Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Super-tankers: worst case scenario

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Super-tankers: worst case scenario

Unread postby Dranny » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 10:40:43

Am I right or wrong to assume the worst case scenario for a 2 million barrel capacity tanker would be the total loss of the Vessel and the Load??
Or is there a more calculated method in working out the WCS :roll:
User avatar
Dranny
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

yes

Unread postby Cool Hand Linc » Tue 08 Feb 2005, 16:35:09

The total loss would seem to me to be a worst case senerio specific to a tanker.

Is this in reference to something specific?

I have heard some speak of how the lose of a tanker would have an on going effect because of the time required to replace it.

Tanker capacity is important for both the nations that produce and the nations that consume. The lose of income to the producing country would be a noticable loss. The lose of oil to the consuming nations would be noticed as well.

Then what ever method of loss. There would be enviromental effects. Peoples lives on board.
Peace out!

Cool Hand Linc 8)
User avatar
Cool Hand Linc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tulsa, Ok

Re: worst case scenario

Unread postby Curmudgicus » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 14:32:08

With tanker capacity being a crucial component of oil availability, is there any plan to try to find another way to move oil?

I ask because since 1991, over 200 supertankers have gone down. Two large ships go down each week even now. There may be a break point for losses that frequent.
User avatar
Curmudgicus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Super-tankers: worst case scenario

Unread postby elroy » Fri 30 Sep 2005, 08:26:47

Two ships each week ? Do you have any link to back this up ?
User avatar
elroy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Netherlands

Re: Super-tankers: worst case scenario

Unread postby backstop » Fri 30 Sep 2005, 08:43:53

New Scientist had a report (2 or three years ago) on an exponential increase of rogue waves, (>25ms) which are implicated in numerous VLC losses, but I've heard nothing of this issue since then.

regards,

Backstop
"The best of conservation . . . is written not with a pen but with an axe."
(from "A Sand County Almanac" by Aldo Leopold, 1948.
backstop
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Varies


Re: Super-tankers: worst case scenario

Unread postby Fergus » Thu 24 Aug 2006, 09:26:57

http://www.bayanihan.org/html/article.p ... 3182017302

Like this! - 9,000 meter depth crushes the hull and the oil leaks out.
User avatar
Fergus
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Super-tankers: worst case scenario

Unread postby Fergus » Thu 24 Aug 2006, 09:27:43

http://www.bayanihan.org/html/article.p ... 3182017302

Like this! - 9,000 meter depth crushes the hull and the oil leaks out.
User avatar
Fergus
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Super-tankers: worst case scenario

Unread postby like_the_dinosaurs » Thu 28 Jun 2007, 07:40:30

looks like it might be fluff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freak_waves

Allthough, if terriosts stuck the oil industry in some way(ie tankers) what would happen with supply!
User avatar
like_the_dinosaurs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat 23 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: Super-tankers: worst case scenario

Unread postby IslandCrow » Thu 28 Jun 2007, 08:09:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dranny', 'A')m I right or wrong to assume the worst case scenario for a 2 million barrel capacity tanker would be the total loss of the Vessel and the Load??
Or is there a more calculated method in working out the WCS :roll:


A sinking would be a serious matter, but IMO a worse case would be having a full tanker blowing up at a major terminal, where the resulting fire would destroy much of the infrastructure (and possibly a lot more oil in storage tanks) Another bad situation would be having a supertanker sinking and blocking a major shipping route.
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest