Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I want someone to answer a few things for me...

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby like_the_dinosaurs » Thu 01 May 2008, 23:04:40

Divest you mentioned Brazil. I read on hear the other day we don't even have the technology to extract it, something like 6miles under the sea floor.

My answer to your basic assumption is more of a moral issue, we can't do what we have done to this planet and expect for it to continue or that we can just walk away unscathed.

We deserve to be punished for this, peak oil and global warming is that that punishment.

Although I disagree with you Divest at least your on peakoil.com so your a step ahead of the rest of the headless chooks.

Peace everyone...
[smilie=glasses2.gif]
"The elite DO believe they are worshipping and are being directed by demon creatures." ALEX JONES
User avatar
like_the_dinosaurs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat 23 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Judgie » Thu 01 May 2008, 23:14:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', 'Y')ou people are hopeless!!

Global demand for oil will abate as economies cool. The US has seen a year over year decrease in oil and gasoline demand, and as the US economy cools the European and Chinese export markets will also start to receede, thus reducing the overall demand. It’s already started, most economists agree that the cost of oil ($112/b) has nothing to do with supply/demand economics.


Please cite the comments/essays/articles/ EVIDENCE of these claims.....

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '
')I think you’re being over dramatic when you say "many people around the world will find themselves unable to buy the basic food and heating they require to sustain life."


Nope, we pay for it through the IMF and other funds. Funny, you seemed to have covered this below..........

Ever heard of third-world countries. This is happening and has been happening in Africa, much of south-east asia, and China for longer than I've been alive.

I think you're clammering for a s**tfight and are getting just a little peeved that we haven't taken the bait the way you intended.

F.Y.I.
Trying to make yourself look superior through the way you compose your posts just doesn't work here. Many like you have come before, we're used to it, and just a little bored by it now. Seriously mate, shutup, use the search function and do some reading. It'll make you feel better, I promise :).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '
') whom are you refering to? Europeans; doubt it because the euro is strong..$112 cost per barrel is like 60 euro to them, Chinese? nope, the chinese government subsudieses the cost of oil, Russians have their own internal supply..besides the poor nations, who will get help from the IMF and the world bank, there won’t be much.


See above. Please cite any and all sources.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '
')There is much evidence to support that a conflict between the US and Iran won’t happen, Iran having any sort of agreements with Iraq is directly supported by the US. As well as the deterant factors of both China and Russia being indirectly supportive of Iran and any activity by the US and its westren european allies against Iran will be hotly contested by both those countries would suggest that the US would be in a world of hurt if it attacked Iran. Besides, Iran has been behind much of the US troop deaths in Iraq; they arm and fund the militias, such as the one in Sardar city and the US has not conducted any actions against the Iranians.


Please cite supporting evidence for argument.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '
')People dying in a far away land is a much diffrent issue then people starving here. When it comes down to it, people of each country will do whats best for that country, meaning before we hit the point of shortage of food in this country we’ll simply stop exporting or giving charatible donations; case in point donations to charities have already decreased since the economic slowdown has hit.


No it's not. Last time I checked, they're human too. How very pig-headed of you. If you claim to know what your leaders will do, then why aren't you one of them?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '
')Try not to be over dramatic in the future, you’re no better then the media when you promote off the wall ideas that serve no propose other then to scare people; the so called "food shortage" here in the US..you can’t buy more then 80 lbs of rice / visit to sams club now? its hardly a crisis worth mentioning, 80lbs of rice is a lot of rice.


What Irony coming from you, particularly regarding your last paragraph. And you reckon we're being dramatic?

It's ok my friend, you can get medical help for your disease. Just inform your GP upon visiting that you have a serious case of "Denial", simply because what's happening in the real world doesn't coincide with your cornucopian, let's all dance in the daisy fields "The hills are alive with the sound of muuuuusic!!" vision of how the world should be. You can chalk that up to capitalistic consumerism and the fact that you were brought up in a world where that is all you know.

Roll on mate............
"That the cream cannot help but always rise up to the top, well I say, <censored by peakoil.com> floats"

Jarvis Cocker - "Running the World"
Judgie
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 07 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby steam_cannon » Thu 01 May 2008, 23:20:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 's')team, nice Mortal Kombat style rebuttal.
Just trying to be informative... :-D

Image
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby tick66 » Thu 01 May 2008, 23:20:54

I took 6 women and 6 men and put them in a room for 20 years. Each pair had enough supplies for the 20 years. Each women gave birth to a child the first year and at the age of 16 the cycle continued. (Nothing went in or out of the room)
So I have a question for Divest. Will they be alive after the 20 years?
I sure do hope the Food or Oil Fairy is real.


:( Unsustainable is just that.
User avatar
tick66
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat 23 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Judgie » Thu 01 May 2008, 23:25:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '
')
Oil is priced in Dollars, world wide. Regardless of what country its bought and sold in, so any increase in the price of oil would automatically raise the price of oil in euros or pounds or rupees or yuan for that matter. When you look at the exchange rate, $1.54 dollars buys 1 euro, the Europeans are actually only paying 72.76E for their oil.


I know of at least one country that is already bucking that trend, guess who?:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008- ... 083804.htm
"That the cream cannot help but always rise up to the top, well I say, <censored by peakoil.com> floats"

Jarvis Cocker - "Running the World"
Judgie
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 07 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Divest » Fri 02 May 2008, 00:39:40

I never said global demand will decline uniformly, I said global demand will decrease. If Europe, China, Japan, and the US all experience a slowdown, it will have a massive slowdown, and perhaps even decrease global demand for oil. I’m glad the middle east states are growing, but they won’t come close to touching what the super powers use now, regardless of how fast they expand in the near term.

And, I never said predict, I said most economists agree that the cost of oil is far over-valued when you look at the supply/demand. Your original statement of “we’re running out” isn’t true, we have enough oil to last decades, perhaps more if more if found. There is not a substantial up-tick in demand and there has not been a huge decrease in supply; hence the massive increase of oil is not due to, as you seem to think by your original statement, the scarcity of oil.

You seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements. Things are not as bad as you make them out to appear and I would very much like for you to stop; its not painting an accurate picture of the situation.

And do you even take the time to read what I type? I said, anything over $95 dollars (hit in December of last year) is due to the steady decline in the value of the USD. Anything over about $70-75 is based on fear that Iran will cut off oil due to sanctions placed on it by the UN over its nuclear problem, or violence in the oil fields of Nigeria, or Venezuela cutting off oil supplies to the US. So no, the USD is not the only reason the value of oil has become double that of last year; it is the primary reason oil spiked to above $115. And yes, we know oil is up; but it does indeed matter what oil is priced in.
User avatar
Divest
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby BigTex » Fri 02 May 2008, 01:40:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', 'I') never said global demand will decline uniformly, I said global demand will decrease. If Europe, China, Japan, and the US all experience a slowdown, it will have a massive slowdown, and perhaps even decrease global demand for oil. I’m glad the middle east states are growing, but they won’t come close to touching what the super powers use now, regardless of how fast they expand in the near term.


Worldwide demand destruction may occur, but it hasn't occurred yet.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd, I never said predict, I said most economists agree that the cost of oil is far over-valued when you look at the supply/demand.


Why would an economist say that the market price was not supported by supply and demand? Isn't supply and demand what determines price? If it's not supply and demand driven, what is driving it? If an oil buyer decides he prefers to pay a lower price, where does he go to buy that cheaper oil?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')our original statement of “we’re running out” isn’t true, we have enough oil to last decades, perhaps more if more if found. There is not a substantial up-tick in demand and there has not been a huge decrease in supply; hence the massive increase of oil is not due to, as you seem to think by your original statement, the scarcity of oil.


Who are you responding to when you say "you" and "your"?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements. Things are not as bad as you make them out to appear and I would very much like for you to stop; its not painting an accurate picture of the situation.


That's not how it works. You have to make your argument with analysis and supporting data. Once you make your argument, people get to decide for themselves whether it makes sense.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd do you even take the time to read what I type? I said, anything over $95 dollars (hit in December of last year) is due to the steady decline in the value of the USD. Anything over about $70-75 is based on fear that Iran will cut off oil due to sanctions placed on it by the UN over its nuclear problem, or violence in the oil fields of Nigeria, or Venezuela cutting off oil supplies to the US. So no, the USD is not the only reason the value of oil has become double that of last year; it is the primary reason oil spiked to above $115. And yes, we know oil is up; but it does indeed matter what oil is priced in.

Right. Some of the price of oil is dollar devaluation. Everyone will agree with you on that.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, start off with EROEI and how the hard to extract oil provides less net energy.

The peak oil topic is really a rich subject and you may find it interesting to learn about. There are some reasonable counter-arguments to many of the peak oil predictions, but you have to study the matter before you will be able to make those arguments.

I'm not really sure what you're doing with today's rants.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Divest » Fri 02 May 2008, 03:29:11

That’s a lot of fancy graphs. Lets start from the top. Global oil production still increased, and according to http://www.globalfirepower.com/list_oil_proven.asp (btw, Iran has about 14% of the worlds total reserves, not 80%), there is still about 900 billion barrels left, more so now because of recent finds in Brazil, and others in the north sea of the coast of Norway. So, no, chances are we have not hit peak oil, and at this point, when there has been several finds just within the past few months its premature to say that we have hit peak oil. Just like with most historical events, we won’t know when we’ve hit that point until well after the fact.

While I appreciate you’re graphs about the US, it just lends to my argument that your middle eastern countries who have been “expanding at a rapid rate” will come no where near the combined 33% of world oil that the US and China consumes; a decrease of anywhere between 1-3% demand of oil is like taking Russia or Spain off that graph completely; something that would have a sizeable effect on the price of oil.

And, after re-reading my argument, I don’t think I’ve ever made the claim that US oil production has risen, or have made any comment on US domestic oil production other then we should drill in ANWR, North Dakota and use the “tar sand” regions of Colorado, much like the Canadians have exploited theirs. And, correct me if I’m wrong- you failed to provide estimates- ANWR has not been fully explored; hence any estimate on how long it would last is premature, again.

I’m not, and never have, said its impossible for the US to undergo food shortages, I’m saying its extremely unlikely. If the rest of the world is in a food crisis, and it spreads here, we’ll simply cut off food exports; something that can be easily resumed once stability returns. It is considerably harder to restart an economy with half its work force unable to work due to years of starvation. Again; if things are “that bad” we as Americans will look out for other Americans first; that means ensuring we have food. But wait, lets look at your next point, if food prices drop due to a decreased dependence on ethanol, then the food crisis abroad will likely be a temporary (1 year) ordeal, because unless the weather is bad this year (i.e., a 2 week snow storm in China that cut rice production) things will stabilize out.

What agricultural product is grown in the south west? None that I can think of off the top of my head; and certainly if it was a huge problem, I’m sure someone would have said something like “what about commodity x?” in the past 10 years. The only problem the south west has is an increasing population and not enough water to go around. The whole food issue is overblown, the fact that it HAS happened before suggests a trend can be created, and using historical data, its likely to be a temporary issue; humans will adapt and find new places to grow these things or the strange weather of this past winter will not be a constant factor in future years.
User avatar
Divest
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby cube » Fri 02 May 2008, 04:12:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '.')..
And, I never said predict, I said most economists agree that the cost of oil is far over-valued when you look at the supply/demand.
...
link please
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Judgie » Fri 02 May 2008, 06:04:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '.')..
And, I never said predict, I said most economists agree that the cost of oil is far over-valued when you look at the supply/demand.
...
link please


As the Cube asked, please cite your source/s
.
"That the cream cannot help but always rise up to the top, well I say, <censored by peakoil.com> floats"

Jarvis Cocker - "Running the World"
Judgie
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 07 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Jack » Fri 02 May 2008, 06:26:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', 'Y')ou seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements. Things are not as bad as you make them out to appear and I would very much like for you to stop; its not painting an accurate picture of the situation.


An accurate picture implies accurate and comprehensive data. Such data are not available to us at this time. Therefore, we will continue to wave our arms about and make gloom and doom statements.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', 'I') would very much like for you to stop;


Ask me if I care. 8)


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '
')And do you even take the time to read what I type?


No, of course not. Why should I?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', 'I') said, anything over $95 dollars (hit in December of last year) is due to the steady decline in the value of the USD. Anything over about $70-75 is based on fear that Iran will cut off oil due to sanctions placed on it by the UN over its nuclear problem, or violence in the oil fields of Nigeria, or Venezuela cutting off oil supplies to the US. So no, the USD is not the only reason the value of oil has become double that of last year; it is the primary reason oil spiked to above $115. And yes, we know oil is up; but it does indeed matter what oil is priced in.


Really? Anything over $95 is due to the decline in value of the USD? Let us consider the logic. If oil is $112.61 - as it is right now, per the WSJ, then $17.61 is due to dollar weakness - correct? But it is up 9 cents right now in; so does this imply the dollar is down? And down against what? The Yen? The Euro? Some undefined market basket of currencies?

You complain about a lack of rigor in the various arguments, and then you provide a blanket statement, without citations, with no indication of statistical analysis, no disclosure of significance, no discussion of likelihood, odds, or the applicable independent variables or predictors. That is an absurdity.

Oh, well. Not to worry. Per my original post, the angelic host is flapping vigorously to Titan. No doubt 33.128% of the price above $91.03 per barrel is due to the fear of molting among the angels, resulting in reduced flow. I got my statistics, along with the analysis, from the same place you seem to have obtained yours.

Out of my....

8)
Dieoff. Fun to watch. Better with hot buttered popcorn! [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby s0cks » Fri 02 May 2008, 09:02:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('divest', '.')..we should drill in ANWR, North Dakota and use the “tar sand” regions of Colorado, much like the Canadians have exploited theirs.


Translated: ...we should drill anywhere, no matter the environmental cost, so I can keep my current lifestyle with no regard of future consequences.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')nvironmental Defence has released a report calling the Alberta Oil Sands the most destructive project on Earth.

Few Canadians know that Canada is home to one of the world's largest dams and it is built to hold toxic waste from just one Tar Sands operation," Rick Smith, the executive director of Environmental Defence.

- At least 90% of the fresh water used in the oil sands ends up in ends up in tailing ponds so toxic that propane cannons are used to keep ducks from landing in them.

- Processing the oil sands uses enough natural gas in a day to heat 3 million homes in Canada.

- Producing a barrel of oil from the oil sands produces three times more greenhouse gas emissions than a barrel of conventional oil.

- The oil sands operations are the fastest growing source of heat-trapping greenhouse gas in Canada. By 2020 the oil sands will release twice the amount produced currently by all the cars and trucks in Canada.


PDF Report
Last edited by s0cks on Fri 02 May 2008, 09:05:12, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
s0cks
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed 17 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: New of Zealand
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 02 May 2008, 09:04:49

Image
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 02 May 2008, 13:25:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', '[')url=http://www.globalfirepower.com/list_oil_proven.asp]http://www.globalfirepower.com/list_oil_proven.asp[/url]

Proven?

They are cooking the books.

Basing the future of one's civilisation on a handful of unaudited companies is a bit risky, no?

Here is the gap that has never been closed since 1981. Today we have used half the total and are discovering only a quarter to a third of what we use. It is a one-off inheritance we are eating into.

Aaron, this troll got eaten.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Jack » Fri 02 May 2008, 14:13:45

So, I wonder....is hunting trolls on a baited field actually feeding them?
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 02 May 2008, 14:27:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'S')o, I wonder....is hunting trolls on a baited field actually feeding them?


Trolls thrive on carnage, Tiger. They consume, infest, destroy, live off the death and destruction of other species.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Pops » Fri 02 May 2008, 14:53:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '.')..

Come on A. lots of good stuff posted on this thread - 1,600 somebodies have viewed it and perhaps had their questions answered due to Chumley.

BTW, what are ya gonna do for your 6,000th post?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 02 May 2008, 15:34:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '.')..

Come on A. lots of good stuff posted on this thread - 1,600 somebodies have viewed it and perhaps had their questions answered due to Chumley.

BTW, what are ya gonna do for your 6,000th post?


Humor & nostalgia
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: I want someone to answer a few things for me...

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sat 03 May 2008, 02:21:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Divest', 'I') never said global demand will decline uniformly, I said global demand will decrease. If Europe, China, Japan, and the US all experience a slowdown, it will have a massive slowdown, and perhaps even decrease global demand for oil.
...
You seem to be displaying arm-waving prophecy with your doom and gloom statements.


We call this "demand destruction" due to limited supply - it means that people have a declining standard of living.

If that isn't "doom and gloom" ...
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

cron