General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.
by americandream » Fri 02 May 2008, 22:58:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoghGoner', '
')This is from late 2007, too.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')peaking at the launch of the IEA’s latest World Energy Outlook in London, Mr Birol reiterated both the Agency’s long term forecast that oil production will reach 116 million barrels per day in 2030.
You have to understand that IEA oil consumption forecasts are demand based.
They take a look at the historical link between GDP growth and oil consumption growth, and then extrapolate oil demand (which they call production) from a given rate of global GDP growth.
It's more of a model than a prediction of physical reality.
I like fellows like you. You're always stirring up confusion and thereby muddying the issues. What is the physical reality?
Will we ever know? Taking your indecisiveness to its ultimate limit, we will never know what the physical limts of this planets crude reserves are given a whole raft of reasons that come to mind, some technological, some economic, some geologic and so forth so why bother doing anything! For all we know, the planet may be awash with oil in reserves deep below currently accessible sources.
In the final analysis, all assumptions as regards our planet's resources such as oil will be based on models and reasonable, sometimes unreasonable guestimates.
All we can do is take the one that conforms most closely with the extrapolation each of us consider reasonable and run with it. Clearly, if you are of the view that peak oil is a weak model, then may I suggest that you remove yourself to a website that caters for your views rather than create confusion and indecisiveness here. I am sure the guys at CERA would be delighted with your input.
And the best model will win in time! Have no fear.