Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

"Walking Away"

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby americandream » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 22:10:00

If the creditors are able to reach you and suspect you have an income source or valuable assets, they may well apply for an order to secure settlement of outstanding debt or institute bankruptcy proceedings. I think a lot depends on individual circumstances.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby mattduke » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 22:25:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'N')ow, don't give me any moral argument about the moral obligation to repay one's debts, those morals went right out the window with the morality of the banks issuing "liar loans" and issuing credit cards to frickin college students without jobs blah blah blah.

There is no morality out there anymore, only greed and everyone doing what's in their own best interest. Everyone is paying for that now.

That seems to be where this society is heading. The grasshopper will eat the ants.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby aflurry » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:14:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Walk away if you want, but if the home sells for less in foreclosure than the mortgage...

You owe the difference and it could be huge.

Do you really want to be homeless and tens of thousands of dollars in debt?

Talking to your creditors is better than defaulting and running away.


don't the terms of the loan dictate whether it is a recourse loan or not? that is, whether they are allowed to go after your other or just the house? i think this stuff is specific to the contract itself.
User avatar
aflurry
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:22:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')oes anyone know


This was actually a common practice back in the 80's as well, and the answer is: it depends on who you are.

The mortgage company is interested in doing what will make them the most money. So, if you have "equity" in your house, defined as the excess of potential selling price over the mortgage amount, you will be doing them a favor, because you are giving them something. So, they will be delighted to wave you farewell.

If you have no "equity", and take a hike, and have no other assets, they will give you a nasty on your credit rating, but in fact, you cannot get blood from a turnip, so they will not spend too much money to track you down to try to get the balance. We knew some people in the S and L crisis in the 80's that did this, and they thought it was the best thing they ever did. After a few years, the credit problem went away, and they bought another house no problemo.

Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on your viewpoint, the ramifications of having bad credit are more serious now than they used to be. Prospective employers will look at your credit rating as a reason not to hire you, for example. Also, you will pay more on your credit cards, etc. So one strategy is to buy another place on the other end while your credit is still good, and let the chips fall where they may. This may not be successful in the current environment though.

If you do have assets, and you take a hike, the bank or mortgage company will weigh the legal fees in tracking you down in whatever jurisdiction versus the amount they think they can extract from you and make a business decision as to whether to go after you.

What the financial whizzes are advising people right now is to do a "short sale". You call the bank ahead of time and work this out; You lower the price to whatever it takes to sell, you tell the bank that is all they are going to get, and a lot of times they will take it and leave you off the hook, because they figure this is the way for them to make the most money, and they really do not particularly want to give you a nasty on your credit.

One thing working in your favor is that in some areas, there are so many foreclosures, and so much stuff flying around, that the situation is chaotic and it will take some time for whatever to happen. Some other areas, not so much, so you have to weigh this as part of the decision.

You have to weigh it from your point of view too: If you think the market has gone to crap to such an extent that you will never get out of it, you have to bite the bullet and take a hike. At one point, a few years ago, at least half of the members of the US House of Representatives had been bankrupt at one point or another, so this stuff happens all the time. The high rollers have all sorts of legal tricks to keep the heat off.

One other thing that might be of interest: There have been some cases lately to the effect that the mortgage company has bundled and traded these mortgages to who knows where to such an extent, that they can no longer prove that they own a particular mortgage. A successful defense can occasionally be made that if the bank or other institution forecloses, you ask them to prove that they own the mortgage, and they cannot, so they keep off your back for awile until they figure out which Chinese bank actually holds your loan. After all, they cannot foreclose if they do not hold the loan in the first place.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby seahorse » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:32:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') successful defense can occasionally be made that if the bank or other institution forecloses, you ask them to prove that they own the mortgage, and they cannot, so they keep off your back for awile until they figure out which Chinese bank actually holds your loan. After all, they cannot foreclose if they do not hold the loan in the first place.


So true, but with a caveat. In Arkansas, to sue on a note, any note, the holder of the note has to produce proof that they are the holder of the note or a valid assignment of it. Also, they have to produce an original copy of the note (Good luck boys). This is to prevent the original from being produced later and forcing the debtor to pay twice for the same debt.

Now, the caveat, the above rule generally does not apply in a nonjudicial foreclosure, which, in Arkansas, can only be taken "in rem" meaning, a judgment against the property only. So, a mortgage holder gets a faster turn around on the foreclosure and doesn't have to produce the original note.
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby Ayoob » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:33:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('korosten', '.')...
So of course I wonder if they would track us down abroad as well if we stopped paying. Does anyone know :-)?

Chantal
That's a really good question. There is one way to find out for sure if you REALLY want to know. :P
Image
-------------------------
add on: All joking aside. I'm not an expert but I honestly believe it is best to work within the legal system. The law is the law. "Walking away" is illegal and therefore would technically make you a fugitive. Furthermore the USA has legal agreements with just about every country on this planet save for (Iran and North Korea) therefore there really is very few places to hide on this planet if you break the law in the USA.


Wow. How long do you think a box of donuts would last around those guys?
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby seahorse » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:34:38

As for bankruptcy hurting you? For many, including Donald Trump, its a minor inconvenience. In fact, I know a woman who filed bankruptcy maybe 3 months ago and gave up her house. The bank that foreclosed has now contacted her and is trying to work out a deal to sell her the house again. Times are tough when, 3 months later, the bank is calling the debtor that filed bankruptcy and trying to get her back into the house.

That's why this whole stupid mess isn't going to resolve itself. That's why this stupid rate cuts will not solve the problem. Because the banks are losing their collective asses and not profitable anymore!
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:45:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NWMossBack', 'A')nother interesting wrinkle is that the IRS will come after you for any difference in what the house sells for in foreclosure, and what you paid for it.

So if you bought a house at the peak of the market for $500k, then walk away when the market value drops to $400k, and the loan is foreclosed and the house sells at auction for $350k, the federal government will consider the $150k to be a "gift" from your mortgage company, and you will owe taxes on it!


That may or may not be true. Essentially it depends on whether you are solvent after the forgiveness. If you are still insolvent (i.e. you owe more than the value of the assets you own) after the loan is forgiven, then the forgiveness is not taxable. If you are solvent before the loan is forgiven, the whole thing is taxable. If you start off insolvent, but become solvent during the forgiveness, then you are taxable on the amount by which you became solvent.

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,, ... 34,00.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', ' ')All joking aside. I'm not an expert but I honestly believe it is best to work within the legal system. The law is the law. "Walking away" is illegal and therefore would technically make you a fugitive.

That would only be true if someone could argue fraud. That would require that they give evidence that you took the loan with the intention of defaulting on it. Except for fraud, defaulting on a loan is a civil issue not a criminal issue. In theory they could sue you in your state, get a judgement, take that judgement to a foreign judge and try to get them to enforce the judgement. Unless you are a fortune 500 company, I really doubt that's gonna happen.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby cube » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 00:13:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '.')..
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', ' ')All joking aside. I'm not an expert but I honestly believe it is best to work within the legal system. The law is the law. "Walking away" is illegal and therefore would technically make you a fugitive.

That would only be true if someone could argue fraud. That would require that they give evidence that you took the loan with the intention of defaulting on it. Except for fraud, defaulting on a loan is a civil issue not a criminal issue. In theory they could sue you in your state, get a judgement, take that judgement to a foreign judge and try to get them to enforce the judgement. Unless you are a fortune 500 company, I really doubt that's gonna happen.
You're probably right smallpox. I certainly doubt they'll be sending black hawk helicopters after anybody because of a McMansion loan default.....but we're not talking about a $5,000 overdue credit card bill here. There are people who are at least $100,000 "underwater".

That's too much money to simply just let go. I'm absolutely certain a bank will attempt to do "something" even if they only get to collect 50 cents on the dollar when the dust finally settles. Maybe the bank will sell the loan default to a collections agency and the "former" home owner can spend the rest of his life being harassed with phone calls from a collection agency. 8O
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby seahorse » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 00:33:37

Cube, did you read anything I just posted above?

A bank can choose a nonjudicial foreclosure (meaning, don't have to go to court) or go with a traditional foreclosure - meaning sue the debtor in court.


This is important, so understand -

Non-judicial means the mortgage company cannot go against the debtor personally, they can only foreclose against the property. The debtor gets off scott free. Why would they do this? For several reasons -

(1) Non-judicial a heck of a lot cheaper - very little attorney time involved, no filing fee costs; If you file a suit in court, it will costs thousands in attorney's fees;
(2) Non-judicial is a heck of a lot faster, usually house back in their possession within 90 days as opposed to at least 6 months;
(3) If the mortgage company files a lawsuit against the debtor, at a minimum, the debtor gets pissed and tears up the place plus, if they can't pay the mortgage payments, they are usually close to bankruptcy, so if filing suit against them just pushes them into bankrutpcy and the mortgage company is out all the time and expenses it just incurred to get the personal judgment.

So, in short, there are lots of big debts on big houses being written off, thus we have this financial crisis Cramer is raving about. As the banks are forced to write off more and more bad loans, they are forced to increase more and more reserves, meaning, they can't loan out as much, meaning, they can't lower rates enough to get out of this mess, bc the amount the can lend at any rate is dropping, so we can't get rid of all this excess in the housing market.

Maybe millions of Chinese will come over and the Bank of China will loan them money to buy up all these unsold houses and houses in foreclosure, but seeing how China is forming its own special subprime reaction team to deal with the subprime fallout hurting their banks, I don't think this is very likely.

[url=[url=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/subprime-crisis-cool-china-growth/story.aspx?guid=%7BA817A470%2D29CB%2D4EAD%2D9BA8%2D46812DBD697B%7D]http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/subprime-crisis-cool-china-growth/story.aspx?guid=%7BA817A470%2D29CB%2D4EAD%2D9BA8%2D46812DBD697B%7D[/url]]Chinese subprime special reaction team[/url]

THIS IS THE PROBLEM, A PROBLEM CAUSED BY BANKS THAT HAVE BAD LOANS, ITS A VICIOUS CREDIT CYCLE THAT CANNOT BE CURED BY LOWERING SHORT TERM RATES.

Bernanke is taking a play from Greenspan's play book to try and inflate our way out of this mess, but once the vicious credit cycle crunch starts, I don't see how we can reinflate out. The handle on the toilet has been flushed, and we are all going down with the rest of the turds.

When Bernanke gets down to where Greenspan was, and realizes its not working, he will look at Japan's old 90s play book and continue to lower rates down to almost 0%. When that doesn't work, everyone will finally realize we have a deflationary spiral.

Sure, many debtors will walk away and their debts be written off, but we will all suffer for it.
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby ki11ercane » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 01:58:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NWMossBack', 'I') have also read that you may be liable for some legal fees incurred by the mortgage company. You have to read ALL the fine print in your mortgage agreement.


Pretty soon you will need a lawyer with you at closing instead of just your realtor.

joeltrout


Wow in Canada, lawyers are mandatory when buying or selling a home.
User avatar
ki11ercane
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Sun 02 Dec 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby jedinvest » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 03:39:50

Googled this after reading this thread: Someone said that a refi can still be a Purchase-money loan (I presume, if you don't take cash out) and the second can be handled separately from the first. Anyway, interesting stuff that you really never wanted to learn about, but will reluctantly become familiar with.

(Did I already tell everybody how I have a relative who has just became a real-estate magnate with no significant assets other than other properties. I just hope the expression 'going for broke' doesn't turn out literally for her, bless her soul.)

L.A. Land: Walking Away
jedinvest
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: No. Calif.

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 13:14:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n some jurisdictions, mortgage loans are non-recourse loans: if the funds recouped from sale of the mortgaged property are insufficient to cover the outstanding debt, the lender may not have recourse to the borrower after foreclosure. In other jurisdictions, the borrower remains responsible for any remaining debt.

Anybody have information regarding which jurisdictions have recourse versus non-recourse loans? If the bank does pursue legal action for breach of contract in a recourse jurisdiction, it sounds like the borrower will just "declare bankruptcy." It seems to me the existance of "bankruptcy protection" can only encourage the taking on of risk amounts of debt. I wonder how the the housing bubble would be different if people knew a breach of contract would land them in a labor prison.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby Twilight » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 16:42:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', 'I')t seems to me the existance of "bankruptcy protection" can only encourage the taking on of risk amounts of debt. I wonder how the the housing bubble would be different if people knew a breach of contract would land them in a labor prison.

Debtor prisons were common until well into the 19th century, but they did little to stop speculative bubbles. Psychology is fundamentally at fault, making people believe their situation is "different" whatever mechanisms are in play. Also, interviews with sub-prime borrowers showed that many neither read the paperwork nor were capable of reading and comprehending it. So some size of bubble would have happened anyway just because the uneducated got scammed.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 17:09:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'P')sychology is fundamentally at fault

The fundamental cause is government monopolization of the money commodity.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby aflurry » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 19:48:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'N')ow, don't give me any moral argument about the moral obligation to repay one's debts, those morals went right out the window with the morality of the banks issuing "liar loans" and issuing credit cards to frickin college students without jobs blah blah blah.

There is no morality out there anymore, only greed and everyone doing what's in their own best interest. Everyone is paying for that now.

That seems to be where this society is heading. The grasshopper will eat the ants.


the debt is a contract with the risks enumerated for each side. there's no moral addendum. the bank (or lets say creditor because the banks now just sell the loan to some other fool) accepts the default risk and in payment they receive interest. if you take out an adjustable loan, you accept interest rate risk,and in return you receive a rate discount.

a person's credit rating gives an idea of what kind of risk they are and so what rate they will have to pay for a loan. if a person defaults the collateral is repossessed and a warning is issued on the borrower. that borrower will have to pay more for the next loan. no morals involved at all. And strategic default on the one side is as acceptable as strategic rate adjustment on the other.

the problem is not that people are less moral, or even that institutions are less moral than they were before. it's that risk has become detached from the writing of the loan. the loan originator should be forced to retain at least a portion of the default risk for the life of the loan. that's the only way to keep loan writing honest.

if two people sit in a room and arrange a loan contract and neither has any interest in the honesty of the other party, why would anyone on earth think the contract would be valid? and ratings agencies and insurers aren't going to enforce it. both of them are making their money on fees just the same as the loan originator.

i'm not saying that banks should have to keep all loans on their books, but there should be a retention of risk with enough muscle behind it to make it financially beneficial for the loan originator to deny loans with bad prospects for repayment.

If interests aren't aligned in this way, as asset/credit bubble is inevitable.
User avatar
aflurry
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby Chesire » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 20:17:52

Just walk away you won't be alone . By the time the courts get to you, the stack of cases in front of you will be mind bogglingly long.

Ask for counsel or a delay and right back to the end of the line you go ).

Maybe your upright honest neighbors will start burning the places to keep the riff raff out and you will get lucky ).
User avatar
Chesire
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri 13 Jul 2007, 03:00:00

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sun 27 Jan 2008, 21:50:14

We're heading toward Great Depression levels of insolvency in the US, so yeah I'd walk away. The typical US'ian takes pride in being responsible and hardworking and will work their ass off to keep their depreciating house though. Then they'll have something medical happen to them and their whole world will crumble anyway. That's the most typical reason for bankruptcy in the US, something medical then you can't work and that's it, either move back in with the parents if you're lucky or you go live in a cardboard box.

Once you walk away and owe debt, you're basically on the shit list. This used to be a bad thing, now we're going to have so many people in this situation that it won't be anything remarkable.

I would advise anyone reading this to get used to, NOW, living on an all-cash basis, living very frugally (your diet will probably actually improve) and getting out of all the debt possible. Also try to develop a hobby or interest to put some fun into life and also it may be something you end up living on once the "real" jobs go away.

The best way to defy the system is to live without their money, their debt, their chains.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby Kez » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 02:52:51

People don't really "walk away", they simply don't pay and hold out for as long as they can until kicked out. This is all planned out to get as much for free while they can. They don't declare bankruptcy, but the foreclosure screws their credit for 7 years as if they did.

And like others have said, the banks don't chase most people down because they need lawyers to get that cash back. If someone can't pay their payment now, chances are that it's going to be hell to get anything out of them with a lawyer or not. My coworker declared bankruptcy twice over 10 years and knew all the tricks to keep from paying people even though they had lawyers.
Kez
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North Texas

Re: "Walking Away"

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 03:10:15

For the most part, people on this board have fixed rate mortgages, right?

And they haven't taken out HELOC after HELOC, right?

So why all the discussion of walking away from our homes?

Just saying...
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests