Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Re: Another Oil price Record

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Another Record

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 20:40:29

I'd be very careful about using the EIA's numbers. They are still considered to be fairly optimisitc when it comes to the future. Discoveries historically do not support an ever increasing production number. We are well past the peak discoveries and it follows both logically and with proven production data that we have to move into decline unless some very large discoveries are made right now.

Until you can produce significant discoveries offsetting decline it doesnt matter what happens this year or next. We still are going to peak and move into decline. There is no one on the planet right now who can accurately predict just what that decline will be.

It does not surprise me that you dismiss Matt Simmons. Personally I do not. The facts are that there is good evidence to show Saudi production is stagnating and they are having huge difficulties growing it. I'm not saying they cant, but until I see them go to 12-13 or even 15mbpd, I'll continue thinking we got some serious problems coming.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Another Record

Unread postby newman1979 » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 21:56:50

"Global oil markets will likely remain tight through 2008, then ease moderately in 2009. EIA projects that world oil demand will continue to grow faster than oil supply outside of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in 2008, leaving OPEC and inventories to offset the upward pressure on prices. In 2009, higher non-OPEC production and planned additions to OPEC capacity should relieve some of the tightness in the market. As a result, the level of surplus production capacity is projected to grow from its current level of under 2 million barrels per day (bbl/d) to more than 4 million bbl/d by the end of 2009. " STEO January 8 2008.
The EIA states clearly that global oil markets will likely remain tight and prices high along with $3.50 gasoline in 08. The EIA sees 2009 as a year with more oil to reduce the price pressure a little. NOC's and IOC's invest a lot of money every year to bring on new oil supplies. No doubt, at some point with high oil prices, more oil is likely to be produced, and for a short time, may even offset the depletion amounts. Time will tell how much and how high the price will be. Longer term, we will certainly be in trouble.
Looks like 2007 will be below 2006 in world crude production by at least 200,000 b/d. 2005 is, until proven different, the year crude oil peaked.
User avatar
newman1979
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon 25 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Another Record

Unread postby Twilight » Sun 13 Jan 2008, 01:04:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zahl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')laces like the North Sea and Mexico appear to be validating the export land model put forth recently and the price signals cant be ignored in light of supply.

Any particular cases won't validate the export land model as it is not supposed to be a model of particular cases. This model would gain credibility if it showed quantitatively that new net exporters like Algeria, Angola and Kazakhstan that offset 100% of the UK and Indonesia net export decline are not rising up any longer. But absolutely no quantitative argument is made that this would be the case. Instead, we have still new countries like Azerbaijan, Equatorial Guinea, Sudan and Chad that export virtually their entire output and that output is growing by the year quite rapidly.

Firstly, Export Land can be a model of particular cases, and it is. That is where it takes its name. It is a hypothetical country called Export Land. What it says about any particular country can have a great deal of significance when it comes to assessing its future prospects.

Secondly, you ask it to show something it is not supposed to show. The global Export Land picture is based on existing exporters whose characteristics are well understood. The entry of any new exporters will be included into the model as and when they arise. You can be sure it will be updated. Given the importance of the top exporters to date and their situations however, it is unlikely the appearance of a handful of new countries will change its direction. Volumes available for export will tend to decrease, not increase. The thesis is rock solid even if the model run for a particular interval shows a deviation.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Another Record

Unread postby VinceG » Tue 15 Jan 2008, 12:48:55

Citigroup Inc. delivered some of the worst quarterly results in its history Tuesday, reporting a nearly $10 billion loss that was much worse than Wall Street had
anticipated.


CNN Money

This event will probably trigger an economic recension in the US, so say goodbye to high oil prices for now :-D
"In the U.S., fears are so exaggerated and out of control that anxiety is the number-one mental health problem in the country.", Barry Glassner
User avatar
VinceG
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue 12 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Another Record

Unread postby FreddyH » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 02:02:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'W')e are well past the peak discoveries and it follows both logically and with proven production data that we have to move into decline unless some very large discoveries are made right now.

Until you can produce significant discoveries offsetting decline it doesnt matter what happens this year or next. We still are going to peak and move into decline.

Actually, decline is not related at all to the increase of Reserves. Production is currently only 31-Gb/yr and there's 1,400-Gb of Reserves. Decline is a function of extraction and refining capacity.

Over the last ten years, Reserves have grown at the rate of 59-Gb/yr (compared to the USGS 2000 forecast of 54-Gb annually 'til 2025). 31-Gb is lost to annual consumption. Your preoccupation with Discoveries is ill founded. Reserve Growth has been sufficient to keep the R/P ratio at 40 for over two decades.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here is no one on the planet right now who can accurately predict just what that decline will be.

That is corrrect. But the reason is because nobody knows precisely how much new capacity is coming on stream each year. The underlying decline rate from mature fields is 3.6% or 3.1-mbd. This would be the Net Decline Rate w/o new capacity and/or EOR.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The facts are that there is good evidence to show Saudi production is stagnating and they are having huge difficulties growing it. I'm not saying they cant, but until I see them go to 12-13 or even 15mbpd, I'll continue thinking we got some serious problems coming.

You will have to wait a very long time. Since 2003, my KSA Annual Outlooks have shown projected Supply in the narrow range of 10.5 to 11.2-mbd. Your expectation of 15-mbd Supply is pure fantasy.

Over the years, the Saudi business plan has been consistent in its desire to implement a plateau. Most production profile models show that the steeper the upslope, the more aggressive the Decline Rate that follows. For its economy (and that of the globe), a plateau is the sound strategy by Aramco.
Last edited by FreddyH on Wed 16 Jan 2008, 02:42:35, edited 1 time in total.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: Another Record

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 02:29:56

I dont hold the same hope for reserve growth as you do as we move forward in time. There is no promise that reserve growth can remain or will remain strong as we pass peak.

My comment about Saudi production moving towards 15mbpd was sarcasm. I guess what i was really saying is I dont believe we will ever see much more than they are doing now as you confirmed.

How do you disconnect reserves from discovery? historically the trend downards over time has to affect the reserve growth rates. I dont understand how that isn't connected.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Another Record

Unread postby FreddyH » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 03:29:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', ' ')My comment about Saudi production moving towards 15mbpd was sarcasm. I guess what i was really saying is I dont believe we will ever see much more than they are doing now as you confirmed.

How do you disconnect reserves from discovery? historically the trend downards over time has to affect the reserve growth rates. I dont understand how that isn't connected.


Presently there are 1400-Gb of 1P Reserves and 1200-Gb of 2P Resources. With 1100-Gb gone, that's a global URR of 3.7Tb. Reserves have grown each year by additions from Discovery, Reserve Growth or reallocation from 2P to 1P due to higher pricing regimes. It matters not which it comes from. It used to be Discoveries prior to 1985. Then Reserve Growth dominated. Now it is reallocation.

Using only 31-Gb/yr, even after 20 years we will still have half (620 + 780) of today's Reserves. Not a litre of oil need be discovered 'til 2028. There is no shortage of oil in the ground.

Our problem is related to the forthcoming Conventional Oil Peak next decade. Upon that date, CO will decline at 3.75%. That is above and beyond the present 3.6% from mature fields. From that point, 6.3-mbd/yr in new capacity and/or EOR must be in place to hold a plateau ... let alone grow Supply.

IMHO, this is best illustrated by my Scenarios-2500 chart. The cliff is quite apparent. Even tho CO is only 77% of All Liquids volume, when it goes Net Decline is inevitable.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: Another Record

Unread postby FreddyH » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 06:39:21

Image

Image
"World oil supply averaged 87.0 mb/d in December" (iea)
well, ain't that just precious...
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon

Re: Another Record

Unread postby Bas » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 07:44:28

I take it you blindly trust the inflated "proven" OPEC reserves (to the tune of a few hundred million barrels) since you brushed them aside?

What are the sources you use for proved, probable and possible reserves?
Bas
 

Re: Another Record

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 11:57:24

vision-master
 

Re: Another Record

Unread postby Valdemar » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 17:32:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', '*')Snip*
"World oil supply averaged 87.0 mb/d in December" (iea)
well, ain't that just precious...


Yeah, too bad OECD inventories still drew down then, else that'd actually mean something (which is still debatable).
"Nothing survives. Not your parents. Not your children. Not even stars."
-Pinbacker, Sunshine
User avatar
Valdemar
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed 28 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Cambs., UK
Top

Re: Another Record

Unread postby Bas » Wed 16 Jan 2008, 21:10:59

Image

yes, this is pretty impressive considering that many of us thought we wouldn't see this number; let's see if it holds up.
Bas
 

Re: Another Record

Unread postby thor » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 17:20:50

Such an increase won't hold. We are witnessing the spasms of a man being strangled to death.
User avatar
thor
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Another Record

Unread postby Sys1 » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 18:02:34

Thor : nice image... Indeed, 1st quarter 2008 looks like an anomaly on the chart...
User avatar
Sys1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Another Record

Unread postby FreddyH » Thu 17 Jan 2008, 20:08:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Valdemar', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', '*')Snip*
"World oil supply averaged 87.0 mb/d in December" (iea)
well, ain't that just precious...


Yeah, too bad OECD inventories still drew down then, else that'd actually mean something (which is still debatable).


For the record, changes to inventories & status of stock in transit has always been an adjustment to final data at both EIA & IEA...

Energy expended in All Liquids production is also under examination to prevent double counts.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: Another Record

Unread postby VinceG » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 10:40:10

As many realistical, rational analysts had already foreseen (as opposite to some of those apocalyptical, unrealistical and anxious post-peakoil believers), we are currently witnessing the beginning of a global economic recession, leading to demand destruction from industrial countries causing a massive drop of oil prices.

Oil prices now trading at $86.38. Do I hear $100 anyone? :)
"In the U.S., fears are so exaggerated and out of control that anxiety is the number-one mental health problem in the country.", Barry Glassner
User avatar
VinceG
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue 12 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Another Record

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 12:33:36

It's just volatility. In two weeks we could be over a hundred just as easily. Granted the overall recession fears will play a part and it will impact price, but as others in these forums have said (based on factual evidence) it's going to take a lot more than a recession to really have a large enough impact on demand to keep prices down long term.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Another Record

Unread postby lowem » Sun 27 Jan 2008, 07:54:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'G')ranted the overall recession fears will play a part and it will impact price, but as others in these forums have said (based on factual evidence) it's going to take a lot more than a recession to really have a large enough impact on demand to keep prices down long term.


Not to forget that the Saudis are also increasing their domestic consumption rapidly : "6 new industrial cities, 4 refineries, 2 petrochemical plants and a ... university. These cities together will have four times the geographical area of Hong Kong, three times the population of Dubai, and an economic output equal to Singapore's ..."

Reduction in US demand for crude oil? Don't worry, the rest of the world will make up for it !
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore
Top

Re: Another Record

Unread postby thor » Sun 27 Jan 2008, 12:59:21

Oil trades around $90. What massive drop are people talking about? I ain't see nothin'
User avatar
thor
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Another Record

Unread postby slick50 » Sun 10 Feb 2008, 23:01:58

back up to $91.77. The word on the Nymex is that $84 oil is the new floor. This despite the recession looming and the "D" word being mentioned in the MSM once in awhile.
User avatar
slick50
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed 05 May 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests