Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 21:21:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'r')ising prices is the definition of inflation.

Actually no. Rising prices is the definition of rising prices. The definition of inflation is the expansion of the money supply.


[smilie=5dunce.gif] Dictionary.com

There are a dozen different definitions there, and they all define it as a generalized rise in prices.

The generally accepted measures of inflation are:
The consumer price index
The cost of living index
The producer price index
The commodity price index
The GDP deflator
The capital goods price index

These all try to measure average prices.

Monetary supply is certainly interwoven with inflation. Some schools of economics hold that inflation can not occur unless the monetary supply is expanded, but the defining feature of inflation is a sustained and generalized increase in prices. Ref: wikipedia

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')mall, did you read the linked blog from Denninger? It lays it out better than I can.

I did, but darned if I can make any sense out of it. Seems like the central concept in a deflationary cycle is that people save their money instead of spending it, so credit dries up. That is so far from American reality that it's laughable. American's are mortgaged up to their eyebrows. The average American doesn't even own the shirt on his back. I'm sure that the folks from the "pretend everything is fine" camp would see it as a major catastrophe if that ends and Americans are forced to live within their means, but I sure don't. When our government is in debt as deeply as ours, I don't see how on earth we would end up with a deflationary cycle. All the government has to do to stop deflation dead is print more cash. The government has a very strong incentive to push us towards inflation because deflation would magnify the national debt and disproportionately drop tax revenues. If there's one thing a politician loves more than lies and cheap hookers, it's taxes.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')rime mortgages are nowhere near 2 per cent, and won't be.

No of course not. My point is that with the federal funds rate at 2%, banks are being about as strongly stimulated as they can be to lend money. If you can't get a loan at this point, it's not because the bank is in a credit crunch, it's because you're not a good credit risk.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby sjn » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 21:25:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'W')hat's the true value of gold? of oil? I don't claim to know, but I'm not betting on the price of either to fall.

So we might not have what is called cost-push inflation. That doesn't mean the price of gasoline and diesel won't be selling at $10/gallon while your income is still the same as now.

Unless someone can tell me why a US dollar backed by some second level mortgage derivative is going to increase in value versus common basic commodities of depleting quantity, all these other points about deflation are seem superfluous to me.

Inflation is usually about the quantity of money, but it could also be about the quality of money. This was easier to see in the gold backed system, when for example, the dollar was devalued from $20 to $35 in the 1930s depression.

I think this the problem. It's not the 1930s, and we don't have a gold standard. It really doesn't matter whether the US has internal inflation or deflation, the economy is global in both the participants and resources. Externally the dollar is losing value, both to commodities (which are representing ever more embodied energy) and to other currencies this means from the perspective of the rest of the world the US is undergoing what appears as monetary inflation, holders of dollars are seeing their purchasing power decline even as the US economy and credit system deflate. Heli Ben is trying to compensate for the loss but is only adding a positive feedback which further weakens the dollar and will in my opinion spur real monetary inflation.
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 21:40:14

Smallpoxgirl,
Exactly, if you can't get a loan now, it's because you're not a good credit risk. Problem is, much of our economy for several years has been based on loaning money to people who were poor credit risks, so they could buy stuff they couldn't afford. Take them out of the equation, and sales go down. (Consumerism is said to be 70% of the economy in the US.) Then, the rest follows it down.

Yep, the govt AND the sheeple are all mortgaged to the hilt, and the result is, who can afford to take on MORE debt to keep this thing crankin' along? How many can be fooled into paying to much for a house that is decreasing in value? And how much more cheap imported electronic crap do we really need? How long can we convince China and the Arabs to keep propping up our insolvent banks?

The FED has, by some reports, already gone through about half of their reserves keeping the finance sector from collapsing, and some say we'll see bad results by April 1, cheap money notwithstanding.

I'm betting that this whole thing goes down like a lead duck, and what the politicians do will be too little, and it's already too late for the IB's. Rumors now say Lehman's and Goldman Sachs ain't near what they are cracked up to be. Think I heard that the Arabs don't want to put any more into Citibank. What's that sucking sound? Did somebody flush a bank?
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby sjn » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 21:42:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'r')ising prices is the definition of inflation.

Actually no. Rising prices is the definition of rising prices. The definition of inflation is the expansion of the money supply.


[smilie=5dunce.gif] Dictionary.com

There are a dozen different definitions there, and they all define it as a generalized rise in prices.

The generally accepted measures of inflation are:
The consumer price index
The cost of living index
The producer price index
The commodity price index
The GDP deflator
The capital goods price index

These all try to measure average prices.

Monetary supply is certainly interwoven with inflation. Some schools of economics hold that inflation can not occur unless the monetary supply is expanded, but the defining feature of inflation is a sustained and generalized increase in prices. Ref: wikipedia

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')mall, did you read the linked blog from Denninger? It lays it out better than I can.

I did, but darned if I can make any sense out of it. Seems like the central concept in a deflationary cycle is that people save their money instead of spending it, so credit dries up. That is so far from American reality that it's laughable. American's are mortgaged up to their eyebrows. The average American doesn't even own the shirt on his back. I'm sure that the folks from the "pretend everything is fine" camp would see it as a major catastrophe if that ends and Americans are forced to live within their means, but I sure don't. When our government is in debt as deeply as ours, I don't see how on earth we would end up with a deflationary cycle. All the government has to do to stop deflation dead is print more cash. The government has a very strong incentive to push us towards inflation because deflation would magnify the national debt and disproportionately drop tax revenues. If there's one thing a politician loves more than lies and cheap hookers, it's taxes.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')rime mortgages are nowhere near 2 per cent, and won't be.

No of course not. My point is that with the federal funds rate at 2%, banks are being about as strongly stimulated as they can be to lend money. If you can't get a loan at this point, it's not because the bank is in a credit crunch, it's because you're not a good credit risk.
The definition I would use: a general increase in prices as a result of the expansion in the supply of money and credit exceeding economic growth (demand for products and services). You might add the external demand for the currency to the economic growth in the case of a reserve currency like the dollar.

I agree with you about the availability of credit, but the issue is nobody is a good credit risk. If you need credit then you're not going to get it!
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 21:49:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'S')mallpoxgirl,
Exactly, if you can't get a loan now, it's because you're not a good credit risk. Problem is, much of our economy for several years has been based on loaning money to people who were poor credit risks, so they could buy stuff they couldn't afford. Take them out of the equation, and sales go down. (Consumerism is said to be 70% of the economy in the US.) Then, the rest follows it down.

Yep, the govt AND the sheeple are all mortgaged to the hilt, and the result is, who can afford to take on MORE debt to keep this thing crankin' along? How many can be fooled into paying to much for a house that is decreasing in value? And how much more cheap imported electronic crap do we really need? How long can we convince China and the Arabs to keep propping up our insolvent banks?

The FED has, by some reports, already gone through about half of their reserves keeping the finance sector from collapsing, and some say we'll see bad results by April 1, cheap money notwithstanding.

I'm betting that this whole thing goes down like a lead duck, and what the politicians do will be too little, and it's already too late for the IB's. Rumors now say Lehman's and Goldman Sachs ain't near what they are cracked up to be. Think I heard that the Arabs don't want to put any more into Citibank. What's that sucking sound? Did somebody flush a bank?

Yeah. People pulling out investment, banks collapsing, I see all that. What's that do? It devalues the dollar, leading to inflation. The government then passes some deficit spending "economic stimulus" package, which leads to inflation. If they can't sell enough T-Bills to cover the deficit, they'll have to raise the interest rate, leading to inflation. If, some how miraculously, we're still in deflation, all they've got to do is crank up the printing presses and make more money.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 21:51:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', 'I') agree with you about the availability of credit, but the issue is nobody is a good credit risk. If you need credit then you're not going to get it!


Nobody "needs" credit. We've all maxed out our credit cards. It's time to collectively cut them up and put ourselves on a budget. That's not a bad thing.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:05:48

Smallpoxgirl,
Yeah, I think they'll do that all right. I just think it'll make matters worse by far in the long run, but politicians are SHORT run thinkers. That makes my Social Security (62 in Oct '08) look like a bad bet.

Yeah, we quit using credit cards some time ago, except for mail order, and pay it online immediately. That's good personal money management. Problem is, the banksters are depending on the outrageous interest income they get from CC debt, and need it to pay for the losses on bad mortgages and derivatives. Without that income, the banks go down faster, and credit gets tighter, as the remaining banks are strapped for cash so they can't loan out 10 x the amount. A dollar in lost reserves means roughly $10 lost loaning ability. Nice on the way up, but it's BAD on the way down!

In the mid 1930's, my uncle bought a farm and had 90% of the purchase price. In order to borrow 10 of the farm's value, he had to have a CO-SIGNER, who was a property owner, as in no mortgage. That's tight credit.
$^&$!!! Every time I hit numeral eight I get that (*^&*^!! smiley!
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby MC2 » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:07:38

Patience, yep, that's it.

Small, it takes awhile for the concepts KD lays out in his TIckers to sink in; we've all been programmed to "believe" in the ability to "inflate away" our problems. Bernanke himself published a paper in 2002 saying exactly that - that he'd operate the printing press. I suspect he's getting a reality call as to what happens if we do that about now. Instantly .gov debt costs go to 20 per cent and we are stalemated.

Read back a few weeks in the Tickers, pretty sure it was covered in there. The big problem is there's really nothing left to make a good "bubble" out of! The debt money system has reached its natural conclusion: the available money is insufficient to service the debt that's been generated. Reset time.
User avatar
MC2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon 26 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby seldom_seen » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:12:58

When the subject of the definition of inflation comes up. It is a good time to ask why is there so much head scratching as to its real meaning? There doesn't seem to be such much confusion surrounding the meaning of other economic terms.

The reason is that inflation is a "secret weapon" of the government. It can tax you without ever passing a law or letting you know. It purposefully under reports inflation in hopes you won't wake up in the middle of the night and realize that someone is stealing from your 401k or pension fund.

The federal reserve no longer reports M3 money supply anymore. That says it all right there.

As for the definition of inflation, it's has been twisted and warped and stretched and mangled to conceal the con job.

How can we discuss an increase in the money supply if it's not reported and there's no word to describe it?
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:14:34

Mc2,
I'm convinced that Karl and Nothing have the eventual outcome NAILED. What I'm wondering is how much can the gov/ FED dilute the buck before that happens, and what happens to other currencies in the mean time? And my purchasing power, of course.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:24:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MC2', 'I') suspect he's getting a reality call as to what happens if we do that about now. Instantly .gov debt costs go to 20 per cent and we are stalemated.


Huh? That's Denninger's central arguement that we're entering deflation is that the interest rate on T-Bills is almost zero. Where did you get 20%?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'A') dollar in lost reserves means roughly $10 lost loaning ability.

Yes I understand. And that's one of the arguments against the fractional reserve system is that it allows bankers to create money, which governments then end up borrowing to pay their debts. If governments did most of the money creation instead, they(i.e. we) wouldn't have to borrow money and pay interest on it. The only thing preventing the US Mint from cranking up the press and paying down the US Debt, is the desire to maintain the strength of the dollar and prevent inflation.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:37:19

I think it's wrong for CB's to control the money. But is the govt any better? Who knows. Andy Jackson tried to end that, and they tried to kill him. The word is, that's what got Lincoln shot, and maybe Kennedy. Both tried to get out of the clutches of the bankers. Any volunteers? Not me, thank you very much.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:41:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'H')ow can we discuss an increase in the money supply if it's not reported and there's no word to describe it?


Why would we want to. It's a baseless fiat currency anyway. As long as there's the right number of them so that people believe in them, then who cares how many there are. It's pretty inconceivable to me that we're going to get into trouble from people hoarding them (i.e. deflation), but it's pretty easy to see how we could end up in a crisis from people loosing faith in them (i.e. inflation).
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby DantesPeak » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 22:55:17

I don't read the Ticker Forum or know KD is.

So far I don't know any reason to think he or she may be right, except that he/she posts a lot there. What exactly is his/her track record as compared to, for example, mine?

Did he specifically predict the price of oil these last few years as well as I, or gasoline shortages last spring, or that gold would go from $850 in December to $1000 before April 1?
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 23:03:32

What I have difficulty with is the means of money delivery, even if they do start printing like crazed counterfitters, if so many no longer qualify for loans. If banks seize up more than they already are how is this cash going to circulate? The Japanese had this problem of getting cash into the hands of people, and tried dealing with it in a number of different ways, one of which was launching massive infrastructure projects, subsidizing banks and sharply lowering their interest rates.

Wikipedia:
The easily obtainable credit that had helped create and engorge the real estate bubble continued to be a problem for several years to come, and as late as 1997, banks were still making loans that had a low guarantee of being repaid. Correcting the credit problem became even more difficult as the government began to subsidize failing banks and businesses, creating many "zombie businesses".
The time after the bubble's collapse (崩壊 hōkai?), which occurred gradually rather than catastrophically, is known as the "lost decade or end of the century" (失われた10年 ushinawareta jūnen?) in Japan. The Nikkei 225 stock index eventually bottomed out at 7603.76 in April 2003 before resuming an upward climb.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_a ... ice_bubble
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 23:05:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'H')ow can we discuss an increase in the money supply if it's not reported and there's no word to describe it?


Why would we want to. It's a baseless fiat currency anyway. As long as there's the right number of them so that people believe in them, then who cares how many there are. It's pretty inconceivable to me that we're going to get into trouble from people hoarding them (i.e. deflation), but it's pretty easy to see how we could end up in a crisis from people loosing faith in them (i.e. inflation).


They don't have to hoard, they simply have to be denied loans, to cause a massive problem of unemployment and misery, and yes, potentially deflation, unless commodity prices remain high.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 23:13:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')hat I have difficulty with is the means of money delivery, even if they do start printing like crazed counterfitters, if so many no longer qualify for loans. If banks seize up more than they already are how is this cash going to circulate? The Japanese had this problem of getting cash into the hands of people, and tried dealing with it in a number of different ways, one of which was launching massive infrastructure projects, subsidizing banks and sharply lowering their interest rates.


Yeah. The Japanese in 90's seems to be the achetype for the deflationary crisis. Compared to the hyperinflationary crisis, it doesn't seem that bad. Japan in the 90's just doesn't scream economic hardship the same way Weimar Germany does.

How would the government spend money? Ton's of ways. They could dump a bunch of money into specialty loans programs like the small business administration, student loans, or HUD. They could embark on any number of new make work program. They could pay down the national debt. They could build a nationalized healthcare system.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby MC2 » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 23:17:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'M')c2,
I'm convinced that Karl and Nothing have the eventual outcome NAILED. What I'm wondering is how much can the gov/ FED dilute the buck before that happens, and what happens to other currencies in the mean time? And my purchasing power, of course.


Same here. My guess is that if they COULD inflate, they would be doing it now. All we've seen is the Fed follow short term credit down to 2 per cent (and they will go lower - won't matter). The key question is going to be what happens with the shit sandwiches the Fed is allowing the IBs and PDs to use as collat for loans, i.e., how long can the Fed keep that stuff juggling in the air, before it all comes tumbling down. I don't think they're "monetizing the debt," YET. If they do, then instantly their borrowing costs moon shot as no one will want to touch their treasuries. We've already arguably had two failed auctions.
I think that down the road a bit, we're going to see the dollar is going to be a lot better off than those other currencies. This is going to take some time to unwind, though, and we will see some more nominal "devaluation" in the interim, before the realization dawns that there's no way out of the depression that's coming, and that "they" are fucked at least as bad as we are.
Cheerie, isn't it?

Small: there's a difference between our ST rates being driven down by capital flight out of "risky" positions and into them, and the moonshot the .gov auctions would experience if we tried to "print our way out of this."
User avatar
MC2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon 26 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby roccman » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 23:58:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'M')c2,
I'm convinced that Karl and Nothing have the eventual outcome NAILED. What I'm wondering is how much can the gov/ FED dilute the buck before that happens, and what happens to other currencies in the mean time? And my purchasing power, of course.


Oh yeah Karl has it figured out...

Here is HIS ticker on September 21, 07...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')imply put - we the people either insist on reform - now - or we risk the following which will total your purchasing power and wealth -


Hyperinflation.

The government continues to raise the debt ceiling whenever they hit the old one and no reforms of substance are enacted. The bond market, however, will continue to price in trouble because foreign governments are no longer willing to prop us up. The only way out of this box will be for The Fed to buy the long end of the curve to force rates back down, which is instantly hyperinflationary. To actually do so would require an immediate devaluation of the dollar by 13-15% and that is to cover China alone! This will precipitate a full on dollar collapse.

Everything you want to buy will double in price.

The price of milk, eggs, and other things you need to buy are already skyrocketing. Exempting food and energy from "inflation numbers" is fraudulent. We are experiencing 10% inflation right now and it will get much worse if we do not act.


Hmmmmm...the all knowing Karl throws out hyperinflation less than a year ago...

You think anything has changed much since September?

Nope.

Flip flopping Karl and his VW veggie mobile can't figure out what side of the fence to be on...
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby sjn » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 00:02:58

Treasury auctions won't matter when the printing press is running full tilt. What are foreign creditors to do while the debts are inflated away? Sure, the current system has relied on foreign purchase of US debt, but the purpose was to get the rest of the world to pay tribute to the US by artificially supporting the Dollar, the system was structured to make it in their interest to do so (and if they disagreed the military/CIA was there to make the point). That system can't operate anymore in the interest of the creditors, as we know it was predicated on constant growth. We now get to see how well the US millitary backing of the system works out.
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron