Nice little doomer fest we have going on here.
There seems to be the implicit assumption that the Haitians brought this famine upon themselves...but is that really the case? How did Haiti become so fucked up in the first place, when neighboring Cuba, under heavy trade sanctions from the Untied States for years, has managed to survive fairly well?
I intend to do a little research into this now, as I admittedly have never looked very much into Haitian affairs. Didn't the good ol' US of A screw around there a few times in the past century? Might that have something to do with it? Just speculating...
While it might seem well and good to say "Hey, I got to look out for my own, can't waste my resources on freeloaders!" it does strike me as a somewhat short-sided perspective (and not to mention somewhat...oh perish the thought...cruel?).
I mean, how many times can you turn your back on fellow human beings before they figure out your game, and then decide to return you the favor when you end up in the same situation? Invoke natural law, if you must. But is this really the kind of attitude that you want to become commonplace? More importantly, is it truly just?
Frighteningly, some of those here will probably say yes to this question. Others will simply say that there is no choice; it is the reality that we have to except.
I think that there is a choice. I think that we should always strive to help our fellow human beings, our precious world. Someone had a chain of responsibility above that went something to the extent of my family > my planet. My belief is complete opposite. Didn't someone say "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one?" Sadly, I think this sentiment is not shared amongst very many people.
Sorry if I'm drifting off subject here, but this placid acceptance of the starvation of an entire nation, somehow, just doesn't sit well with me. I suppose somebody will jump up and say that I'm making a personal value judgment here. Well, it's one I'm probably going to bloody well keep, unless you can somehow convince me that every single one of those Haitians are somehow less worthy of life than your own ass. Giving those statistical odds, I'd say no.
Instead, why doesn't someone here at least attempt to posit an idea to help those people for a change? Shipping them out of the country seems like a better solution, then just leaving them all to die. Or do you truly not care at all?
Someone made a thread here about a "monkeysphere" that people have where they cannot be assed to help anyone beyond their own immediate friends, family and associates. Does that not strike you as somewhat pathetic, despite any rationalizations to the contrary? Has thousands of years of human cooperation and construction of society really led us to this?
It seems farcical, but at this very moment I can hear in my mind the voice of a certain imaginary character born of the mind of Charles Dickens:
If they all must die, then they had better do it, and decrease the SURPLUS POPULATION!
Seems to me to be a sad state of affairs when one is reduced to agreeing with that statement.
