by Homesteader » Sun 16 Mar 2008, 22:49:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Iaato', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jasonraymondson', 'I') just don't understand the whole shtick. Long run, what is the benefit?
Basically, BSC was bankrupt, and in debt to other corporate entities because they were holding $13Trillion in bad derivative paper based mostly on bad morgage loans.
The Fed is backstopping JPM's purchase and guaranteeing the deal. If the derivatives have to be cashed in, the Fed will exchange the worthless derivative paper for treasuries which can then be used to prop, prop, prop some more.
The sends the dollar off the cliff, and gold up out of the pit it has been in for 25 years. And will eventually crash the markets. The benefit to JPM is that they eventually, after a number of the same sort of consolidations, become the United States of America National Bank. USANB. Kind of catchy, isn't it?
The benefit is to the executives of JPM, who will get rich, and their buddies. It delays problems for the other investment banks, and props the regular banks. Eventually it will make it all worse, but for now, it delays things. The US taxpayer will descend into the poorhouse as the cost of everything they need to live explodes (except their salaries). The poor staff of BSC also get totally shafted, as BSC was about 30% employee-owned.
Somebody, and I don't remember who, on peakoil forecast 6-8 months ago that JPM would be the "last man standing". Well, it looks like whoever it was needs to start thinking of an acceptance speech for some kind of award. JPM goes back a long way with the International Bankers, yes?