by Lumpy » Mon 11 Feb 2008, 22:47:13
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nano', '
')I have about the same situation as you, only I am the man in this case. I think I know what your man's problem is. It is the fact that there is very little for people to really do about the peak oil problem. Of course: you can save money and cut down on energy use, sure, but the fact is we still don't know enough about how the world will decisively react to peak oil - the macroscopic consequences and fallout are still difficult to predict. So until one knows more about that, the major preparedness changes like perhaps moving somewhere else or getting a different job still require extensive 'thinking about the problem' or 'worrying' in other words. No?
Your point might be well taken in general, but in our case it is not applicable.
1. 2.5 years ago we bought 7.5 acres with an old farm house, artesian well, etc. -- and left the city.
2. 1.5 years ago he stopped working (telecommuting) full time,and went to part time in order to be able to devote more time to reclaiming the land and developing the farm.
3. 1 year ago, he went to an on-contract basis only, which ends this month. i.e. I am the breadwinner, and have been for the greatest part for over a year.
4. So the whole question of moving/getting different job are not applicable in our case.
I work full time practicing rural psychiatry. (Not lucrative as it would be in the city, but way more fulfilling -- and I would NEVER want to move back to the city.)
So I don't think you have struck upon the explanation for the difference between the way he expends more energy worrying and I spend more energy doing -- in comparison to one another.
Lumpy
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson