Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Coping..

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Unread postby Zechs » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 17:36:25

Here's my two cents:

In an intense survival situtation, your own survival will depend on the people you are with, as one single person cannot possibly embody the library of skills required to sustain long-term survival conditions. Of course, there are always those that choose to retreat to the wilderness until the situation normalizes after a crisis, however in this particular scenario such a normalization may take a decade or more! One person, alone in the wilderness, has only a very remote chance of long-term survival on that time-scale, simply because one-person can easily perish when wounded or sick if not cared for by at least another. A small, mixed group of men and women retreating into the wilderness will stand a substantially better chance of long-term survival, however it must be stated that thier chances are still not all that exceptional.

The establishment of a post-collapse community gives the best odds, but brings it's own additional problems of sanitation, defense, and leadership. A community may well be easier to establish around the dictates of one individual, but for long-term survival purposes it becomes clear that some form of town-hall elder-caste leadership must be constructed prior to the leader's death to prevent a social collapse of the community.

Some form of preparation for this event is mandatory for survival. Since we know that a community is the best chance for survival, your first step towards preparation is to make steps towards being accepted in a small-rural community. Preferably, said community should be located at least 50 miles from any major city, and preferably well away of any major highway. You must also consider how you may retreat to said community without drawing to much attention towards yourself. Perhaps moving to the community and commuting, despite increasing expense, is the best solution. Also consider mapping out a route to the community from your current dwelling using only secondary roads off of the highway.

Secondly, aquisition of skills that would be valuable to such a community is the next great leap in survival probability. Almost all skills, save fashion and high-technology trades are scalable in some way to a small community operating off-grid. For instance, even a lowly janitor's knowledge of proper sanitation will become indispensable for prevention of dysentry and other forms of sanitory diseases.

The next logical step is to determine what material possessions you will need to individually aquire in order to ply your trade within the community. A carpenter would do well to quietly set aside a good set of hand-powered tools and several thousand nails into storage. Likewise, a dentist would do well to quietly create a stockpile of cheap toothbrushes.

Overall, the individual must aquire extra skills and knowledge to further bolster the skill set of the community. In addition, the procurement of basic supplies should be set about with common sense and patience. A large supply of MRE's, though desirable, would promote the thought that one should remain inside a city post-collapse, which screams against common-sense.
User avatar
Zechs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby jato » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 17:43:05

Zechs, welcome, great post. I agree with it.
jato
 

Unread postby Zechs » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 17:50:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', 'Z')echs, welcome, great post. I agree with it.


Thanks. I'll share more later, but I've got to get to work soon. 8)
User avatar
Zechs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby holmes » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 19:01:48

1 in 400 understand basic ecology.
supposedly 1/3 of the US population "FEELS" that evolution is not valid and not enough has been done to prove it. its so innate. OMFG.
that 1 is the "fringe" of society.

The illegal alien population is truthfully at 30 million in the US. lets have a highly conservative guess of 5 children per family (catholic). Prison system. check that overpopulated mess and welfare system. then go to the overpopulation and consumption of the corporate and social welfare state. Promotes and provides an environment for easy breeding and low genetic variability. rich and poor. We are not even close to a free market system in the US. Im starting to think its due to low IQ's helped being created with cheap energy.
there is way more. Mismanagement and incompetency greed of the highest order.
personal experience employed with several US governemnts and the waste is unbelievable.
4 years observing the waste and pollution by the US military. Years and years of this compounded.

We in the US have Mega-landfills. Cool.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby holmes » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 19:04:03

U in europe are on big landfills. Years and years compounded. Millennia. t

The fertility pounded out of the soils.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby holmes » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 19:10:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('retiredguy', 'I')'ll second what PhilBiker said about the Amish. I was in an Amish general store in December. Almost all of the goods in the store came from somewhere else. They were even selling toys made in China. And the canned goods were all factory-canned.

You can bet stuff didn't arrive via horse and wagon, either.


Its all about skills and toughness.
fertile soils are highly prized. The most important thing along with seeds.
Its the vegetables, man. got to have them especially when your old.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Pfish » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 22:01:32

One of the issues I have with PO is that somehow we go from a lot of oil to no oil in such a short period of time. We are all going to die over night?

One of the things I have not seen is a timeline for all of the above. Do we die as soon as oil hits $70 a barrel? $200 a barrel? Come on. People go through hardships all the time: divorce, loss of a job, loss of a loved one and yet they still make it through.

Maybe the reason PO has not made it into the mainstream is because one minute we have some accurate and highly scientific figures from some insightful individuals and the next minute we conjure die-offs and the end of civilization.
"If what we had was a dog and pony show what we have now is a canine-equestrian extravaganza"
User avatar
Pfish
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Leucadia in the summer and Baja in the winter

Unread postby Zechs » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 23:28:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pfish', 'O')ne of the issues I have with PO is that somehow we go from a lot of oil to no oil in such a short period of time. We are all going to die over night?

One of the things I have not seen is a timeline for all of the above. Do we die as soon as oil hits $70 a barrel? $200 a barrel? Come on. People go through hardships all the time: divorce, loss of a job, loss of a loved one and yet they still make it through.

Maybe the reason PO has not made it into the mainstream is because one minute we have some accurate and highly scientific figures from some insightful individuals and the next minute we conjure die-offs and the end of civilization.


Hmm...Not quite.

Realistically speaking, the Die-Off has already started. Think about it: Rising Oil prices have already driven up the cost of medication to such an extent that now Americans are importing certain medications. Undoubtedly some elderly have already died from lack of proper medicine.

The larger portion of the Die-Off will occur once food becomes prohibitively expensive to grow. And that will occur over a spread of perhaps several years, less if the government destablizes and is no longer in place to affect Food Rationing.

I think the largest misunderstanding here is that the Die-Off is in effect a very real outcome, but people do not understand that the population death will start slowly at first, like it is now, and then accelerate and snowball as global economic conditions deteriorate.
User avatar
Zechs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Pfish » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 23:49:29

Zechs:

People die every day. It is a fact of life. I don't think they are dying any faster today than the were 30 years ago.

I would argue that we are keeping people alive too long. I just lost my mom and day this past year. My mom had been in a hospital for the last 19 months of her life. It drained her, us and the healthcare system.

The states and federal government are going to "reform" Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid right out of existence. The easiset way would be to raise the age of elgibility for the two. Did you listen to Bush's speech? It is in play.
"If what we had was a dog and pony show what we have now is a canine-equestrian extravaganza"
User avatar
Pfish
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Leucadia in the summer and Baja in the winter

Unread postby Creach » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:08:00

Imagine this.

Suppose supply has fallen to the point we're paying $200 a barrell. We're still using 80 million barrels a day, so at $200 it costs us $16 billion a day.

The US cannot afford to import enough oil to keep the economy running. The government subsidizes the domestic oil industry in hopes of jump starting production here at home. We've already peaked here, and thus this effort fails eventually. Oil has to be rationed to keep the food supply going. Martial law is imposed after a while to protect this system from utter collapse.

Riots break out in the cities as people go without food or too little food. The military will no doubt weaken as people leave, and are eventually forced to stay. All while the government uselessly throws money at oil production here and buys what it can abroad.

Productivity and economic output drops rapidly as martial law, civil unrest, and fear rise. A great deal of people will die, most of them likely in the riots rather than from starvation or lack of medical treatment.

Eventually...the system will go completely broke and collapse. A new America and world will rise from the ashes, no doubt.

It will be slow getting to that point, but once the decline starts it is likely to be rapid. The fact is our country is just too big and designed around the idea that we'll be able to use cars and planes to transport vital goods long distances.

If in say...40 years, when I'm 59, if I were to still live where I presently do...I'd only be able to eat bread and drink beer, and that's as long as the two factories I'm near have supplies. What happens when the workers quit and they shut down, as everyone clogs the highways, rushing to the big cities to get the government handouts?

Imagine the lines of empty cars. Imagine the people walking towards the cities.

People will not simply devolve into an agrarian society. At least most people won't. So it will be as rough as some say, I do believe.
"I do not want my work to bring me immortality. I wish to gain my immortality through not dying."
-Woody Allen
User avatar
Creach
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Zechs » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:14:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pfish', 'Z')echs:

People die every day. It is a fact of life. I don't think they are dying any faster today than the were 30 years ago.

I would argue that we are keeping people alive too long. I just lost my mom and day this past year. My mom had been in a hospital for the last 19 months of her life. It drained her, us and the healthcare system.

The states and federal government are going to "reform" Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid right out of existence. The easiset way would be to raise the age of elgibility for the two. Did you listen to Bush's speech? It is in play.


I think you misunderstand. What I am trying to say is that the Die-Off has already started, but in such a small degree that it is without notice. Undoubtedly, the number of elderly that have perished because of inability to purchase medication is very small. I'm not saying to expect the elderly to start dropping left and right, but I am saying to expect this trend to continue to grow in proportion to the population as economic conditions continue to decline.

What I think people must come to grasp is that modern society has managed to unhitch "Survival of the Fittest" with medicine. Whether this is a good or bad thing is up to philosophical debate, and my view would be biased as my father is still alive thanks to the use of insulin. Undoubtedly, as medicine becomes more and more expensive people that are dependent on modern medicine for survival will face the consequences, which while rather unpleasant to think about even in my own case, can be looked at as the realistic outcome.

The only solution that presents itself to me on how to reduce the impact of Peak-Oil would be massive and immediate efforts world-wide for convervation of energy and resources at every level of life. However, such an effort would require the US in particular to switch to a very totalitarian government, and I find it probable that the US population, to long spoiled to their ways, may revolt to such strict rationing.

Yes, I heard Bush's speech. Unfortunately, I am seeing a trend starting in the near future where in the Government's eyes the Elderly are becoming more and more a liability to the Financial future of the goverment, and thus are quietly shuffled loose the mortal coil. Ala Logan's Run, if you will, though without the age-limit executions. Still, denying citizens medication is tantamount to an execution, just without pulling the trigger or switch.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. ~ Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)
User avatar
Zechs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby maverickdoc » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:20:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Creach', 'I')magine this.

Suppose supply has fallen to the point we're paying $200 a barrell. We're still using 80 million barrels a day, so at $200 it costs us $16 billion a day.

The US cannot afford to import enough oil to keep the economy running. The government subsidizes the domestic oil industry in hopes of jump starting production here at home. We've already peaked here, and thus this effort fails eventually. Oil has to be rationed to keep the food supply going. Martial law is imposed after a while to protect this system from utter collapse.

Riots break out in the cities as people go without food or too little food. The military will no doubt weaken as people leave, and are eventually forced to stay. All while the government uselessly throws money at oil production here and buys what it can abroad.

Productivity and economic output drops rapidly as martial law, civil unrest, and fear rise. A great deal of people will die, most of them likely in the riots rather than from starvation or lack of medical treatment.

Eventually...the system will go completely broke and collapse. A new America and world will rise from the ashes, no doubt.

It will be slow getting to that point, but once the decline starts it is likely to be rapid. The fact is our country is just too big and designed around the idea that we'll be able to use cars and planes to transport vital goods long distances.

If in say...40 years, when I'm 59, if I were to still live where I presently do...I'd only be able to eat bread and drink beer, and that's as long as the two factories I'm near have supplies. What happens when the workers quit and they shut down, as everyone clogs the highways, rushing to the big cities to get the government handouts?

Imagine the lines of empty cars. Imagine the people walking towards the cities.

People will not simply devolve into an agrarian society. At least most people won't. So it will be as rough as some say, I do believe.



Price of oil will not go to $200 a barrel over night. It will rise from 40 to 50 to then dip to 45 then go to 52. So on a so forth. Yes it will have an up wards trajectory. My point is the rise will be gradual and as the price goes up people and governments will adapt. People will buy more fuel efficient/hybrid cars and governments will switch to nuclear energy or develop alternative (efficient solar, or fusion or something else). No there will be no mass starvation or riots or any thing like that. Calm down.
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby TrueKaiser » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:24:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('maverickdoc', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Creach', 'I')magine this.

Suppose supply has fallen to the point we're paying $200 a barrell. We're still using 80 million barrels a day, so at $200 it costs us $16 billion a day.

The US cannot afford to import enough oil to keep the economy running. The government subsidizes the domestic oil industry in hopes of jump starting production here at home. We've already peaked here, and thus this effort fails eventually. Oil has to be rationed to keep the food supply going. Martial law is imposed after a while to protect this system from utter collapse.

Riots break out in the cities as people go without food or too little food. The military will no doubt weaken as people leave, and are eventually forced to stay. All while the government uselessly throws money at oil production here and buys what it can abroad.

Productivity and economic output drops rapidly as martial law, civil unrest, and fear rise. A great deal of people will die, most of them likely in the riots rather than from starvation or lack of medical treatment.

Eventually...the system will go completely broke and collapse. A new America and world will rise from the ashes, no doubt.

It will be slow getting to that point, but once the decline starts it is likely to be rapid. The fact is our country is just too big and designed around the idea that we'll be able to use cars and planes to transport vital goods long distances.

If in say...40 years, when I'm 59, if I were to still live where I presently do...I'd only be able to eat bread and drink beer, and that's as long as the two factories I'm near have supplies. What happens when the workers quit and they shut down, as everyone clogs the highways, rushing to the big cities to get the government handouts?

Imagine the lines of empty cars. Imagine the people walking towards the cities.

People will not simply devolve into an agrarian society. At least most people won't. So it will be as rough as some say, I do believe.



Price of oil will not go to $200 a barrel over night. It will rise from 40 to 50 to then dip to 45 then go to 52. So on a so forth. Yes it will have an up wards trajectory. My point is the rise will be gradual and as the price goes up people and governments will adapt. People will buy more fuel efficient/hybrid cars and governments will switch to nuclear energy or develop alternative (efficient solar, or fusion or something else). No there will be no mass starvation or riots or any thing like that. Calm down.


actualy it can hit that high all that is needed is one attack on a major saudi oil refinery.
User avatar
TrueKaiser
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby maverickdoc » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:28:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TrueKaiser', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('maverickdoc', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Creach', 'I')magine this.

Suppose supply has fallen to the point we're paying $200 a barrell. We're still using 80 million barrels a day, so at $200 it costs us $16 billion a day.

The US cannot afford to import enough oil to keep the economy running. The government subsidizes the domestic oil industry in hopes of jump starting production here at home. We've already peaked here, and thus this effort fails eventually. Oil has to be rationed to keep the food supply going. Martial law is imposed after a while to protect this system from utter collapse.

Riots break out in the cities as people go without food or too little food. The military will no doubt weaken as people leave, and are eventually forced to stay. All while the government uselessly throws money at oil production here and buys what it can abroad.

Productivity and economic output drops rapidly as martial law, civil unrest, and fear rise. A great deal of people will die, most of them likely in the riots rather than from starvation or lack of medical treatment.

Eventually...the system will go completely broke and collapse. A new America and world will rise from the ashes, no doubt.

It will be slow getting to that point, but once the decline starts it is likely to be rapid. The fact is our country is just too big and designed around the idea that we'll be able to use cars and planes to transport vital goods long distances.

If in say...40 years, when I'm 59, if I were to still live where I presently do...I'd only be able to eat bread and drink beer, and that's as long as the two factories I'm near have supplies. What happens when the workers quit and they shut down, as everyone clogs the highways, rushing to the big cities to get the government handouts?

Imagine the lines of empty cars. Imagine the people walking towards the cities.

People will not simply devolve into an agrarian society. At least most people won't. So it will be as rough as some say, I do believe.



Price of oil will not go to $200 a barrel over night. It will rise from 40 to 50 to then dip to 45 then go to 52. So on a so forth. Yes it will have an up wards trajectory. My point is the rise will be gradual and as the price goes up people and governments will adapt. People will buy more fuel efficient/hybrid cars and governments will switch to nuclear energy or develop alternative (efficient solar, or fusion or something else). No there will be no mass starvation or riots or any thing like that. Calm down.


actualy it can hit that high all that is needed is one attack on a major saudi oil refinery.


Excellent point. But the shock will be temporary. Weeks to one month tops. + the US (and others) will open the reserves.
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Creach » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:29:29

I don't think I could be any calmer. I'm quite at peace.

The price will indeed be gradual. None of this will take place over night. I can only really assume, and that's not good.

But I'm not optimistic enough about humanity to believe for a minute people would adapt like that. It seems to me that when we have a good thing going, we tend to ride it until it stops, even if it means hitting a brick wall.

And people will riot over just about anything, just like governments of any form don't mind declaring martial law.

We've stalled as far as major energy advances go. People are afraid of nuclear power, plain and simple. They've been that way for decades. It will takes at least 20 years before we even seriously begin thinking about it, I'd say. That basically gives China time to build a lot of reactors and get good, long term results.

I wrote that to give Pfish some food for thought. It's not necessarily just doom and gloom and oh my God the world is gonna end!! but rather conclusions based on logical speculation.
"I do not want my work to bring me immortality. I wish to gain my immortality through not dying."
-Woody Allen
User avatar
Creach
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby maverickdoc » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:41:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Creach', ' ') People are afraid of nuclear power, plain and simple. They've been that way for decades. It will takes at least 20 years before we even seriously begin thinking about it, I'd say. That basically gives China time to build a lot of reactors and get good, long term results.


I agree people are scared of nuclear power, but it is that or nothing. You will be surprised how quickly people change their minds. Also China is building many new reactors and designing new models. Yes uranium too has a Hubbert’s curve, and disposal will be tough, but is a viable option. Coal will make a big comeback. Just look at coal related stock prices recently. And new technology will come online 10-15 years from now. Will there be problems? Absolutely. But it can, and will be solved .
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Creach » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 00:51:15

We'll worry about Peak Uranium when it gets closer 8) .

The comeback of coal will suck for the environment, but that's a sacrifice that will have to be made in the short term.

I don't know what all new tech will be available in a decade, but I haven't heard anything too optimistic.

Bottom line is this...supposing things do not change, and there is a peak oil decline, it will likely be worse than some say and better than others.
"I do not want my work to bring me immortality. I wish to gain my immortality through not dying."
-Woody Allen
User avatar
Creach
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Golgo13 » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 02:21:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', '
')Not for 6.3 BILLION people.


Of course. But this isn't about saving the world, it's about saving yourself and your loved ones.
User avatar
Golgo13
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon 13 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby holmes » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 10:46:51

fuck u and your nuclear energy ya bloated hogs. No clue and no care about sustainablility or sacrifice.

yep ill be sitting back in my earth ship living FREE watching the glutons and lunatics "getting their rightful energy nuclear". Then i will watch their demise as they develop cancers and disease frm all their wack experiments trying to sustain their energy fixes.

stop being a lazy ahole and ditch the nuclear. start building something sustainable. ya dopes.

and they will take every one down with them.

fuc u. selfish jerks.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby mindfarkk » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 10:57:05

for the OP... give it time. keep talking about it, about your feelings. be honest but keep it simple. and give it time. acceptance takes a while, redefining your world view takes a while. try to avoid extremes. yes, it's heartbreaking. try reading "desiderata", it helps me. also "beyond good and evil" is a good philosophy (shameless plug for my own POV). remember the world has always been full of this kind of madness. it doesn't mean people are all bad. try not to project out too much. sure, it *could* eventually mean the end of the world as we know it (believe me, the world will go on, with or without us), but extreme thinking usually comes straight out of extreme fear and anger - it has no perspective, it's a primal response. try to let it go. you don't actually know what the outcome will be, and it's as easy to try to envision the best case as the worst. yes, it's very frightening and it's very enraging, it's a bitter pill, it's incredibly disappointing to realize with all we know and have accomplished and learned, this is where we are as a species. we are very perverse!!! i have totally been there these last few months. but some of that is my internal alarm system, not just the information itself. get some emotional support. i have talked very plainly with my therapist about PO, which was difficult because i was afraid she would just write me off as a nutcase. but then again if she did, i'd know something about her, and find someone else. fortunately i presented the information first and as plainly as i could, my emotional and intellectual reaction to it, and we have been able to talk - not just about the logic, or the information, but how much of my reaction is just my stuff, and is counterproductive, and how much is (for lack of a better word) "legitimate" and effective response to *how things are now* as well as how they could get. i dunno, it helped me get some balance back. i don't feel as overwhelmed. i feel like i need to keep an eye on things, but like i can wait also, and take care of first things first.

to wit, there is simply too much that has to happen right now financially, materially, physically, intellectually, for me to be in a big rush. it's going to be about 3 years before i can be financially solvent, period - before i can even begin digging myself out of debt. after that, with good fortune, i can dig myself out of my student loans in ten or fifteen years. i might be able to assume a mortgage in that time, but leaving the state would be difficult to say the least. so i'm tied to a very expensive area. i've decided to deal with it all this way;

1) to learn and practice as many skills as i can, which i like to do anyway. that's everything from post-PO type trades to survival skills.

2) water purifiers. that and ultra-cold-weather sleeping bags i consider essential in an emergency. anything else we can make or do for ourselves.

3) pay off my student loan debts, work on my relationship til we get to a point where i'm confident we can work together in a crisis as a team, and to a point where we can co-invest in some property. property will probably be a house with enough square footage for me to start a garden and not in the city.

i honestly see that PO *could* have horrific consequences in my immediate neighborhood (i recognize it already has for many people). and, in fact, i can't see anything that's going to stand in the way of same. at the same time, because i can't see them all, doesn't mean there's not a lot of mitigating factors in how this plays out (quickly, slowly, etc.); maybe it will not be instant disaster, easilly rampant unemployment et al, yes, social unrest but not necessarily a state of martial law and complete breakdown of society.

it appears to me that to react too strongly, too fast, due to my material situation, health, etc., will in my situation weaken my position in almost any scenario. i'm going still going to hope for the best and prepare for the worst, but right now my plan by necessity has to be long term (meaning 10-15 years out). so i'm hoping life in the U.S. will hold together at least that long. i think it's certainly possible, maybe even more likely.

today i want to simply wait, learn, and observe. and i just have to be patient with the fact that i'm not in a position to get off the grid just yet. but i can feed my brain, practice skills, and strengthen the underpinning of my life, which is my network of friends and most of all, my life partner. if anyone can fight elbow to elbow with me, who i would trust with my life, it would be him.

it's a gift to have some heads-up on what's coming. i feel grateful for that. i'm not going to be ambushed by this. that will have to be my main asset for now.
what, me worry?
User avatar
mindfarkk
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron