Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Are you divorced?

Poll ended at Tue 15 Apr 2008, 03:53:58

I am divorced
9
No votes
I am married
27
No votes
I'm single and loving it
16
No votes
 
Total votes : 52

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 17:48:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('basil_hayden', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '
')I don't knock marriage though, it can be a wonderful thing.


Same with divorce!
I knew there was something I didn't like about you. Just kidding. :-D
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby FreakOil » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 00:09:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'u')nburdened by a wife and children,


Never understood that attitude. I think marriage and children are a joy, like music. Could music be a burden?

If you mean that there are others to care for than yourself, I call that "community." Community starts with the family (however defined) as its most basic unit.

If we do have a serious crisis, and I believe we will, the last thing we will need is a bunch of lone rangers just interested in takng care of themselves. this is neither the basis for virtue or the long-run reorganization of society in form that we would call "good." What we will need is groups of people working together and caring for one another and that begins with families taking care of one another.


I chose the word "unburdened" very carefully. I believe that unemployment will be one of the first major effects of Peak Oil, and it would be a distinct advantage to be able to pack up and move somewhere else at a moment's notice. A person with a family can do that, but not as easily.

I don't have any illusions about traveling around the country on my own like the lone ranger. Buying land is hardly an option for me, considering the state of my personal finances. The best possible outcome would be to find some stable employment.

I'm not one to make predictions, but let's assume that men are hired to do work that machines used to do. In that scenario, being young and strong I could pick up a job at a farm or hauling goods on a canal, if I'm lucky. The first thing I would do is make friends with my neighbors and workmates and become part of the community. I don't fancy riding around on a motorcycle and killing people for gas like Mad Max.

Although a part of me would like to have a family (believe it or not, I adore children), I will probably end up single. It's not a decision, it's just the likely outcome for an eccentric person. I live in a very culturally homogenous place, and it's not easy for weirdos to find a mate. Peak Oil is not helping.

I regret that my original post looked at the whole question of "married vs. single" through the very narrow lense of survivability. One thing that I picked up from your post - though it wasn't mentioned explicitly - was that being a permanent bachelor and being a family man are just fundamentally different, and dying a family man would be better than surviving as a bachelor.

There's something so fundamental about having a family that I can't help but think there's something wrong with me. But I don't think it's necessary for a person to have a family in order to be a part of a community. If I'm kind and useful to my neighbors, and we band together to get through the tough times, am I not of value to the group? Are we less of a community because one sorry sod isn't married?
User avatar
FreakOil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun 04 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 10:17:23

My critique of the use of "burden" is philosophical. We have gone too far, in my opinion, in thinking of people as either assets or burdens. We have made people commodities to be bought or sold, or to be sent off to old folks homes when they get in our way or need care or upset our apple cart. The same can be true of spouses and divorce. There are times that divorce is unavoidable, sometimes however, it is a way of saying, "that person is no longer an asset to my sense of self-fullfillment" and I need to dump them (often for a younger version).

Mid-life crisis? Maybe he is just a narcissistic jerk.

I do have a bone to pick with a culture that treats people as if they were luxeries to be attained or disposed of, this does not mean that I cannot understand that, at certain times of life, one cannot be thankful that they do not yet have the responsibility for children, or, for that matter, aging parents or that such emotions are not the right attitude to have.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby Armageddon » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 13:21:45

I have been married for 13 years and have been with my wife since high school. I am 40 and she is 39. We have two daughter age 12 and 10. I wouldn't have it any other way. We are typical soccer parents. My youngest daugher plays select, so we are all over the place with her. My wife doesn't believe in my 911 and PO conspiracies, but she still loves me, lol.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby Specop_007 » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 15:45:35

Married with 3 kids. Its given me my humanity. Before that, trust me when I say, I would have been your worst nightmare in a crisis situation.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 15:50:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'u')nburdened by a wife and children,


Never understood that attitude. I think marriage and children are a joy, like music. Could music be a burden?


Two words: Yoko Ono
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 16:40:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'u')nburdened by a wife and children,


Never understood that attitude. I think marriage and children are a joy, like music. Could music be a burden?


Two words: Yoko Ono
John seemed to like it. She did have some pretty decent hooters. So OK, she couldn't sing for crap. But who cares with hooters like that.

Image
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby WildRose » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 18:25:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '
')
I do have a bone to pick with a culture that treats people as if they were luxeries to be attained or disposed of, this does not mean that I cannot understand that, at certain times of life, one cannot be thankful that they do not yet have the responsibility for children, or, for that matter, aging parents or that such emotions are not the right attitude to have.


Just a few thoughts, wisconsin_cur. Most people today, particularly in large cities, do not live "in community" the way our ancestors did, or the way those in small towns or farming communities still do. If they did, certain responsibilities, such as aging parents, a very sick spouse, troubled teens, etc. would be significantly easier to bear, in my opinion. Families are separated by distance, across the country but also as islands unto themselves in sprawling suburbs. That physical separation is complicated by other factors: mom and dad both work, often long hours, kids are home alone too much and no one knows their neighbors. Many of us are just not "set up" to cope with an elderly or sick family member the way it was done before, when people weren't so isolated and could rely on help and meals, etc. from their neighbors. Another fact is that most of this type of help traditionally was done by the women in the community, organizing support for neighbors going through a hard time, and now most women work outside the home and balance the responsibilities of their immediate families with work, extended family, the so-called "sandwich generation".

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm married, 29 years this spring (33 years with the same guy, counting our dating years). It's been good, can't imagine being without him. We had some tough times, though, when money was really tight, but the worst time was when my husband was critically ill. He was only 30 at the time, our firstborn was just 2 years old. Hubby had a series of operations, lost a lot of weight, but gradually built his strength up again and is now quite healthy. I grew up quite a bit during that period in our marriage. Everyone's okay now, our daughter is an adult and we have two sons as well, and although it's a lot of work, family life is a great joy. I can appreciate that marriage and kids is not for everyone, though.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 18:56:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'u')nburdened by a wife and children,


Never understood that attitude. I think marriage and children are a joy, like music. Could music be a burden?


Two words: Yoko Ono


[smilie=laughing6.gif]

Ok, bad simile. Could she be an exception that proves the rule though?
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby FreakOil » Fri 18 Jan 2008, 07:44:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'M')y critique of the use of "burden" is philosophical. We have gone too far, in my opinion, in thinking of people as either assets or burdens. We have made people commodities to be bought or sold, or to be sent off to old folks homes when they get in our way or need care or upset our apple cart. The same can be true of spouses and divorce. There are times that divorce is unavoidable, sometimes however, it is a way of saying, "that person is no longer an asset to my sense of self-fullfillment" and I need to dump them (often for a younger version).

Mid-life crisis? Maybe he is just a narcissistic jerk.

I do have a bone to pick with a culture that treats people as if they were luxeries to be attained or disposed of, this does not mean that I cannot understand that, at certain times of life, one cannot be thankful that they do not yet have the responsibility for children, or, for that matter, aging parents or that such emotions are not the right attitude to have.


I agree with you 100%. I was merely looking at the narrow issue of survivability in my original post. Another thing that should be mentioned is that real community is almost impossible in the developed world because people don't really need each other. We're atomized.

However, I must take issue with this statement:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ommunity starts with the family (however defined) as its most basic unit.

If we do have a serious crisis, and I believe we will, the last thing we will need is a bunch of lone rangers just interested in takng care of themselves. this is neither the basis for virtue or the long-run reorganization of society in form that we would call "good." What we will need is groups of people working together and caring for one another and that begins with families taking care of one another.


So if a person doesn't have a family, they can't be a part of a community? That sounds a bit harsh, especially for orphans. I believe I can be a part of a community - despite that fact that I am unmarried - because I am willing to help those around me in a time of crisis. I am not a lone ranger.
User avatar
FreakOil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun 04 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Hong Kong
Top

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 18 Jan 2008, 10:32:17

Lets take the orphan example.

When she becomes part of a community... lets say she gets involved in a local food coop or a church, the details are unimportant.

When is she going to feel most included in the group? Will it not be when she is invited into the home for a meal? When she feels part of "the family."

There are reasons other than the emotional that makes the loss of parents at a young age a tragedy (or for that matter children born to parents who abuse or otherwise do not provide the community of family) which is the absence of that proto-community which is (or at least should be) family.

It is not that the orphan is forever without community but it is the family that is the building blocks of community. We learn to look beyond ourselves in family (however that is defined) with people that we know and love. We then move into community where we learn to do give even to people we do not love, or even people that we definitely dislike.

I have a neighbor that shot, and killed my dog last year. I don't particularly like this fellow though his wife and kids seem ok. I am in community with that person, even though I do not like him. I learned that skill with aunts and uncles that I did not like but they were family and you love them and support them even though they are not... loveable.

This support flows both ways, which is good since I have needed support and while I think I am loveable I understand that much of what I have done with my life might appear... irrational. This does not mean you can not tell people that they are a horse's ass when need be (easier in family than in community) but when help is needed you still show up to help the horse's ass. You still take them Christmas cookies. You still invite them in for coffee if life's busisness brings them your way.

I don't know if this has been clear. Its early.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Best of 2007: Are You Divorced

Unread postby FreakOil » Thu 24 Jan 2008, 08:41:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'L')ets take the orphan example.

When she becomes part of a community... lets say she gets involved in a local food coop or a church, the details are unimportant.

When is she going to feel most included in the group? Will it not be when she is invited into the home for a meal? When she feels part of "the family."

There are reasons other than the emotional that makes the loss of parents at a young age a tragedy (or for that matter children born to parents who abuse or otherwise do not provide the community of family) which is the absence of that proto-community which is (or at least should be) family.

It is not that the orphan is forever without community but it is the family that is the building blocks of community. We learn to look beyond ourselves in family (however that is defined) with people that we know and love. We then move into community where we learn to do give even to people we do not love, or even people that we definitely dislike.

I have a neighbor that shot, and killed my dog last year. I don't particularly like this fellow though his wife and kids seem ok. I am in community with that person, even though I do not like him. I learned that skill with aunts and uncles that I did not like but they were family and you love them and support them even though they are not... loveable.

This support flows both ways, which is good since I have needed support and while I think I am loveable I understand that much of what I have done with my life might appear... irrational. This does not mean you can not tell people that they are a horse's ass when need be (easier in family than in community) but when help is needed you still show up to help the horse's ass. You still take them Christmas cookies. You still invite them in for coffee if life's busisness brings them your way.

I don't know if this has been clear. Its early.


Quite clear, and thanks for taking the time to respond. I have a wonderful family and hope to have my own someday (one child only!), but it's quite possible that I will be single for a while, if not forever, and I hope to find a place where I can fit and work.
User avatar
FreakOil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun 04 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Hong Kong
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron