producing food that is incredibly cheap and abundant, Big Ag will be producing food that is incredibly expensive, and with a supply and distribution system that is increasingly unreliable and uneven. Although I don't believe in straight-line extrapolations, it's easy to see how the current arrangement is headed for certain collapse.

Farming as we have it is all about giant machinery, herbicides, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, immense processing plants, refrigeration, and the trucking industry and its associated infrastructure. All almost completely dependent on oil and other fossil fuels.

It can't continue; but the changes that are needed in agriculture must be accompanied by a total revolution in how people live and work.

We need a world of small, walkable towns, surrounded by cottage industries, surrounded in turn by small farms run by people and not corporations, surrounded in turn by forest and wilderness. All connected by trains. I've been saying this for years, but we haven't moved one inch closer to that world, at least not in the US. Other than the ethanol craze, some windmills and solar panels, and greater awareness and application of various conservation measures, I don't see any revolution happening, Pops. The corn planters are getting greased up and ready to roll, just as always this time of year.

Like any other mega-business, Big Ag will resist REAL change with all the power and bucks at its disposal. Institutions don't let go, they are crushed by factors they eventually can no longer control.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Thu 08 May 2008, 14:31:37

Thanks for all the thoughtful replies, I've heard that the planting progress on corn is quite a bit behind right now because of all the wet weather.

The problem with corn planted late is it then matures in the dry hot season substantially reducing harvest since the ears don't fill out and even the kernels don't get as big.
----

This is a description of the boom in ag in the 1970's from this USDA report (PDF).
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')ncreased farm income, rising inflation,
readily available credit, and low to negative
real interest rates led to sustained
increases in farmland values and in outlays
for farm machinery and equipment.
Because financial assets lose value with
inflation while real assets gain value, rising
inflation encourages investors to shift
their holdings from financial to real
assets. Such a shift exacerbates the loss
for financial assets but strengthens the
gain for real assets, including farmland.


Sound familiar?

Here is the situation that lead to the bust of the '80's:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y the early 1980’s, many of the factors
that spurred the boom were reversing.
Commodity prices fell, input prices and
interest rates rose, export demand turned
down, and farm income declined. Many
farmers who had bought land or made
other long-term investments—especially
those who used debt financing—now had
difficulty meeting their other financial
obligations or even making a living.


Colorado Valley mentioned the increasing population generating demand. Today there is big demand for pork both here and abroad and it is no surprise since pork is fantastically cheap. The last report I saw said hog farmers are getting $75-$90 a head on hogs they paid more than $200 to raise.

They were fat and sassy until corn went through the roof and I'd bet they took on a good deal of debt for capital improvements. Even thought the packers can't get enough the price hasn't budged.

So one of two things will happen:
The producer goes broke, the supply goes down, consumer prices rise and demand falls.
or
The farm gate price goes up, the consumer price goes up and demand falls.

Looks to me like either way consumer prices rise, affecting demand for pork and because piggies like corn and lots of it; directly impacting the corn market.

Just because there are more people doesn't necessarily mean they will be all eating the same expensive foods, probably the opposite considering the negative influence higher energy prices are bound to have on food budgets.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Heineken » Thu 08 May 2008, 14:40:28

Just as an aside, in warmer, Japanese beetle zones, planting corn late may be the way to go (this applies to small-scale growers, not huge farms, of course). The idea is to push the silking period as late as possible, deep into August, when the beetle is on the wane. Otherwise the beetle eats the silk as fast as it grows and you get stunted ears.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Thu 08 May 2008, 14:44:31

BTW, to Henie's point, between 1970 and 1990 the number of farms decreased by over a half million and the average size increased by almost 70 acres.

If that is repeated again it is not at all what either of us are hoping.

http://inventors.about.com/library/inve ... lfarm4.htm
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 08 May 2008, 14:59:29

I expect many more people will be getting out of farming these days.
:(
Ludi
 

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 08 May 2008, 15:45:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'B')ig Ag must die off and replaced by small ag, 19th century style.

The essential shift that is taking place is that instead of producing food that is incredibly cheap and abundant, Big Ag will be producing food that is incredibly expensive, and with a supply and distribution system that is increasingly unreliable and uneven. Although I don't believe in straight-line extrapolations, it's easy to see how the current arrangement is headed for certain collapse.

Farming as we have it is all about giant machinery, herbicides, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, immense processing plants, refrigeration, and the trucking industry and its associated infrastructure. All almost completely dependent on oil and other fossil fuels.


I'm more convinced by arguments that Big Ag will pull through, owning to efficiencies of scale, and that their ultimate fuel requirements are reasonable - and will undoubtedly be subsidized if need be. People can be unemployed and without gas for cars, but the last thing we want is to have them starving as well. Say what you will about modern ag, it is good at producing huge quantities of crops, and is the system in place - like modern inefficient car engines, it's what we have to work with for the time being. Distribution of food will undoubtedly receive premiums in rationing as well, until more transport can be electrified.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t can't continue; but the changes that are needed in agriculture must be accompanied by a total revolution in how people live and work.


I believe this will undoubtedly be true for city dwellers, more community/backyard gardening. Millions of urban unemployed will make for Heinberg's nation of farmers, building a surplus on top of existing ag.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e need a world of small, walkable towns, surrounded by cottage industries, surrounded in turn by small farms run by people and not corporations, surrounded in turn by forest and wilderness. All connected by trains. I've been saying this for years, but we haven't moved one inch closer to that world, at least not in the US.


The price of gas hasn't gone high enough to force people to change from BAU. Rebuilding the urban landscape in toto would require decades, and funding it all in a declining energy world will be a massive task. Already it is pulling teeth in most states to get modest LR projects going, never mind an interurban rail system. What you're hoping for sounds quite idyllic :) but I see a rather depressing burnt out landscape of makeshift structures, cracked pavement, grime. Watch some videos of urban Cuba for a taste.

In the face of PO I'd hope for drastic changes in approval/funding/development of passenger rail - the big paradigm shift will come when never ending decline in oil supply is plain as the face on your nose. Right now it's some obscure technical point hardly anyone is aware of, including Congress from the looks of things. :x
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby green_achers » Thu 08 May 2008, 15:56:38

The rising commodity prices are causing a major increase in ag land prices and rents. The trend has already been toward larger holdings and absentee owners. You would think it would be easier for a small owner to make a living these days, but I guess the higher acreage values are just too high for a lot to resist.

It's interesting to look at the drop in residential land values and the pull-back in the building sector while ag land values are ballooning. This might be a tough time for those who have been thinking of unloading their suburban properties for that little hobby horse ranch, rural residential, peak-oil farmstead (pick your fantasy or distopia). Oops. Timing is everything.
User avatar
green_achers
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Mississippi Delta

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Thu 08 May 2008, 16:27:19

Back in the 19th century there were large farms, hitches of twenty or 30 mules pulled harvesters over wheat fields in the northwest. There is no way to sustain anything near todays population or that of 50 years ago harvesting wheat with a sythe.

My Amish neighbor makes big round bales of hay with a baler pulled by two big Percherons and a little 10hp gas engine that powers the wrapper when the baler stops and the ground-drive can't function. But even that ignores the lessons learned about stockpiling graze for winter - the animals do the harvesting, manure spreading, weeding, etc. - no machinery required.

I guess I both agree and disagree with Heiney and Dude to this extent, the only option is for modern ag to evolve. If it dies outright, then so do we, if it doesn't become more local and less reliant on transport and begin to employ the many lessons learned the last 150 years we may get pretty slim and if it survives in anything like the current mode only through subsidies, rationing or other political action we are simply passing down the pain to our kids.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby fletch_961 » Thu 08 May 2008, 22:06:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')Here is the situation that lead to the bust of the '80's:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y the early 1980’s, many of the factors
that spurred the boom were reversing.
Commodity prices fell, input prices and
interest rates rose, export demand turned
down, and farm income declined. Many
farmers who had bought land or made
other long-term investments—especially
those who used debt financing—now had
difficulty meeting their other financial
obligations or even making a living.






Soviet Grain Embargo


Where is Carter's F'ing grain embargo?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')I On January 4, 1980, using his most potentially effective response to Soviet military action in Afghanistan, President Carter cancelled contracts for the sale of 17 million metric tons mmt) of U.S. corn, wheat and soybeans to the Soviet Union.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')he incoming Secretary of Agriculture indicated that food can be used for geo-political purposes. mation hearings on January 5, John R. Block said: In his confir I believe food is now the great weapon we have for keeping peace in the world. It will continue to be so for the next 20 years, as other countries become more dependent on American farm exports and become reluctant to upset us The rising trend in Soviet purchases of U.S. grain over the Such a lever theoretically gives For grain cutoffs to influence four-year period of the grain agreement explains why grain has become a potential bargaining lever for the United States in dealing with the Soviet Union U.S. policymakers the ability to affect Soviet behavior by threat ening cutoffs of grain exports.


Who ever typed that has worse skills than me. The Soviets, its allies, and our allies decided that having the weapon of food hanging over them was to much and responded by making it their policy to raise production.

While the boom-bust cycle was going to happen anyway, it would certainly not have been as drastic if Carter hadn't decided to use US farmers as his personal pawns.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Of all the negative things the U.S. government could do or have done to agriculture, this one has hurt the most, with long-lasting consequences because it meant the U.S. could be an unreliable supplier and it sent the signal to big importers to expand their supply sources and in turn to supplying countries to increase their production."

Those are truly long-term impacts that while hard to quantify have stuck around for years and years. It generated debate about and legislation involving contract sanctity. But it also helped fuel the dramatiac growth in South America's agricultural production.

excerpted from Carter Grain Embargo, AgWeb, Oct 31, 2002

link

So, thanks to Carter, grain production shifted to South America and edible oils (Palm Oil) goes to malyasia---so much for the rain forests. And US surplus goes into ... Pstarr's favorite topic.

Good thing Carter wore a sweater so he could be an environmental hero for nutters.
User avatar
fletch_961
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu 31 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby Pops » Thu 08 May 2008, 22:15:29

I take your points fletch, but what is your conclusion about the ag response to PO going forward?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby fletch_961 » Thu 08 May 2008, 22:28:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think we are feeling the effects of subsidized ethanol consumption in our food prices but what I fear more is an abrupt cutting of the subsidies .


I forgot to get to my point.

The government should get out of the business of engineering farm policy. Although, I agree with not going with the abrupt removal of farm subsides they should be eliminated. High farm returns only lead to high land prices which then reguire continued high prices to pay back the loans for the high priced loans which requires more subsidies. A dependancy started long ago.

Farmers will be fine...if they are allowed to fail.
User avatar
fletch_961
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu 31 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Agriculture Response to Peak Oil

Unread postby fletch_961 » Thu 08 May 2008, 22:43:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') take your points fletch, but what is your conclusion about the ag response to PO going forward?


I don't think ag has a response to PO. Ethanol has nothing to do with PO. Except in the minds of politicians.

Ethanol is about getting rid of out surplus production as cheaply as possible. How much would it cost the government to get farmers to plant nothing? Add to that the lost tax revenue from monsanto, John Deere, and everyone else who makes a buck when fields get planted. The couple billion in subsidies that goes to ethanol production is cheap in comparison. They more than likely get it most of it back from the income tax they collect from the folks that work at the ethanol plants.

Now, high energy prices come along. Politicians get it in their head to push more of it. Run the price of corn up. Start pissing people off that are used to having their subsidized $2 / bushel corn. So now the government decides to back track a little.

Or something like that.
User avatar
fletch_961
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu 31 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron